AzTrials
AzTrials

Central SensitizationNCT07468097

The Impact of Metabolic Status on Pain and Central Sensitization in Women With Lipedema: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study

An observational study of Central Sensitization and Lipedema, run by Marmara University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of metabolic markers (HOMA-IR, triglyceride/HDL ratio, HbA1c, waist and hip circumference measurements, BMI, etc.) on pain and central sensitization in patients diagnosed with lipedema. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Central Sensitization, Lipedema, Pain
How many people
59 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
9 Mar 2026to 1 Mar 2027
Phase
Observational

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients aged 18 years or older with a diagnosis of lipedema who have undergone laboratory testing in which metabolic markers were evaluated within the past three months.

Who may be able to join

  • Being female and aged 18 years or older
  • Having chronic pain persisting for at least 3 months
  • Having sufficient cognitive ability to understand and respond to the assessment scales used in the study
  • Voluntarily agreeing to participate in the study and providing written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Presence of a history of malignancy, active infection, inflammatory rheumatic disease, or severe systemic disease
  • History of known neurological disorders (e.g., stroke, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy)
  • Diagnosis of severe psychiatric disorders (e.g., psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder)
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Presence of cognitive impairment or communication difficulties that could affect the study results
  • Diagnosed diabetes mellitus
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Active thyroid disease (uncontrolled hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism)
  • Cushing's syndrome or other significant endocrine disorders
  • Use of antidiabetic medications
  • Use of lipid-lowering therapy (e.g., statins, fibrates)
  • Systemic glucocorticoid use within the past 3 months
  • Use of medications that may significantly affect central pain mechanisms (e.g., high-dose opioids, antipsychotic drugs)
  • History of major surgery or invasive treatment for pain within the past 3 months

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Marmara University Faculty of Medicine Pendik Training and Research Hospital

    Istanbul, Pendik, 34890

    Secretary General Secretary, +90 2166254545, fatma.betul820@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: THE IMPACT OF METABOLIC STATUS ON PAIN AND CENTRAL SENSITIZATION IN WOMEN WITH LIPEDEMA: A CROSS-SECTIONAL OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of metabolic markers (HOMA-IR, triglyceride/HDL ratio, HbA1c, waist and hip circumference measurements, BMI, etc.) on pain and central sensitization in patients diagnosed with lipedema. The primary objective is to investigate the association between metabolic markers and central sensitization. The secondary objective is to assess the relationship between metabolic markers and pain intensity, pain phenotype, and functional status.

Read the detailed description

Lipedema is a chronic disorder observed in women, characterized by symmetrical accumulation of adipose tissue in the lower extremities, easy bruising, and marked tenderness or pain. In lipedema, pain is often spontaneous, increases with pressure, and does not always correlate with the amount of adipose tissue. This suggests that lipedema-related pain cannot be explained solely by peripheral mechanical factors.

Previous studies in patients with lipedema have demonstrated reduced pressure pain thresholds, bilateral and symmetrical hyperalgesia, and increased pain sensitivity extending beyond the areas of local adipose tissue involvement. These findings suggest that alterations in central pain processing mechanisms may occur in lipedema and that central sensitization may play a role. However, systematic studies specifically evaluating central sensitization in lipedema remain limited.

Although lipedema has long been considered a "metabolically protected" condition, recent studies have reported that insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and components of metabolic syndrome are more frequently observed, particularly in lipedema cases accompanied by obesity. HOMA-IR, which is used to evaluate insulin resistance; the triglyceride/HDL ratio (TG/HDL), a marker of atherogenic dyslipidemia; and HbA1c, reflecting long-term glycemic load, are closely associated with chronic inflammation and metabolic dysfunction.

In the chronic pain literature, metabolic dysfunction has been shown to play an important role in the development of central sensitization and nociplastic pain, with obesity, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia being associated with central pain amplification. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies in lipedema have simultaneously evaluated the relationship between metabolic parameters, pain phenotype, and central sensitization.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of metabolic markers (HOMA-IR, triglyceride/HDL ratio, HbA1c, waist and hip circumference measurements, BMI, etc.) on pain and central sensitization in patients diagnosed with lipedema. The primary objective is to investigate the association between metabolic markers and central sensitization. The secondary objective is to assess the relationship between metabolic markers and pain intensity, pain phenotype, and functional status.

Keywords
Triglyceride, HOMA-IR, Pain, Fasting Blood Glucose, Fasting Insulin, Lipedema
Medical subject headings
Lipedema, Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT07468097
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Female patients diagnosed with lipedemaPatients aged 18 years and older who are followed with a diagnosis of lipedema and who have undergone laboratory testing in which metabolic markers were evaluated within the last three months.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI)

    The Central Sensitization Inventory is a self-report screening tool developed to assess the presence and severity of symptoms associated with central sensitization. The inventory evaluates symptoms reflecting sensitization in central nervous system pain-processing mechanisms, including widespread pain, fatigue, sleep disturbances, and cognitive complaints. The CSI consists of 25 items, each scored on a scale from 0 to 4, with a total score ranging from 0 to 100. A total score of 40 or higher is considered to be associated with a high likelihood of central sensitization.

    Measured: At baseline

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is used to measure and monitor pain intensity. A score of "0" represents no pain, while "10" indicates the worst pain imaginable. Patients are asked to rate their pain on a scale from 0 to 10. Due to its simplicity and ease of understanding, this scale is frequently used in clinical research.

    Measured: At baseline

  2. Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)

    The Fatigue Severity Scale is a self-report measure used to evaluate the impact of fatigue on daily life and functional activities. The scale consists of 9 items, each scored on a scale from 1 to 7. Higher average scores indicate greater fatigue severity.

    Measured: At baseline

  3. Neuropathic Pain Diagnostic Questionnaire (DN4)

    The DN4 questionnaire was developed to assess the presence of neuropathic pain. It consists of 10 items derived from symptom-based questions and clinical examination findings. The total score ranges from 0 to 10, and a score of 4 or higher is considered indicative of neuropathic pain.

    Measured: At baseline

  4. Short Form-12 (SF-12)

    The Short Form-12 is a questionnaire used to assess general health status and health-related quality of life. It consists of 12 items. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

    Measured: At baseline

  5. Jenkins Sleep Scale (JSS)

    The Jenkins Sleep Scale is a self-report measure consisting of four items that evaluates the frequency of sleep problems experienced over the past month. Higher scores indicate a greater frequency of sleep disturbance symptoms, such as difficulty falling asleep, nocturnal awakenings, and early morning awakening.

    Measured: At baseline

  6. Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS)

    The Lower Extremity Functional Scale is a self-report measure consisting of 20 items that evaluates lower extremity functional status during activities of daily living. Lower total scores indicate greater functional limitation, whereas higher scores reflect better lower extremity function.

    Measured: At baseline

  7. International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)

    The International Physical Activity Questionnaire is a measure consisting of seven items that assess the time spent walking, performing moderate-intensity and vigorous-intensity activities, and sitting. The total score is calculated by considering the duration (minutes) and frequency (days) of walking, moderate-intensity activity, and vigorous-intensity activity. Energy expenditure for these activities is expressed in MET-minutes. Standard MET values have been established for each activity: sitting 1.5 MET, walking 3.3 MET, moderate-intensity physical activity 4 MET, and vigorous-intensity physical activity 8 MET. Using these values, daily and weekly physical activity levels can be calculated.

    Measured: At baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Mar 2026
  2. Study start9 Mar 2026
  3. Primary completion1 Feb 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Mar 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
59 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07468097
Sponsor's protocol ID
09.2026.26-0134
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
9 Mar 2026
Last updated
12 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in