AzTrials
AzTrials

Orthodontic Tooth MovementNCT05782088

Single Versus Repeated Piezocision-assisted Orthodontic Tooth Movement

A study testing Single Piezocision and Repeated Piezocision in people with Orthodontic Tooth Movement and Canine Retraction, run by Nourhan M.Aly at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of single and repeated piezocisions on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. Secondary aims are to evaluate the effect of both protocols on molar anchorage loss, as well as on canine root resorption. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 15 to 25 years
Conditions the study is for
Orthodontic Tooth Movement, Canine Retraction
What is being tested?
Single Piezocision and Repeated Piezocision
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Jan 2023to 15 Jan 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 15 to 25 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Malocclusion that requires at least the extraction of maxillary first premolars, such as Class I bimaxillary protrusion, and Class II division 1 cases.
  • Normal shape and structure of the maxillary canines, with no history of root canal treatment

Who cannot join

  • Patients who underwent previous orthodontic treatment.
  • Patients currently receiving drug therapy that may affect orthodontic tooth movement, e.g. hormonal therapy and corticosteroids.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University

    Alexandria, 21512

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Single Versus Repeated Piezocision-assisted Orthodontic Tooth Movement: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

The primary aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of single and repeated piezocisions on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. Secondary aims are to evaluate the effect of both protocols on molar anchorage loss, as well as on canine root resorption.

Being tested
Single Piezocision, Repeated Piezocision

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Single PiezocisionProcedure or surgery

    Piezocision will be performed only once before the onset of canine retraction (T0) on one side of the maxillary arch that will be randomly chosen.

  • Repeated PiezocisionProcedure or surgery

    Piezocision will be repeated three times, on a monthly basis (T0, T1, and T2), over the 12-week study period.

Study groups in NCT05782088
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Single PiezocisionExperimentalNot described
Receives: Procedure: Single Piezocision
Repeated PiezocisionExperimentalNot described
Receives: Procedure: Repeated Piezocision

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Measurement of canine retraction

    Several landmarks will be identified on the dental arch, including the mid-palatal raphe, the most medial points on the third right and left rugae, and the cusp tips of the right and left maxillary canines. Perpendicular lines will be drawn from the medial points of the right and left third rugae, and the cusp tips of the right and left maxillary canines to the mid-palatal raphe. The antero-posterior measurements will be carried out between the canine lines and the third rugae lines bilaterally, to assess the rate of canine retraction.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  2. Measurement of molar anchorage loss

    Perpendicular lines will be drawn from the central fossae of both maxillary right and left first molars to the mid-palatal raphe. Consequently, molar anchorage loss will be calculated by measuring the distance between those lines, and the lines representing the third rugae as previously mentioned.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  3. Measurement of canine root resorption

    Root resorption of the maxillary canines will be evaluated and measured by comparing pre-retraction and post-retraction CBCT scans.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  4. Bone Microstructure (Fractal Dimension)

    Using the collected CBCT scans, the region of interest will be selected within the maxillary alveolar process, and the fractal dimension analysis will be performed using a special software for the maxillary canines in the experimental and control groups.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  5. Alveolar bone density

    From the acquired pre- and post-retraction CBCTs, bone density will be measured form a coronal cross-section of the maxillary arch around each canine in the experimental and control groups.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  6. Alveolar bone thickness

    The buccal bone thickness will also be measured at three points from the buccal bone to the root, at the coronal, mid-root, and apical level for each maxillary canine

    Measured: 12 weeks

  7. Alveolar bone volume

    From the pre- and post-retraction CBCTs (at T0 and T1), bone volume in areas of the maxillary alveolar process surrounding the canines will be measured using a special software.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  8. Maxillary canine tipping

    Tipping of the maxillary canine during retraction was evaluated by drawing vertical lines on the palatal surfaces of the lateral incisor and the canine that extend from the middle of the incisal edge of the lateral incisor and the cusp tip of the maxillary canine to the middle of the cervical line of each, thereby dividing each of them into equal halves. The distance between the lateral incisor and the canine was assessed at two points on their clinical crowns: incisal, and cervical, enabling the detection of crown tipping of the canine during retraction if there was a difference in the measurements between the both the assessed levels.

    Measured: 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Mar 2023
  2. Study start1 Jan 2023
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2024
  4. Study completion15 Jan 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05782088
Sponsor's protocol ID
200
Status last verified
Mar 2024
First submitted
12 Mar 2023
Last updated
26 Mar 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Eid FY, El-Kalza AR. The effect of single versus multiple piezocisions on the rate of canine retraction: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Oral Health. 2024 Aug 30;24(1):1024. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04716-6.

    PubMed 39215274

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Single Piezocision and Repeated Piezocision in people with Orthodontic Tooth Movement and Canine Retraction, run by Nourhan M.Aly at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Measurement of canine retraction (time frame: 12 weeks). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05782088, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Mar 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in