Carcinoma of the AppendixPhase 2NCT01580410
Surgery and Oxaliplatin or Mitomycin C in Treating Patients With Tumors of the Appendix
A Phase 2 study testing mitomycin C, oxaliplatin and therapeutic conventional surgery in people with Carcinoma of the Appendix and Primary Peritoneal Cavity Cancer, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This randomized phase II trial is studying the side effects and how well giving oxaliplatin or mitomycin C directly into the abdomen after surgery works in treating patients with tumors of the appendix. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Carcinoma of the Appendix, Primary Peritoneal Cavity Cancer
- What is being tested?
- mitomycin C, oxaliplatin and therapeutic conventional surgery
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 136 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- May 2009to Nov 2016
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients must have histologically or cytologically confirmed peritoneal surface malignancies from primary appendiceal tumors
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status =< 2
- Absolute neutrophil count >= 1,500/mcL
- Platelets >=100,000/mcL
- Total bilirubin =< 1.5 mg/dL
- Creatinine =< 2.0 mg/dL
Show all 12Show fewer
- Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase [SGOT])/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase [SGPT]) =< 3 X institutional upper limit of normal
- Alkaline phosphatase =< 3 X institutional upper limit of normal
- Patients must be recovered from both the acute and late effects of any prior surgery, radiotherapy, or other antineoplastic therapy
- Women of child-bearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or double-barrier method of birth control; abstinence) for the duration of study participation and for 90 days following HIPEC
- Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document (either directly or via a legally authorized representative)
- Participants who have received oxaliplatin during prior systemic chemotherapy regimens are eligible for enrollment in this protocol
Who cannot join
- Patients with an active infection or with a fever >= 101.3 degrees Fahrenheit (F) within 3 days of the first scheduled day of protocol treatment
- Patients who are receiving concurrent investigational therapy or who have received investigational therapy within 30 days of HIPEC (investigational therapy is defined as treatment for which there is currently no regulatory authority approved indication)
- Patients with carcinoid tumors
- Patients with active central nervous system (CNS) metastases
- Patients with known hypersensitivity to any of the components of oxaliplatin or mitomycin C
- History of prior malignancy within the past 5 years, except for curatively treated basal cell carcinoma of the skin, cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia, or localized prostate cancer with a current prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of < 1.0 mg/dL on 2 successive evaluations, at least 3 months apart, with the most recent evaluation no more than 4 weeks prior to entry
Show all 14Show fewer
- Patients who received radiotherapy to more than 25% of their bone marrow
- Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements
- Pregnant/nursing women are excluded from this study because oxaliplatin is an agent with the potential for teratogenic or abortifacient effects; because there is an unknown but potential risk for adverse events in nursing infants secondary to treatment of the mother with oxaliplatin, breastfeeding should be discontinued if the mother is treated with oxaliplatin or mitomycin C
- Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B or C-positive patients (active, previously treated or both)
- Peripheral neuropathy >= grade 2
- History of allogenic transplant
- History of prior HIPEC
- Evidence of metastatic disease outside of the abdomen
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
United States3 sites
M D Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
UPMC Hillman Cancer Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
About this study
Official title: A Multi-Center, Open-Label, Randomized Phase II Trial to Evaluate Hematologic Toxicities After HIPEC With Oxaliplatin or Mitomycin C in Patients With Appendiceal Tumors
This randomized phase II trial is studying the side effects and how well giving oxaliplatin or mitomycin C directly into the abdomen after surgery works in treating patients with tumors of the appendix. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as oxaliplatin and mitomycin C, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Heating a chemotherapy solution and infusing it directly into the abdomen may kill more tumor cells. Giving these treatments after surgery may kill any tumor cells that remain after surgery.
Read the detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
- To compare the toxicity profiles within 4 weeks of surgery of oxaliplatin and mitomycin C delivered via Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies from primary appendiceal tumors.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- To compare the time to progression in patients treated with oxaliplatin vs. mitomycin C delivered via Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for surface malignancies from primary appendiceal tumors.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
Arm I: Patients undergo surgical cytoreduction and receive mitomycin C by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).
Arm II: Patients undergo surgical cytoreduction and receive oxaliplatin by HIPEC.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months.
- Being tested
- mitomycin C, oxaliplatin, therapeutic conventional surgery, quality-of-life assessment, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy
- Medical subject headings
- Appendiceal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
mitomycin CDrug
Also called MITC, MITO, MITO-C, Mitocin-C
Given by HIPEC
oxaliplatinDrug
Also called 1-OHP, Dacotin, Dacplat, Eloxatin
Given by HIPEC
therapeutic conventional surgeryProcedure or surgery
Undergo surgery
quality-of-life assessmentOther
Also called quality of life assessment
Ancillary studies
hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapyDrug
Undergo HIPEC
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm I (mitomycin C) | Experimental | Patients undergo surgical cytoreduction and receive mitomycin C by HIPEC. Receives: Drug: mitomycin C; Procedure: therapeutic conventional surgery; Other: quality-of-life assessment; Drug: hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy |
| Arm II (oxaliplatin) | Experimental | Patients undergo surgical cytoreduction and receive oxaliplatin by HIPEC. Receives: Drug: oxaliplatin; Procedure: therapeutic conventional surgery; Other: quality-of-life assessment; Drug: hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The Difference in the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Hematologic Toxicities (Leukopenia, Thrombocytopenia, and Neutropenia) Between the Mitomycin C and Oxaliplatin Treatments
If a patient has a grade 3 or 4 standard hematologic toxicity (leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia), the patient will be considered to be an event. The observed rates of the 2 treatments will be the primary outcome, and the rates will be analyzed using a 2-sided chi-square test.
Measured: Within 4 weeks of surgery
Secondary outcomes (3)
The Difference in Percentage of Disease-free Survival Between the Two Treatment Arms up to 3 Years
Measured: Time to first progression unless the patient's resection status is R2b or 2c, regardless of toxicity or response to study drug, assessed up to 3 years
The Difference in Percentage of Overall Survival Between the Two Treatment Arms up to 3 Years
Measured: Interval between surgery and death or date of last contact, assessed up to 3 years
Quality of Life as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: General (FACT-G)
The FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General) consists of 27 core items assessing patient well-being in four components: Physical (7 items), Social/Family (7 items), Emotional (6 items), and Functional (7 items). Items are rated on a five-point scale: 0-"not at all", 1- "a little bit", 2-"somewhat", 3- "quite a bit" and 4-"very much". The score of each component is the mean times the number of items in the component. The range of the physical, social/family, and functional components I 0-28 and the range of the emotional component is 0-24. The sum of the component scores creates the overall score which has a range of 0-108. For all component scores and overall score, the higher the score the better the QOL.
Measured: Throughout study completion, up to 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Apr 2012 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2009
- Primary completionOct 2015
- Study completionNov 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Carcinoma of the AppendixStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Wake Forest University Health SciencesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 136 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Edward Levine, Principal investigator, Wake Forest University Health Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01580410
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB00009326
- Other IDs
- NCI-2009-00947, CCCWFU 59109
- Status last verified
- Jun 2018
- First submitted
- 17 Apr 2012
- Last updated
- 3 Jul 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Jul 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multi-Center, Open-Label, Randomized Phase II Trial to Evaluate Hematologic Toxicities After HIPEC With Oxaliplatin or Mitomycin C in Patients With Appendiceal Tumors
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01580410
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB00009326
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 136 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Wake Forest University Health SciencesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- May 2009
- Primary completion
- Oct 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Apr 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 21 Mar 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This randomized phase II trial is studying the side effects and how well giving oxaliplatin or mitomycin C directly into the abdomen after surgery works in treating patients with tumors of the appendix. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as oxaliplatin and mitomycin C, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Heating a chemotherapy solution and infusing it directly into the abdomen may kill more tumor cells. Giving these treatments after surgery may kill any tumor cells that remain after surgery.
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
- To compare the toxicity profiles within 4 weeks of surgery of oxaliplatin and mitomycin C delivered via Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies from primary appendiceal tumors.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- To compare the time to progression in patients treated with oxaliplatin vs. mitomycin C delivered via Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for surface malignancies from primary appendiceal tumors.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
Arm I: Patients undergo surgical cytoreduction and receive mitomycin C by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).
Arm II: Patients undergo surgical cytoreduction and receive oxaliplatin by HIPEC.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm I (mitomycin C) | Experimental | Drug: mitomycin C, Procedure: therapeutic conventional surgery, Other: quality-of-life assessment, Drug: hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapyPatients undergo surgical cytoreduction and receive mitomycin C by HIPEC. |
| Arm II (oxaliplatin) | Experimental | Drug: oxaliplatin, Procedure: therapeutic conventional surgery, Other: quality-of-life assessment, Drug: hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapyPatients undergo surgical cytoreduction and receive oxaliplatin by HIPEC. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Patients must have histologically or cytologically confirmed peritoneal surface malignancies from primary appendiceal tumors
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status =< 2
- Absolute neutrophil count >= 1,500/mcL
- Platelets >=100,000/mcL
- Total bilirubin =< 1.5 mg/dL
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Patients with an active infection or with a fever >= 101.3 degrees Fahrenheit (F) within 3 days of the first scheduled day of protocol treatment
- Patients who are receiving concurrent investigational therapy or who have received investigational therapy within 30 days of HIPEC (investigational therapy is defined as treatment for which there is currently no regulatory authority approved indication)
- Patients with carcinoid tumors
- Patients with active central nervous system (CNS) metastases
- Patients with known hypersensitivity to any of the components of oxaliplatin or mitomycin C
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| mitomycin CAlso: MITC, MITO, MITO-C, Mitocin-CGiven by HIPEC | Drug | Arm I (mitomycin C) |
| oxaliplatinAlso: 1-OHP, Dacotin, Dacplat, EloxatinGiven by HIPEC | Drug | Arm II (oxaliplatin) |
| therapeutic conventional surgeryUndergo surgery | Procedure or surgery | Arm I (mitomycin C), Arm II (oxaliplatin) |
| quality-of-life assessmentAlso: quality of life assessmentAncillary studies | Other | Arm I (mitomycin C), Arm II (oxaliplatin) |
| hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapyUndergo HIPEC | Drug | Arm I (mitomycin C), Arm II (oxaliplatin) |
Primary outcome
The Difference in the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Hematologic Toxicities (Leukopenia, Thrombocytopenia, and Neutropenia) Between the Mitomycin C and Oxaliplatin Treatments
Time frame: Within 4 weeks of surgery
If a patient has a grade 3 or 4 standard hematologic toxicity (leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia), the patient will be considered to be an event. The observed rates of the 2 treatments will be the primary outcome, and the rates will be analyzed using a 2-sided chi-square test.
3 secondary outcomes
The Difference in Percentage of Disease-free Survival Between the Two Treatment Arms up to 3 Years
Time frame: Time to first progression unless the patient's resection status is R2b or 2c, regardless of toxicity or response to study drug, assessed up to 3 years
The Difference in Percentage of Overall Survival Between the Two Treatment Arms up to 3 Years
Time frame: Interval between surgery and death or date of last contact, assessed up to 3 years
Quality of Life as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: General (FACT-G)
Time frame: Throughout study completion, up to 3 years
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Jul 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Carcinoma of the Appendix
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
Individual Response to Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) Treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis From Peritoneal Mesothelioma or Atypical Mesothelial Proliferation or From Ovarian, Colorectal, or Appendiceal Histologies
Peritoneal Mesothelioma, Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
RecruitingPhase 3
Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosolized Chemotherapy With Mitomycin for the Treatment of Unresectable Appendix or Colorectal Cancer With Peritoneal Metastases, The IMPACT Trial
Metastatic Appendix Carcinoma, Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma
Recruiting
Studying the PAGODA Algorithm for Chemotherapy Dose Changes to Prevent Unplanned Treatment Delays
Ampulla of Vater Carcinoma, Appendix Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 4
Intraoperative Imaging of Gastrointestinal Malignancies Using Pafolacianine (CYTALUX™)
Gastrointestinal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Edward Levine principal investigator
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing mitomycin C, oxaliplatin and therapeutic conventional surgery in people with Carcinoma of the Appendix and Primary Peritoneal Cavity Cancer, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Mar 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The Difference in the Number of Grade 3 or 4 Hematologic Toxicities (Leukopenia, Thrombocytopenia, and Neutropenia) Between the Mitomycin C and Oxaliplatin Treatments (time frame: Within 4 weeks of surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jul 2018.