Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction SurgeryRECUP-NVMNCT07919756
Nerve Block of the Vastus Medialis and Anterior Obturator Branch in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With DIDT Graft
A study testing Femoral Nerve Block, iPACK Block and Nerve to Vastus Medialis Block in people with Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction Surgery, run by GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche at 2 sites in France.
Trial summary
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate whether a targeted regional anesthesia strategy combining an adductor canal block, a nerve to the vastus medialis (NVM) block, an anterior obturator nerve branch block, and an iPACK block improves postoperative recovery in patients undergoing anterior cruciate… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction Surgery
- What is being tested?
- Femoral Nerve Block, iPACK Block and Nerve to Vastus Medialis Block
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 108 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 15 Nov 2026to 15 Nov 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients aged 18 to 60 years.
- Patients with a primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury.
- Patients scheduled for ACL reconstruction using a DIDT graft under general anesthesia.
- Patients managed as ambulatory surgery or short stay.
- Patients who understand the validated French version of the QoR-15 questionnaire.
- Patients who have given written informed consent to participate in the study.
- Patients affiliated with or beneficiaries of a social security system.
Who cannot join
- Patients with allergy to local anesthetics or a contraindication to peripheral nerve blocks.
- Patients with lower-limb neuropathy.
- Patients with coagulation disorders or on major anticoagulation.
- Patients with chronic pain requiring more than 30 mg morphine-equivalents per day.
- Patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction or a major combined surgical procedure.
- Pregnant women.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Patients unable to complete the questionnaires or who refuse to participate.
- Pregnant women or women who may be pregnant (of childbearing potential without effective contraception) or who are breastfeeding.
- Protected adults: patients under guardianship, curatorship or other legal protection, deprived of liberty, or unable to provide informed consent.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
France2 sites
Clinique du Mousseau
Évry
Karim Guessous, +33 6 51 99 54 38, k.guessous@quincyanesthesie.com
Hôpital Privé Claude Galien
Quincy-sous-Sénart
Yoan Elmaleh, +33 7 81 33 04 31, yoann.d.elmaleh@gmail.com
About this study
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate whether a targeted regional anesthesia strategy combining an adductor canal block, a nerve to the vastus medialis (NVM) block, an anterior obturator nerve branch block, and an iPACK block improves postoperative recovery in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a hamstring tendon (semitendinosus and gracilis; DIDT) graft, compared with the standard analgesic protocol used in participating centres, consisting of a femoral nerve block combined with an iPACK block.
The main question the study aims to answer is whether this targeted combination of nerve blocks, compared with the standard femoral nerve block plus iPACK regimen, improves the quality of postoperative recovery, as measured by the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score at 24 hours after surgery.
Read more
The study hypothesis is that the targeted adductor canal + NVM + anterior obturator branch + iPACK strategy will significantly improve postoperative recovery quality at 24 hours compared with the standard femoral nerve block + iPACK protocol, with an expected improvement of at least 8 points on the QoR-15 score. This 8-point difference represents the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for this questionnaire (Léger et al., 2020). The QoR-15 is a validated global recovery assessment tool, available in French, and sensitive to variations in recovery quality in outpatient orthopedic surgery (Nakase et al., 2021). An improvement of at least 8 points at 24 hours would therefore indicate a clinically meaningful benefit from the patient's perspective.
The study will also assess:
- Postoperative pain at rest and during mobilization.
- Opioid consumption during the first 48 hours after surgery.
- Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.
- Time to first ambulation.
- Postoperative thigh edema.
- Neuromuscular recovery of the thigh.
- Patient satisfaction with analgesic management.
- Adverse events related to regional anesthesia.
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. All participants will undergo ACL reconstruction with a DIDT graft. Participants in the comparator group will receive a femoral nerve block combined with an iPACK block. Participants in the intervention group will receive a targeted regional anesthesia strategy combining an adductor canal block, a nerve to the vastus medialis (NVM) block, an anterior branch of the obturator nerve block, and an iPACK block.
Postoperative assessments will include pain scores, QoR-15 questionnaires, opioid consumption, nausea and vomiting, thigh measurements, and neuromuscular function assessments during the first 48 hours after surgery. Patient satisfaction and safety outcomes will also be assessed during follow-up.
The primary outcome will compare the QoR-15 score at 24 hours between the two groups, with an 8-point difference considered clinically meaningful.
- Being tested
- Femoral Nerve Block, iPACK Block, Nerve to Vastus Medialis Block, Anterior Obturator Nerve Block, Adductor Canal Block
- Keywords
- ACL reconstruction, DIDT graft, QoR-15, Postoperative pain, Vastus medialis nerve block, iPACK block, Femoral nerve block, Adductor canal block
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Postoperative
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Femoral Nerve BlockProcedure or surgery
Ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block administered as part of the standard regional anesthesia protocol for ACL reconstruction.
iPACK BlockProcedure or surgery
Ultrasound-guided infiltration between the popliteal artery and the posterior capsule of the knee (iPACK) administered as part of the regional anesthesia protocol.
Nerve to Vastus Medialis BlockProcedure or surgery
Ultrasound-guided nerve block targeting the nerve to the vastus medialis (NVM), administered in addition to theadductor canal and iPACK blocks in the experimental arm.
Anterior Obturator Nerve BlockProcedure or surgery
Ultrasound-guided block of the anterior branch of the obturator nerve, administered in addition to the adductor canal and iPACK blocks in the experimental arm.
Adductor Canal BlockProcedure or surgery
Ultrasound-guided adductor canal block administered as part of the targeted regional anesthesia protocol for ACL reconstruction in the experimental arm.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Adductor Canal + iPACK + NVM and Anterior Obturator Nerve Blocks | Experimental | Participants will undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a semitendinosus and gracilis (DIDT) graft. They will receive a targeted regional anesthesia protocol consisting of an adductor canal block, a nerve to the vastus medialis (NVM) block, an iPACK block, and a block of the anterior branch of the obturator nerve. Receives: Procedure: iPACK Block; Procedure: Nerve to Vastus Medialis Block; Procedure: Anterior Obturator Nerve Block; Procedure: Adductor Canal Block |
| Femoral + iPACK Nerve Blocks | Active comparator | Participants will undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a semitendinosus and gracilis (DIDT) graft. They will receive the standard regional anesthesia protocol consisting of a femoral nerve block and an iPACK block, without additional nerve blocks of the nerve to the vastus medialis (NVM) or anterior branch of the obturator nerve. Receives: Procedure: Femoral Nerve Block; Procedure: iPACK Block |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) Score
The quality of postoperative recovery will be assessed using the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire. The QoR-15 score ranges from 0 to 150, with higher scores indicating better quality of recovery. The primary analysis will compare the change in QoR-15 score from baseline to 24 hours postoperatively between the experimental and active comparator groups. An 8-point difference between groups is considered the minimal clinically important difference.
Measured: Baseline (preoperatively, before regional anesthesia) and 24 hours after surgery
Secondary outcomes (8)
Postoperative Pain
Pain intensity will be assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), both at rest and during mobilization. The NRS ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
Measured: 6, 24, and 48 hours after surgery
Postoperative Opioid Consumption
Total opioid consumption will be recorded and converted to oral morphine equivalents (OME).
Measured: 24 and 48 hours after surgery
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) will be recorded.
Measured: 24 and 48 hours after surgery
Time to ambulation
Time from completion of surgery to first postoperative ambulation will be recorded.
Measured: Day 0 (postoperative)
Postoperative Thigh Edema
Postoperative changes in thigh circumference will be measured at three standardized locations: 15 cm above the superior pole of the patella, at the level of the patellar apex, and 10 cm below the patellar apex.
Measured: Day 0 and Day 1 after surgery
Postoperative Neuromuscular Recovery of the Thigh
Neuromuscular recovery will be assessed using the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale, ranging from 0 (no muscle contraction) to 5 (normal muscle strength), across four motor tests: isometric heel press into the mattress, flattening of the popliteal fossa against the mattress, sliding knee flexion/extension, and straight-leg raise at 30 degrees.
Measured: Day 0 and Day 1 after surgery
Patient Satisfaction With Analgesic Management
Patient satisfaction with postoperative analgesic management will be assessed using a 5-point Likert scale.
Measured: 1 month after surgery
Adverse Events Related to Regional Anesthesia
Adverse events related to locoregional anesthesia will be recorded, including signs of local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) and persistent paresthesia.
Measured: Day 0
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Nov 2026
- Study start15 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion15 Nov 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Nov 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction SurgeryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la RechercheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 108 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Yoann ELMALEH, Principal investigator, Hôpital Privé Claude Galien
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07919756
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- COS-RGDS-2025-12-028-P-ELMALEH
- Other IDs
- 2026-A01040-51
- Acronym
- RECUP-NVM
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 30 Oct 2026
- Last updated
- 5 Nov 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Nakase J, Shimozaki K, Asai K, Yoshimizu R, Kimura M, Tsuchiya H. Usefulness of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block in combination with femoral nerve block for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Mar;141(3):455-460. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03724-9. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
PubMed 33386977Leger M, Campfort M, Cayla C, Parot-Schinkel E, Lasocki S, Rineau E. Validation of an alternative French version of the Quality of Recovery-15 Score: the FQoR-15. Br J Anaesth. 2020 Oct;125(4):e345-e347. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.05.052. Epub 2020 Jul 9. No abstract available.
PubMed 32654751Le Bescond V, Petit-Phan J, Campfort M, Nicolleau C, Conte M, Bouhours G, Rony L, Lasocki S, Leger M. Validation of the postoperative Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire after emergency surgery and association with quality of life at three months. Can J Anaesth. 2024 May;71(5):590-599. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02722-4. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
PubMed 38504036Myles PS, Myles DB, Galagher W, Chew C, MacDonald N, Dennis A. Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Three Quality of Recovery Scales. Anesthesiology. 2016 Jul;125(1):39-45. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001158.
PubMed 27159009Uddin I, Chazapis M. Obturator nerve block [Internet]. World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists; juin 2024 [cité 4 févr 2026]. https://resources.wfsahq.org/atotw/obturator-nerve-block/ doi:10.28923/atotw.525
Savalli L, Hernandez-Sendin MI, Puig PL, Trouve P. [Pain after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: detail and treatment]. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2004 Aug;47(6):299-308. doi: 10.1016/j.annrmp.2004.05.005. French.
PubMed 15297120Demumieux F, Ludes PO, Diemunsch P, Bennett-Guerrero E, Lujic M, Lefebvre F, Noll E. Validation of the translated Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire in a French-speaking population. Br J Anaesth. 2020 Jun;124(6):761-767. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.03.011. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
PubMed 32303379Kim KY, Huh YG, Ma SH, Yoon JH, Jeong KY, Park DY, Yoon SH. Efficacy of Adductor Canal Block on Medial Knee Pain in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Single-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 21;19(22):15419. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215419.
PubMed 36430138
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Nov 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Nerve Block of the Vastus Medialis and Anterior Obturator Branch in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With DIDT Graft
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07919756
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RECUP-NVM / COS-RGDS-2025-12-028-P-ELMALEH
- Keywords
- ACL reconstruction, DIDT graft, QoR-15, Postoperative pain, Vastus medialis nerve block, iPACK block, Femoral nerve block, Adductor canal block
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 108 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la RechercheUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 15 Nov 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 Nov 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Nov 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate whether a targeted regional anesthesia strategy combining an adductor canal block, a nerve to the vastus medialis (NVM) block, an anterior obturator nerve branch block, and an iPACK block improves postoperative recovery in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a hamstring tendon (semitendinosus and gracilis; DIDT) graft, compared with the standard analgesic protocol used in participating centres, consisting of a femoral nerve block combined with an iPACK block.
The main question the study aims to answer is whether this targeted combination of nerve blocks, compared with the standard femoral nerve block plus iPACK regimen, improves the quality of postoperative recovery, as measured by the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score at 24 hours after surgery.
The study hypothesis is that the targeted adductor canal + NVM + anterior obturator branch + iPACK strategy will significantly improve postoperative recovery quality at 24 hours compared with the standard femoral nerve block + iPACK protocol, with an expected improvement of at least 8 points on the QoR-15 score. This 8-point difference represents the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for this questionnaire (Léger et al., 2020). The QoR-15 is a validated global recovery assessment tool, available in French, and sensitive to variations in recovery quality in outpatient orthopedic surgery (Nakase et al., 2021). An improvement of at least 8 points at 24 hours would therefore indicate a clinically meaningful benefit from the patient's perspective.
The study will also assess:
- Postoperative pain at rest and during mobilization.
- Opioid consumption during the first 48 hours after surgery.
- Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.
- Time to first ambulation.
- Postoperative thigh edema.
- Neuromuscular recovery of the thigh.
- Patient satisfaction with analgesic management.
- Adverse events related to regional anesthesia.
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. All participants will undergo ACL reconstruction with a DIDT graft. Participants in the comparator group will receive a femoral nerve block combined with an iPACK block. Participants in the intervention group will receive a targeted regional anesthesia strategy combining an adductor canal block, a nerve to the vastus medialis (NVM) block, an anterior branch of the obturator nerve block, and an iPACK block.
Postoperative assessments will include pain scores, QoR-15 questionnaires, opioid consumption, nausea and vomiting, thigh measurements, and neuromuscular function assessments during the first 48 hours after surgery. Patient satisfaction and safety outcomes will also be assessed during follow-up.
The primary outcome will compare the QoR-15 score at 24 hours between the two groups, with an 8-point difference considered clinically meaningful.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Adductor Canal + iPACK + NVM and Anterior Obturator Nerve Blocks | Experimental | Procedure: iPACK Block, Procedure: Nerve to Vastus Medialis Block, Procedure: Anterior Obturator Nerve Block, Procedure: Adductor Canal BlockParticipants will undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a semitendinosus and gracilis (DIDT) graft. They will receive a targeted regional anesthesia protocol consisting of an adductor canal block, a nerve to the vastus medialis (NVM) block, an iPACK block, and a block of the anterior branch of the obturator nerve. |
| Femoral + iPACK Nerve Blocks | Active comparator | Procedure: Femoral Nerve Block, Procedure: iPACK BlockParticipants will undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a semitendinosus and gracilis (DIDT) graft. They will receive the standard regional anesthesia protocol consisting of a femoral nerve block and an iPACK block, without additional nerve blocks of the nerve to the vastus medialis (NVM) or anterior branch of the obturator nerve. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Adult patients aged 18 to 60 years.
- Patients with a primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury.
- Patients scheduled for ACL reconstruction using a DIDT graft under general anesthesia.
- Patients managed as ambulatory surgery or short stay.
- Patients who understand the validated French version of the QoR-15 questionnaire.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patients with allergy to local anesthetics or a contraindication to peripheral nerve blocks.
- Patients with lower-limb neuropathy.
- Patients with coagulation disorders or on major anticoagulation.
- Patients with chronic pain requiring more than 30 mg morphine-equivalents per day.
- Patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction or a major combined surgical procedure.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Femoral Nerve BlockUltrasound-guided femoral nerve block administered as part of the standard regional anesthesia protocol for ACL reconstruction. | Procedure or surgery | Femoral + iPACK Nerve Blocks |
| iPACK BlockUltrasound-guided infiltration between the popliteal artery and the posterior capsule of the knee (iPACK) administered as part of the regional anesthesia protocol. | Procedure or surgery | Adductor Canal + iPACK + NVM and Anterior Obturator Nerve Blocks, Femoral + iPACK Nerve Blocks |
| Nerve to Vastus Medialis BlockUltrasound-guided nerve block targeting the nerve to the vastus medialis (NVM), administered in addition to theadductor canal and iPACK blocks in the experimental arm. | Procedure or surgery | Adductor Canal + iPACK + NVM and Anterior Obturator Nerve Blocks |
| Anterior Obturator Nerve BlockUltrasound-guided block of the anterior branch of the obturator nerve, administered in addition to the adductor canal and iPACK blocks in the experimental arm. | Procedure or surgery | Adductor Canal + iPACK + NVM and Anterior Obturator Nerve Blocks |
| Adductor Canal BlockUltrasound-guided adductor canal block administered as part of the targeted regional anesthesia protocol for ACL reconstruction in the experimental arm. | Procedure or surgery | Adductor Canal + iPACK + NVM and Anterior Obturator Nerve Blocks |
Primary outcome
Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) Score
Time frame: Baseline (preoperatively, before regional anesthesia) and 24 hours after surgery
The quality of postoperative recovery will be assessed using the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire. The QoR-15 score ranges from 0 to 150, with higher scores indicating better quality of recovery. The primary analysis will compare the change in QoR-15 score from baseline to 24 hours postoperatively between the experimental and active comparator groups. An 8-point difference between groups is considered the minimal clinically important difference.
8 secondary outcomes
Postoperative Pain
Time frame: 6, 24, and 48 hours after surgery
Postoperative Opioid Consumption
Time frame: 24 and 48 hours after surgery
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Time frame: 24 and 48 hours after surgery
Time to ambulation
Time frame: Day 0 (postoperative)
Postoperative Thigh Edema
Time frame: Day 0 and Day 1 after surgery
Postoperative Neuromuscular Recovery of the Thigh
Time frame: Day 0 and Day 1 after surgery
Patient Satisfaction With Analgesic Management
Time frame: 1 month after surgery
Adverse Events Related to Regional Anesthesia
Time frame: Day 0
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Nov 2026.
- Background: PubMed 33386977Nakase J, Shimozaki K, Asai K, Yoshimizu R, Kimura M, Tsuchiya H. Usefulness of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block in combination with femoral nerve block for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Mar;141(3):455-460. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03724-9. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
- Background: PubMed 32654751Leger M, Campfort M, Cayla C, Parot-Schinkel E, Lasocki S, Rineau E. Validation of an alternative French version of the Quality of Recovery-15 Score: the FQoR-15. Br J Anaesth. 2020 Oct;125(4):e345-e347. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.05.052. Epub 2020 Jul 9. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 38504036Le Bescond V, Petit-Phan J, Campfort M, Nicolleau C, Conte M, Bouhours G, Rony L, Lasocki S, Leger M. Validation of the postoperative Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire after emergency surgery and association with quality of life at three months. Can J Anaesth. 2024 May;71(5):590-599. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02722-4. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
- Background: PubMed 27159009Myles PS, Myles DB, Galagher W, Chew C, MacDonald N, Dennis A. Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Three Quality of Recovery Scales. Anesthesiology. 2016 Jul;125(1):39-45. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001158.
- BackgroundUddin I, Chazapis M. Obturator nerve block [Internet]. World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists; juin 2024 [cité 4 févr 2026]. https://resources.wfsahq.org/atotw/obturator-nerve-block/ doi:10.28923/atotw.525
- Background: PubMed 15297120Savalli L, Hernandez-Sendin MI, Puig PL, Trouve P. [Pain after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: detail and treatment]. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2004 Aug;47(6):299-308. doi: 10.1016/j.annrmp.2004.05.005. French.
- Background: PubMed 32303379Demumieux F, Ludes PO, Diemunsch P, Bennett-Guerrero E, Lujic M, Lefebvre F, Noll E. Validation of the translated Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire in a French-speaking population. Br J Anaesth. 2020 Jun;124(6):761-767. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.03.011. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
- Background: PubMed 36430138Kim KY, Huh YG, Ma SH, Yoon JH, Jeong KY, Park DY, Yoon SH. Efficacy of Adductor Canal Block on Medial Knee Pain in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Single-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 21;19(22):15419. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215419.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction Surgery
Recruiting
The Effect of Plyometric Training in Post-ACLR Surgery
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR), Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Rehabilitation
Recruiting
The Effect of Isokinetic Vs Plyometric Training in Post-ACLR Surgery
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR), Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Rehabilitation
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of the Correlation Between Bone Tunnel Projection Placement and Clinical Outcomes in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury, Tunneling Technique
RecruitingObservational study
Intraoperative Energy Expenditure During ACL Reconstruction Surgery
ACL Injury, Meniscal Injuries
Recruiting
Comparison of Analgesic Effects of ACB Versus ACB Combined With BiFeS Block in ACL Reconstruction Surgery
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Pain Management
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Yoann ELMALEH principal investigator
Hôpital Privé Claude Galien
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Femoral Nerve Block, iPACK Block and Nerve to Vastus Medialis Block in people with Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction Surgery, run by GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche at 2 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Yoann ELMALEH (+33 07 81 33 04 31, yoann.d.elmaleh@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) Score (time frame: Baseline (preoperatively, before regional anesthesia) and 24 hours after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07919756, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Nov 2026.