Burn InjuryNCT07896135
Effects of Hop-Stabilization Training on Postural and Functional Rehabilitation in Children With Lower-Limb Burns
A study testing Progressive Hop-Stabilization Training and Traditional physical therapy in people with Burn Injury and Postural Balance Disorders, run by Qassim University at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.
Trial summary
Children with severe burns affecting both lower limbs may experience persistent difficulties with balance, walking, and physical function. This randomized controlled trial investigated whether adding progressive hop-stabilization training to standard physical rehabilitation improves postural control, dynamic balance… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 10 to 17 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Burn Injury, Postural Balance Disorders, Gait Impairment
- What is being tested?
- Progressive Hop-Stabilization Training and Traditional physical therapy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 54 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSaudi Arabia
- Study dates
- 6 Apr 2026to 17 Oct 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 10 to 17 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Children aged 10-17 years.
- Healed deep partial-thickness, full-thickness, or mixed-depth burns involving both lower limbs.
- Total body surface area (TBSA) affected by burns greater than 30%.
- At least six months elapsed since hospital discharge.
- Medically stable and capable of participating in structured exercise rehabilitation.
- Able to walk independently without assistive devices.
- Able to understand and safely perform the required exercise and assessment procedures.
Who cannot join
- Pre-existing neurological or musculoskeletal disorders that could affect balance, gait, or lower-limb performance.
- Metabolic diseases or peripheral neuropathy that could interfere with functional assessments.
- Visual or vestibular impairments affecting postural stability.
- Severe lower-limb contractures or restricted joint mobility that could compromise safe hopping or functional testing.
- Cognitive or behavioral difficulties that substantially limit understanding of instructions or adherence to study procedures.
- Concurrent participation in another structured rehabilitation or exercise program that could influence the study outcomes.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Saudi Arabia1 site
Physical Therapy Outpatient Clinic, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University
Al Kharj, Riyadh Region
About this study
Official title: Targeted Postural and Functional Rehabilitation Via Adjunctive Hop-Stabilization Training in Pediatric Lower-Limb Burns: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Children with severe burns affecting both lower limbs may experience persistent difficulties with balance, walking, and physical function. This randomized controlled trial investigated whether adding progressive hop-stabilization training to standard physical rehabilitation improves postural control, dynamic balance, gait, and lower-limb function.
Fifty-four children aged 10-17 years with healed bilateral lower-limb burns were randomly assigned to two groups. Both groups received standard rehabilitation three times weekly for eight weeks, while the experimental group additionally performed supervised hop-stabilization exercises. Postural stability, dynamic balance, walking ability, and lower-limb functional performance were assessed before and immediately after treatment.
Read the detailed description
Children with lower-limb burns may experience persistent limitations in balance, gait, and lower-limb function. Hop-stabilization training provides repeated multidirectional loading, controlled landing, and rapid postural adjustment and may therefore represent a task-specific rehabilitation strategy; however, its effects in pediatric burn rehabilitation remain unclear. This two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial will include 54 children aged 10-17 years with healed bilateral lower-limb burns and total body surface area involvement >30%. Participants will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either a hop-stabilization group receiving progressive hop-stabilization training in addition to traditional physical therapy or a control group receiving traditional physical therapy alone. Both groups will receive treatment three times weekly for 8 weeks. The experimental program will include progressive multidirectional hopping and landing-stabilization exercises. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline and after treatment by a blinded examiner.
- Conditions
- Burn Injury, Postural Balance Disorders, Gait Impairment
- Being tested
- Progressive Hop-Stabilization Training, Traditional physical therapy
- Keywords
- Burns, Children, Hop-stabilization training, Balance, Gait, Lower-limb function, Rehabilitation
- Medical subject headings
- Burns
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Progressive Hop-Stabilization TrainingOther
In addition to traditional physical therapy, participants in the experimental group received a progressive hop-stabilization training program three times per week for eight consecutive weeks. The program included side-to-side hopping, forward-and-backward hopping, forward hop-and-stabilization, figure-8 hopping, zigzag hopping, and 4-square hopping. All exercises were performed under the direct supervision of a physiotherapist. Difficulty throughout the program was progressively, verbal feedback was provided throughout the hop-stabilization program to promote appropriate landing biomechanics.
Traditional physical therapyOther
Participants in both groups received a supervised traditional rehabilitative exercise program three times per week for eight consecutive weeks. The program was individualized according to each child's functional status, burn characteristics, and exercise tolerance. Each 50-60-minute session included warm-up, aerobic conditioning, progressive strengthening, functional training, scar management as indicated, and cool-down.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Hop-Stabilization Training (HS-TR) | Experimental | Participants received an eight-week progressive hop-stabilization training program in addition to standard physical rehabilitation. Training was supervised by a physiotherapist and conducted three times weekly. Receives: Other: Progressive Hop-Stabilization Training; Other: Traditional physical therapy |
| Standard Physical Rehabilitation | Active comparator | Participants underwent supervised standard physical rehabilitation three times weekly for eight weeks. Receives: Other: Traditional physical therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Postural Stability
Postural stability and dynamic Limits of Stability (LOS) were assessed using the ProKin System. Across three maximum-effort trials with 60-second rest intervals, the software calculated: Mediolateral Excursion Limit (%), Anteroposterior Excursion Limit (%), Overall Excursion Area (mm2), Directional Control Index, and Trunk Displacement Angle (o), with the mean of three successful trials retained for statistical analysis.
Measured: Baseline (Pre-Intervention)
Postural Stability
Postural stability and dynamic Limits of Stability (LOS) were assessed using the ProKin System. Across three maximum-effort trials with 60-second rest intervals, the software calculated: Mediolateral Excursion Limit (%), Anteroposterior Excursion Limit (%), Overall Excursion Area (mm2), Directional Control Index, and Trunk Displacement Angle (o), with the mean of three successful trials retained for statistical analysis.
Measured: Week 8 (Post-Intervention)
Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test (YBT-LQ)
Dynamic balance was assessed using the Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test (YBT-LQ). Participants stood on one leg on the central platform and reached as far as possible with the contralateral leg in the anterior (AT), posteromedial (PM), and posterolateral (PL) directions while maintaining balance. The composite score for was calculated as: composite score (%) = [AT + PM + PL maximal reach distances (cm)] / [3 × lower-limb length (cm)] × 100.
Measured: Baseline (Pre-Intervention)
Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test (YBT-LQ)
Dynamic balance was assessed using the Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test (YBT-LQ). Participants stood on one leg on the central platform and reached as far as possible with the contralateral leg in the anterior (AT), posteromedial (PM), and posterolateral (PL) directions while maintaining balance. The composite score for was calculated as: composite score (%) = [AT + PM + PL maximal reach distances (cm)] / [3 × lower-limb length (cm)] × 100.
Measured: Week 8 (Post-Intervention)
Secondary outcomes (8)
Functional Gait Assessment Modified for Children
Functional gait performance was assessed using the Functional Gait Assessment modified for Children (FGA-mC). The FGA-mC consists of 10-item assessment designed to evaluate higher-level gait performance under progressively challenging conditions. Higher scores indicate better functional gait performance.
Measured: Baseline (Pre-Intervention)
Functional Gait Assessment Modified for Children
Functional gait performance was assessed using the Functional Gait Assessment modified for Children (FGA-mC). The FGA-mC consists of 10-item assessment designed to evaluate higher-level gait performance under progressively challenging conditions. Higher scores indicate better functional gait performance.
Measured: Week 8 (Post-Intervention)
Single Hop for Distance Test
The Single Hop for Distance Test used to assess unilateral lower-limb functional performance, including forward propulsion and landing control. Hop distance was measured to the nearest 0.5 cm from the starting line to the posterior aspect of the heel at landing. To allow standardized comparisons, absolute hop distance (cm) was normalized to leg length and demonstrated as a percentage.
Measured: Baseline (Pre-Intervention)
Single Hop for Distance Test
The Single Hop for Distance Test used to assess unilateral lower-limb functional performance, including forward propulsion and landing control. Hop distance was measured to the nearest 0.5 cm from the starting line to the posterior aspect of the heel at landing. To allow standardized comparisons, absolute hop distance (cm) was normalized to leg length and demonstrated as a percentage.
Measured: Week 8 (Post-Intervention)
Timed Up and Down Stairs Test
Timed Up and Down Stairs Test was used to assess functional mobility. the subject was asked to stand 30 cm from the bottom of a 14-step flight of stairs (19.5-cm step height). The test score was the time in seconds from the "go" cue until the second foot returned to the bottom land
Measured: Baseline (Pre-Intervention)
Timed Up and Down Stairs Test
Timed Up and Down Stairs Test was used to assess functional mobility. the subject was asked to stand 30 cm from the bottom of a 14-step flight of stairs (19.5-cm step height). The test score was the time in seconds from the "go" cue until the second foot returned to the bottom land
Measured: Week 8 (Post-Intervention)
Timed One-Legged Stance Test
The Timed One-Legged Stance test was used to assess single-limb static balance and postural control. Timing began when the no stance foot left the floor and stopped if the participant removed the hands from the hips, looked down, touched the floor with the contralateral foot, or otherwise lost the test position. Performance was recorded in seconds, with longer times indicating better balance ability.
Measured: Baseline (Pre-Intervention)
Timed One-Legged Stance Test
The Timed One-Legged Stance test was used to assess single-limb static balance and postural control. Timing began when the no stance foot left the floor and stopped if the participant removed the hands from the hips, looked down, touched the floor with the contralateral foot, or otherwise lost the test position. Performance was recorded in seconds, with longer times indicating better balance ability.
Measured: Week 8 (Post-Intervention)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Oct 2026
- Study start6 Apr 2026
- Primary completion15 Oct 2026
- Study completion17 Oct 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Burn InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial included 54 children with bilateral lower-limb burns. Participants were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either an experimental group receiving progressive hop-stabilization training combined with standard physical rehabilitation or a control group receiving standard rehabilitation alone. Both groups underwent supervised treatment three times weekly for eight consecutive weeks. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and immediately after the intervention by an assessor blinded to group allocation.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Qassim University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Cairo University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Maged Basha, Qassim University
- Investigators
- Maged A. Basha, PhD, Study chair, Maged A. Basha
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07896135
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RHPT/026/023
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 19 Oct 2026
- Last updated
- 26 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Patel KF, Rodriguez-Mercedes SL, Grant GG, Rencken CA, Kinney EM, Austen A, Hou C, Brady KJS, Schneider JC, Kazis LE, Ryan CM. Physical, Psychological, and Social Outcomes in Pediatric Burn Survivors Ages 5 to 18 Years: A Systematic Review. J Burn Care Res. 2022 Mar 23;43(2):343-352. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irab225.
PubMed 34922361Jeschke MG, Herndon DN. Burns in children: standard and new treatments. Lancet. 2014 Mar 29;383(9923):1168-78. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61093-4. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
PubMed 24034453Koljonen V, Laitila M, Rissanen AM, Sintonen H, Roine RP. Treatment of patients with severe burns-costs and health-related quality of life outcome. J Burn Care Res. 2013 Nov-Dec;34(6):e318-25. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182779c90.
PubMed 23702860Santos E, Chacon KL, Shepler LJ, McMullen KA, Slavin MD, van de Rijn M, Kowalske KJ, Ryan CM, Schneider JC. Balance Impairment in the Burn Population: A Burn Model System National Database Study. Eur Burn J. 2024;5(3):238-248. doi: 10.3390/ebj5030023.
PubMed 39309318Basha MA, Elnaggar RK, Aloraini SM, Alsultan F, Alharbi A, Alqahtani A, El-Keblawy MM, Azab AR, Kamel FH. Trajectories of physical fitness following paediatric burn injury: A two-year longitudinal and predictive analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2026 Jun 16:2692155261459618. doi: 10.1177/02692155261459618. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42299688
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Targeted Postural and Functional Rehabilitation Via Adjunctive Hop-Stabilization Training in Pediatric Lower-Limb Burns: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07896135
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RHPT/026/023
- Conditions
- Burn Injury, Postural Balance Disorders, Gait Impairment
- Keywords
- Burns, Children, Hop-stabilization training, Balance, Gait, Lower-limb function, Rehabilitation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Qassim UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Cairo University
- Study start
- 6 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Oct 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 17 Oct 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Oct 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Children with severe burns affecting both lower limbs may experience persistent difficulties with balance, walking, and physical function. This randomized controlled trial investigated whether adding progressive hop-stabilization training to standard physical rehabilitation improves postural control, dynamic balance, gait, and lower-limb function.
Fifty-four children aged 10-17 years with healed bilateral lower-limb burns were randomly assigned to two groups. Both groups received standard rehabilitation three times weekly for eight weeks, while the experimental group additionally performed supervised hop-stabilization exercises. Postural stability, dynamic balance, walking ability, and lower-limb functional performance were assessed before and immediately after treatment.
Detailed description
Children with lower-limb burns may experience persistent limitations in balance, gait, and lower-limb function. Hop-stabilization training provides repeated multidirectional loading, controlled landing, and rapid postural adjustment and may therefore represent a task-specific rehabilitation strategy; however, its effects in pediatric burn rehabilitation remain unclear. This two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial will include 54 children aged 10-17 years with healed bilateral lower-limb burns and total body surface area involvement >30%. Participants will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either a hop-stabilization group receiving progressive hop-stabilization training in addition to traditional physical therapy or a control group receiving traditional physical therapy alone. Both groups will receive treatment three times weekly for 8 weeks. The experimental program will include progressive multidirectional hopping and landing-stabilization exercises. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline and after treatment by a blinded examiner.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial included 54 children with bilateral lower-limb burns. Participants were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either an experimental group receiving progressive hop-stabilization training combined with standard physical rehabilitation or a control group receiving standard rehabilitation alone. Both groups underwent supervised treatment three times weekly for eight consecutive weeks. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and immediately after the intervention by an assessor blinded to group allocation.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Hop-Stabilization Training (HS-TR) | Experimental | Other: Progressive Hop-Stabilization Training, Other: Traditional physical therapyParticipants received an eight-week progressive hop-stabilization training program in addition to standard physical rehabilitation. Training was supervised by a physiotherapist and conducted three times weekly. |
| Standard Physical Rehabilitation | Active comparator | Other: Traditional physical therapyParticipants underwent supervised standard physical rehabilitation three times weekly for eight weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 10 to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Children aged 10-17 years.
- Healed deep partial-thickness, full-thickness, or mixed-depth burns involving both lower limbs.
- Total body surface area (TBSA) affected by burns greater than 30%.
- At least six months elapsed since hospital discharge.
- Medically stable and capable of participating in structured exercise rehabilitation.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Pre-existing neurological or musculoskeletal disorders that could affect balance, gait, or lower-limb performance.
- Metabolic diseases or peripheral neuropathy that could interfere with functional assessments.
- Visual or vestibular impairments affecting postural stability.
- Severe lower-limb contractures or restricted joint mobility that could compromise safe hopping or functional testing.
- Cognitive or behavioral difficulties that substantially limit understanding of instructions or adherence to study procedures.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Progressive Hop-Stabilization TrainingIn addition to traditional physical therapy, participants in the experimental group received a progressive hop-stabilization training program three times per week for eight consecutive weeks. The program included side-to-side hopping, forward-and-backward hopping, forward hop-and-stabilization, figure-8 hopping, zigzag hopping, and 4-square hopping. All exercises were performed under the direct supervision of a physiotherapist. Difficulty throughout the program was progressively, verbal feedback was provided throughout the hop-stabilization program to promote appropriate landing biomechanics. | Other | Hop-Stabilization Training (HS-TR) |
| Traditional physical therapyParticipants in both groups received a supervised traditional rehabilitative exercise program three times per week for eight consecutive weeks. The program was individualized according to each child's functional status, burn characteristics, and exercise tolerance. Each 50-60-minute session included warm-up, aerobic conditioning, progressive strengthening, functional training, scar management as indicated, and cool-down. | Other | Hop-Stabilization Training (HS-TR), Standard Physical Rehabilitation |
Primary outcome
Postural Stability
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-Intervention)
Postural stability and dynamic Limits of Stability (LOS) were assessed using the ProKin System. Across three maximum-effort trials with 60-second rest intervals, the software calculated: Mediolateral Excursion Limit (%), Anteroposterior Excursion Limit (%), Overall Excursion Area (mm2), Directional Control Index, and Trunk Displacement Angle (o), with the mean of three successful trials retained for statistical analysis.
Postural Stability
Time frame: Week 8 (Post-Intervention)
Postural stability and dynamic Limits of Stability (LOS) were assessed using the ProKin System. Across three maximum-effort trials with 60-second rest intervals, the software calculated: Mediolateral Excursion Limit (%), Anteroposterior Excursion Limit (%), Overall Excursion Area (mm2), Directional Control Index, and Trunk Displacement Angle (o), with the mean of three successful trials retained for statistical analysis.
Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test (YBT-LQ)
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-Intervention)
Dynamic balance was assessed using the Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test (YBT-LQ). Participants stood on one leg on the central platform and reached as far as possible with the contralateral leg in the anterior (AT), posteromedial (PM), and posterolateral (PL) directions while maintaining balance. The composite score for was calculated as: composite score (%) = [AT + PM + PL maximal reach distances (cm)] / [3 × lower-limb length (cm)] × 100.
Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test (YBT-LQ)
Time frame: Week 8 (Post-Intervention)
Dynamic balance was assessed using the Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test (YBT-LQ). Participants stood on one leg on the central platform and reached as far as possible with the contralateral leg in the anterior (AT), posteromedial (PM), and posterolateral (PL) directions while maintaining balance. The composite score for was calculated as: composite score (%) = [AT + PM + PL maximal reach distances (cm)] / [3 × lower-limb length (cm)] × 100.
8 secondary outcomes
Functional Gait Assessment Modified for Children
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-Intervention)
Functional Gait Assessment Modified for Children
Time frame: Week 8 (Post-Intervention)
Single Hop for Distance Test
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-Intervention)
Single Hop for Distance Test
Time frame: Week 8 (Post-Intervention)
Timed Up and Down Stairs Test
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-Intervention)
Timed Up and Down Stairs Test
Time frame: Week 8 (Post-Intervention)
Timed One-Legged Stance Test
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-Intervention)
Timed One-Legged Stance Test
Time frame: Week 8 (Post-Intervention)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Oct 2026.
- Background: PubMed 34922361Patel KF, Rodriguez-Mercedes SL, Grant GG, Rencken CA, Kinney EM, Austen A, Hou C, Brady KJS, Schneider JC, Kazis LE, Ryan CM. Physical, Psychological, and Social Outcomes in Pediatric Burn Survivors Ages 5 to 18 Years: A Systematic Review. J Burn Care Res. 2022 Mar 23;43(2):343-352. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irab225.
- Background: PubMed 24034453Jeschke MG, Herndon DN. Burns in children: standard and new treatments. Lancet. 2014 Mar 29;383(9923):1168-78. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61093-4. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
- Background: PubMed 23702860Koljonen V, Laitila M, Rissanen AM, Sintonen H, Roine RP. Treatment of patients with severe burns-costs and health-related quality of life outcome. J Burn Care Res. 2013 Nov-Dec;34(6):e318-25. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182779c90.
- Results publication: PubMed 39309318Santos E, Chacon KL, Shepler LJ, McMullen KA, Slavin MD, van de Rijn M, Kowalske KJ, Ryan CM, Schneider JC. Balance Impairment in the Burn Population: A Burn Model System National Database Study. Eur Burn J. 2024;5(3):238-248. doi: 10.3390/ebj5030023.
- Results publication: PubMed 42299688Basha MA, Elnaggar RK, Aloraini SM, Alsultan F, Alharbi A, Alqahtani A, El-Keblawy MM, Azab AR, Kamel FH. Trajectories of physical fitness following paediatric burn injury: A two-year longitudinal and predictive analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2026 Jun 16:2692155261459618. doi: 10.1177/02692155261459618. Online ahead of print.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Burn Injury
RecruitingObservational study
Early Detection and Kinetics of Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy in Severe Burn Patients
Sepsis, Sepsis-induced Coagulopathy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Hypertrophic Scar Prosthetic Pressure in Burn Amputee
Amputation Stump, Burn Injury
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Short-Video Distraction During Burn Dressing on Anxiety, Pain, and Fear in Children
Burn Injury, Procedural Anxiety
RecruitingObservational study
Early Detection and Kinetics of Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy in Severe Burn Patients
Peer Bullying Intervention, Vodcast
RecruitingPhase 2
Dupixent in Adults With Refractory Post-Burn Pruritus in an Ambulatory Clinic
Pruritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Maged A. Basha, PhD study chair
Maged A. Basha
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Progressive Hop-Stabilization Training and Traditional physical therapy in people with Burn Injury and Postural Balance Disorders, run by Qassim University at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Postural Stability (time frame: Baseline (Pre-Intervention)). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07896135, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Oct 2026.