Radical ProstatectomyEVERiSTNCT07597798
EVERiST: Impact of Image Detected Accessory Pudendal Artery on Erection Recovery After Nerve Sparing Prostatectomy
An observational study of Radical Prostatectomy and Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy, run by University College, London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer amongst men in the United Kingdom, and two common curative treatments are surgery to remove the prostate (radical prostatectomy) or radiotherapy. Both treatments can affect quality of life, mainly because of problems with erections and urinary leakage. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 79 years, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Radical Prostatectomy, Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy, Erectile Dysfunction Due to Arterial Insufficiency
- What is being tested?
- Robotic Radical Prostatectomy and Penile doppler ultrasound
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 15 Jan 2026to 15 Jan 2028
- Phase
- Observational
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 79 years
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with localised prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy with bilateral nerve sparing.
Who may be able to join
- Men diagnosed with cT2-T3a N0 M0 PCa aged between 18 and 79 from all ethnic backgrounds.
- Patients who underwent a prostate mpMRI before prostate biopsy.
- Medically fit to undergo RARP.
- Diagnostic quality prostate biopsies concordant with a diagnostic quality prostate mpMRI adequate to provide a surgical plan.
- Scheduled for RARP with a recommendation of NVB spare based on multidisciplinary meetings informed by mpMRI, biopsy result and clinical factors.
- Sexually active men with no to mild ED at baseline based on IIEF-EFD (>=24) questionnaire.
- Preference to preserve erectile function for sexual intercourse.
- Ability to read English sufficiently to understand PIS and able to give informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Established moderate/ severe ED (IIEF-EFD <24)
- Patients who received neo-adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy.
- Patients with previous surgery for benign prostatic enlargement
- Patients who received previous treatment for prostate cancer: External beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, focal therapy, chemotherapy.
- Previous pelvic or penile fracture
- Previous surgery for ED
- Poor quality prostate mpMRI or biparametric MRI (no contrast)
- Established vascular disease (ischaemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United Kingdom1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University College London Hospitals NHS foundation trust
London, W1G 8PH
Zafer Tandogdu, PhD, MD, FRCS, 447711957097, z.tandogdu@ucl.ac.uk
Abdullah Almitwalli, MD, MRCS, Mphil, 447711957097, abdullah.al-mitwalli.23@ucl.ac.uk
About this study
Official title: EVERiST: Erectile Function Recovery After Bilateral neuroVascular Bundle Sparing Robot Assisted Radical prostatEctomy in Patients With or Without an Accessory Pudendal aRtery Detected on diagnoSTic Multiparametric MRI: A Feasibility Study
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer amongst men in the United Kingdom, and two common curative treatments are surgery to remove the prostate (radical prostatectomy) or radiotherapy. Both treatments can affect quality of life, mainly because of problems with erections and urinary leakage. Many men feel disappointed or regret their treatment choice because of changes in their sexual function. Surgeons often use a 'nerve-sparing' technique to reduce the risk of erectile dysfunction (ED), but many men still experience erection problems afterwards. A way to improve erectile function recovery after surgery further would be to identify accessory (additional) arteries to the penis. Up to one in three men have an extra artery called the accessory pudendal artery (APA). Preserving this artery during surgery may improve recovery of erections by protecting blood flow and reducing the risk or severity of ED. Until recently, surgeons could only try to see these arteries during the operation, and no study has tested whether they are preserved or whether this makes a difference. This has changed with the advent of imaging. Men already have an advanced MRI scan (called a multiparametric MRI) before prostate cancer treatment. These scans can also show whether an APA is present. In addition, robotic surgery, now the gold standard for radical prostatectomy, allows operations to be video recorded. This allows comparison of what was seen on the scan with what happened during surgery and then monitoring of recovery afterwards. Early research suggests that men with an APA have better erections before surgery. This study will test whether preserving the APA during surgery helps erections recover afterwards.
In this first phase of the research (Phase 1), a feasibility study will be carried out at University College London Hospital. The study will invite 20-40 men with good sexual function before surgery, who are having robotic prostatectomy with a nerve-sparing approach. Multiparametric MRI scans will be used to identify whether an APA is present and video recordings will be collected to see if the artery was preserved. Participants will complete simple questionnaires on erections and quality of life before and after surgery up to 1 year. To assess whether the artery was preserved, an extra MRI scan will be organised after surgery for those with an APA, as well as penile ultrasound to assess erectile machinery. Ethical approval has already been obtained from the regulatory bodies, and the study is ready to start recruiting participants.
The results will allow planning of a larger, national study (Phase 2). That study will test whether preserving the APA improves erectile recovery, reduces the severity of ED, and improves quality of life. If confirmed, this research could lead to modification in surgical approach, more personalised counselling before surgery, and reduced long-term need for costly ED treatments within the NHS.
Read the detailed description
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men in the UK and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths, with over 55,000 new cases diagnosed each year. It is a major health concern, but when caught early, localized prostate cancer can often be treated successfully. Treatments such as surgery (radical prostatectomy) or radiotherapy aim to cure the disease. Over the years, imaging techniques have advanced significantly. A specialized scan called multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) is now routinely used to diagnose prostate cancer and to guide biopsies, allowing doctors to precisely target areas of concern.
Despite these advances, prostate cancer surgery, even with modern robotic-assisted techniques, can have long-lasting side effects. These include erectile dysfunction (ED) and urinary incontinence, both of which can have a significant impact on a patient's quality of life. In fact, poor sexual function is one of the most commonly reported problems after surgery, affecting many patients' mental and emotional wellbeing. Every year, around 8,000 men undergo radical prostatectomy in England through the NHS, and the majority experience some degree of these side effects.
Surgical techniques such as neurovascular bundle (NVB) sparing are designed to protect the nerves and blood vessels around the prostate that are critical for erectile function. However, recovery of erectile function after NVB-sparing surgery is unpredictable, and many patients do not regain their full sexual function. The reasons for this are not fully understood. Some experts believe that erectile dysfunction may be due to damage to blood vessels, while others suggest nerve damage is the primary cause. It's likely that both factors play a role.
One overlooked issue might be variations in pelvic anatomy. In up to 38% of men, the blood vessels that supply the penis-such as the accessory pudendal arteries (APAs)-can be in different locations than expected. These variations are often not considered during conventional nerve-sparing procedures, which focus on preserving structures behind the prostate. If these additional arteries are damaged or removed during surgery, it could contribute to erectile dysfunction.
Fortunately, new tools offer the potential to address this. High-resolution mpMRI scans, which are already part of the standard diagnostic process for prostate cancer, can map the location of these blood vessels before surgery. Additionally, robotic-assisted surgery allows surgeons to record the entire operation in detail. By analyzing these recordings alongside the pre-surgery MRI scans and post-surgery outcomes, researchers can better understand how preserving these arteries affects recovery of erectile function.
This is feasibility study aims to explore whether identifying and preserving accessory pudendal arteries during surgery can improve erectile function outcomes for prostate cancer patients. The goal is to assess whether it's feasible to incorporate these imaging and surgical techniques into regular practice. If successful, this research could guide surgeons in refining their methods, help patients make better-informed decisions, and ultimately improve recovery outcomes for men undergoing prostate cancer surgery.
This is a prospective, single-centre, non-interventional feasibility study evaluating functional and imaging outcomes in patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing bilateral neurovascular bundle (NVB)-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) at University College London Hospitals.
The study will recruit 20-40 sexually active men, aged 18 years or older, with good baseline erectile function (IIEF-EF ≥24). All procedures will be performed by one of four designated surgeons (Mr Zafer Tandogdu, Mr Ben Lamb, Mr Ashwin Sridhar, Prof Greg Shaw) to minimise surgical variability.
Data collection: Demographics, medical history, and preoperative multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) parameters will be recorded. Functional outcomes will be assessed using validated Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) at baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months post-surgery. Standard UCLH andrology follow-up will continue, with optional telephone consultations instead of clinic visits.
Additional assessments:
- 3-month follow-up mpMRI will be performed only in participants with an accessory pudendal artery (APA) identified on their baseline mpMRI, to assess vessel patency.
- Penile Doppler ultrasound (optional) will be offered to participants considering intracavernosal injections for erectile dysfunction, both before and after surgery.
Surgical quality assessment: Intraoperative videos (routine recordings made for training) will capture only the operative field, excluding identifiable patient features. These anonymised recordings will be securely stored and reviewed by high-volume surgeons for assessment of surgical technique. Theatre staff consent procedures have been implemented to address GDPR and confidentiality.
Participation is entirely voluntary. The aim is to assess the feasibility of recruitment, data collection, and follow-up procedures to inform a larger future study.
The aim of this project is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a full-scale observational study that investigates whether imaging-detected accessory pudendal arteries (APAs) influence erectile function outcomes following nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
In other words, the main goal of this feasibility study is to test whether it is possible and practical to run a larger future study. The investigators will explore whether men can be successfully recruited and followed up, and whether imaging and surgical data can be collected and analysed in a reliable way. This will lay the groundwork for a definitive study on whether preserving APAs affects erectile recovery after prostate surgery.
- Conditions
- Radical Prostatectomy, Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy, Erectile Dysfunction Due to Arterial Insufficiency, Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
- Being tested
- Robotic Radical Prostatectomy, Penile doppler ultrasound
- Keywords
- ED post RARP, Prostate Cancer Survivorship, Erectile dysfunction, Radical prostatectomy, Accessory pudendal artery, APA
- Medical subject headings
- Erectile Dysfunction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Robotic Radical ProstatectomyProcedure or surgery
Bilateral nerve spare radical prostatectomy
Penile doppler ultrasoundDiagnostic test
Stimulated PDUS to assess erectile machinery after ertogenic intracavernosal injection before and after robotic radical prostatectomy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients undergoing radical prostatectomy | Patients with good baseline erectile function undergoing bilateral nerve spare radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer. Receives: Procedure: Robotic Radical Prostatectomy; Diagnostic Test: Penile doppler ultrasound |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants Enrolled During the Recruitment Period
Number of eligible participants who provide informed consent and are enrolled in the study during the 12-month recruitment period.
Measured: 12 months
Percentage of Participants Completing Follow-up Through 12 Months
Percentage of enrolled participants who complete all scheduled post-operative follow-up assessments up to 12 months after surgery.
Measured: 12 months
Percentage of Participants With Accessory Pudendal Artery Identified on Pre-operative mpMRI
Percentage of participants in whom an accessory pudendal artery (APA) is identified and mapped on pre-operative multiparametric MRI imaging.
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Percentage of Participants With Complete Intraoperative Video Recording Available for APA Assessment
Percentage of participants with intraoperative surgical video recordings of sufficient quality to allow evaluation of accessory pudendal artery preservation.
Measured: 12 months
Percentage of Cases With Determinable APA Preservation Status on Video Review
Percentage of recorded surgeries in which accessory pudendal artery preservation status (preserved vs not preserved) can be determined by intraoperative video analysis.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 May 2026
- Study start15 Jan 2026
- Primary completion15 Jul 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Jan 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Radical ProstatectomyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University College, LondonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University College, London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07597798
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EDGE number: 177704
- Other IDs
- NHS Health Research Authority
- Acronym
- EVERiST
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 25 Dec 2025
- Last updated
- 19 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Henry BM, Pekala PA, Vikse J, Sanna B, Skinningsrud B, Saganiak K, Walocha JA, Tomaszewski KA. Variations in the Arterial Blood Supply to the Penis and the Accessory Pudendal Artery: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Implications in Radical Prostatectomy. J Urol. 2017 Aug;198(2):345-353. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.080. Epub 2017 Feb 12.
PubMed 28202357Mulhall JP, Secin FP, Guillonneau B. Artery sparing radical prostatectomy--myth or reality? J Urol. 2008 Mar;179(3):827-31. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.10.021. Epub 2008 Jan 25.
PubMed 18221962Al-Mitwalli A, Tarim K, Wani M, Dickinson L, Lee WG, Ralph D, Tandogdu Z. Prostatic and pelvic imaging parameters to predict post radical prostatectomy erectile function recovery: a systematic review. Int J Impot Res. 2026 Jan;38(1):1-10. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01047-0. Epub 2025 May 2.
PubMed 40316775