AzTrials
AzTrials

HypospadiasNCT07099560

Ultrasound Guided Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Ultrasound Guided Caudal Block in Pediatric Undergoing Hypospadias Surgery

A study testing Ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block (sESPB) and Ultrasound-guided caudal epidural block in people with Hypospadias and Caudal Block, run by Tanta University at 1 site in Egypt.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Randomized, parallel-group, assessor-blinded clinical trial at Tanta University Hospitals comparing ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block (sESPB) versus ultrasound-guided caudal epidural block for postoperative analgesia in male children (1-5 years) undergoing hypospadias repair. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 year to 5 years, men only
What is being tested?
Ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block (sESPB) and Ultrasound-guided caudal epidural block
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
70 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Apr 2025to Apr 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 year to 5 years
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Male children aged 1-5 years
  • ASA physical status I-II
  • Scheduled for elective hypospadias repair under general anesthesia
  • Parent or legal guardian provides written informed consent
  • Able to complete postoperative assessments through 24 hours after surgery Exclusion Criteria
  • Parent/guardian refusal of participation
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Coagulopathy or current anticoagulant therapy
  • Infection at the intended injection site (sacral/caudal region) or systemic infection
  • Allergy/hypersensitivity to amide local anesthetics (e.g., bupivacaine) or study medications
  • Neurologic or spinal disorders or congenital sacral anomalies affecting block safety
  • Significant hepatic, renal, or cardiac disease
  • Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, contraindicates caudal block or sacral ESPB or could interfere with safe participation

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Ghada MA Elfekey, MBBCH contact

+201271600557

ghadaelfekey0@gmail.com

Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Tanta University Hospital

    Tanta, El-Gharbia Govenorate, 31527

    Marwa A ELoraby, MD

    Gehan M Eid, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Preemptive Analgesic Effect of Ultrasound Guided Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Ultrasound Guided Caudal Block in Pediatric Undergoing Hypospadias Surgery

Randomized, parallel-group, assessor-blinded clinical trial at Tanta University Hospitals comparing ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block (sESPB) versus ultrasound-guided caudal epidural block for postoperative analgesia in male children (1-5 years) undergoing hypospadias repair. Seventy participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive sESPB or caudal block with 0.25% bupivacaine (0.5-1 mL/kg; maximum 20 mL) after induction of general anesthesia. The primary outcome is pain over the first 24 hours, assessed using the FLACC scale at prespecified time points. Secondary outcomes include total opioid consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting, parent/guardian satisfaction, hemodynamic trends, and predefined adverse effects (e.g., motor weakness, urinary retention, respiratory depression, hematoma, infection at injection site). Perioperative care is standardized; rescue pethidine is administered when FLACC ≥4. The trial evaluates whether sESPB provides superior or comparable analgesia with fewer adverse effects than caudal block.

Read the detailed description

Randomized, parallel-group, assessor-blinded clinical trial at Tanta University Hospitals comparing ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block (sESPB) versus ultrasound-guided caudal epidural block for postoperative analgesia in male children (1-5 years) undergoing hypospadias repair. Seventy participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive sESPB or caudal block with 0.25% bupivacaine (0.5-1 mL/kg; maximum 20 mL) after induction of general anesthesia. The primary outcome is pain over the first 24 hours, assessed using the FLACC scale at prespecified time points. Secondary outcomes include total opioid consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting, parent/guardian satisfaction, hemodynamic trends, and predefined adverse effects (e.g., motor weakness, urinary retention, respiratory depression, hematoma, infection at injection site). Perioperative care is standardized; rescue pethidine is administered when FLACC ≥4. The trial evaluates whether sESPB provides superior or comparable analgesia with fewer adverse effects than caudal block.

Being tested
Ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block (sESPB), Ultrasound-guided caudal epidural block
Keywords
hypospadias, nerve block, erector spinae plane block, caudal block, pain, ultra-sound
Medical subject headings
Hypospadias, Pain, Postoperative, Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block (sESPB)Procedure or surgery

    Also called sESPB, sacral ESP block

    After induction of general anesthesia, bilateral sESPB is performed under ultrasound guidance. Needle advanced to the sacral interfascial plane near the median sacral crest; after negative aspiration, bupivacaine 0.25% at 0.5-1 mL/kg (max total 20 mL) is injected. Standardized perioperative care; rescue pethidine 0.5 mg/kg if FLACC ≥4.

  • Ultrasound-guided caudal epidural blockProcedure or surgery

    Also called Caudal epidural block (CEB), Caudal epidural anesthesia, Caudal block

    After induction of general anesthesia, caudal epidural injection via sacral hiatus under ultrasound guidance; after negative aspiration, bupivacaine 0.25% at 0.5-1 mL/kg (max total 20 mL) is injected. Standardized perioperative care; rescue pethidine if FLACC ≥4.

Study groups in NCT07099560
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm A: Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block (sESPB)ExperimentalParticipants receive bilateral ultrasound-guided sacral ESPB after induction of general anesthesia. Using a high-frequency linear probe, the needle is advanced to the sacral fascial plane near the median sacral crest; after negative aspiration, bupivacaine 0.25% at 0.5-1 mL/kg (maximum total volume 20 mL) is injected. Standardized perioperative care; rescue analgesia (pethidine 0.5 mg/kg) if FLACC ≥4.
Receives: Procedure: Ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block (sESPB)
Arm B - Active Comparator: Caudal Epidural BlockExperimentalParticipants receive ultrasound-guided caudal epidural block after induction of general anesthesia. Needle introduced via the sacral hiatus under ultrasound; after negative aspiration, bupivacaine 0.25% at 0.5-1 mL/kg (maximum total volume 20 mL) is injected. Standardized perioperative care; rescue pethidine if FLACC ≥4.
Receives: Procedure: Ultrasound-guided caudal epidural block

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. FLACC pain score (0-10) during the first 24 hours after surgery

    The FLACC scale (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) is a validated behavioral pain measure. Each category is scored 0-2; the total score ranges 0-10 with higher scores indicating more pain. Scores will be recorded at rest by a blinded outcomes assessor at the prespecified time points. Rescue analgesia is IV pethidine 0.5 mg/kg when FLACC ≥4. The primary analysis compares groups across time (mixed-effects model) and/or as the time-weighted mean over 0-24 h.

    Measured: From immediately after surgery through 24 hours postoperatively: at the time of Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) arrival (0 hours), and at 30 minutes, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours after surgery.

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Total opioid consumption (pethidine), 0-24 h (mg/kg)

    Cumulative dose of IV pethidine given as rescue analgesia when FLACC ≥4, from PACU arrival through 24 h post-op. Sum all doses per participant; no other opioids planned. Group summaries will be reported.

    Measured: From the time of arrival to the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (0 hours) through 24 hours after surgery.

  2. Time to first rescue analgesia requirement postoperatively

    If FLACC pain score ≥ 4 I.V pethidine 0.5 mg/kg will be given as rescue analgesia.

    Measured: From the time of arrival to the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (0 hours) until the first rescue dose, within 24 hours after surgery

  3. Parent's satisfaction

    Parent's Satisfaction Level were recorded on a numerical scale from 1 to 3 (not satisfied - neutral - satisfied).

    Measured: 24 hours postoperatively

  4. Incidence of postoperative adverse events

    Postoperative adverse events as nausea and vomiting, motor weakness, urinary retention, drowsiness, respiratory depression, hematoma or infection at the site of injection will be recorded.

    Measured: 24 hours postoperatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Aug 2025
  2. Study start1 Apr 2025
  3. Primary completionApr 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionApr 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Two-arm, parallel assignment. Participants are randomized 1:1 after induction of anesthesia to receive either ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block or ultrasound-guided caudal epidural block. Each participant receives one procedure only (no crossover), and both groups are followed concurrently for 24 hours with standardized perioperative care. Randomization uses a computer-generated sequence with allocation concealment via sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. Blocks are performed by an anesthesiologist not involved in postoperative assessments; outcome assessors are blinded to group assignment. Single-center study at Tanta University Hospitals.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
70 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07099560
Sponsor's protocol ID
36264MS869/3/25
Status last verified
Jul 2025
First submitted
25 Jul 2025
Last updated
9 Sep 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author after the end of study for one year.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block (sESPB) and Ultrasound-guided caudal epidural block in people with Hypospadias and Caudal Block, run by Tanta University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Ghada MA Elfekey, MBBCH (+201271600557, ghadaelfekey0@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

FLACC pain score (0-10) during the first 24 hours after surgery (time frame: From immediately after surgery through 24 hours postoperatively: at the time of Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) arrival (0 hours), and at 30 minutes, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours after surgery.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Sep 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in