AzTrials
AzTrials

PreTerm NeonateCERAINENCT06808997

Prospective Multicentre Mixed Methods Study to Explore Extubation Practices and Respiratory Outcomes in Extremely Preterm Neonates.

An observational study of PreTerm Neonate and Extubation Readiness, run by Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Creteil at 31 sites in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this observational study is to learn about neonatologists' perceptions of extubation readiness and extubation and reintubation practices in extremely preterm infants in the first 2 weeks of life using prospective qualitative and quantitative data. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 minute to 5 months
How many people
166 participants
Where
31 sitesFrance
Study dates
17 Feb 2025to 14 May 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 minute to 5 months
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Study population: Participation in the study is proposed to type 3 neonatal intensive care units in France. Extremely premature newborns born before 28 weeks gestation in the participating units will be included.

Who may be able to join

  • Gestational age < 28 weeks of gestation
  • Age at admission to the participating unit <24 hours

Who cannot join

  • Parental opposition to their infant's clinical data collection
  • Participation in a research protocol with potential impact on extubation and/or duration of mechanical ventilation

Trial locations and contacts

31 sites in 1 country.

31 sites in 1 country

France31 sites
  • CHU Amiens Sud

    Amiens, 80054

  • CH Cote Basque

    Bayonne, 64109

  • CHU De Besancon

    Besançon, 25030

  • Dr Jean-michel Roue

    Brest, 26609

  • Hopital Femme Mére Enfant - HFME

    Bron, 69677

  • Centre Hospitalier Public du Cotentin

    Cherbourg-Octeville, 50102

  • CH Estaing

    Clermont-Ferrand, 63 003

  • Chu Louis Mourier

    Colombes, 92700

  • CHIC

    Créteil, 94000

  • CHU Grenoble Alpes _site nord

    Grenoble, 38700

  • CHU Félix Guyon

    La Réunion, 97405

  • CHU Kremlin-Bicêtre

    Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94270

  • CH Le Mans

    Le Mans, 72037

  • CHU Lille

    Lille, 75019

  • HME Limoges

    Limoges, 87042

  • APHM_ Hôpital Nord

    Marseille, 13915

  • GHEF- Site de MEAUX

    Meaux, 77104

  • Chi Andre Gregoire

    Montreuil, 93105

  • GHRMSA-Hopital Emile Muller

    Mulhouse, 68100

  • CHU NICE

    Nice, 06202

  • Chu Nimes

    Nîmes, 30000

  • CH Orléans

    Orléans, 45067

  • CHU Robert Debre

    Paris, 75019

  • Chu Port Royal

    Paris, 75679

  • CHU Necker

    Paris, 75743

  • CHI Poissy - St Germain en LayE

    Poissy, 78303

  • CHU Reims

    Reims, 51100

  • CHU Rennes

    Rennes, 35203

  • CH General Delafontaine

    Saint-Denis, 93205

  • CH GHPSO

    Senlis, 60300

  • CH Troyes

    Troyes, 10000

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Criteria and Reasons for Extubation and Non-extubation in Preterm Infants: A Mixed Methods Study Prospectively Exploring Extubation and Reintubation Practices in Extremely Preterm Infants, and Associated Respiratory Outcomes.

The purpose of this observational study is to learn about neonatologists' perceptions of extubation readiness and extubation and reintubation practices in extremely preterm infants in the first 2 weeks of life using prospective qualitative and quantitative data. Actual extubation readiness is defined as successful extubation, defined as no reintubation in the 7 days following extubation.

Key research questions are: How do clinicians assess extubation readiness in this population? Does this assessment correlate with actual extubation success? What factors (reasons, clinical status, ventilatory parameters) are associated with extubation readiness? Patients born before 28 weeks gestational age and admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) within the first 24 hours are be included. The attending physician will complete a prospectively administered questionnaire with open-ended and multiple-choice questions to daily assess the decision and rationale for extubation or non-extubation of patients mechanically ventilated during the first 15 days of life.

Patient characteristics, respiratory outcomes, and mortality will be recorded until the end of hospitalisation and/or definitive weaning from any ventilatory support or supplemental oxygen.

Read the detailed description

With prolonged stays in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and significant respiratory morbidity, respiratory management of the most premature newborns - born before 28 weeks gestational age (GA) - brings a number of challenges. Despite recommendations to give priority to non-invasive ventilation in cases of respiratory insufficiency, recent studies show that over 80% of these newborns receive mechanical ventilation (MV) at least once in their NICU course, most within the first week of life (100% if born at 23 SA, >90% at 24 and 25 SA, >80% at 26 and >70% at 27 weeks GA). Several studies have shown that a longer cumulative duration of MV is associated with a worse respiratory and neurodevelopmental prognosis in this population.

Early extubation is therefore recommended. However, extubation failures in patients born at these early stages of life are common and are per se associated with respiratory morbidity. Extubation failure is defined in the literature as reintubation within days of extubation.

A delay of 7 days after extubation has been identified as the time frame for capturing extubations related to respiratory causes. In a French study, using the SEPREVEN cohort for patients born before 27 weeks' GA, extubation failure at 3, 7 and 15 days concerned 25%, 33% and 50% of patients respectively. The decision to extubate a premature patient is a complex one, but contributes in part to the patient's outcome.

Shalish referred to the concept of "extubation readiness dilemma" to indicate the uncertainty surrounding the clinical features associated with successful extubation. Identifying a state for each patient that allows successful extubation, without reintubation in the following days, is most often based on ward routines in which assessments of the infant's respiratory capacity are taken into account. Medical literature doesn't provide recommendations on extubation criteria, and practices differ from one unit to another.

The aim of this study is to provide a detailed description of extubation practices and failures in several NICUs in France, based on a prospective collection of qualitative and mixed data.

Keywords
extremely preterm infants, extubation, mechanical ventilation, bronchopulmonary dysplasia
Medical subject headings
Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT06808997
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Extremely Low Gestational Age Newborns (elgans)No intervention. unique group.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Reasons for non-extubation in case of MV in patients born before 28 wks GA in the first 15 days of life,

    For each included patient who is intubated and mechanically ventilated during a period within his first 15 days of life, the reasons for non-extubation. These are the reasons reported by the physician by answering a qualitative questionnaire with an open-ended question, and preexistent possible multiple choices.

    Measured: On a 12 hours basis from Day 0 to Day 2 of life, and on a dialy basis from Day 2 to Day 15 of life (according to the period the patient is on Mechanical Ventilation)

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Reported perceived extubation readiness in Extremely Low Gestational Age Neonates (ELGANs) born before 28weeks gestation and mechanically ventilated in a period within the first 15 days of life.

    Reported perceived extubation readiness in ELGANs born before 28weeks gestation and mechanically ventilated in a period within the first 15 days of life, defined as Reasons for extubation and ventilatory and clinical data,

    Measured: These data will be collected in case of Mechanical Ventilation every 48 hours between the Birthday and Day 2 of life and then every morning between Day 2 and Day 15 of life

  2. Occurrence of Extubation failure in ELGANs on Mechanical ventilation within the first 15 days of life.

    Occurrence of Extubation failure defined as reintubation in the 7 days after an extubation.

    Measured: These data will be collected in case of Mechanical Ventilation every 48 hours between the Birthday and Day 2 of life and then every morning between Day 2 and Day 15 of life

  3. Corrected gestational age on definitive discontinuation of MV, of Positive Pressure Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV), of High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) ventilation) and Low Flow Nasal Cannula Ventilation (LFNNC)

    Corrected gestational age on definitive discontinuation of MV, of Positive Pressure Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV), of High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) ventilation) and Low Flow Nasal Cannula Ventilation (LFNNC)

    Measured: From the day of birth to 4 months of age.

  4. Cumulative duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) during the NICU stay.

    Sum of the days of mechanical ventilation during the NICU stay, collected prospectively.

    Measured: These data will be collected from the day of birth to the day of discharge from the NICU, up to maximum 4 months of age..

  5. The cumulative duration of any respiratory support

    The cumulative duration of positive pressure Non-Invasive Ventilation (PPNIV) and High Flow Nasal Ventilation (HFNV), Low Flow Nasal Ventilation (LFNV) during the entire hospital stay

    Measured: From the day of birth to the day of discharge from the hospital, up to maximum 4 months of age.

  6. Duration of Mechanical Ventilation and Positive Pressure Non-Invasive Ventilation

    Sum of the days of Mechanical Ventilation or positive pressure non invasive ventilation during the entire hospital stay

    Measured: From the day of birth to the day of discharge from the hospital, up to 4 months of age

  7. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 36 weeks corrected Gestational Age

    Bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 36 weeks corrected Gestational age defined as need for any type of ventilation (invasive or non-invasive) or low flow oxygen therapy at 36 weeks gestational age.

    Measured: At 36 weeks corrected gestational age

  8. Mortality

    Mortality before discharge from the hospital

    Measured: From the day of birth to the day of discharge from the hospital, maximum 5 months of age

  9. Length of stay in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU)

    Length of stay in the NICU

    Measured: From the day of birth to the day of discharge from the NICU, maximum 4 months of life

  10. Factors involved in the perception of "too altered respiratory condition to be extubated"

    Description of the reasons related to the respiratory system, clinical respiratory conditions (e;g. apneas ....) and ventilatory settings (pressure, oxygen, ...) reported by the physician associated with a reported "too altered respiratory condition to be extubated" condition.

    Measured: From the day of birth to day 15 of life during the period on Mechanical Ventilation

  11. Clinician-reported Prognosis of extubation succes

    Physician-reported prognosis of extubation based on a 4 points scale (from 1 "unconfident" to 4 "very confident")

    Measured: From day of birth to day 15 of life during the period on Mechanical Ventilation

  12. Description of complications of intubation

    Description of a multiple choice of complications after each intubation :

    No complication, oropharyngeal lesion, cardiorespiratory arrest, severe intraventricular haemorraghe, contribution to patient's death.

    Measured: from the day birth to the day discharge from the NICU, up to maximum 4 months of life

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Feb 2025
  2. Study start17 Feb 2025
  3. Primary completion5 Jan 2026
  4. Study completion14 May 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
166 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06808997
Sponsor's protocol ID
CERAINE
Acronym
CERAINE
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
13 Jan 2025
Last updated
14 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Shalish W, Keszler M, Davis PG, Sant'Anna GM. Decision to extubate extremely preterm infants: art, science or gamble? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2022 Jan;107(1):105-112. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-321282. Epub 2021 Feb 24.

    PubMed 33627331

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of PreTerm Neonate and Extubation Readiness, run by Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Creteil at 31 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 31 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Reasons for non-extubation in case of MV in patients born before 28 wks GA in the first 15 days of life, (time frame: On a 12 hours basis from Day 0 to Day 2 of life, and on a dialy basis from Day 2 to Day 15 of life (according to the period the patient is on Mechanical Ventilation)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06808997, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Sep 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in