AzTrials
AzTrials

Clinical High RiskNCT06774430

Digital Strategies to Advance Help-Seeking Aim 1 and 2

An observational study of Clinical High Risk and Early Psychosis, run by Columbia University at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This proposal aims to establish a Digital Laboratory focused on advancing help-seeking and expediting treatment initiation in youth ages 12-29 who are at Clinical High-Risk (CHR) for developing psychosis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 to 29 years
How many people
25,000 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
7 Apr 2025to 31 May 2028
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 to 29 years
  • All sexes
  • Child, Adult

Study population: Based on current MHA user demographic data, the investigators expect a high percentage of youth from low-income families (over 50% report household income below $40,000/year) who have never been in psychiatric care (65% of those who screen positive report having no mental health diagnosis). MHA visitors who complete the PQ-B are a diverse and representative sample of US youth in terms of racial, ethnic, sexual orientation, and gender identity.

Who may be able to join

  • Ages 12-29 years
  • Living within a 50-mile radius of a US based AMP-SCZ site
  • Able to complete the English language PQ-B on MHA's screening platform

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Michael Birnbaum, MD contact

212-523-2154

mlb2216@cumc.columbia.edu

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center

    New York, New York, 10032

    Michael Birnbaum, MD, 212-523-2154, mlb2216@cumc.columbia.edu

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Digital Strategies to Advance Help-Seeking in Youth at Clinical High Risk for Developing Psychosis

This proposal aims to establish a Digital Laboratory focused on advancing help-seeking and expediting treatment initiation in youth ages 12-29 who are at Clinical High-Risk (CHR) for developing psychosis. Leveraging the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) model, this study will identify help-seeking subtypes in 25,000 youth who screen positive for psychosis-risk on Mental Health America's national online screening platform, iteratively develop and test theory and data-driven, personalized strategies to advance help-seeking using Micro-Randomized Trials and a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial, identify the most accurate CHR screening threshold in an online environment, and link youth, when indicated, to local clinical care via Accelerating Medicines Partnership - Schizophrenia (AMP-SCZ), a NIH funded national network of CHR programs throughout the US. This academic-industry partnership aims to curate one of the largest datasets of youth with CHR, and to develop effective strategies to enhance early help-seeking, in a population where help-seeking is critical and a significant barrier to care.

Read the detailed description

Aim 1: Characterize help-seeking patterns in 25,000 youth who score above Prodromal-Questionnaire (PQ-B) threshold. H1a: Youth will cluster into (1) pre-intenders (take the PQ-B and engage with educational content), (2) intenders (initiate a text exchange with a Strong365 peer navigator (3) actors (advance from texting to clinical assessment with a Strong365 clinician over phone/video) and (4) super-actors (advance from assessment to AMP-SCZ intake). Data will include online metadata (time spent online, # of resources viewed, time spent to complete the PQ-B, # of texts initiated/exchanged), self-report (demographics, symptom type and severity, PQ-B score, goals/needs, self-efficacy), and natural language. H1b (Strong365 only): Natural Language Processing (NLP) of data extracted from participant/provider interactions over text and video will identify linguistic markers of HAPA stages: intender, actor, super-actor. Models based on HAPA stages, along with behavioral features (i.e., message timing, frequency, response lag) will predict help-seeking advancement vs. disengagement. Top predictive features will be used to inform the crafting of help-seeking advancement strategies to be tested in MRTs (Aim 3).

Aim 2: To ensure that those who complete the PQ-B are directed appropriately, this study will establish the most accurate threshold for identifying CHR online. H2: Using data from population-based PQ-B screening, the investigators predict that a total distress score of 20+ will generate the highest diagnostic odds ratio with a sensitivity of at least 80% online, as determined by remote clinical assessment. For the remainder of the study, the threshold score that maximizes specificity and sensitivity will be used.

Medical subject headings
Psychotic Disorders

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Aim 1: Proportion of participants in each help-seeking category

    Data from participants, including online metadata (time spent online, # of resources viewed, time spent to complete the PQ-B, # of texts initiated/exchanged), self-report (demographics, symptom type and severity, PQ-B score, goals/needs, self-efficacy), and natural language will be used to cluster participants into 4 categories: (1) Pre-intenders (take the PQ-B); (2) Intenders (initiate a text exchange with a peer navigator; (3) Actors (advance to clinical assessment); and (4) Super-actors (advance to intake).

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Aim 2: Threshold score for identifying Clinical High-Risk Youth online

    This score will be determined using data from population-based PQ-B screening. A total distress score of 20+ is predicted to generate the highest diagnostic odds ratio with a sensitivity of at least 80% online, as determined by remote clinical assessment. For the remainder of the study, a threshold score that maximizes specificity and sensitivity will be used.

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Jan 2025
  2. Study start7 Apr 2025
  3. Primary completion31 May 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 May 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
25,000 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06774430
Sponsor's protocol ID
AAAV1315 Aim 1 and 2
Other IDs
1R01MH133569-01A1
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
13 Jan 2025
Last updated
5 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Clinical High Risk and Early Psychosis, run by Columbia University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Michael Birnbaum, MD (212-523-2154, mlb2216@cumc.columbia.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Aim 1: Proportion of participants in each help-seeking category (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 May 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in