Artificial Intelligence (AI)NCT06754826
Learning Diagnostic Reasoning Through AI
A study testing AI-generated questions and feedback as a spaced repetition in people with Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Clinical Reasoning, run by Gazi University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
This experiment aims to determine the effect of AI-generated questions and feedback on diagnostic reasoning in preclinical medical students. Main Research Question: What is the effect of AI-generated questions and feedback on diagnostic reasoning skills in preclinical medical students? Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Artificial Intelligence (AI), Clinical Reasoning, Medical Education
- What is being tested?
- AI-generated questions and feedback as a spaced repetition
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 71 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 27 Jan 2025to 16 Feb 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Medical students in Gazi University Faculty of Medicine
Who cannot join
- Medical students outside Gazi University Faculty of Medicine
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Gazi University Faculty of Medicine
Ankara, 06500
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of AI-Generated Questions and Feedback in Learning Diagnostic Reasoning: An Experimental Study
This experiment aims to determine the effect of AI-generated questions and feedback on diagnostic reasoning in preclinical medical students.
Main Research Question:
What is the effect of AI-generated questions and feedback on diagnostic reasoning skills in preclinical medical students?
Read the detailed description
This study involves a two groups:
- Intervention Group: Medical students will receive AI-generated questions and feedback related to five abdominal pain diagnoses.
- Control Group: Medical students will not receive any intervention. Participants in the intervention group will undergo structured learning sessions consisted of AI-generated questions and feedback as a spaced repetition. Control group will not attend these sessions; they only receive their usual medical training.
The diagnostic reasoning performance will be assessed using a video-based Objective Structured Clinical Examination: OSVE (Objective Structured Video Examination) where videos of "patient-doctor encounters are shown to students and questions related to the video clip are asked. Written answers are marked in a standardised manner."
- Being tested
- AI-generated questions and feedback as a spaced repetition
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, diagnostic reasoning, clinical reasoning, medical education, feedback
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AI-generated questions and feedback as a spaced repetitionOther
Participants in the intervention group will undergo structured learning sessions consisted of AI-generated questions and feedback as a spaced repetition.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Experimental | The group who receives AI-generated questions and feedback related to five abdominal pain diagnoses. Receives: Other: AI-generated questions and feedback as a spaced repetition |
| Control Group | No intervention | The group who does not receive AI-generated questions and feedback related to five abdominal pain diagnoses. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Diagnostic Reasoning Performance
The diagnostic reasoning performance will be assessed using a video-based Objective Structured Clinical Examination: OSVE (Objective Structured Video Examination) where videos of "patient-doctor encounters are shown to students and questions related to the video clip are asked. Written answers are marked in a standardised manner."
Measured: up to 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jan 2025
- Study start27 Jan 2025
- Primary completion16 Feb 2025
- Study completion16 Feb 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Artificial Intelligence (AI)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 71 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Gazi University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Yavuz Selim KIYAK, Gazi University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06754826
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2024 - 2019
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 19 Dec 2024
- Last updated
- 24 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The dataset (containing information about correct and incorrect answers) will be shared without including participants' identifiable information (e.g., names). Identifiable data will be replaced with codes (e.g., Participant 1, Participant 2, etc.).
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of AI-Generated Questions and Feedback in Learning Diagnostic Reasoning: An Experimental Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06754826
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2024 - 2019
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, diagnostic reasoning, clinical reasoning, medical education, feedback
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 71 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Gazi UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 27 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 16 Feb 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This experiment aims to determine the effect of AI-generated questions and feedback on diagnostic reasoning in preclinical medical students.
Main Research Question:
What is the effect of AI-generated questions and feedback on diagnostic reasoning skills in preclinical medical students?
Detailed description
This study involves a two groups:
- Intervention Group: Medical students will receive AI-generated questions and feedback related to five abdominal pain diagnoses.
- Control Group: Medical students will not receive any intervention. Participants in the intervention group will undergo structured learning sessions consisted of AI-generated questions and feedback as a spaced repetition. Control group will not attend these sessions; they only receive their usual medical training.
The diagnostic reasoning performance will be assessed using a video-based Objective Structured Clinical Examination: OSVE (Objective Structured Video Examination) where videos of "patient-doctor encounters are shown to students and questions related to the video clip are asked. Written answers are marked in a standardised manner."
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Experimental | Other: AI-generated questions and feedback as a spaced repetitionThe group who receives AI-generated questions and feedback related to five abdominal pain diagnoses. |
| Control Group | No intervention | –The group who does not receive AI-generated questions and feedback related to five abdominal pain diagnoses. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Medical students in Gazi University Faculty of Medicine
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Medical students outside Gazi University Faculty of Medicine
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AI-generated questions and feedback as a spaced repetitionParticipants in the intervention group will undergo structured learning sessions consisted of AI-generated questions and feedback as a spaced repetition. | Other | Intervention Group |
Primary outcome
Diagnostic Reasoning Performance
Time frame: up to 30 days
The diagnostic reasoning performance will be assessed using a video-based Objective Structured Clinical Examination: OSVE (Objective Structured Video Examination) where videos of "patient-doctor encounters are shown to students and questions related to the video clip are asked. Written answers are marked in a standardised manner."
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Mar 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The dataset (containing information about correct and incorrect answers) will be shared without including participants' identifiable information (e.g., names). Identifiable data will be replaced with codes (e.g., Participant 1, Participant 2, etc.).
Related trials for Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Safety, Feasibility, and Acceptability of the MINERVA Voice Conversational Agent for Emergency Department History-Taking
History Taking, Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Radiomics-Based Non-Invasive MRI Differentiation of Uterine Sarcomas and Fibroids
Uterine Fibroid, Uterine Sarcoma
Not yet recruitingObservational study
A Prospective Validation Study of Radiomics in the Differential Diagnosis of Uterine Leiomyoma and Uterine Sarcoma
Uterine Fibroid, Uterine Sarcoma
Not yet recruiting
A Pragmatic Trial of AI-Assisted Discharge Summary Generation
Inpatient Internal Medicine Patients, Patient Discharge
RecruitingObservational study
Development and Demonstration of a Precision Prevention and Treatment System for Colorectal Tubular Adenomas Lesions
Colorectal Adenoma, Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing AI-generated questions and feedback as a spaced repetition in people with Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Clinical Reasoning, run by Gazi University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Diagnostic Reasoning Performance (time frame: up to 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Mar 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.