Osteoarthritis, KneePhase 4NCT06478186
Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment With Zilretta vs. Kenalog in the Context of Type II Diabetes
A Phase 4 study testing triamcinolone acetonide extended-release injectable suspension; TCA-ER and Triamcinolone Acetonide- Immediate Release;TCA-IR in people with Osteoarthritis, Knee and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by University of Kansas Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
A Phase 2 Randomized Study to Evaluate the Effects of triamcinolone acetonide extended-release (TA-ER; Zilretta) vs. triamcinolone acetonide immediate-release (TA-IR; Kenalog) on Blood Glucose Levels in Diabetic Subjects with Knee Osteoarthritis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoarthritis, Knee, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- What is being tested?
- triamcinolone acetonide extended-release injectable suspension; TCA-ER and Triamcinolone Acetonide- Immediate Release;TCA-IR
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 16 Aug 2024to 16 Jan 2027
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 1. Written consent to participate in the study. 2. Willingness and ability to comply with the study procedures and visit schedules and ability to follow verbal and written instructions.
- 3. Male or female ≥40 years of age. 4. Females with negative pregnancy test, who are not breastfeeding and have no intention to become pregnant during the time from screening through EOS.
- 5. Type 2 DM for at least 1 year prior to Screening. 6. Currently being treated with injectable (except insulin) and/or oral antidiabetic agents with stable doses for at least 1 month prior to Screening.
- 7. HbA1c 6.5-9% (in past 8 weeks). 8. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥50 mL/min/1.73 m2. (in past 8 weeks) 9. Triglycerides <500 mg/dL (in past 8 weeks) 10. Painful symptoms associated with OA of the knee for ≥6 months prior to Screening (NRS of 4-9 during most of the 30 days prior to enrollment).
- 11. Currently meets modified ACR criteria (clinical and radiological) for OA (Altman et al, 1986) as follows:
- Knee pain
Show all 12Show fewer
- At least 1 of the following:
- Stiffness <30 minutes
- Crepitus
- Osteophytes 12. Index knee pain more than 15 days over the last month (as reported by the subject).
- 13. Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 2-4. 14. Willingness to wear a CGM device uninterrupted for 24 hours per day throughout the required time during the study and comply to the correct use requirements of CGM throughout the trial and perform self BG checks as directed.
- 15. Adequate BG data collected during the pretreatment phase (Day -10 through Day -1) ≥70% data available.
Who cannot join
- Disease-related Criteria
- Reactive arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, or arthritis associated with inflammatory bowel disease.
- History of infection in the index knee joint.
- Clinical signs and symptoms of active knee infection or crystal disease of the index knee within 1 month of Screening.
- Presence of surgical hardware or other foreign body in the index knee.
- Unstable joint (such as a torn anterior cruciate ligament) within 12 months of Screening.
Show all 33Show fewer
- Moderate or severe kidney, liver, or thyroid disease.
- Glaucoma.
- Active cancer. Previous or Concomitant Treatment-related Criteria
- IA corticosteroid (investigational or marketed) in any joint within 3 months of Screening.
- IA hyaluronic acid (investigational or marketed) in the index knee within 6 months of Screening.
- IV or intramuscular (IM) corticosteroids (investigational or marketed) within 3 months of Screening.
- Oral corticosteroids (investigational or marketed) within 1 month of Screening.
- Inhaled, intranasal, or topical corticosteroids (investigational or marketed) within 2 weeks of Screening.
- Any other IA investigational device, drug/biologic within 6 months of Screening or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer).
- Prior arthroscopic or open surgery of the index knee within 12 months of Screening.
- Planned/anticipated surgery of the index knee or any other surgery during the study period.
- Use of acetaminophen, or acetaminophen-containing products, from Screening through Day 14 (completion of post-treatment BG monitoring).
- Subjects on Coumadins with INR ≥5 will be excluded (Bashir et al, 2015) Subject-related Criteria
- Known hypersensitivity to any form of triamcinolone.
- History of sarcoidosis or amyloidosis.
- Active or history of malignancy within the last 3 years, except for resected basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or effectively managed cervical carcinoma.
- Known active or quiescent systemic fungal, bacterial (including tuberculosis), viral, or parasitic infections or ocular herpes simplex.
- Any infection requiring IV antibiotics within 4 weeks of Screening or infection requiring oral antibiotics within 2 weeks of Screening.
- History of osteomyelitis.
- Known or clinically suspected infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or hepatitis B or C viruses.
- Requiring or likely to require treatment with corticosteroids during the study period based on subject medical history.
- History or active Cushing's or Addison's syndrome.
- Active substance abuse (drugs or alcohol), history of chronic substance abuse within the last year, or prior chronic substance abuse judged by the Investigator likely to recur during the study.
- Skin breakdown at the knee where the injection would take place.
- Use of immunomodulators, immunosuppressives, or chemotherapeutic agents within 2 years of Screening.
- Receipt of a live or live attenuated vaccine within 3 months of Screening.
- Any other clinically significant psychiatric acute or chronic medical conditions that, in the judgment of the Investigator, would preclude the use of an IA corticosteroid or NSAIDs or that could compromise subject safety, limit the subject's ability to complete or adhere to the study, and/or compromise the objectives of the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160
Neil Segal, MD, MS, 9135886944, segal-research@kumc.edu
Jessica Lee, PhD, 9135740958
About this study
Official title: RCT to Evaluate the Effects of Zilretta (Triamcinolone Acetonide- Extended Release) and Kenalog (Triamcinolone Acetonide- Immediate Release) on Blood Glucose in Subjects With Osteoarthritis of the Knee and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
A Phase 2 Randomized Study to Evaluate the Effects of triamcinolone acetonide extended-release (TA-ER; Zilretta) vs. triamcinolone acetonide immediate-release (TA-IR; Kenalog) on Blood Glucose Levels in Diabetic Subjects with Knee Osteoarthritis. Subjects should have Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) with HbA1C ≤9 that is managed without insulin and have been diagnosed with symptomatic unilateral or bilateral osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee, based on clinical and radiological criteria (if bilateral, then a target knee will be selected).Total study duration for individual subject will be about 4 months, which includes 3 weeks of Screening period, 10 days of pretreatment phase, treatment day, and 12 weeks of post-treatment period.
Read the detailed description
Protocol Title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Effects of ZILRETTA (Triamcinolone Acetonide-Extended Release) and TA-IR (Triamcinolone Acetonide-Immediate Release) on Blood Glucose Levels in Subjects with Osteoarthritis of the Knee and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Brief Title: Zilretta Diabetic Knee OA Regulatory Agency Identifier Number(s): IND 111325 Test Product, Dose, Mode of Administration, and Lot Number Name: ZILRETTA (triamcinolone acetonide extended-release injectable suspension; TA-ER) Active ingredient: Extended-release formulation of TA in 75:25 poly (lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA) microspheres Dosage: Nominal 32 mg TA, intra-articular (IA) injection, administered as a 5 mL injection Mode of Administration: IA Knee Injection Reference Product, Dose, Mode of Administration, and Lot Number Name: Kenalog®-40 (triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension) Active Ingredient: Triamcinolone Acetonide- Immediate Release (TA-IR) Dosage: 40 mg/mL, IA, administered as a 1 mL Injection: TA-IR Mode of Administration: IA Knee Injection Current Indication: extended-release synthetic corticosteroid indicated as an IA injection for the management of osteoarthritis pain of the knee.
Study Population and Number of Study Subjects: Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) with HbA1C ≤9 that is managed without insulin and have been diagnosed with symptomatic unilateral or bilateral osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee, based on clinical and radiological criteria (if bilateral, then a target knee will be selected) Approximately 120 subjects (1:1 randomization, 60 ZILRETTA and 60 TA-IR) will be enrolled for this study.
Note: Subject is considered enrolled, if subject meets initial eligibility criteria and is randomized to a treatment arm.
Study Duration for Subjects:
Total study duration for individual subject will be about 4 months, which includes a 3-week Screening period, 10 days pretreatmentperiod, treatment day, and a 12-week post-treatment period.
Overall Study Design:
This randomized clinical trial will include male and female subjects ≥40 years of age, with known history of T2DM and symptomatic unilateral or bilateral OA of the knee. Eligible subjects must be on stable doses of oral and/or injectable (non-insulin) pharmacological agents (e.g. GLP-1 agonists) for at least 3 months prior to the study screening and after the IA injection till EOS and have hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels ≤9% at Screening. Subjects on current insulin treatment will be excluded.
After signing informed consent, subjects will be screened and a total of 120 qualified subjects with T2DM will be randomized to 1 of the 2 treatment groups (1:1). Randomized subjects will be treated with either 32 mg ZILRETTA (60 subjects) or 40 mg TA-IR (60 subjects). Subjects who fail to meet eligibility criteria may be re-screened once at the discretion of Principal Investigator (PI) after documenting the rationale for any re-screening decision. Subjects who meet all eligibility criteria but are found to have insufficient BG data at their Day 1 visit (ie, missing CGM data ≥ 30%) may repeat the full 7-day pretreatment phase at the discretion of the PI.
BG Monitoring and Management of T2DM During the Trial After a Screening visit, BG levels in each subject will be measured using a CGM device, for at least 10 days pre-injection (pretreatment period) and for at least 10 days postinjection (post-treatment). The final 10 days of the pretreatment period will be also considered as Baseline for BG control.
Subjects and the assessor responsible for subject's clinical assessments and safety monitoring will be blinded throughout the study to both treatment assignments. Subjects will be blinded to the glucose readings, so as not to influence behaviors that could alter blood glucose outcome measures. However, study endocrinologists will monitor subjects' glucose readings. The study will involve between 6-12 outpatient visits (depending on whether selected for salivary cortisol tesing) and up to 4 phone visits that will include Screening, a Pretreatment visit (Day -14 where the CGM sensor will be placed to initiate study BG data collection), Day 1 (Baseline and treatment), and 2 Posttreatment visits (Days 43, and 85). CGM data will be continuously collected from the treatment visit through Day 15. On Day 15, subjects will remove the CGM sensor. Day 85 will be end-of-study (EOS) visit.
A subset of subjects will will return saliva for cortisol testing at baseline and on Days 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 21, 42, 72, and 90 following treatment.
After IA treatment subjects are should not adjust their diabetes medications and Baseline physical activity should remain unchanged.
Intermediate-acting glucocorticoids (GCs) represent the most commonly prescribed steroid agents. In general, during the course of chronic GC treatment, GCs may require frequent dose adaptations that result in more intensive altered requirements of glucose-lowering therapies. However, since the selected diabetic population will receive a single IA injection, large glucose fluctuations as experienced with chronic GC treatments are not expected. Baseline glucose medication dosage will not change. Subjects' BG control will be monitored in coordination with study endocrinologist.
The analyses of primary and secondary endpoints will be conducted mainly based on CGM device.
Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) Axis Evaluation Treatment with GCs represents one of the most frequent causes of secondary adrenal insufficiency. When GCs are used at supraphysiologic doses, HPA axis suppression causes adrenal glands' inability to produce sufficient cortisol response to abrupt treatment cessation (Nicolaider et al, 2018). To avoid HPA axis suppression, it is recommended not to exceed 3 GC IA injections per year with a minimum of 30 days between (Johnston et al, 2015). Recovery of the HPA axis to Baseline normally occurs within 1-4 weeks but can be longer in consideration of the dose and frequency of injections (Habib, 2009). However, after single IA dose of GC injection recovery after 1-2 weeks was observed in most of the patients (Mader et al, 2005). Thus, an initial 90-day salivary cortisol assessment in a subset of this trial population should suffice. An 8 AM salivary cortisol test will be completed at baseline and 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 21, 42, 72, and 90 day following baseline to evaluate the effect of Zilretta and TA-IR on the HPA axis and recovery time.
Intra-Articular Injection On Day 1 (Treatment Day), IA injections will be administered by the assigned blinded, trained injector, who has experience in the administration of IA injections and has been trained on study administration procedures. Injection into the knee joint will be performed with/without ultrasound guidance.
Subjects will be advised to avoid strenuous or prolonged weight-bearing activities for approximately 24 to 48 hours following the injection. If the subject has an immediate reaction (eg, tenderness, increased pain, swelling, effusion, and/or decreased mobility of the index knee), the subject should be treated according to clinical guidelines and physician experience and judgment.
Pain will be assessed by NRS evaluating Worst Daily Knee Pain Intensity and Average Daily Knee Pain, which will be recorded in the pain Diary per the Schedule of Assessments (Table 1) and reviewed at each study visit. Physical performance will be assessed with OARSI recommended10 physical performance measures (40m walk time and stair ascent time) along with patient-reported physical function (KOOS-PS) and quality of life (KOOS-QoL) at baseline and at intervals following IA injection.
Internal Safety Review Subject safety will be monitored by an endocrinologist. The endocrinologist will review, at a minimum, safety, tolerability, and pharmacodynamic (PD) data on ongoing basis. All members will be blinded to the treatment.
The study PI and study endocrinologist will review all SAEs on an ongoing basis (ie, as the events are reported). The study PI is responsible for temporarily halting the study if the type, frequency, or seriousness/severity of such events suggests a potential threat to the safety of the study subjects. The safety review team will meet semiweekly or monthly depending upon recruitment rate. Ad hoc meetings may be scheduled as necessary.
The study PI may pause/stop the study if any of the following occurs:
Any deaths, regardless of causality. Non-fatal SAEs in 12 subjects (≥10% of total subject population) where a clear unrelated causality is not readily apparent.
Grade 3 or higher AEs in 12 subjects (≥10% of total subject population) that are clinically significant (Exception: PD parameters or related changes to labs and symptoms will not be considered as AEs) In the event that any of the preceding criteria occurs, enrollment will be paused during the review. If a pausing/stopping rule is met, a decision will be made whether to resume the enrollment.
Case unblinding may be performed for above reviews if necessary and documented accordingly.
Clinical Safety Assessments The index knee assessment will be performed by the designated assessor at the visits indicated in the Schedule of Assessments (Table 1). The index knee will be assessed for injection site reaction, joint effusion, range of motion and presence of Baker's cyst.,. After Day 1 Baseline, new clinically significant findings or findings that worsen from the subject's Baseline knee condition will be recorded as an adverse event (AE).
PD parameters measured during this study such as BG levels (CGM or fingerstick), insulin consumption, HPA axis evaluation parameters, and hyperglycemia symptoms will not be reported as AEs.
Safety evaluations will be based on the assessment of AEs occurring after the initiation of investigational product (IP) on Day 1 through the EOS Visit (Day 85). Results of clinical safety assessments are to be recorded in the subject's medical records and transcribed to the appropriate electronic case report form (eCRF), including the AE eCRF for clinically significant findings.
AEs will be coded using CTCAE v.5. Incidences (number and percent) of TEAEs, those events that started after dosing or worsened in severity after dosing, will be presented by treatment group. Incidences of TEAEs will also be presented by maximum severity and relationship to IP. Safety laboratory investigations and vital signs will be summarized descriptively by time point collected along with changes from Baseline assessments.
Statistical Methods Descriptive statistics (n, mean, standard deviation [SD], median, minimum, and maximum) will be calculated by treatment group and time point for continuous variables. Frequencies and percentages will be presented by treatment group for categorical and ordinal variables.
The primary endpoint of change in percent of time in TAR will be analyzed with linear regression. Both models will have a fixed effect for treatment group along with covariates (eg, the mean of the pretreatment BG values, BMI).
A step-down testing procedure will be employed for primary and key secondary endpoints, with sequential testing proceeded as long as p < 0.05. Key secondary endpoints and order of testing will be specified in the SAP (Holm, S., 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian journal of statistics, pp.65-70).
Study Sample Size A prior Phase II study found a difference of approximately 15 percentage points in TAR for TA-ER vs standard triamcinolone acetonide crystalline suspension (TAcs) (~35% for TA-ER vs. 50% for TAcs). 120 subjects will provide >80% power to detect an effect size of 10 percentage points, assuming a standard deviation of 18. The primary outcome will be measured 72 hours after treatment by a sensor automatically uploading the data, thus we expect few dropouts are expected.
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, Knee, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Being tested
- triamcinolone acetonide extended-release injectable suspension; TCA-ER, Triamcinolone Acetonide- Immediate Release;TCA-IR
- Keywords
- Zilretta, Kenalog
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Knee, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
triamcinolone acetonide extended-release injectable suspension; TCA-ERDrug
Mode of Administration: IA Knee Injection Nominal 32 mg TCA, intra-articular (IA) injection, administered as a 5 mL injection
Triamcinolone Acetonide- Immediate Release;TCA-IRDrug
Mode of Administration: IA Knee Injection Triamcinolone Acetonide- Immediate Release (TCA-IR)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| TA-ER | Active comparator | Name: ZILRETTA (triamcinolone acetonide extended-release injectable suspension; TA-ER) Active ingredient: Extended-release formulation of TA in 75:25 poly (lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA) microspheres Dosage: Nominal 32 mg TA, intra-articular (IA) injection, administered as a 5 mL injection Mode of Administration: IA Knee Injection Receives: Drug: triamcinolone acetonide extended-release injectable suspension; TCA-ER |
| TA-IR | Active comparator | Name: Kenalog®-40 (triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension) Active Ingredient: Triamcinolone Acetonide- Immediate Release (TA-IR) Dosage: 40 mg/mL, IA, administered as a 1 mL Injection: TA-IR Mode of Administration: IA Knee Injection Receives: Drug: Triamcinolone Acetonide- Immediate Release;TCA-IR |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percent of time spent with blood glucose >180 mg/dL
To assess continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) patterns for Time Above Range (TAR) levels of the upper limit of the recommended target range (glucose levels >180 mg/dL) from Baseline to 72 hours following a single IA injection of 32 mg of ZILRETTA relative to 40 mg of TA-IR.
Measured: The primary outcome will be measured up to 72 hours after treatment by a sensor automatically uploading the data
Secondary outcomes (7)
Area under the curve (AUC) for cortisol levels
To characterize HPA axis suppression from Baseline until the end-of-study comparing ZILRETTA vs TA IR.
Measured: From baseline until the end-of-study (Day 85).
Percentage of time spent with blood glucose above >180 mg/dL
To characterize the number of subjects and percentage of time spent in TAR from Baseline throughout the10 days comparing ZILRETTA vs TA-IR.
Measured: From baseline throughout 10 days follow-up.
Number of blood glucose peaks ≥250 mg/dL
To characterize number of peaks ≥250 mg/dL per subject from Baseline throughout the 10 days comparing ZILRETTA vs TCA-IR.
Measured: From baseline throughout 10 days follow-up
Change in 40m walk time
To determine the extent to which intra-articular (IA) injection of Zilretta vs. TA-IR in patients with dual diagnosis of T2DM and knee OA improves physical performance (OARSI recommended physical performance measures- timed 40m walk).
Measured: Between baseline and 12 weeks.
Change in stair climb time
To determine the extent to which intra-articular (IA) injection of Zilretta vs. TA-IR in patients with dual diagnosis of T2DM and knee OA improves physical performance (OARSI recommended physical performance measures- timed stair climb).
Measured: Between baseline and 12 weeks.
Change in patient-reported physical function (KOOS-PS)
To determine the extent to which intra-articular (IA) injection of Zilretta vs. TA-IR in patients with dual diagnosis ofT2DM and knee OA improves physical function (KOOS-PF). 100 point scale on which 100 is best and 0 is worst.
Measured: Between baseline and 12 weeks.
Change in quality of life (KOOS-QoL)
To determine the extent to which intra-articular (IA) injection of Zilretta vs. TA-IR in patients with dual diagnosis ofT2DM and knee OA improves quality of life (KOOS-QoL). 100 point scale on which 100 is best and 0 is worst.
Measured: Between baseline and 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jun 2024
- Study start16 Aug 2024
- Primary completion16 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion16 Jan 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Osteoarthritis, KneeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Kansas Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial of 2 interventions
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Kansas Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Neil A Segal, MD, MS, Principal investigator, University of Kansas Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06478186
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY00160230
- Other IDs
- 006-C-201
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 3 Jun 2024
- Last updated
- 13 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Russell SJ, Sala R, Conaghan PG, Habib G, Vo Q, Manning R, Kivitz A, Davis Y, Lufkin J, Johnson JR, Kelley S, Bodick N. Triamcinolone acetonide extended-release in patients with osteoarthritis and type 2 diabetes: a randomized, phase 2 study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Dec 1;57(12):2235-2241. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key265.
PubMed 30203101Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K, Christy W, Cooke TD, Greenwald R, Hochberg M, et al. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis Rheum. 1986 Aug;29(8):1039-49. doi: 10.1002/art.1780290816.
PubMed 3741515Arbuckle RA, Humphrey L, Vardeva K, Arondekar B, Danten-Viala M, Scott JA, Snoek FJ. Psychometric evaluation of the Diabetes Symptom Checklist-Revised (DSC-R)--a measure of symptom distress. Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1168-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00571.x. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
PubMed 19558371Bannuru RR, Osani MC, Vaysbrot EE, Arden NK, Bennell K, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Kraus VB, Lohmander LS, Abbott JH, Bhandari M, Blanco FJ, Espinosa R, Haugen IK, Lin J, Mandl LA, Moilanen E, Nakamura N, Snyder-Mackler L, Trojian T, Underwood M, McAlindon TE. OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee, hip, and polyarticular osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019 Nov;27(11):1578-1589. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
PubMed 31278997Bashir MA, Ray R, Sarda P, Li S, Corbett S. Determination of a safe INR for joint injections in patients taking warfarin. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2015 Nov;97(8):589-91. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2015.0044.
PubMed 26492905Choudhry MN, Malik RA, Charalambous CP. Blood Glucose Levels Following Intra-Articular Steroid Injections in Patients with Diabetes: A Systematic Review. JBJS Rev. 2016 Mar 22;4(3):e5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.O.00029.
PubMed 27500431Derendorf H, Mollmann H, Gruner A, Haack D, Gyselby G. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of glucocorticoid suspensions after intra-articular administration. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1986 Mar;39(3):313-7. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1986.45.
PubMed 3948470Johnston PC, Lansang MC, Chatterjee S, Kennedy L. Intra-articular glucocorticoid injections and their effect on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA)-axis function. Endocrine. 2015 Mar;48(2):410-6. doi: 10.1007/s12020-014-0409-5. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
PubMed 25182149Kompel AJ, Roemer FW, Murakami AM, Diaz LE, Crema MD, Guermazi A. Intra-articular Corticosteroid Injections in the Hip and Knee: Perhaps Not as Safe as We Thought? Radiology. 2019 Dec;293(3):656-663. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019190341. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
PubMed 31617798Mader R, Lavi I, Luboshitzky R. Evaluation of the pituitary-adrenal axis function following single intraarticular injection of methylprednisolone. Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Mar;52(3):924-8. doi: 10.1002/art.20884.
PubMed 15751089Patel J, Schneider BJ, Smith CC; Spine Intervention Society's Patient Safety Committee. Fact Finders for Patient Safety: Intra-Articular Corticosteroid Injections and Hyperglycemia. Pain Med. 2018 May 1;19(5):1091-1092. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx303. No abstract available.
PubMed 29741744Tamez-Perez HE, Quintanilla-Flores DL, Rodriguez-Gutierrez R, Gonzalez-Gonzalez JG, Tamez-Pena AL. Steroid hyperglycemia: Prevalence, early detection and therapeutic recommendations: A narrative review. World J Diabetes. 2015 Jul 25;6(8):1073-81. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i8.1073.
PubMed 26240704Young P, Homlar KC. Extreme Postinjection Flare in Response to Intra-Articular Triamcinolone Acetonide (Kenalog). Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016 Mar-Apr;45(3):E108-11.
PubMed 26991574
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- RCT to Evaluate the Effects of Zilretta (Triamcinolone Acetonide- Extended Release) and Kenalog (Triamcinolone Acetonide- Immediate Release) on Blood Glucose in Subjects With Osteoarthritis of the Knee and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06478186
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STUDY00160230
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, Knee, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Keywords
- Zilretta, Kenalog
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Kansas Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 16 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 16 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A Phase 2 Randomized Study to Evaluate the Effects of triamcinolone acetonide extended-release (TA-ER; Zilretta) vs. triamcinolone acetonide immediate-release (TA-IR; Kenalog) on Blood Glucose Levels in Diabetic Subjects with Knee Osteoarthritis. Subjects should have Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) with HbA1C ≤9 that is managed without insulin and have been diagnosed with symptomatic unilateral or bilateral osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee, based on clinical and radiological criteria (if bilateral, then a target knee will be selected).Total study duration for individual subject will be about 4 months, which includes 3 weeks of Screening period, 10 days of pretreatment phase, treatment day, and 12 weeks of post-treatment period.
Detailed description
Protocol Title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Effects of ZILRETTA (Triamcinolone Acetonide-Extended Release) and TA-IR (Triamcinolone Acetonide-Immediate Release) on Blood Glucose Levels in Subjects with Osteoarthritis of the Knee and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Brief Title: Zilretta Diabetic Knee OA Regulatory Agency Identifier Number(s): IND 111325 Test Product, Dose, Mode of Administration, and Lot Number Name: ZILRETTA (triamcinolone acetonide extended-release injectable suspension; TA-ER) Active ingredient: Extended-release formulation of TA in 75:25 poly (lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA) microspheres Dosage: Nominal 32 mg TA, intra-articular (IA) injection, administered as a 5 mL injection Mode of Administration: IA Knee Injection Reference Product, Dose, Mode of Administration, and Lot Number Name: Kenalog®-40 (triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension) Active Ingredient: Triamcinolone Acetonide- Immediate Release (TA-IR) Dosage: 40 mg/mL, IA, administered as a 1 mL Injection: TA-IR Mode of Administration: IA Knee Injection Current Indication: extended-release synthetic corticosteroid indicated as an IA injection for the management of osteoarthritis pain of the knee.
Study Population and Number of Study Subjects: Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) with HbA1C ≤9 that is managed without insulin and have been diagnosed with symptomatic unilateral or bilateral osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee, based on clinical and radiological criteria (if bilateral, then a target knee will be selected) Approximately 120 subjects (1:1 randomization, 60 ZILRETTA and 60 TA-IR) will be enrolled for this study.
Note: Subject is considered enrolled, if subject meets initial eligibility criteria and is randomized to a treatment arm.
Study Duration for Subjects:
Total study duration for individual subject will be about 4 months, which includes a 3-week Screening period, 10 days pretreatmentperiod, treatment day, and a 12-week post-treatment period.
Overall Study Design:
This randomized clinical trial will include male and female subjects ≥40 years of age, with known history of T2DM and symptomatic unilateral or bilateral OA of the knee. Eligible subjects must be on stable doses of oral and/or injectable (non-insulin) pharmacological agents (e.g. GLP-1 agonists) for at least 3 months prior to the study screening and after the IA injection till EOS and have hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels ≤9% at Screening. Subjects on current insulin treatment will be excluded.
After signing informed consent, subjects will be screened and a total of 120 qualified subjects with T2DM will be randomized to 1 of the 2 treatment groups (1:1). Randomized subjects will be treated with either 32 mg ZILRETTA (60 subjects) or 40 mg TA-IR (60 subjects). Subjects who fail to meet eligibility criteria may be re-screened once at the discretion of Principal Investigator (PI) after documenting the rationale for any re-screening decision. Subjects who meet all eligibility criteria but are found to have insufficient BG data at their Day 1 visit (ie, missing CGM data ≥ 30%) may repeat the full 7-day pretreatment phase at the discretion of the PI.
BG Monitoring and Management of T2DM During the Trial After a Screening visit, BG levels in each subject will be measured using a CGM device, for at least 10 days pre-injection (pretreatment period) and for at least 10 days postinjection (post-treatment). The final 10 days of the pretreatment period will be also considered as Baseline for BG control.
Subjects and the assessor responsible for subject's clinical assessments and safety monitoring will be blinded throughout the study to both treatment assignments. Subjects will be blinded to the glucose readings, so as not to influence behaviors that could alter blood glucose outcome measures. However, study endocrinologists will monitor subjects' glucose readings. The study will involve between 6-12 outpatient visits (depending on whether selected for salivary cortisol tesing) and up to 4 phone visits that will include Screening, a Pretreatment visit (Day -14 where the CGM sensor will be placed to initiate study BG data collection), Day 1 (Baseline and treatment), and 2 Posttreatment visits (Days 43, and 85). CGM data will be continuously collected from the treatment visit through Day 15. On Day 15, subjects will remove the CGM sensor. Day 85 will be end-of-study (EOS) visit.
A subset of subjects will will return saliva for cortisol testing at baseline and on Days 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 21, 42, 72, and 90 following treatment.
After IA treatment subjects are should not adjust their diabetes medications and Baseline physical activity should remain unchanged.
Intermediate-acting glucocorticoids (GCs) represent the most commonly prescribed steroid agents. In general, during the course of chronic GC treatment, GCs may require frequent dose adaptations that result in more intensive altered requirements of glucose-lowering therapies. However, since the selected diabetic population will receive a single IA injection, large glucose fluctuations as experienced with chronic GC treatments are not expected. Baseline glucose medication dosage will not change. Subjects' BG control will be monitored in coordination with study endocrinologist.
The analyses of primary and secondary endpoints will be conducted mainly based on CGM device.
Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) Axis Evaluation Treatment with GCs represents one of the most frequent causes of secondary adrenal insufficiency. When GCs are used at supraphysiologic doses, HPA axis suppression causes adrenal glands' inability to produce sufficient cortisol response to abrupt treatment cessation (Nicolaider et al, 2018). To avoid HPA axis suppression, it is recommended not to exceed 3 GC IA injections per year with a minimum of 30 days between (Johnston et al, 2015). Recovery of the HPA axis to Baseline normally occurs within 1-4 weeks but can be longer in consideration of the dose and frequency of injections (Habib, 2009). However, after single IA dose of GC injection recovery after 1-2 weeks was observed in most of the patients (Mader et al, 2005). Thus, an initial 90-day salivary cortisol assessment in a subset of this trial population should suffice. An 8 AM salivary cortisol test will be completed at baseline and 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 21, 42, 72, and 90 day following baseline to evaluate the effect of Zilretta and TA-IR on the HPA axis and recovery time.
Intra-Articular Injection On Day 1 (Treatment Day), IA injections will be administered by the assigned blinded, trained injector, who has experience in the administration of IA injections and has been trained on study administration procedures. Injection into the knee joint will be performed with/without ultrasound guidance.
Subjects will be advised to avoid strenuous or prolonged weight-bearing activities for approximately 24 to 48 hours following the injection. If the subject has an immediate reaction (eg, tenderness, increased pain, swelling, effusion, and/or decreased mobility of the index knee), the subject should be treated according to clinical guidelines and physician experience and judgment.
Pain will be assessed by NRS evaluating Worst Daily Knee Pain Intensity and Average Daily Knee Pain, which will be recorded in the pain Diary per the Schedule of Assessments (Table 1) and reviewed at each study visit. Physical performance will be assessed with OARSI recommended10 physical performance measures (40m walk time and stair ascent time) along with patient-reported physical function (KOOS-PS) and quality of life (KOOS-QoL) at baseline and at intervals following IA injection.
Internal Safety Review Subject safety will be monitored by an endocrinologist. The endocrinologist will review, at a minimum, safety, tolerability, and pharmacodynamic (PD) data on ongoing basis. All members will be blinded to the treatment.
The study PI and study endocrinologist will review all SAEs on an ongoing basis (ie, as the events are reported). The study PI is responsible for temporarily halting the study if the type, frequency, or seriousness/severity of such events suggests a potential threat to the safety of the study subjects. The safety review team will meet semiweekly or monthly depending upon recruitment rate. Ad hoc meetings may be scheduled as necessary.
The study PI may pause/stop the study if any of the following occurs:
Any deaths, regardless of causality. Non-fatal SAEs in 12 subjects (≥10% of total subject population) where a clear unrelated causality is not readily apparent.
Grade 3 or higher AEs in 12 subjects (≥10% of total subject population) that are clinically significant (Exception: PD parameters or related changes to labs and symptoms will not be considered as AEs) In the event that any of the preceding criteria occurs, enrollment will be paused during the review. If a pausing/stopping rule is met, a decision will be made whether to resume the enrollment.
Case unblinding may be performed for above reviews if necessary and documented accordingly.
Clinical Safety Assessments The index knee assessment will be performed by the designated assessor at the visits indicated in the Schedule of Assessments (Table 1). The index knee will be assessed for injection site reaction, joint effusion, range of motion and presence of Baker's cyst.,. After Day 1 Baseline, new clinically significant findings or findings that worsen from the subject's Baseline knee condition will be recorded as an adverse event (AE).
PD parameters measured during this study such as BG levels (CGM or fingerstick), insulin consumption, HPA axis evaluation parameters, and hyperglycemia symptoms will not be reported as AEs.
Safety evaluations will be based on the assessment of AEs occurring after the initiation of investigational product (IP) on Day 1 through the EOS Visit (Day 85). Results of clinical safety assessments are to be recorded in the subject's medical records and transcribed to the appropriate electronic case report form (eCRF), including the AE eCRF for clinically significant findings.
AEs will be coded using CTCAE v.5. Incidences (number and percent) of TEAEs, those events that started after dosing or worsened in severity after dosing, will be presented by treatment group. Incidences of TEAEs will also be presented by maximum severity and relationship to IP. Safety laboratory investigations and vital signs will be summarized descriptively by time point collected along with changes from Baseline assessments.
Statistical Methods Descriptive statistics (n, mean, standard deviation [SD], median, minimum, and maximum) will be calculated by treatment group and time point for continuous variables. Frequencies and percentages will be presented by treatment group for categorical and ordinal variables.
The primary endpoint of change in percent of time in TAR will be analyzed with linear regression. Both models will have a fixed effect for treatment group along with covariates (eg, the mean of the pretreatment BG values, BMI).
A step-down testing procedure will be employed for primary and key secondary endpoints, with sequential testing proceeded as long as p < 0.05. Key secondary endpoints and order of testing will be specified in the SAP (Holm, S., 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian journal of statistics, pp.65-70).
Study Sample Size A prior Phase II study found a difference of approximately 15 percentage points in TAR for TA-ER vs standard triamcinolone acetonide crystalline suspension (TAcs) (~35% for TA-ER vs. 50% for TAcs). 120 subjects will provide >80% power to detect an effect size of 10 percentage points, assuming a standard deviation of 18. The primary outcome will be measured 72 hours after treatment by a sensor automatically uploading the data, thus we expect few dropouts are expected.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial of 2 interventions
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| TA-ER | Active comparator | Drug: triamcinolone acetonide extended-release injectable suspension; TCA-ERName: ZILRETTA (triamcinolone acetonide extended-release injectable suspension; TA-ER) Active ingredient: Extended-release formulation of TA in 75:25 poly (lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA) microspheres Dosage: Nominal 32 mg TA, intra-articular (IA) injection, administered as a 5 mL injection Mode of Administration: IA Knee Injection |
| TA-IR | Active comparator | Drug: Triamcinolone Acetonide- Immediate Release;TCA-IRName: Kenalog®-40 (triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension) Active Ingredient: Triamcinolone Acetonide- Immediate Release (TA-IR) Dosage: 40 mg/mL, IA, administered as a 1 mL Injection: TA-IR Mode of Administration: IA Knee Injection |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- 1. Written consent to participate in the study. 2. Willingness and ability to comply with the study procedures and visit schedules and ability to follow verbal and written instructions.
- 3. Male or female ≥40 years of age. 4. Females with negative pregnancy test, who are not breastfeeding and have no intention to become pregnant during the time from screening through EOS.
- 5. Type 2 DM for at least 1 year prior to Screening. 6. Currently being treated with injectable (except insulin) and/or oral antidiabetic agents with stable doses for at least 1 month prior to Screening.
- 7. HbA1c 6.5-9% (in past 8 weeks). 8. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥50 mL/min/1.73 m2. (in past 8 weeks) 9. Triglycerides <500 mg/dL (in past 8 weeks) 10. Painful symptoms associated with OA of the knee for ≥6 months prior to Screening (NRS of 4-9 during most of the 30 days prior to enrollment).
- 11. Currently meets modified ACR criteria (clinical and radiological) for OA (Altman et al, 1986) as follows:
Key exclusion criteria (33 listed)
- Disease-related Criteria
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| triamcinolone acetonide extended-release injectable suspension; TCA-ERMode of Administration: IA Knee Injection Nominal 32 mg TCA, intra-articular (IA) injection, administered as a 5 mL injection | Drug | TA-ER |
| Triamcinolone Acetonide- Immediate Release;TCA-IRMode of Administration: IA Knee Injection Triamcinolone Acetonide- Immediate Release (TCA-IR) | Drug | TA-IR |
Primary outcome
Percent of time spent with blood glucose >180 mg/dL
Time frame: The primary outcome will be measured up to 72 hours after treatment by a sensor automatically uploading the data
To assess continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) patterns for Time Above Range (TAR) levels of the upper limit of the recommended target range (glucose levels >180 mg/dL) from Baseline to 72 hours following a single IA injection of 32 mg of ZILRETTA relative to 40 mg of TA-IR.
7 secondary outcomes
Area under the curve (AUC) for cortisol levels
Time frame: From baseline until the end-of-study (Day 85).
Percentage of time spent with blood glucose above >180 mg/dL
Time frame: From baseline throughout 10 days follow-up.
Number of blood glucose peaks ≥250 mg/dL
Time frame: From baseline throughout 10 days follow-up
Change in 40m walk time
Time frame: Between baseline and 12 weeks.
Change in stair climb time
Time frame: Between baseline and 12 weeks.
Change in patient-reported physical function (KOOS-PS)
Time frame: Between baseline and 12 weeks.
Change in quality of life (KOOS-QoL)
Time frame: Between baseline and 12 weeks
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Oct 2026.
- Background: PubMed 30203101Russell SJ, Sala R, Conaghan PG, Habib G, Vo Q, Manning R, Kivitz A, Davis Y, Lufkin J, Johnson JR, Kelley S, Bodick N. Triamcinolone acetonide extended-release in patients with osteoarthritis and type 2 diabetes: a randomized, phase 2 study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Dec 1;57(12):2235-2241. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key265.
- Background: PubMed 3741515Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K, Christy W, Cooke TD, Greenwald R, Hochberg M, et al. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis Rheum. 1986 Aug;29(8):1039-49. doi: 10.1002/art.1780290816.
- Background: PubMed 19558371Arbuckle RA, Humphrey L, Vardeva K, Arondekar B, Danten-Viala M, Scott JA, Snoek FJ. Psychometric evaluation of the Diabetes Symptom Checklist-Revised (DSC-R)--a measure of symptom distress. Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1168-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00571.x. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
- Background: PubMed 31278997Bannuru RR, Osani MC, Vaysbrot EE, Arden NK, Bennell K, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Kraus VB, Lohmander LS, Abbott JH, Bhandari M, Blanco FJ, Espinosa R, Haugen IK, Lin J, Mandl LA, Moilanen E, Nakamura N, Snyder-Mackler L, Trojian T, Underwood M, McAlindon TE. OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee, hip, and polyarticular osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019 Nov;27(11):1578-1589. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
- Background: PubMed 26492905Bashir MA, Ray R, Sarda P, Li S, Corbett S. Determination of a safe INR for joint injections in patients taking warfarin. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2015 Nov;97(8):589-91. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2015.0044.
- Background: PubMed 27500431Choudhry MN, Malik RA, Charalambous CP. Blood Glucose Levels Following Intra-Articular Steroid Injections in Patients with Diabetes: A Systematic Review. JBJS Rev. 2016 Mar 22;4(3):e5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.O.00029.
- Background: PubMed 3948470Derendorf H, Mollmann H, Gruner A, Haack D, Gyselby G. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of glucocorticoid suspensions after intra-articular administration. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1986 Mar;39(3):313-7. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1986.45.
- Background: PubMed 25182149Johnston PC, Lansang MC, Chatterjee S, Kennedy L. Intra-articular glucocorticoid injections and their effect on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA)-axis function. Endocrine. 2015 Mar;48(2):410-6. doi: 10.1007/s12020-014-0409-5. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
- Background: PubMed 31617798Kompel AJ, Roemer FW, Murakami AM, Diaz LE, Crema MD, Guermazi A. Intra-articular Corticosteroid Injections in the Hip and Knee: Perhaps Not as Safe as We Thought? Radiology. 2019 Dec;293(3):656-663. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019190341. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
- Background: PubMed 15751089Mader R, Lavi I, Luboshitzky R. Evaluation of the pituitary-adrenal axis function following single intraarticular injection of methylprednisolone. Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Mar;52(3):924-8. doi: 10.1002/art.20884.
- Background: PubMed 29741744Patel J, Schneider BJ, Smith CC; Spine Intervention Society's Patient Safety Committee. Fact Finders for Patient Safety: Intra-Articular Corticosteroid Injections and Hyperglycemia. Pain Med. 2018 May 1;19(5):1091-1092. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx303. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 26240704Tamez-Perez HE, Quintanilla-Flores DL, Rodriguez-Gutierrez R, Gonzalez-Gonzalez JG, Tamez-Pena AL. Steroid hyperglycemia: Prevalence, early detection and therapeutic recommendations: A narrative review. World J Diabetes. 2015 Jul 25;6(8):1073-81. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i8.1073.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
Holistic Healing for Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
Recruiting
Effect of Anti-inflammatory Diet in Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Single vs Triple Hyaluronic Acid in Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
The Feasibility of a Virtual/Home-based OA Treatment Program in Older Adults With OA and Multimorbidity
Osteoarthritis of the Knee
RecruitingObservational study
Exploring Factors Linked to Worsening Over Time in People With Early-stage Knee Osteoarthritis and Those With Prior Proven Acute Knee Injury.
Knee Osteoarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Neil A Segal, MD, MS principal investigator
University of Kansas Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing triamcinolone acetonide extended-release injectable suspension; TCA-ER and Triamcinolone Acetonide- Immediate Release;TCA-IR in people with Osteoarthritis, Knee and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by University of Kansas Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 33 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jessica Lee, PhD (913-574-0958, jlee33@kumc.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percent of time spent with blood glucose >180 mg/dL (time frame: The primary outcome will be measured up to 72 hours after treatment by a sensor automatically uploading the data). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06478186, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Oct 2026.