AuscultationNCT06359158
Enhancing Respiratory Auscultation Skills Among Medical Students: Digital Stethoscopes in Medical Education
A study testing Digital stethoscope use in people with Auscultation and Breathing Sound, run by Chung Shan Medical University at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
Objectives: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a novel digital stethoscope curriculum integrated into respiratory auscultation training for medical students. It seeks to compare the auscultation proficiency gained through this innovative approach with that from traditional teaching methods, to understand… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 30 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Auscultation, Breathing Sound, Asthma
- What is being tested?
- Digital stethoscope use
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 84 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2023to 31 Jan 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 30 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Medical students who were completing their clinical clerkship rotations in the Department of Thoracic Surgery during the study period.
Who cannot join
- All medical students who did not complete the clinical clerkship rotations, the pre- and post-tests, and the course feedback questionnaire.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Enhancing Respiratory Auscultation Skills Among Medical Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Integration of Digital Stethoscopes in Medical Education
Objectives: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a novel digital stethoscope curriculum integrated into respiratory auscultation training for medical students. It seeks to compare the auscultation proficiency gained through this innovative approach with that from traditional teaching methods, to understand the potential of digital stethoscopes in reinvigorating clinical skills training.
Methods: In a single-center, controlled, longitudinal, randomized experimental design, 84 medical students undergoing clinical clerkship rotations at Chung Shan Medical University Hospital were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to either the intervention group, receiving training with digital stethoscopes and the Eko auscultation software, or the control group, following a traditional curriculum. Pre- and post-intervention assessments measured auscultation skills, and student feedback on teaching quality was collected. The primary outcome was the improvement in auscultation proficiency, while secondary outcomes included student engagement and feedback on the educational approach.
Expected Results: The investigators hypothesize that the integration of digital stethoscopes into the curriculum will significantly improve the auscultation skills of medical students compared to traditional methods. Enhanced engagement and positive feedback from students are anticipated, underscoring the pedagogical value of incorporating digital health technologies in medical education.
Read the detailed description
Subjects and Procedures Research Methodology The present investigation carried out at a university hospital, was a longitudinal, controlled, single-center, randomized trial with an interventional design. A total of 84 medical students who were completing their clinical clerkship rotations in the Department of Thoracic Surgery were included in the study. The participants were randomized to either the intervention group or the control group.
Intervention The participants in the intervention group were provided with the curriculum titled "Respiratory Auscultation with Digital Stethoscopes," which involved the use of electronic digital stethoscopes and the Eko auscultation software platform developed by Eko Devices in Berkeley, California, USA. The utilization of this methodology enabled the viewing and examination of documented respiratory sounds, which were then shown as phonopneumograms. The participants assigned to the control group were provided with conventional respiratory auscultation training in accordance with the established clerkship curriculum. The curriculum encompassed practical sessions conducted at the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) center, utilizing the SAM II respiratory sound simulator (Cardionics, Webster, Texas, USA). Additionally, instructional videos were provided to facilitate the acquisition of knowledge pertaining to breath sounds. Furthermore, a breathing assignment was assigned to each student, necessitating the recording and description of five distinct breath sounds. The process of gathering data The Zuvio Interactive Response System (Zuvio, Taipei, Taiwan) was used to measure participants' auscultation skills before and after the intervention. This was done by employing a question bank consisting of 50 breath sound audio files. The collection of student feedback regarding the quality of teaching and the helpfulness of the course was conducted by means of surveys employing 5-point Likert scales. Furthermore, the researchers collected data pertaining to OSCE attendance, video viewing, answer-checking behavior, and the time interval between pre-and post-tests. The variables that were assessed included alterations in auscultation test scores and self-reported levels of teaching satisfaction within the two cohorts.
Statistical analysis The data analysis was performed utilizing the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics, version 25). A range of statistical tests were employed to comprehensively analyze the distribution of student scores and teaching satisfaction, compare the intervention and control groups, and explore the influence of the course on students' engagement and learning outcomes. The normality of distributions for student scores and teaching satisfaction was initially examined using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. To compare scores and satisfaction levels between the intervention and control groups, either the Student t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test was selected, depending on the distributions. The paired Student's t-test or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used, as appropriate, to assess the changes in scores before and after the course. The study employed the chi-square test to examine the disparity in the proportions of students from both groups who opted to rent electronic stethoscopes subsequent to the completed course. This was conducted as an indirect method to assess the student's level of interest in auscultation and their comprehension of digital stethoscope technology, hence indicating the effectiveness of the course instruction. In addition, the researchers used regression analysis to investigate the relationships between different variables and outcomes, thereby offering valuable insights into the determinants that impact students' learning experiences and preferences. The statistical significance level was set at p<0.05.
- Conditions
- Auscultation, Breathing Sound, Asthma, Pneumonia, Pleural Effusion
- Being tested
- Digital stethoscope use
- Keywords
- Medical Education, Auscultation Pedagogy, Digital Stethoscope, Clinical Skills Training
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Sounds, Asthma, Pneumonia, Pleural Effusion
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Digital stethoscope useDevice
Also called video, Pre- and Post- test, Questionnaire on student feedback
In this interventional study, 84 medical students were randomly allocated to an intervention group utilizing a novel digital stethoscope curriculum or a control group receiving traditional instruction. The intervention leveraged digital stethoscopes, enabling visualization and analysis of recorded breath sounds. Pre- and post-assessments evaluated respiratory
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Digital stethoscope use | Experimental | The intervention comprises a comprehensive curriculum titled "Respiratory Auscultation with Digital Stethoscopes," designed to enhance the proficiency of medical students in diagnosing respiratory disorders through auscultation. The curriculum utilizes advanced digital stethoscope technology, specifically electronic digital stethoscopes, and the Eko auscultation software platform, to facilitate the visualization and analysis of recorded breath sounds, thereby augmenting traditional auscultation training methods. Receives: Device: Digital stethoscope use |
| Traditional stethoscope use | No intervention | The curriculum utilizes a traditional stethoscope. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pre-test and Post-test using the Zuvio Interactive Response System (Zuvio, Taipei, Taiwan)
The Zuvio Interactive Response System evaluates participants' auscultation skills through a question bank of 50 breath sound audio files.
Measured: At the beginning and end of the two-week Thoracic Surgery clinical rotation.
Student Feedback
Helpfulness of the course: Student feedback on teaching quality and course helpfulness was collected through surveys using 5-point Likert scales.
Measured: End of the two-week Thoracic Surgery clinical rotation.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Apr 2024
- Study start1 Aug 2023
- Primary completion31 Jan 2024
- Study completion31 Jan 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for AuscultationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Chung Shan Medical University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Education, Taiwan
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Frank Lin, MD, PhD, Chung Shan Medical University
- Investigators
- Frank CF Lin, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Chung Shan Medical University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06359158
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- eStethoscope for Med Student
- Status last verified
- Apr 2024
- First submitted
- 23 Mar 2024
- Last updated
- 11 Apr 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Apr 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Enhancing Respiratory Auscultation Skills Among Medical Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Integration of Digital Stethoscopes in Medical Education
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06359158
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- eStethoscope for Med Student
- Conditions
- Auscultation, Breathing Sound, Asthma, Pneumonia, Pleural Effusion
- Keywords
- Medical Education, Auscultation Pedagogy, Digital Stethoscope, Clinical Skills Training
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Chung Shan Medical UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Education, Taiwan
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Objectives: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a novel digital stethoscope curriculum integrated into respiratory auscultation training for medical students. It seeks to compare the auscultation proficiency gained through this innovative approach with that from traditional teaching methods, to understand the potential of digital stethoscopes in reinvigorating clinical skills training.
Methods: In a single-center, controlled, longitudinal, randomized experimental design, 84 medical students undergoing clinical clerkship rotations at Chung Shan Medical University Hospital were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to either the intervention group, receiving training with digital stethoscopes and the Eko auscultation software, or the control group, following a traditional curriculum. Pre- and post-intervention assessments measured auscultation skills, and student feedback on teaching quality was collected. The primary outcome was the improvement in auscultation proficiency, while secondary outcomes included student engagement and feedback on the educational approach.
Expected Results: The investigators hypothesize that the integration of digital stethoscopes into the curriculum will significantly improve the auscultation skills of medical students compared to traditional methods. Enhanced engagement and positive feedback from students are anticipated, underscoring the pedagogical value of incorporating digital health technologies in medical education.
Detailed description
Subjects and Procedures Research Methodology The present investigation carried out at a university hospital, was a longitudinal, controlled, single-center, randomized trial with an interventional design. A total of 84 medical students who were completing their clinical clerkship rotations in the Department of Thoracic Surgery were included in the study. The participants were randomized to either the intervention group or the control group.
Intervention The participants in the intervention group were provided with the curriculum titled "Respiratory Auscultation with Digital Stethoscopes," which involved the use of electronic digital stethoscopes and the Eko auscultation software platform developed by Eko Devices in Berkeley, California, USA. The utilization of this methodology enabled the viewing and examination of documented respiratory sounds, which were then shown as phonopneumograms. The participants assigned to the control group were provided with conventional respiratory auscultation training in accordance with the established clerkship curriculum. The curriculum encompassed practical sessions conducted at the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) center, utilizing the SAM II respiratory sound simulator (Cardionics, Webster, Texas, USA). Additionally, instructional videos were provided to facilitate the acquisition of knowledge pertaining to breath sounds. Furthermore, a breathing assignment was assigned to each student, necessitating the recording and description of five distinct breath sounds. The process of gathering data The Zuvio Interactive Response System (Zuvio, Taipei, Taiwan) was used to measure participants' auscultation skills before and after the intervention. This was done by employing a question bank consisting of 50 breath sound audio files. The collection of student feedback regarding the quality of teaching and the helpfulness of the course was conducted by means of surveys employing 5-point Likert scales. Furthermore, the researchers collected data pertaining to OSCE attendance, video viewing, answer-checking behavior, and the time interval between pre-and post-tests. The variables that were assessed included alterations in auscultation test scores and self-reported levels of teaching satisfaction within the two cohorts.
Statistical analysis The data analysis was performed utilizing the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics, version 25). A range of statistical tests were employed to comprehensively analyze the distribution of student scores and teaching satisfaction, compare the intervention and control groups, and explore the influence of the course on students' engagement and learning outcomes. The normality of distributions for student scores and teaching satisfaction was initially examined using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. To compare scores and satisfaction levels between the intervention and control groups, either the Student t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test was selected, depending on the distributions. The paired Student's t-test or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used, as appropriate, to assess the changes in scores before and after the course. The study employed the chi-square test to examine the disparity in the proportions of students from both groups who opted to rent electronic stethoscopes subsequent to the completed course. This was conducted as an indirect method to assess the student's level of interest in auscultation and their comprehension of digital stethoscope technology, hence indicating the effectiveness of the course instruction. In addition, the researchers used regression analysis to investigate the relationships between different variables and outcomes, thereby offering valuable insights into the determinants that impact students' learning experiences and preferences. The statistical significance level was set at p<0.05.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Digital stethoscope use | Experimental | Device: Digital stethoscope useThe intervention comprises a comprehensive curriculum titled "Respiratory Auscultation with Digital Stethoscopes," designed to enhance the proficiency of medical students in diagnosing respiratory disorders through auscultation. The curriculum utilizes advanced digital stethoscope technology, specifically electronic digital stethoscopes, and the Eko auscultation software platform, to facilitate the visualization and analysis of recorded breath sounds, thereby augmenting traditional auscultation training methods. |
| Traditional stethoscope use | No intervention | –The curriculum utilizes a traditional stethoscope. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 30 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Medical students who were completing their clinical clerkship rotations in the Department of Thoracic Surgery during the study period.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All medical students who did not complete the clinical clerkship rotations, the pre- and post-tests, and the course feedback questionnaire.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Digital stethoscope useAlso: video, Pre- and Post- test, Questionnaire on student feedbackIn this interventional study, 84 medical students were randomly allocated to an intervention group utilizing a novel digital stethoscope curriculum or a control group receiving traditional instruction. The intervention leveraged digital stethoscopes, enabling visualization and analysis of recorded breath sounds. Pre- and post-assessments evaluated respiratory | Device | Digital stethoscope use |
Primary outcome
Pre-test and Post-test using the Zuvio Interactive Response System (Zuvio, Taipei, Taiwan)
Time frame: At the beginning and end of the two-week Thoracic Surgery clinical rotation.
The Zuvio Interactive Response System evaluates participants' auscultation skills through a question bank of 50 breath sound audio files.
Student Feedback
Time frame: End of the two-week Thoracic Surgery clinical rotation.
Helpfulness of the course: Student feedback on teaching quality and course helpfulness was collected through surveys using 5-point Likert scales.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Apr 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Auscultation
Not yet recruiting
Music Listening for Chronic Pain in Adults With Early-Stage Dementia
Chronic Pain, Alzheimer Disease
Not yet recruiting
Pilot Trial of Ambient Listening for Intensive Care Unit Family Meeting Summaries
Documentation of Serious Illness Communication for Critically Ill Patients
Recruiting
Preoperative Music Intervention for Anxiety in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty
Anxiety, Osteoarthritis
Active, not recruiting
Musical Intervention for Dental Anxiety
Dental Anxiety
Recruiting
Cochlear Implants and Listening Effort: the Interaction of Cognitive and Sensory Constraints
Cochlear Implant Users
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Frank CF Lin, MD, PhD principal investigator
Chung Shan Medical University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Digital stethoscope use in people with Auscultation and Breathing Sound, run by Chung Shan Medical University at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pre-test and Post-test using the Zuvio Interactive Response System (Zuvio, Taipei, Taiwan) (time frame: At the beginning and end of the two-week Thoracic Surgery clinical rotation.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Apr 2024.