AchalasiaNCT06042127
POEM-F for Achalasia International Study
A study testing POEM-F and Conventional POEM in people with Achalasia, run by Chinese University of Hong Kong at 7 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has emerged as the endoscopic treatment of choice for achalasia, offering comparable symptom relief with laparoscopic Heller's cardiomyotomy. The main concern with POEM is the higher incidence of post-procedure gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), occurring in up to 50-60% of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Achalasia
- What is being tested?
- POEM-F and Conventional POEM
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 81 participants
- Where
- 7 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2023to 31 Oct 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patient (age ≥18 and ≤65 years-old) and with symptomatic achalasia type I or II.
- Capability of understanding and complying with the study requirements, including filling the Eckardt Score, GERD-HRQL and RSI questionnaire and signing the informed consent form.
- Patients with achalasia type I, II or III who are one of the following:
- Treatment naïve, or
- Failed prior through-the-scope balloon dilation, Savary or pneumatic dilation
Who cannot join
- Patients unable or unwilling to provide consent.
- Previous esophageal or gastric surgery.
- Prior achalasia treatment including Heller myotomy, POEM.
- Sigmoid achalasia, or significant esophageal dilatation >6cm in lower esophagus
- Disrupted mucosal integrity at the distal esophagus, eg. Ulcer, fibrotic scars etc
- Patients with large hiatal hernias (axial length > 2 cm and Hill grade >2).
Show all 10Show fewer
- Patients with significant cardiorespiratory comorbidities which may limit their ability to undertake general anesthesia for the procedure, including ASA grade III or above.
- Patients with obesity (Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 30).
- Pregnant women or those planning pregnancy or breastfeeding women.
- Uncorrectable coagulopathy defined by international normalized ratio (INR) > 1.5 or platelet count < 50000/µl.
Trial locations and contacts
7 sites in 4 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
7 sites in 4 countries
India4 sites, 4 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
Chandigarh
Jayanta Samanta, dj_samanta@yahoo.co.in
Jayanta Samanta
- Not yet recruiting
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology
Hyderabad
Mohan Ramchandani, ramchandanimohan@gmail.com
Mohan Ramchandani
- Not yet recruiting
Baldota Institute of Digestive Sciences
Mumbai
Amit Maydeo, amitmaydeo@gmail.com
Amit Maydeo
- Not yet recruiting
Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital & Research Center
Pune
Amol Bapaye, amolbapaye@gmail.com
Amol Bapaye
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
Mouen Khashab, mkhasha1@jhmi.edu
Farimah Fayyaz
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
Guangzhou
Xiaobei Luo, luoxiaobei63@126.com
Xiaobei Luo
Hong Kong1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong
Hon Chi Yip, FRCSEd, +85235052627, hcyip@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk
About this study
Official title: Per-oral Endoscopic Myotomy With Fundoplication for Achalasia - an International Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has emerged as the endoscopic treatment of choice for achalasia, offering comparable symptom relief with laparoscopic Heller's cardiomyotomy. The main concern with POEM is the higher incidence of post-procedure gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), occurring in up to 50-60% of patients. In order to reduce the risk of GERD, endoscopic fundoplication has been developed as a novel procedure mimicking surgical anterior partial fundoplication that can be performed in the same session as POEM (POEM-F). Case series of POEM-F in patients with achalasia reported encouraging outcomes of low GERD rate of ~12% at 1 year. Prospective comparative data between POEM-F and conventional POEM on post-procedure GERD is current lacking. The investigators therefore designed an international multicenter prospective randomized study to investigate the efficacy of POEM-F. The investigators postulate that POEM-F could reduce the incidence of post-procedure GERD when compared with conventional POEM.
This is an international multicenter randomized controlled trial conducted between high volume expert centers from Hong Kong SAR, China, India and United States of America. Adult patients with manometry confirmed achalasia would be randomised to undergo POEM-F or POEM. The procedure would be performed by experts with vast experience in POEM. The primary outcome is the incidence of post-procedure GERD at 1 year, defined by the updated Lyon consensus. Secondary outcomes include technical and clinical success rates, adverse events, post-POEM endoscopic and manometry findings as well as patients' symptom scores.
Read more
Sample size calculation Based on existing pilot comparative data on POEM-F and POEM, it is estimated that 84 patients would be required to demonstrate a difference in post-procedure GERD of 47.6% to 18.2%, with 80% power and false positive rate of 0.05, accounting for 10% loss to follow-up.
Purpose and potential The current study proposal could demonstrate the superiority of POEM-F over POEM in reducing post-procedural GERD. It would also demonstrate the safety and reproducibility of the technique in expert centers across the globe. It could potentially replace conventional POEM as the preferred minimally invasive endoscopic treatment for achalasia.
Read the detailed description
Achalasia is the most common esophageal motility disorder worldwide, with an annual incidence of 1.6 per 100'000 individual and prevalence of 10 per 100'000 population. The incidence of achalasia has been dramatically rising over the past decade. A study conducted in Chicago suggested that over the 10 years from 2004 to 2014, the incidence and prevalence of achalasia were two- to threefold greater than estimates would have predicted. The likely explanation to the rise in incidence is an increased awareness of this condition and widespread availability of accurate diagnostic test with high resolution manometry. The cardinal features of achalasia include failed relaxation of lower esophageal sphincter and absent esophageal peristalsis. Owing to the benign nature of the disease, patients suffering from it would experience longstanding debilitating symptoms of dysphagia, chest pain, regurgitation, resulting in poor quality of life. In the past, laparoscopic Heller's cardiomyotomy with partial fundoplication and endoscopic pneumatic dilatation were considered as treatment options for achalasia.
In the past 10 years, per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has emerged as the incisionless minimally invasive endoscopic treatment of choice for achalasia. This Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgical (NOTES) technique involves mucosal incision and creation of a submucosal tunnel in the distal esophagus down to gastric cardia, followed by esophageal and gastric myotomy. Since the procedure was first reported by Inoue H, et al in 2010, it has seen worldwide acceptance as first-line therapy. POEM has been associated with excellent relief of dysphagia and achalasia-related symptoms with a low and acceptable adverse event rate of 0.5%. In a previous randomised controlled trial, POEM had a higher treatment success rate than pneumatic dilatation. When compared with laparoscopic Heller's cardiomyotomy, POEM was associated with at least similar treatment efficacy and a trend towards reduced short term adverse event. POEM could perform even better than surgical myotomy in patients with type III achalasia.
The main limitation of POEM is the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) post-POEM. Kumbhari et al. looked at rates of GERD after POEM on patients who underwent subsequent objective pH testing. A total of 282 patients were included in this analysis from multiple centers in America, Asia, and Europe. About 58% of patients had objective evidence of abnormal acid exposure, with 23% showing evidence of esophagitis. More concerning, however, was that 60% of the patients with GERD were completely asymptomatic. This highlights an important issue at hand that many patients, either related to the propensity of GERD to be silent or the nature of achalasia to develop and insensate esophagus, do not report symptoms while showing high rates of GERD. POEM has been found to be consistently associated with higher rate of GERD than conventional Heller's cardiomyotomy or pneumatic dilatation across multiple studies.
Supported by evidence demonstrating the efficacy of partial fundoplication during Heller's operation, there has been a significant interest in performing fundoplication after POEM during the same session to prevent the development of post-POEM GERD. Inoue et al. pioneered the technique of POEM-F that mimics the surgical Dor (anterior partial fundoplication) procedure. In the pilot study, technical success was achieved in all 21 patients, and all but one had an intact fundoplication wrap on upper endoscopy at a 1-month follow-up. Four more studies conducted in Japan and India have reported good early outcomes with POEM-F (Technical success of 85-100%) for achalasia. No severe adverse event has been reported in these studies which reiterates the safety of this procedure. In the longest follow-up study on POEM-F, GERD diagnosed by an abnormal esophageal acid exposure was seen in 11.1% of the 21 cases at one-year follow-up: comparable (8.8%) to a large meta-analysis of 4871 Heller's cardiomyotomy with fundoplication procedures.
To date, no prospective multicenter randomised study has been conducted to compare the efficacy of POEM-F with conventional POEM in reducing post-procedure GERD. Therefore, in this study, the investigators aim to evaluate the of POEM-F in patients with achalasia through an international multicenter randomized controlled trial.
- Conditions
- Achalasia
- Being tested
- POEM-F, Conventional POEM
- Keywords
- POEM, Fundoplication, GERD
- Medical subject headings
- Esophageal Achalasia, Gastroesophageal Reflux
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
POEM-FProcedure or surgery
POEM-F would be performed as described in the arms section
Conventional POEMProcedure or surgery
Anterior POEM performed as described in the arms section
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Per-oral endoscopic myotomy with fundoplication | Experimental | The detail of the procedure has been reported in the literature. After completion of myotomy as per conventional anterior POEM, a serosal incision would be made at the level of the GE junction below the diaphragmatic crus. The peritoneal cavity would then be entered and the anterior gastric wall could be identified. A detachable endoloop would be introduced alongside the endoscope with the guidance of endoscopic clip. Three to four clips would be applied to the anterior gastric fundus while additional 3-4 clips would be applied to the edge of the submucosal tunnel, all anchoring to the endoloop. Upon tightening of the endoloop the anterior fundus would be approximated to the esophagogastric junction and thus completing the partial anterior fundoplication. Abdominal paracentesis to treat capnoperitoneum would be performed as required based on patient's clinical condition. Receives: Procedure: POEM-F |
| Conventional POEM | Active comparator | Conventional per-oral endoscopic myotomy An anterior POEM would be performed per usual manner described in the literature. The procedure would be performed under general anaesthesia by expert endoscopists with at least 50 case experience of conventional POEM and 5 cases experience of POEM-F. The requirement of POEM experience is based on a recent multicenter study of learning curve by Fujiyoshi Y, et al. The procedure would follow the current recommendations from expert panel in reducing GER, including avoidance of excessive gastric myotomy and preservation of the sling fibers are the gastric cardia. The length of the esophageal and gastric myotomy is standardized at 5cm and 2cm respectively Receives: Procedure: Conventional POEM |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Post-procedure rate of gastroesophageal reflux
Defined by updated Lyon 2.0 consensus as fulfilling one or more of the criteria:
- Endoscopic erosive esophagitis, LA grade B or above
- Long segment Barrett's esophagus
- Peptic esophageal stricture
- 24-hour pH study with acid exposure time >6% Both endoscopy and pH study to be performed with proton pump inhibitor stopped for 4 weeks
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (18)
Clinical success rate of procedure
Post-treatment Eckhardt score <=3
Measured: 1 year
Adverse event of procedure
frequency of severe adverse events with probable or definite attribution to the procedure based on the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) lexicon as well as Clavien Dindo classification
Measured: 30 day
Technical success rate of procedure
Completing all steps of the intended procedure successfully in the same session
Measured: 1 day
Procedure time
Procedure time of the intended procedure in minutes
Measured: 1 day
Erosive esophagitis on post-procedure endoscopy
The presence of erosive esophagitis as well as the grading on post-procedure endoscopy
Measured: 1 year
Fundoplication wrap integrity on post-procedure endoscopy
Endoscopic appearance of fundoplication wrap on retroflexion in the stomach.
- Intact - wrap is completely visualised
- Indistinct - wrap is visualised but appears to be loosened
- Absent - the wrap is completely not visible
Measured: 1 year
Distensibility index on EndoFLIP, premyotomy
Distensibility index (mm2/mmHg) using EndoFLIP
Measured: During index procedure, before myotomy
Distensibility index on EndoFLIP, post myotomy
Distensibility index (mm2/mmHg) using EndoFLIP
Measured: During index procedure, after myotomy
Distensibility index on EndoFLIP, post fundoplication
Distensibility index (mm2/mmHg) using EndoFLIP
Measured: During index procedure, after fundoplication
Distensibility index on EndoFLIP, on follow-up
Distensibility index (mm2/mmHg) using EndoFLIP, at follow-up endoscopy
Measured: 1 year
Maximum diameter on EndoFLIP, premyotomy
Maximum diameter (mm) on EndoFLIP
Measured: During index procedure, before myotomy
Maximum diameter on EndoFLIP, post-myotomy
Maximum diameter (mm) on EndoFLIP
Measured: During index procedure, after myotomy
Maximum diameter on EndoFLIP, post-fundoplication
Maximum diameter (mm) on EndoFLIP
Measured: During index procedure, after fundoplication
Maximum diameter on EndoFLIP, on follow-up
Maximum diameter (mm) on EndoFLIP, at follow-up endoscopy
Measured: 1 year
GERD-HRQL score
Symptom and quality of life score relating to GERD The score ranged from 0-50 with higher score signifying more severe GERD symptom / worse quality of life
Measured: 1 month, 3 month, 6 month and 1 year
GERD-RSI score
Symptom and quality of life score relating to GERD The score ranged from 0-45 with higher score signifying more severe GERD symptom
Measured: 1 month, 3 month, 6 month and 1 year
GERD-Q score
Symptom and quality of life score relating to GERD The score is ranged from 0-18 with the higher score signifying more symptom of GERD
Measured: 1 month, 3 month, 6 month and 1 year
Use of proton pump inhibitor post-procedure
Number of participants who are on regular / as required / not on PPI
Measured: 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, and 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Sep 2023
- Study start1 Dec 2023
- Primary completion31 Oct 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Oct 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for AchalasiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Chinese University of Hong KongThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomised controlled trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 81 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Chinese University of Hong Kong
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Centre, Johns Hopkins University, Northwestern University, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hon Chi Yip, Chinese University of Hong Kong
- Investigators
- Hon Chi Yip, FRCSEd, Principal investigator, Chinese University of Hong Kong
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06042127
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2023 145-T
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 6 Sep 2023
- Last updated
- 3 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Per-oral Endoscopic Myotomy With Fundoplication for Achalasia - an International Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06042127
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2023 145-T
- Conditions
- Achalasia
- Keywords
- POEM, Fundoplication, GERD
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 81 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Chinese University of Hong KongUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Centre, Johns Hopkins University, Northwestern University, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Oct 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has emerged as the endoscopic treatment of choice for achalasia, offering comparable symptom relief with laparoscopic Heller's cardiomyotomy. The main concern with POEM is the higher incidence of post-procedure gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), occurring in up to 50-60% of patients. In order to reduce the risk of GERD, endoscopic fundoplication has been developed as a novel procedure mimicking surgical anterior partial fundoplication that can be performed in the same session as POEM (POEM-F). Case series of POEM-F in patients with achalasia reported encouraging outcomes of low GERD rate of ~12% at 1 year. Prospective comparative data between POEM-F and conventional POEM on post-procedure GERD is current lacking. The investigators therefore designed an international multicenter prospective randomized study to investigate the efficacy of POEM-F. The investigators postulate that POEM-F could reduce the incidence of post-procedure GERD when compared with conventional POEM.
This is an international multicenter randomized controlled trial conducted between high volume expert centers from Hong Kong SAR, China, India and United States of America. Adult patients with manometry confirmed achalasia would be randomised to undergo POEM-F or POEM. The procedure would be performed by experts with vast experience in POEM. The primary outcome is the incidence of post-procedure GERD at 1 year, defined by the updated Lyon consensus. Secondary outcomes include technical and clinical success rates, adverse events, post-POEM endoscopic and manometry findings as well as patients' symptom scores.
Sample size calculation Based on existing pilot comparative data on POEM-F and POEM, it is estimated that 84 patients would be required to demonstrate a difference in post-procedure GERD of 47.6% to 18.2%, with 80% power and false positive rate of 0.05, accounting for 10% loss to follow-up.
Purpose and potential The current study proposal could demonstrate the superiority of POEM-F over POEM in reducing post-procedural GERD. It would also demonstrate the safety and reproducibility of the technique in expert centers across the globe. It could potentially replace conventional POEM as the preferred minimally invasive endoscopic treatment for achalasia.
Detailed description
Achalasia is the most common esophageal motility disorder worldwide, with an annual incidence of 1.6 per 100'000 individual and prevalence of 10 per 100'000 population. The incidence of achalasia has been dramatically rising over the past decade. A study conducted in Chicago suggested that over the 10 years from 2004 to 2014, the incidence and prevalence of achalasia were two- to threefold greater than estimates would have predicted. The likely explanation to the rise in incidence is an increased awareness of this condition and widespread availability of accurate diagnostic test with high resolution manometry. The cardinal features of achalasia include failed relaxation of lower esophageal sphincter and absent esophageal peristalsis. Owing to the benign nature of the disease, patients suffering from it would experience longstanding debilitating symptoms of dysphagia, chest pain, regurgitation, resulting in poor quality of life. In the past, laparoscopic Heller's cardiomyotomy with partial fundoplication and endoscopic pneumatic dilatation were considered as treatment options for achalasia.
In the past 10 years, per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has emerged as the incisionless minimally invasive endoscopic treatment of choice for achalasia. This Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgical (NOTES) technique involves mucosal incision and creation of a submucosal tunnel in the distal esophagus down to gastric cardia, followed by esophageal and gastric myotomy. Since the procedure was first reported by Inoue H, et al in 2010, it has seen worldwide acceptance as first-line therapy. POEM has been associated with excellent relief of dysphagia and achalasia-related symptoms with a low and acceptable adverse event rate of 0.5%. In a previous randomised controlled trial, POEM had a higher treatment success rate than pneumatic dilatation. When compared with laparoscopic Heller's cardiomyotomy, POEM was associated with at least similar treatment efficacy and a trend towards reduced short term adverse event. POEM could perform even better than surgical myotomy in patients with type III achalasia.
The main limitation of POEM is the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) post-POEM. Kumbhari et al. looked at rates of GERD after POEM on patients who underwent subsequent objective pH testing. A total of 282 patients were included in this analysis from multiple centers in America, Asia, and Europe. About 58% of patients had objective evidence of abnormal acid exposure, with 23% showing evidence of esophagitis. More concerning, however, was that 60% of the patients with GERD were completely asymptomatic. This highlights an important issue at hand that many patients, either related to the propensity of GERD to be silent or the nature of achalasia to develop and insensate esophagus, do not report symptoms while showing high rates of GERD. POEM has been found to be consistently associated with higher rate of GERD than conventional Heller's cardiomyotomy or pneumatic dilatation across multiple studies.
Supported by evidence demonstrating the efficacy of partial fundoplication during Heller's operation, there has been a significant interest in performing fundoplication after POEM during the same session to prevent the development of post-POEM GERD. Inoue et al. pioneered the technique of POEM-F that mimics the surgical Dor (anterior partial fundoplication) procedure. In the pilot study, technical success was achieved in all 21 patients, and all but one had an intact fundoplication wrap on upper endoscopy at a 1-month follow-up. Four more studies conducted in Japan and India have reported good early outcomes with POEM-F (Technical success of 85-100%) for achalasia. No severe adverse event has been reported in these studies which reiterates the safety of this procedure. In the longest follow-up study on POEM-F, GERD diagnosed by an abnormal esophageal acid exposure was seen in 11.1% of the 21 cases at one-year follow-up: comparable (8.8%) to a large meta-analysis of 4871 Heller's cardiomyotomy with fundoplication procedures.
To date, no prospective multicenter randomised study has been conducted to compare the efficacy of POEM-F with conventional POEM in reducing post-procedure GERD. Therefore, in this study, the investigators aim to evaluate the of POEM-F in patients with achalasia through an international multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomised controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Per-oral endoscopic myotomy with fundoplication | Experimental | Procedure: POEM-FThe detail of the procedure has been reported in the literature. After completion of myotomy as per conventional anterior POEM, a serosal incision would be made at the level of the GE junction below the diaphragmatic crus. The peritoneal cavity would then be entered and the anterior gastric wall could be identified. A detachable endoloop would be introduced alongside the endoscope with the guidance of endoscopic clip. Three to four clips would be applied to the anterior gastric fundus while additional 3-4 clips would be applied to the edge of the submucosal tunnel, all anchoring to the endoloop. Upon tightening of the endoloop the anterior fundus would be approximated to the esophagogastric junction and thus completing the partial anterior fundoplication. Abdominal paracentesis to treat capnoperitoneum would be performed as required based on patient's clinical condition. |
| Conventional POEM | Active comparator | Procedure: Conventional POEMConventional per-oral endoscopic myotomy An anterior POEM would be performed per usual manner described in the literature. The procedure would be performed under general anaesthesia by expert endoscopists with at least 50 case experience of conventional POEM and 5 cases experience of POEM-F. The requirement of POEM experience is based on a recent multicenter study of learning curve by Fujiyoshi Y, et al. The procedure would follow the current recommendations from expert panel in reducing GER, including avoidance of excessive gastric myotomy and preservation of the sling fibers are the gastric cardia. The length of the esophageal and gastric myotomy is standardized at 5cm and 2cm respectively |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Adult patient (age ≥18 and ≤65 years-old) and with symptomatic achalasia type I or II.
- Capability of understanding and complying with the study requirements, including filling the Eckardt Score, GERD-HRQL and RSI questionnaire and signing the informed consent form.
- Patients with achalasia type I, II or III who are one of the following:
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Patients unable or unwilling to provide consent.
- Previous esophageal or gastric surgery.
- Prior achalasia treatment including Heller myotomy, POEM.
- Sigmoid achalasia, or significant esophageal dilatation >6cm in lower esophagus
- Disrupted mucosal integrity at the distal esophagus, eg. Ulcer, fibrotic scars etc
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| POEM-FPOEM-F would be performed as described in the arms section | Procedure or surgery | Per-oral endoscopic myotomy with fundoplication |
| Conventional POEMAnterior POEM performed as described in the arms section | Procedure or surgery | Conventional POEM |
Primary outcome
Post-procedure rate of gastroesophageal reflux
Time frame: 1 year
Defined by updated Lyon 2.0 consensus as fulfilling one or more of the criteria: 1. Endoscopic erosive esophagitis, LA grade B or above 2. Long segment Barrett's esophagus 3. Peptic esophageal stricture 4. 24-hour pH study with acid exposure time >6% Both endoscopy and pH study to be performed with proton pump inhibitor stopped for 4 weeks
18 secondary outcomes
Clinical success rate of procedure
Time frame: 1 year
Adverse event of procedure
Time frame: 30 day
Technical success rate of procedure
Time frame: 1 day
Procedure time
Time frame: 1 day
Erosive esophagitis on post-procedure endoscopy
Time frame: 1 year
Fundoplication wrap integrity on post-procedure endoscopy
Time frame: 1 year
Distensibility index on EndoFLIP, premyotomy
Time frame: During index procedure, before myotomy
Distensibility index on EndoFLIP, post myotomy
Time frame: During index procedure, after myotomy
Distensibility index on EndoFLIP, post fundoplication
Time frame: During index procedure, after fundoplication
Distensibility index on EndoFLIP, on follow-up
Time frame: 1 year
Maximum diameter on EndoFLIP, premyotomy
Time frame: During index procedure, before myotomy
Maximum diameter on EndoFLIP, post-myotomy
Time frame: During index procedure, after myotomy
Maximum diameter on EndoFLIP, post-fundoplication
Time frame: During index procedure, after fundoplication
Maximum diameter on EndoFLIP, on follow-up
Time frame: 1 year
GERD-HRQL score
Time frame: 1 month, 3 month, 6 month and 1 year
GERD-RSI score
Time frame: 1 month, 3 month, 6 month and 1 year
GERD-Q score
Time frame: 1 month, 3 month, 6 month and 1 year
Use of proton pump inhibitor post-procedure
Time frame: 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, and 1 year
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Dec 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Achalasia
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
RecruitingPhase 2
Full-thickness Versus Progressive Myotomy in Peroral Endoscopic Esophageal Myotomy in Achalasia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Achalasia Cardia, Achalasia
RecruitingPhase 3
PREcision MEDicine In Achalasia (PREMEDIA)
Type I Achalasia, Type II Achalasia
RecruitingObservational study
PREcision MEDicine In Achalasia (PREMEDIA) - Cohort
Type III Achalasia, EGJ Outflow Obstruction With Spastic/Hypercontractile Features
RecruitingPhase 4
VZV in the Enteric Nervous System: Pathogenesis and Consequences
Achalasia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Hon Chi Yip, FRCSEd principal investigator
Chinese University of Hong Kong
7 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing POEM-F and Conventional POEM in people with Achalasia, run by Chinese University of Hong Kong at 7 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 7 sites in India, United States, China, Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Hon Chi Yip, FRCSEd (35052627, hcyip@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Post-procedure rate of gastroesophageal reflux (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Dec 2024.