AzTrials
AzTrials

Vaginal DischargePOCT-BRANCT05977491

Point-of-care Tests for Vaginal Discharge in Nepal

A study testing Health care practitioner is informed of POCT results for CT and NG, Health care practitioner is informed about POCT result for TV and BV and addressing psycholsocial problems in people with Vaginal Discharge and Sexually Transmitted Diseases, run by Norwegian University of Science and Technology at 1 site in Nepal.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to examine if and how the implementation of point-of care-tests (POCT) for sexually transmitted infections in the management of abnormal vaginal discharge reduces the overtreatment with antibiotics in a low income country. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Health care practitioner is informed of POCT results for CT and NG, Health care practitioner is informed about POCT result for TV and BV and addressing psycholsocial problems
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,500 participants
Where
1 siteNepal
Study dates
22 Apr 2024to 25 Jan 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Women presenting with vaginal discharge to gynecological outpatients

Who cannot join

  • Minors below the age of 18 years.
  • Any bleeding from the vagina.
  • Suspicion of gynecological cancer.
  • Previous inclusion in the same study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Nepal1 site
  • Dhulikhel Hospital

    Dhulikhel, Kavre

Other trials in Nepal

About this study

Official title: Randomized Controlled Trial in Nepal: Introducing Point-of-care Tests and Identifying Barriers to Reduce Antibiotics for Vaginal Discharge

The goal of this clinical trial is to examine if and how the implementation of point-of care-tests (POCT) for sexually transmitted infections in the management of abnormal vaginal discharge reduces the overtreatment with antibiotics in a low income country. The setting is a university hospital in a semi-rural area in Nepal and several of its rural out-reach-centers. The plan is to include 1500 women attending the gynecological outpatients with a problem of vaginal discharge over approximately a one year period.

The main questions the clinical trial aims to answer are:

Read more
  • Does POCT guided treatment result in reduced over-treatment of antibiotics, compared to the current approach in Nepal?
  • What are the barriers and facilitators of the acceptability of POCTs and the resulting treatment from the perspective of both patients and health care practitioners?

Participants will be randomized in three groups:

  • standard treatment according to current practice
  • POCT result based treatment
  • POCT result based treatment plus patient education and addressing of psycho social vulnerabilities
Read the detailed description

Abnormal vaginal discharge (AVD) is a common problem women seek treatment for allover the world. In low and low- middle income countries (LLMICs) about one third of these women will have a sexually transmitted disease (STI) caused by Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoea (NG) or Trichomonal vaginalis (TV). Approximately another third will have an imbalance in the vaginal microbiotic flora, bacterial vaginosis (BV). These women and their sexual partners in the case of sexually transmitted diseases will benefit from specific antibiotic treatment. The last third of women will not have any infection and there are indications that psychosocial problems may be expressed as somatic complaints, for example of abnormal vaginal discharge in some cultures.

In high income countries, with the help of laboratory-based tests, available after few days, treatment is usually with a narrow spectrum antibiotic for specific bacteria. This involves less risk for the development of antibiotic resistance. In low-income countries, laboratory testing is not feasible due to costs and logistics. Women are usually receiving antibiotic treatment with several types of antibiotics to cover STIs. More recently, point-of -care tests which are nearly as accurate as laboratory-based tests have been developed. Implementation studies for these tests in LLMICs are lacking. However, these molecular tests are still expensive.

In this study the investigators propose a combination of molecular tests for the two most serious infections (CT and NG) and a cheap and simple tests for TV and BV, which both are treated with the same type of antibiotic.

In addition, women attending an outpatient department in a LLMIC setting, expect (antibiotic) treatment, which they will not receive with a negative POCT. In LLMICs it is common practice to purchase over the counter medication, inclusive antibiotics. In particular for women with negative POCT results, there could be a lack of adherence to treatment recommendations.

We want to examine the following research questions (RQ) in the context of treatment for vaginal discharge:

  1. Can POCTs effectively reduce the use of antibiotics? A) The amount of antibiotics prescribed at the time of the appointment B) the proportion of correcly pescribed antibiotics (as defined by gold-standard tests) C) Additional antibiotics used, as reported by the patients,
  2. Barriers and facilitators for patients and health practitioners with a focus on psychosocial and educational elements

For this purpose, a RCT with three arms was designed:

(A) Treatment as usual, (B) Treatment according to POCT results, (C) Treatment according to POCT results and additional patient information on vaginal discharge and antibiotics and screening and available counseling for psychosocial problems.

The investigators plan to include 1500 women with the complaint of abnormal vaginal during a 10-12 month period at Dhulikhel hospital, a tertiary university hospital in central Nepal and selected outreach centers in 2024 and 2025.

Sample size calculation are based on RQ1 and RQ2, feasibility of recruitment and the precision of the estimates, a two-sided 95 % confidence intervals (CI). For RQ1, the use of any antibiotics will be assessed in both POCT arms combined versus the treatment as usual arm (n = 1500), whilst the effect of the educational material on the use of over-the-counter medications will be assessed in the POCTplus versus the POCT group (n = 1000). As many as 85% of women with AVD are over-treated with antibiotics in LLMICs, around 50 % receive antimicrobial resistance driving antibiotics and it is expected, that around 40 % women in the POCT group will subsequently seek over the counter antibiotics. With 1500 participants randomized 1:1:1, a 10 to 20 percentage point reduction in any of these measures will produce CIs with a width between 8 and 12 % and at least 90% power. When allowing for around 40 % loss to follow-up, when assessing the use of over-the-counter antibiotics, the expected width of the CI is still around 15 %.

The investigators will collect self-sampled urine and vaginal swabs from all included women and a self-administered questionnaire with a color-coded audio-computer. The questionnaire contains demographic information and a validated tool to screen for anxiety, depression and domestic violence.

Gold standard testing for the STIs and BV will be performed on all women. Participants will be randomized into three arms. In the standard treatment arm, the attending health practitioner will not be informed about POCT results. In the two POCT arms, the health care practitioner will be informed about CT and NG status and about the pH, inclusive a confirmatory whiff test.

Addition (22.09.2024): after the first 100 participants it was recognized, that sensitivity of the combination pH and whiff test was unacceptably low for TV for women with a high pH and negative whiff test. We will add another low cost, immunological POCT for TV for women with a high pH and a negative whiff test after the first half of participants has been enrolled. Based on our additional power calculation, we will have sufficient power to seperately analyse the diagnostic accuracy for TV both before and after the addition of this test.

In the POCT-PLUS arm, patients will receive additional educational information about physiological and abnormal vaginal discharge and about potentially negative effects of antibiotic treatment. In this arm, woman screening positive for positive for anxiety, depression or domestic violence will be offered psychological counseling or referral to a crisis center Participants will be followed up telephonically after 1 and 4 months.

Being tested
Health care practitioner is informed of POCT results for CT and NG, Health care practitioner is informed about POCT result for TV and BV, addressing psycholsocial problems
Keywords
antibiotic overtreatment, psychosomatic, domestic violence, anxiety and depression, chlamydia trachomatis, neisseria gonorrhoea, trichomonas vaginalis, bacterial vaginosis, process evaluation, point-of-care-test
Medical subject headings
Vaginal Discharge, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Vaginosis, Bacterial

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Health care practitioner is informed of POCT results for CT and NGDiagnostic test

    Also called GeneXpert test from Cepheid for CT andNG

    Molecular, PCR based near-POCT performed by the research assistant on self -collected urine. The outcome is positive or negative

  • Health care practitioner is informed about POCT result for TV and BVDiagnostic test

    Also called Narrow range pH and confirmatory whiff test with potassium hydroxide (KHO), Amsel criteria, for second half of participants to be included: if pH > 4.5 and whiff test is negative, the OSOM test will be performed for TV

    The pH of vaginal secretion is measured from a self-collected swab by the research assistant, and if above 4.5 a dropp of KOH is added. If it smells fishy, the whiff test is positive.

  • addressing psycholsocial problemsOther

    Also called providing basic information on vaginal discharge and antibiotics

    1. Participants screening positive for anxiety, depression or domestic violence will be offered psychological counseling or referral to a crisis management center in the POCT-PLUS arm
    2. All participants of the POCT-PLUS arm receive audio- visual and written education on vaginal discharge and antibiotics
Study groups in NCT05977491
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard treatmentNo interventionPatients are treated by the health care practitioner according to local protocol. This protocol corresponds to the syndromic approach without laboratory or microscopic testing. This may or may not include inspection and examination of the vulva, vagina, cervix and lower abdomen.
POCT based treatmentActive comparatorThe health care practitioner is informed about the POCT results for CT and NG (positive or negative). In addition, if the pH is within the normal level (4.5 and below). If it is higher, he will receive the outcome of the whiff test (positive or negative). For the second half of enrolled participants: if pH is > 4.5 and whiff test is negative, the OSOM test for TV will be performed an self collected vaginal discharge. The Health care practitioner is informed if the TV test is positive or negative. Examination of the patient is performed according to the discretion of the health care practitioner.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Health care practitioner is informed of POCT results for CT and NG; Diagnostic Test: Health care practitioner is informed about POCT result for TV and BV
POCT based treatment PLUSActive comparatorSame as in POCT based treatment PLUS in addition: 1. All women complete a questionnaire prior to examination, including a screening tool for anxiety and depression and domestic violence. If they screen positive, they are offered psychological counseling. All women are informed about referral possibilities to a crisis management center. 2. Patients are given a short educational leaflet and 10 min audio-recording about physiological and abnormal vaginal discharge and about problems associated with unnecessary use of antibiotics.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Health care practitioner is informed of POCT results for CT and NG; Diagnostic Test: Health care practitioner is informed about POCT result for TV and BV; Other: addressing psycholsocial problems

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of participants overtreated with antibiotics (excluding antifungals)

    Comparing the proportion of women overtreated with antibiotics for treatment depending if the health care practitioner was informed about the POCT results (arm 2+3) or not (arm1). Reported by the health care practitioner. Overtreatment is defined as receiving a cephalosporin when NG is negative; a tetracycline when CT is negative; a macrolide when NT and CT are neagtive; a nitroimidazole when the gold standard test for TV or BV is negative.

    These subgroups are anlayzed: (a) before addition of an additional POCT for women with a pH above 4.5 and a negative whiff test, this is the first half of participants; (b) after addition of this extra test, for the second half of included participants; (c) suburban- and (d) rural clinics.

    We compare arm 1 with the combined arms 2+3.

    Measured: At inclusion

  2. Proportion of participant prescribed antimicrobial resistance driving antibiotics

    Comparing the proportion of women in arm 1( comparison arm) compared to arm 2 and 3 (intervention arms), receiving AMR driving antibiotics (Cephalosporins, Azithromycin, Ciprofloxacillin), depending if the health practitioner received POCT results.

    These subgroup analysis are planned: (a) suburban vs urban clinics. We compare arm 1 with the combined arms 2+3.

    Measured: At inclusion.

  3. Proportion of participants adhering to treatment recommendations

    Among participants, where the health practitioner had received POCT results, we compare the proportion of women adhering to treatment recommendations, depending on if they received psycho social intervention (arm 3) or not (arm2), in the arm Adherence is defined as follows: (1) participants report they took the prescribed medication, (2) no additional purchase of antibiotics; (3) no purchase of other medication for VD.

    Subgroup analysis for (a) suburban and (b) rural areas. (c) participants screening positive for domestic violence or (d) anxiety or depression, offered counseling or not.

    We compare all arms (arm1, 2 and 3)

    Measured: At telephonic follow up after 1 month.

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Proportion of participants prescribed antibiotics

    Comparing the proportion of participants prescribed antibiotics depending if the healthpractitioner was informed about POCT results or not. Comparing arm 1 versus arm 2+3.

    Following subgroup analysis: (a) first half of participants before adding another POCT for TV; (b)second half of participants after adding TV POCT; (c) suburban-; (d) rural clinic.

    (e) 8 antibiotic groups: tetracyclines (including doxycillin), kinolones (ciprofloxacin), macrolides (erythromycin, azitromycin), sulfonamides (trimethoprim(-sulfa), imidazolderivates (metronidazole), penicillins(including Selexid), cephalosporines, other antibiotics.

    Measured: At inclusion

  2. Undertreatment with antibiotics for CT, NG, TV and BV with or without POCT guided treatment

    We compare proportions of participants under treated for CT, NG, TV or BV, depending on , if the health practitioner received POCT results or not.

    Definition: of under treatment: not receiving a tetracycline or macrolide with a positive CT test, no Cephalosporin with positive Ng test, no imidazoles with a positive gold standard test for TV or BV. We compare control groups (arm 1) with the intervention groups (arm 2+3)

    Measured: At inclusion

  3. Proportion of women adhering to treatment recommendationss

    Description: Among participants, where the health practitioner had received POCT results, we compare the proportion of women adhering to treatment recommendations, depending on if they received psycho social intervention (arm 3) or not (arm2), in the arm Adherence is defined as follows: (1) participants report they took the prescribed medication, (2) no additional purchase of antibiotics; (3) no purchase of other medication for VD. Subgroup analysis for (a) suburban and (b) rural areas, participants screening positive for (c) domestic violence, (d) anxiety or depression, offered counseling or not.

    We compare all arms (arm 1, 2 and 3).

    Measured: At telephonic follow up 4 months after initial consultation

  4. Does educational and psychosocial measures affect change in VD symptoms?

    Comparing graded VD symptoms (3 grades), depending on if participants received educational material or psychosocial measures (in arm 3)? Subroups: (a) participants screening positive for domestic violence , (b) participants screening positive for anxiety and/or depression, (c) participants receiving counseling for anxiety and depression Overall comparison arm 1,2,3.

    -

    Measured: At telephonic follow up after 4 weeks and 4 months.

  5. Comparing prevalence of screening positive for anxiety and depression before and 4 months after consultation for VD

    Change in proportion of participants screening positive for anxiety or depression 4 months after consultation for VD

    Measured: At telephonic follow up, 4 months after initial consultation

  6. Comparing mean patient satisfaction with consultation and treatment between all RCT arms

    Satisfaction with (a)consultation and (b) treatment is measured on a self-reported scale from 1-5 at the telephonic follow up interview. We will compare mean (SD) for all three arms

    Measured: At follow up after 4 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Aug 2023
  2. Study start22 Apr 2024
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion25 Jan 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Three armed RCT. 1. Standard treatment 2. POCT result based treatment 3. POCT result based treatment plus patient education and addressing of anxiety, depression and domestic violence
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
1,500 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05977491
Sponsor's protocol ID
335889
Acronym
POCT-BRA
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
4 Jul 2023
Last updated
6 Jan 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the applicable article, after deidentification (without participant number) (text, tables, figures,and appendices).

Publications

  • Shrestha S, Shakya S, Infanti JJ, Skovlund E, Simpson MR, Lonnee-Hoffmann RAM. Implementing point-of-care tests to optimize antibiotic use for vaginal discharge: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in Nepal. Trials. 2025 Dec 12;27(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-09333-4.

    PubMed 41388307

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Health care practitioner is informed of POCT results for CT and NG, Health care practitioner is informed about POCT result for TV and BV and addressing psycholsocial problems in people with Vaginal Discharge and Sexually Transmitted Diseases, run by Norwegian University of Science and Technology at 1 site in Nepal.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Nepal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of participants overtreated with antibiotics (excluding antifungals) (time frame: At inclusion). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05977491, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jan 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in