AzTrials
AzTrials

Bone SarcomaNCT05746429

Culturally Adapted Mobile Treatment of Chronic Pain in Adolescent Survivors of Pediatric Cancer

A study testing Cognitive Behavior Therapy, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Questionnaire Administration in people with Bone Sarcoma and Childhood Cancer, run by St. Jude Children's Research Hospital at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a prospective study that will conduct a series of focus groups with non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic childhood cancer survivors to obtain their input on culturally adapting a mobile CBT program for chronic pain and tDCS procedures. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 10 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Bone Sarcoma, Childhood Cancer
What is being tested?
Cognitive Behavior Therapy, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Questionnaire Administration
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
68 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
6 Apr 2023to 29 Oct 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 10 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White 10-17-year-old survivors of pediatric cancer
  • At least one year post treatment
  • Pain present over the past 3 months and pain at least once per week
  • Pain interfering with at least one area of daily functioning

Who cannot join

  • Adults/Adolescents
  • Inability or unwillingness of research participants or legal guardian/representative to give written informed consent
  • Limb amputation
  • History of seizures or other neurological disorders
  • Implanted medical device or metal in the head
  • Serious comorbid psychiatric condition
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Current substance abuse
  • History of development delay or significant cognitive impairment
  • History of brain tumor diagnosis

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

    Memphis, Tennessee, 38105

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Culturally Adapted Mobile Treatment of Chronic Pain in Adolescent Survivors of Pediatric Bone Sarcoma

This is a prospective study that will conduct a series of focus groups with non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic childhood cancer survivors to obtain their input on culturally adapting a mobile CBT program for chronic pain and tDCS procedures. Once this adaptation process is completed, the investigators will conduct a feasibility trial with non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic and non-Hispanic White survivors of childhood cancer with chronic pain. The feasibility study will assign eligible participants to either culturally adapted mobile CBT + active tDCS to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex or culturally adapted mobile CBT + sham tDCS. We anticipate approximately 60 participants for the focus groups and approximately 30 participants for the feasibility study for a total of about 90 participants.

Read the detailed description

Survivors of pediatric childhood cancer are at-risk for developing chronic pain. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an effective non-pharmacologic treatment for chronic pain, and can be delivered remotely to reduce access barriers. However, these programs have not been adapted to be culturally sensitive to underserved populations thus limiting their reach, usefulness, and uptake. The investigators propose to culturally tailor an established, evidence-based mobile CBT program for chronic pain to Black and Hispanic adolescent survivors of childhood cancer. Once the program is fully adapted, we propose to pair the culturally adapted mobile CBT program with remotely delivered transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), which may enhance pain control in survivors. The investigators will conduct a 6-week feasibility study in a racially/ethnically diverse sample of non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic adolescent survivors of pediatric childhood cance with chronic pain using culturally adapted CBT paired with remote tDCS. Study results will inform the development of a randomized clinical trial.

Being tested
Cognitive Behavior Therapy, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Placebo Administration, Questionnaire Administration, Interview
Medical subject headings
Bone Neoplasms, Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cognitive Behavior TherapyBehavioural

    Also called CBT, CBT, cognitive behavior therapy, cognitive therapy, CT

    Receive mobile CBT

  • Transcranial Direct Current StimulationDevice

    Also called tDCS

    Undergo active tDCS

  • Placebo AdministrationDrug

    Undergo sham tDCS

  • Questionnaire AdministrationOther

    Ancillary studies

  • InterviewOther

    Attend virtual meetings and focus groups

Study groups in NCT05746429
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm I (mobile CBT + active tDCS)ExperimentalParticipants receive mobile CBT and undergo active tDCS to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Receives: Behavioral: Cognitive Behavior Therapy; Device: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation; Other: Questionnaire Administration
Arm II (mobile CBT + sham tDCS)Sham comparatorParticipants receive mobile CBT and undergo sham tDCS to the DLPFC over 20 minutes twice a week for 6 weeks.
Receives: Behavioral: Cognitive Behavior Therapy; Drug: Placebo Administration; Other: Questionnaire Administration
InterviewExperimentalParticipants attend virtual meetings and virtual focus groups during the cultural adaptation phase. Feedback is collected and analyzed to develop the finalized adaptation.
Receives: Other: Interview

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain Intensity

    Efficacy of mobile CBT paired with active versus sham tDCS on pain intensity in adolescent survivors with chronic pain. The Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI) includes a 4-item pain severity scale. Participants rate their worst and least pain in the last 24 hours, average pain, and current pain using a 10-point rating scale (0=no pain to 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). The pain severity score was calculated as the average of the 4 items, with scores ranging between 0 and 10. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. Changes in pain intensity from baseline (enrollment) up to 8 weeks from the start of the intervention in the active treatment and placebo groups were reported.

    Measured: Baseline (enrollment) and up to 8 weeks from start of feasibility study

  2. Pain Interference

    Efficacy of mobile CBT paired with active versus sham tDCS on pain interference in adolescent survivors with chronic pain. Using the BPI, participants rate the impact of pain on general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work/school, relationships with other people, sleep and enjoyment of life using a 10-point rating scale (0=does not interfere to 10=completely interferes). The pain interference score was calculated as the average of the 7 items, with scores ranging between 0 and 10. Higher scores indicate greater pain interference. Changes in pain interference from baseline (enrollment) up to 8 weeks from the start of the intervention in the active treatment and placebo groups were reported.

    Measured: Baseline (enrollment) and up to 8 weeks from start of feasibility study

  3. Pain Catastrophizing

    The Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Child version (PCS-C) is a 13-item self-report measure of overly negative attitudes of pain. It consists of three scales of rumination, magnification and helplessness. The measure uses a 5-point rating scale (0=not at all true to 4=very true). The scores of three subscales were calculated as the sum of specific items: Rumination (4 items; score range 0-16), Magnification (3 items; score range 0-12), and Helplessness (6 items; score range 0-24). The total score was calculated as the sum of all 13 items (score range 0-52). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes (i.e., more pain rumination, magnification, helplessness and overall pain catastrophizing). Changes in pain catastrophizing from baseline (enrollment) up to 8 weeks from the start of the intervention in the active treatment and placebo groups were reported.

    Measured: Baseline (enrollment) and up to 8 weeks from start of feasibility study

  4. Depression

    The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information (PROMIS) Pediatric Depressive Symptoms is an 8-item measure of self-reported symptoms of low mood in children and adolescents over the past 7 days. The measure has a 5-point rating scale (Never to Almost Always). The PROMIS Health Measures Scoring Service was used to convert raw scores to T-scores (population mean=50 and standard deviation=10. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms. Changes in depressive symptoms from baseline (enrollment) up to 8 weeks from the start of the intervention in the active treatment and placebo groups were reported.

    Measured: Baseline (enrollment) and up to 8 weeks from start of feasibility study

  5. Anxiety

    The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Anxiety is an 8-item measure of self-reported symptoms of anxiety symptoms in children and adolescents over the past 7 days. The measure has a 5-point rating scale (Never to Almost Always). The PROMIS Health Measures Scoring Service was used to convert raw scores to T-scores (population mean=50 and standard deviation=10). Higher scores indicate more severe anxiety symptoms. Changes in anxiety symptoms from baseline (enrollment) up to 8 weeks from the start of the intervention in the active treatment and placebo groups were reported.

    Measured: Baseline (enrollment) and up to 8 weeks from start of feasibility study

  6. Cancer-related Worry

    The Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory is a 9-item measure developed specifically for survivors of childhood cancer (8-18 years) to assess the presence of fear of recurrence and perceived risk recurrence. The measure has 5-point rating scale (0=Not at All to 4=A Great Deal). The total score was calculated as the sum of all 9 items, with scores ranging between 0 and 36. Higher scores indicate greater cancer-related worry. Changes in cancer-related worry symptoms from baseline (enrollment) up to 8 weeks from the start of the intervention in the active treatment and placebo groups were reported.

    Measured: Baseline (enrollment) and up to 8 weeks from start of feasibility study

  7. Physical Functioning

    The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Mobility is an 8-item measure of self-reported ability at physical activities in children and adolescents in the past 7 days. The PROMIS Pediatric Upper Extremity is an 8-item measure of self-upper extremity function in the past 7 days. Both measures have a 5-point rating scale (No Trouble to Not Able to Do). For both measures, the PROMIS Health Measures Scoring Service was used to convert raw scores to T-scores (population mean=50 and standard deviation=10). Higher scores indicate better outcomes (i.e., greater mobility and upper extremity function, respectively). Changes in physical functioning from baseline (enrollment) up to 8 weeks from the start of the intervention in the active treatment and placebo groups were reported.

    Measured: Baseline (enrollment) and up to 8 weeks from start of feasibility study

  8. Peer Relations

    The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Peer Relationship is an 8-item measure that assesses the quality of peer relationships. The measure has a 5-point rating scale (Never to Almost Always). The PROMIS Health Measures Scoring Service was used to convert raw scores to T-scores (population mean=50 and standard deviation=10). Higher scores indicate better quality relationships with peers. Changes in peer relationship quality from baseline (enrollment) up to 8 weeks from the start of the intervention in the active treatment and placebo groups were reported.

    Measured: Baseline (enrollment) and up to 8 weeks from start of feasibility study

  9. Fatigue

    The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Fatigue is a 10-item measure that assesses symptoms of fatigue in the past 7 days. The measure has a 5-point rating scale (Never to Almost Always). The PROMIS Health Measures Scoring Service was used to convert raw scores to T-scores (population mean=50 and standard deviation=10). Higher scores indicate more fatigue. Changes in fatigue from baseline (enrollment) up to 8 weeks from the start of the intervention in the active treatment and placebo groups were reported.

    Measured: Baseline (enrollment) and up to 8 weeks from start of feasibility study

  10. Sleep (Adolescent Sleep Wake Scale (ASWS))

    The Adolescent Sleep Wake Scale (ASWS) short form is a 10-item measure of behavioral sleep patterns in adolescents. The measure has a 6-point rating scale (1=Never to 6=Always). The total score was calculated as the average of the 10 items, with scores ranging between 0 and 6. Higher scores indicating better success of sleep quality. Changes in sleep from baseline (enrollment) up to 8 weeks from the start of the intervention in the active treatment and placebo groups were reported.

    Measured: Baseline (enrollment) and up to 8 weeks from start of feasibility study

  11. Sleep (PROMIS Sleep-related Impairment)

    The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep-Related Impairment 8-item measure to allow for assessment of sleep quality during the night as well as the impact of sleepiness on daytime function. This measure assesses sleep-related impairment over the past 7 days. The measure has a 5-point rating scale (Never to Always). The PROMIS Health Measures Scoring Service was used to convert raw scores to T-scores (population mean=50 and standard deviation=10). Higher scores indicate more sleep problems. Changes in sleep from baseline (enrollment) up to 8 weeks from the start of the intervention in the active treatment and placebo groups were reported.

    Measured: Baseline (enrollment) and up to 8 weeks from start of feasibility study

  12. Global Acceptability and Satisfaction With Treatment

    Acceptability and satisfaction with treatment will be assessed using a 5-point numerical rating scale (NRS) (strongly disagree to strongly agree). Higher score indicates greater acceptability and satisfaction. The answers were categorized as agree yes (strongly agree or agree) versus no (neither agree nor disagree, disagree, or strongly disagree).

    Measured: Up to 8 weeks from start of feasibility study

  13. Opioid Use

    At each timepoint participants and/or their parents will be asked to list the names of their medications, doses taken, and the frequency with which the medications were taken over the past 2 weeks. Opioid doses will be converted to morphine equivalent doses (MED; in mg) using an opioid equivalence table. Changes in opioid use from baseline (enrollment) up to 8 weeks from the start of the intervention in the active treatment and placebo groups were reported.

    Note: no participants reported taking opioids during the study

    Measured: Baseline (enrollment) and up to 8 weeks from start of feasibility study

  14. Parental Depression

    Parental depression will be measured at each time point using the Patient Health Questionnaire 8-item (PHQ-8), a measure of symptoms of major depressive disorder. The Patient Health Questionnaire is a 4-point rating scale (0=Not at All to 3=Nearly Every Day). The total score was calculated as the sum of all 8 items, with scores ranging between 0 and 24. Higher scores indicate greater depression. . Changes in parental depression from baseline (enrollment) up to 8 weeks from the start of the intervention in the active treatment and placebo groups were reported.

    Measured: Baseline (enrollment) and up to 8 weeks from start of feasibility study

  15. Parental Anxiety

    Parental anxiety will be measured at each time point using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7), a measure of symptoms of generalized anxiety. The Generalized Anxiety Disorder measure is a 4-point rating scale (0=Not at 3=All to Nearly Every Day). The total score was calculated as the sum of all 7 items, with scores ranging between 0 and 21. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety. Changes in parental anxiety from baseline (enrollment) up to 8 weeks from the start of the intervention in the active treatment and placebo groups were reported.

    Measured: Baseline (enrollment) and up to 8 weeks from start of feasibility study

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Feb 2023
  2. Study start6 Apr 2023
  3. Primary completion29 Oct 2024
  4. Study completion29 Oct 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
68 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05746429
Sponsor's protocol ID
ADAPTED
Other IDs
NCI-2022-10013, R61CA280978
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
10 Jan 2023
Last updated
4 Feb 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Cognitive Behavior Therapy, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Questionnaire Administration in people with Bone Sarcoma and Childhood Cancer, run by St. Jude Children's Research Hospital at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Feb 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain Intensity (time frame: Baseline (enrollment) and up to 8 weeks from start of feasibility study). The study lists 15 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Feb 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in