AzTrials
AzTrials

Nursing EducationNCT05706571

Pediatric Orotracheal Suctioning Training Using a Benner Model-Based Augmented Reality Application

A study testing Benner Model-Based Augmented Reality Training and Conventional Mannequin-Based Training in people with Nursing Education, run by Medipol University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study evaluated the effect of a Benner model-based augmented reality (AR) training module on undergraduate nursing students' knowledge and procedural skills in pediatric endotracheal suctioning of orally intubated patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Nursing Education
What is being tested?
Benner Model-Based Augmented Reality Training and Conventional Mannequin-Based Training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
66 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
24 Nov 2023to 24 Nov 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Undergraduate nursing students enrolled in the Pediatric Nursing Practice course.
  • Voluntary agreement to participate in the study.
  • Sufficient Turkish language proficiency to understand the instructional materials and complete the assessments.
  • No hearing, visual, or fine motor impairments.

Who cannot join

  • Students who had previously completed or repeated the Pediatric Nursing Practice course.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Istanbul Medipol University - Kavacik South Campus

    Istanbul, Istanbul, 34815

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: The Effect of an Augmented Reality Application Based on Patricia Benner's Model on Nursing Students' Learning: A Training Module for Pediatric Endotracheal Suctioning in Orally Intubated Patients

This study evaluated the effect of a Benner model-based augmented reality (AR) training module on undergraduate nursing students' knowledge and procedural skills in pediatric endotracheal suctioning of orally intubated patients.

The study used a two-arm randomized controlled design within a convergent mixed-methods framework. It was conducted among undergraduate nursing students enrolled in the Pediatric Nursing Practice course at Istanbul Medipol University, Türkiye.

Read more

A total of 66 students were randomized to an intervention group receiving Benner model-based AR training (n = 33) or a control group receiving conventional mannequin-based training (n = 33). Knowledge was assessed using a 20-item multiple-choice test, and procedural skills were evaluated using a 25-step assessment form before and after training.

Sixty-one students completed the assessments and were included in the quantitative analysis (intervention, n = 30; control, n = 31). Individual semi-structured interviews were also conducted with 10 volunteers from the intervention group to explore their experiences with AR-based training.

Read the detailed description

Background

Pediatric endotracheal suctioning is a clinical procedure requiring appropriate knowledge, technical skills, and patient assessment. Nursing students need opportunities to develop these competencies in a controlled educational environment before performing the procedure in clinical practice. Augmented reality (AR) offers an additional approach to procedural training through interactive visualization and simulated practice.

Patricia Benner's Novice to Expert Model provides a conceptual basis for supporting the development of nursing competencies. This study applied the model to an AR-based training module for pediatric endotracheal suctioning in orally intubated patients.

Objective

The study aimed to evaluate the effect of Benner model-based AR training on nursing students' knowledge and procedural skills compared with conventional mannequin-based training. It also explored students' experiences with the AR-based educational intervention.

Study Design and Participants

A two-arm randomized controlled study was conducted within a convergent mixed-methods framework at Istanbul Medipol University, Türkiye, during 2023.

Eligible participants were undergraduate nursing students enrolled in the Pediatric Nursing Practice course who voluntarily agreed to participate and met the study eligibility criteria.

Sixty-six students were randomized into two groups, with 33 participants allocated to each group. Sixty-one students completed the assessments and were included in the quantitative analysis.

Educational Interventions

The intervention group received AR-based pediatric endotracheal suctioning training guided by Patricia Benner's Novice to Expert Model. The training focused on knowledge acquisition and procedural skill development in the care of orally intubated pediatric patients.

The control group received conventional mannequin-based training covering the same clinical procedure.

Outcome Assessment

Knowledge was assessed before and after training using a researcher-developed 20-item multiple-choice test. Scores ranged from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge.

Procedural skills were evaluated before and after training using a researcher-developed 25-step assessment form. Each correctly performed step received one point, producing a total score ranging from 0 to 25.

Two independent faculty members assessed procedural performance. Although the assessors were not informed of group allocation, complete blinding could not be guaranteed because the training methods were visibly different.

Qualitative Component

Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 volunteers from the intervention group after the educational intervention. The interviews explored participants' experiences, perceived educational benefits, opportunities for practice, feedback, and challenges associated with AR-based training.

Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed separately and integrated during interpretation to provide a broader understanding of the educational intervention.

Being tested
Benner Model-Based Augmented Reality Training, Conventional Mannequin-Based Training
Keywords
Augmented Reality, Pediatric Endotracheal Suctioning, Nursing Students, Patricia Benner's Novice to Expert Model, Simulation-Based Education

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Benner Model-Based Augmented Reality TrainingBehavioural

    Nursing students in the intervention group received augmented reality-based pediatric orotracheal suctioning training guided by Patricia Benner's Novice to Expert Model. The educational module was designed to support students' knowledge acquisition and procedural skill development in endotracheal suctioning of orally intubated pediatric patients.

  • Conventional Mannequin-Based TrainingBehavioural

    Nursing students in the control group received conventional mannequin-based training in pediatric orotracheal suctioning. The training focused on the procedural steps required to perform endotracheal suctioning in orally intubated pediatric patients.

Study groups in NCT05706571
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Conventional Mannequin-Based Training (Control Group)Active comparatorThe control group (n = 33) received conventional mannequin-based training in pediatric orotracheal suctioning. The training focused on the procedural steps of endotracheal suctioning in orally intubated pediatric patients. Participants were evaluated using the study's knowledge and procedural skill assessment instruments.
Receives: Behavioral: Conventional Mannequin-Based Training
Benner Model-Based Augmented Reality Training (Intervention Group)ExperimentalThe intervention group (n = 33) received augmented reality-based pediatric orotracheal suctioning training guided by Patricia Benner's Novice to Expert Model. The educational module focused on developing students' knowledge and procedural skills in endotracheal suctioning of orally intubated pediatric patients.
Receives: Behavioral: Benner Model-Based Augmented Reality Training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pediatric Endotracheal Suctioning Knowledge Score

    Knowledge was assessed using a researcher-developed 20-item multiple-choice test covering pediatric open-system endotracheal suctioning and related clinical care in orally intubated pediatric patients. Each correct answer received 5 points, and each incorrect answer received 0 points. Total scores ranged from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge.

    Measured: Immediately before and after the educational intervention (pretest and posttest)

  2. Pediatric Endotracheal Suctioning Procedural Skill Score

    Psychomotor skills were assessed using a researcher-developed 25-step procedural skill assessment form. Each step was scored as 0 (incorrect) or 1 (correct). Total scores ranged from 0 to 25, with higher scores indicating better procedural performance. Skills were assessed before and after the educational intervention.

    Measured: Immediately before and after the educational intervention (pretest and posttest)

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Nursing Students' Experiences With Augmented Reality-Based Training

    Students' experiences and perceptions of augmented reality-based training were explored through individual semi-structured interviews with 10 volunteers from the intervention group. Interviews lasted approximately 25-30 minutes and addressed practice opportunities, feedback, perceived educational benefits, and implementation challenges. Data were analyzed using a hybrid deductive-inductive qualitative content analysis approach to identify categories and themes.

    Measured: After completion of the educational intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Jan 2023
  2. Study start24 Nov 2023
  3. Primary completion24 Nov 2023
  4. Study completion24 Nov 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This study used a two-arm, parallel-group randomized design within a convergent mixed-methods framework. Nursing students were randomly assigned to an intervention group receiving augmented reality-based pediatric orotracheal suctioning training guided by Patricia Benner's Novice to Expert Model or a control group receiving conventional mannequin-based training. A total of 66 students were randomized (33 per group), and 61 completed the assessments (intervention, n = 30; control, n = 31). Qualitative interviews were conducted with 10 participants from the intervention group.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
66 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05706571
Sponsor's protocol ID
MedipolU-makbule-yılmaz-001
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
23 Jan 2023
Last updated
21 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data will not be publicly shared due to participant confidentiality and ethical considerations. Study findings will be reported in aggregate form.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Benner Model-Based Augmented Reality Training and Conventional Mannequin-Based Training in people with Nursing Education, run by Medipol University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pediatric Endotracheal Suctioning Knowledge Score (time frame: Immediately before and after the educational intervention (pretest and posttest)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Oct 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 28 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in