AzTrials
AzTrials

Vaginal DischargePhase 3LISPRAYNCT05201313

Efficacy and Safety of the Application of Local Anaesthetic in Spray to Repair of 1st- 2nd Perineal Lacerations

A Phase 3 study testing Lidocaine Hydrochloride and Mepivacaine Injection in people with Vaginal Discharge and Perineum; Rupture, run by Azienda Sanitaria-Universitaria Integrata di Udine at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Randomized controlled trial aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of the use of a local anesthetic spray, commonly used in clinical practice as off-label, during the suturing of perineal lacerations in post-partum, comparing it with the standard technique that involves the infiltration of lacerated tissues, by… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Vaginal Discharge, Perineum; Rupture, Analgesia
What is being tested?
Lidocaine Hydrochloride and Mepivacaine Injection
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
136 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
20 Jan 2022to 8 Aug 2022
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • have a 1st or 2nd degree postpartum perineal laceration requiring suturing;
  • have reached 37 gestational weeks;
  • are over 18 years of age;
  • had a top birth;
  • are able to understand the Italian language;
  • have a consent to participate in the study;

Who cannot join

  • have received epidural anesthesia within 2 hours prior to delivery;
  • had an operative birth;
  • have a psychiatric pathology;
  • have had a twin birth;
  • have experienced adverse reactions to any local anesthetic in the past;
  • hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients
Show all 20Show fewer
  • Severe disturbances of the cardiac conduction system
  • Acute non compensated heart failure
  • Severe arteriopathies
  • Severe uncontrolled hypertension
  • Intravascular injections
  • Septicemia Dysfunction
  • Infection at the injection site
  • Kidney failure. Providing for the exclusion of patients with severe renal impairment (estimated GFR <30 mL / min / 1.73 m2 at the time of screening).
  • Advanced liver dysfunction
  • Hyperthyroidism
  • Acute angle glaucoma
  • Participation in a clinical trial in which an investigational drug was administered within 30 days of screening or 5 half-lives of the study drug
  • Any clinical condition that in the investigator's judgment would render the patient unsuitable for the study including, but not limited to, infectious, inflammatory, psychiatric, neurological, cardiological, renal, hepatic, respiratory, diabetes) conditions or laboratory value at clinically meaningful screening that, an investigator's opinion, may present a safety risk, interface with study compliance and follow-up;
  • have had in pregnancy liver disease including pre-eclampsia.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • ASUFC

    Udine, 33100

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Randomised Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Local Anaesthetic Application in Spray for the Repair of 1st- 2nd Perineal Lacerations Following Vaginal Delivery

Randomized controlled trial aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of the use of a local anesthetic spray, commonly used in clinical practice as off-label, during the suturing of perineal lacerations in post-partum, comparing it with the standard technique that involves the infiltration of lacerated tissues, by administering a NRS card at the end of the procedure.

Read the detailed description

The study aims to compare the effectiveness of pain treatment during the suturing of postpartum perineal lacerations with lidocaine spray vs skin infiltration. The hypothesis of the study is that the treatment of perineal pain with nebulization demonstrates comparable efficacy vs the infiltration of mepivacaine hydrochloride in a population of patients subjected to suturing of postpartum lacerations. Eligible women will be randomly assigned to receive, after wound disinfection and cleansing of bleeding with mild haemostasis:

  1. nebulization 3 puffs of 10 mL Lidocaine hydrochloride 10% spray at a distance of 4-5 cm (experimental group).
  2. subcutaneous / submucosal infiltration depending on the type of perineal laceration of 10 ml of 1% mepivacaine hydrochloride (control group).

Since there are no previous published studies, regarding the use of nebulized lidocaine hydrochloride for the suturing of perineal lacerations, the number of puffs chosen was chosen based on what is indicated on the technical data sheet of lidocaine hydrochloride and making use of previous studies in the gynecological field, but with other indications.

The suture will be made once anesthetic efficacy is achieved, as per pharmacological indications. The administration of the anesthetic and the suturing of the lacerations will be performed by the gynecologist or by the gynecology resident who will be working at that time in the delivery room, as is routinely done in our Clinic. The patients will be enrolled consecutively following the order generated by the randomization list itself. By filling in specific pre-set cards, the data will be collected.

Initially, the primary outcome was NRS at the beginning of suturing and NRS at the end of the procedure. In a second moment, the investigators thought it would be better to ensure that adequate analgesia (NRS<4) was achieved for all patients during suturing, rather than varying the dosage of the anesthetic itself. The investigators then decided to reassess pain at successive time points, evaluating it at 0, 2, 4, 12, and 24 hours.

Being tested
Lidocaine Hydrochloride, Mepivacaine Injection
Keywords
perineal laceration, suturing, anesthetic
Medical subject headings
Vaginal Discharge, Rupture, Agnosia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Lidocaine HydrochlorideDrug

    Also called ECOCAIN

    nebulization of 3 puffs of 10 mL Lidocaine hydrochloride 10% spray at a distance of 4-5 cm

  • Mepivacaine InjectionDrug

    Also called MEPIVACAINA CLORIDRATO

    subcutaneous / submucosal infiltration depending on the type of perineal tear of 10 ml of 1% mepivacaine hydrochloride

Study groups in NCT05201313
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
lidocaine sprayExperimentalnebulization 3 puffs of 10 mL Lidocaine hydrochloride 10% spray at a distance of 4-5 cm
Receives: Drug: Lidocaine Hydrochloride
mepivacaine infiltrationActive comparatorsubcutaneous / submucosal infiltration depending on the type of perineal tear of 10 ml of 1% mepivacaine hydrochloride
Receives: Drug: Mepivacaine Injection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. NRS 2

    numeric rating scale for pain (0=no pain-10=maximum pain)

    Measured: At 2 hours after delivery

  2. NRS 4

    numeric rating scale for pain (0=no pain-10=maximum pain)

    Measured: At 4 hours after delivery

  3. NRS 12

    numeric rating scale for pain (0=no pain-10=maximum pain)

    Measured: At 12 hours after delivery

  4. NRS 24

    numeric rating scale for pain (0=no pain-10=maximum pain)

    Measured: At 24 hours after delivery

  5. NRS o

    numeric rating scale for pain (0=no pain-10=maximum pain)

    Measured: during suturing

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. need for additional doses (number of additional nebulizations, presence or absence of additional infiltration)

    need for an additional dose of nebulization and / or additional infiltration during the suturing of the postpartum perineal laceration

    Measured: during the suture

  2. final satisfaction, assessed via telephonic interview

    satisfaction of the puerpera, assessed through the 30 days-follow up, asking for the patient's opinion regarding postpartum pain and any long-term complications

    Measured: 30 days follow up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Jan 2022
  2. Study start20 Jan 2022
  3. Primary completion8 Jul 2022
  4. Study completion8 Aug 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Randomized controlled trial (RCT) of superiority, with two parallel treatment arms. Phase 3 study. Randomized controlled single-center perspective study.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
136 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05201313
Sponsor's protocol ID
0042698/P/GEN/ARCS
Acronym
LISPRAY
Status last verified
Sep 2023
First submitted
4 Jan 2022
Last updated
21 Sep 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Restaino S, Degano M, Rizzante E, Battello G, Paparcura F, Biasioli A, Arcieri M, Filip G, Vetrugno L, Dogareschi T, Bove T, Petrillo M, Capobianco G, Vizzielli G, Driul L; LISPRAY Group. Lidocaine spray vs mepivacaine local infiltration for suturing 1st/2nd grade perineal lacerations: a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jun 24;24(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06640-7.

    PubMed 38914976

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Lidocaine Hydrochloride and Mepivacaine Injection in people with Vaginal Discharge and Perineum; Rupture, run by Azienda Sanitaria-Universitaria Integrata di Udine at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

NRS 2 (time frame: At 2 hours after delivery). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05201313, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Sep 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in