Swallowing DisordersE-CRILNCT04859595
Follow-up After a Stay in Intensive Rehabilitation for Patients With Swallowing Disorders
A study testing Telephone follow-up in people with Swallowing Disorders, run by University Hospital, Toulouse at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Prospective, open-label, randomized, single-center study evaluating the benefit of a months long monthly telephone follow-up for patients with chronic disorders following the after-effects of anti-cancer treatments after an intensive rehabilitation stay versus standard follow-up. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Swallowing Disorders
- What is being tested?
- Telephone follow-up
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 35 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 29 Jul 2021to 1 May 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients treated for cancer of the upper aero-digestive tract
- Patients who have stayed at the intensive laryngectomee rehabilitation center CRIL
- Patients with a medical diagnosis of swallowing disorders at risk of inhalation (i.e. a Penetration Aspiration Scale score ≥5)
- Informed consent signed by the patient.
- Patients with social security or equivalent
- Patient who does not need intensive speech therapy when leaving the rehabilitation center or only benefits from one rehabilitation session per week
Who cannot join
- Progressive neurological disease leading to cognitive disorders (MOntreal Cognitive Assessment ≤ 17)
- Patient under guardianship, curator or legal protection
- Inability to provide the person with enlightened information and to ensure the subject's compliance due to impaired physical and / or psychological health,
- Patient who cannot be reached by telephone or does not have a telephone line
- Patient participating in another research including an exclusion period still in progress
- Patient whose state of health on leaving the rehabilitation center requires intensive town speech therapy for more than 1 rehabilitation session per week
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Benefit of an at Home Telephone Follow-up After a Stay in an Intensive Rehabilitation Center for Patients With Chronic Swallowing Disorders Following a Upper Aero-digestive Tract Cancer Treatment : Open, Controlled, Randomized Study
Prospective, open-label, randomized, single-center study evaluating the benefit of a months long monthly telephone follow-up for patients with chronic disorders following the after-effects of anti-cancer treatments after an intensive rehabilitation stay versus standard follow-up.
Read the detailed description
Upper aerodigestive tract (UAT) cancer is a malignant tumor in the hypopharynx, larynx, oropharynx and oral cavity. In 2017, 15,000 new cases of cancers of the upper aero-digestive tract were identified: which in France places them among the most frequent cancers.
The treatments used to treat UAT cancers are of three types: surgery, radiotherapy and radio chemotherapy and can have significant functional consequences, in particular on swallowing and phonation.
This therapeutic management is routinely associated with supportive care, in order to ensure the functional rehabilitation that will allow the maintenance of the quality of life of these patients as well as their entourage by reducing the side effects of the treatments and the effects of disease.
Intensive rehabilitation is offered to patients who have been treated for UAT cancer in order to speed up the learning of new behaviors and improve their memorization. Thus, these patients benefit from intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation within the Intensive Reeducation Center for Laryngectomees.
However, it is not uncommon to see patients return for a second stay following a loss of the benefits learned, in particular on the swallowing function, omissions of food safety instructions or an interruption of local rehabilitation.
Studies have shown that remote monitoring can have a positive impact on the health of these patients. However, no study has assessed the impact of such monitoring on functional swallowing abilities.
This study will asses the impact of a monthly phone call during 6 months on patients with chronic swallowing disorders compared to the routine follow up. The telephone interviews will mainly consist of questionnaires.
- Conditions
- Swallowing Disorders
- Being tested
- Telephone follow-up
- Keywords
- cancer of the upper aerodigestive tract, chronic swallowing disorders sequelae
- Medical subject headings
- Deglutition Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Telephone follow-upOther
Monthly follow-up by telephone from M1 to M6. The interview will unroll in 2 stages, a first stage of discussion during which the speech therapist will take news of the patient. The second, more formal phase will be the opportunity to collect the data necessary for the validation of the primary and secondary outcomes. To do this, the speech therapist will use the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) score, the DHI and an interview grid.
The interview will be conducted using an interview sheet previously written by the project team. The following elements will be discussed: the description of oral food intakes (TIMES), the perceived swallowing handicap (DHI), the instructions related to the diet and their daily application, ongoing rehabilitation follow-ups, notable events as well, then his emotional and psychological experience in relation to the disorder.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| telephone follow-up arm | Experimental | The experimental arm corresponds to the patient benefiting from a monthly telephone follow-up during the first 6 months of their discharge from the reeducation center : "CRIL" (from M1 to M6). They will be contacted each month by CRIL's speech therapist for a telephone interview (20 to 30 minutes). Receives: Other: Telephone follow-up |
| control arm | No intervention | The comparison group will follow the standard follow-up protocol. A technician will contact the patients in the control arm to obtain the TIMES score each month. No further telephone follow-up will be carried out. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Maintenance of functional capacities
Assessed by establishing the FOIS (Functional Oral Intake Scale) score :
Level from 1 to 7, (1 being the worse functional oral intake, 7 being the best functional oral intake possible)
TUBE DEPENDENT (levels 1-3)
- No oral intake
- Tube dependent with minimal/inconsistent oral intake
- Tube supplements with consistent oral intake TOTAL ORAL INTAKE (levels 4-7)
- Total oral intake of a single consistency
- Total oral intake of multiple consistencies requiring special preparation
- Total oral intake with no special preparation, but must avoid specific foods or liquid items
- Total oral intake with no restrictions
Measured: Baseline T0 : At the end of the initial routine reeducation intervention
Maintenance of functional capacities
Assessed by establishing the FOIS (Functional Oral Intake Scale) score :
Level from 1 to 7 :
TUBE DEPENDENT (levels 1-3)
- No oral intake
- Tube dependent with minimal/inconsistent oral intake
- Tube supplements with consistent oral intake TOTAL ORAL INTAKE (levels 4-7)
- Total oral intake of a single consistency
- Total oral intake of multiple consistencies requiring special preparation
- Total oral intake with no special preparation, but must avoid specific foods or liquid items
- Total oral intake with no restrictions
Measured: T1M : 1 month after Baseline T0 (the end of the routine reeducation intervention)
Maintenance of functional capacities
Assessed by establishing the FOIS (Functional Oral Intake Scale) score :
Level from 1 to 7 :
TUBE DEPENDENT (levels 1-3)
- No oral intake
- Tube dependent with minimal/inconsistent oral intake
- Tube supplements with consistent oral intake TOTAL ORAL INTAKE (levels 4-7)
- Total oral intake of a single consistency
- Total oral intake of multiple consistencies requiring special preparation
- Total oral intake with no special preparation, but must avoid specific foods or liquid items
- Total oral intake with no restrictions
Measured: T2M : 2 months after Baseline T0 (the end of the routine reeducation intervention)
Maintenance of functional capacities
Assessed by establishing the FOIS (Functional Oral Intake Scale) score :
Level from 1 to 7 :
TUBE DEPENDENT (levels 1-3)
- No oral intake
- Tube dependent with minimal/inconsistent oral intake
- Tube supplements with consistent oral intake TOTAL ORAL INTAKE (levels 4-7)
- Total oral intake of a single consistency
- Total oral intake of multiple consistencies requiring special preparation
- Total oral intake with no special preparation, but must avoid specific foods or liquid items
- Total oral intake with no restrictions
Measured: T3M : 3 months after Baseline T0 the end of the routine reeducation intervention
Maintenance of functional capacities
Assessed by establishing the FOIS (Functional Oral Intake Scale) score :
Level from 1 to 7 :
TUBE DEPENDENT (levels 1-3)
- No oral intake
- Tube dependent with minimal/inconsistent oral intake
- Tube supplements with consistent oral intake TOTAL ORAL INTAKE (levels 4-7)
- Total oral intake of a single consistency
- Total oral intake of multiple consistencies requiring special preparation
- Total oral intake with no special preparation, but must avoid specific foods or liquid items
- Total oral intake with no restrictions
Measured: T4M : 4 months after Baseline T0 the end of the routine reeducation intervention
Maintenance of functional capacities
Assessed by establishing the FOIS (Functional Oral Intake Scale) score :
Level from 1 to 7 :
TUBE DEPENDENT (levels 1-3)
- No oral intake
- Tube dependent with minimal/inconsistent oral intake
- Tube supplements with consistent oral intake TOTAL ORAL INTAKE (levels 4-7)
- Total oral intake of a single consistency
- Total oral intake of multiple consistencies requiring special preparation
- Total oral intake with no special preparation, but must avoid specific foods or liquid items
- Total oral intake with no restrictions
Measured: T5M : 5 months after Baseline T0 the end of the routine reeducation intervention
Maintenance of functional capacities
Assessed by establishing the FOIS (Functional Oral Intake Scale) score:
Level from 1 to 7 :
TUBE DEPENDENT (levels 1-3)
- No oral intake
- Tube dependent with minimal/inconsistent oral intake
- Tube supplements with consistent oral intake TOTAL ORAL INTAKE (levels 4-7)
- Total oral intake of a single consistency
- Total oral intake of multiple consistencies requiring special preparation
- Total oral intake with no special preparation, but must avoid specific foods or liquid items
- Total oral intake with no restrictions
Measured: T6M : 6 months after BaselineT0 the end of the routine reeducation intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Apr 2021
- Study start29 Jul 2021
- Primary completion1 May 2023
- Study completion1 May 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Swallowing DisordersStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, ToulouseThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Single-center, open-label, prospective study
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 35 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Toulouse
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Fondation de l'Avenir
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Anais Galtier, Principal investigator, University Hospital, Toulouse
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04859595
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RC31/21/0022
- Acronym
- E-CRIL
- Status last verified
- Aug 2023
- First submitted
- 19 Apr 2021
- Last updated
- 23 Aug 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Aug 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Benefit of an at Home Telephone Follow-up After a Stay in an Intensive Rehabilitation Center for Patients With Chronic Swallowing Disorders Following a Upper Aero-digestive Tract Cancer Treatment : Open, Controlled, Randomized Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04859595
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- E-CRIL / RC31/21/0022
- Conditions
- Swallowing Disorders
- Keywords
- cancer of the upper aerodigestive tract, chronic swallowing disorders sequelae
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 35 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, ToulouseUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Fondation de l'Avenir
- Study start
- 29 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 May 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 May 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Prospective, open-label, randomized, single-center study evaluating the benefit of a months long monthly telephone follow-up for patients with chronic disorders following the after-effects of anti-cancer treatments after an intensive rehabilitation stay versus standard follow-up.
Detailed description
Upper aerodigestive tract (UAT) cancer is a malignant tumor in the hypopharynx, larynx, oropharynx and oral cavity. In 2017, 15,000 new cases of cancers of the upper aero-digestive tract were identified: which in France places them among the most frequent cancers.
The treatments used to treat UAT cancers are of three types: surgery, radiotherapy and radio chemotherapy and can have significant functional consequences, in particular on swallowing and phonation.
This therapeutic management is routinely associated with supportive care, in order to ensure the functional rehabilitation that will allow the maintenance of the quality of life of these patients as well as their entourage by reducing the side effects of the treatments and the effects of disease.
Intensive rehabilitation is offered to patients who have been treated for UAT cancer in order to speed up the learning of new behaviors and improve their memorization. Thus, these patients benefit from intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation within the Intensive Reeducation Center for Laryngectomees.
However, it is not uncommon to see patients return for a second stay following a loss of the benefits learned, in particular on the swallowing function, omissions of food safety instructions or an interruption of local rehabilitation.
Studies have shown that remote monitoring can have a positive impact on the health of these patients. However, no study has assessed the impact of such monitoring on functional swallowing abilities.
This study will asses the impact of a monthly phone call during 6 months on patients with chronic swallowing disorders compared to the routine follow up. The telephone interviews will mainly consist of questionnaires.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Single-center, open-label, prospective study
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| telephone follow-up arm | Experimental | Other: Telephone follow-upThe experimental arm corresponds to the patient benefiting from a monthly telephone follow-up during the first 6 months of their discharge from the reeducation center : "CRIL" (from M1 to M6). They will be contacted each month by CRIL's speech therapist for a telephone interview (20 to 30 minutes). |
| control arm | No intervention | –The comparison group will follow the standard follow-up protocol. A technician will contact the patients in the control arm to obtain the TIMES score each month. No further telephone follow-up will be carried out. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients treated for cancer of the upper aero-digestive tract
- Patients who have stayed at the intensive laryngectomee rehabilitation center CRIL
- Patients with a medical diagnosis of swallowing disorders at risk of inhalation (i.e. a Penetration Aspiration Scale score ≥5)
- Informed consent signed by the patient.
- Patients with social security or equivalent
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Progressive neurological disease leading to cognitive disorders (MOntreal Cognitive Assessment ≤ 17)
- Patient under guardianship, curator or legal protection
- Inability to provide the person with enlightened information and to ensure the subject's compliance due to impaired physical and / or psychological health,
- Patient who cannot be reached by telephone or does not have a telephone line
- Patient participating in another research including an exclusion period still in progress
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Telephone follow-upMonthly follow-up by telephone from M1 to M6. The interview will unroll in 2 stages, a first stage of discussion during which the speech therapist will take news of the patient. The second, more formal phase will be the opportunity to collect the data necessary for the validation of the primary and secondary outcomes. To do this, the speech therapist will use the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) score, the DHI and an interview grid. The interview will be conducted using an interview sheet previously written by the project team. The following elements will be discussed: the description of oral food intakes (TIMES), the perceived swallowing handicap (DHI), the instructions related to the diet and their daily application, ongoing rehabilitation follow-ups, notable events as well, then his emotional and psychological experience in relation to the disorder. | Other | telephone follow-up arm |
Primary outcome
Maintenance of functional capacities
Time frame: Baseline T0 : At the end of the initial routine reeducation intervention
Assessed by establishing the FOIS (Functional Oral Intake Scale) score : Level from 1 to 7, (1 being the worse functional oral intake, 7 being the best functional oral intake possible) TUBE DEPENDENT (levels 1-3) 1. No oral intake 2. Tube dependent with minimal/inconsistent oral intake 3. Tube supplements with consistent oral intake TOTAL ORAL INTAKE (levels 4-7) 4. Total oral intake of a single consistency 5. Total oral intake of multiple consistencies requiring special preparation 6. Total oral intake with no special preparation, but must avoid specific foods or liquid items 7. Total oral intake with no restrictions
Maintenance of functional capacities
Time frame: T1M : 1 month after Baseline T0 (the end of the routine reeducation intervention)
Assessed by establishing the FOIS (Functional Oral Intake Scale) score : Level from 1 to 7 : TUBE DEPENDENT (levels 1-3) 1. No oral intake 2. Tube dependent with minimal/inconsistent oral intake 3. Tube supplements with consistent oral intake TOTAL ORAL INTAKE (levels 4-7) 4. Total oral intake of a single consistency 5. Total oral intake of multiple consistencies requiring special preparation 6. Total oral intake with no special preparation, but must avoid specific foods or liquid items 7. Total oral intake with no restrictions
Maintenance of functional capacities
Time frame: T2M : 2 months after Baseline T0 (the end of the routine reeducation intervention)
Assessed by establishing the FOIS (Functional Oral Intake Scale) score : Level from 1 to 7 : TUBE DEPENDENT (levels 1-3) 1. No oral intake 2. Tube dependent with minimal/inconsistent oral intake 3. Tube supplements with consistent oral intake TOTAL ORAL INTAKE (levels 4-7) 4. Total oral intake of a single consistency 5. Total oral intake of multiple consistencies requiring special preparation 6. Total oral intake with no special preparation, but must avoid specific foods or liquid items 7. Total oral intake with no restrictions
Maintenance of functional capacities
Time frame: T3M : 3 months after Baseline T0 the end of the routine reeducation intervention
Assessed by establishing the FOIS (Functional Oral Intake Scale) score : Level from 1 to 7 : TUBE DEPENDENT (levels 1-3) 1. No oral intake 2. Tube dependent with minimal/inconsistent oral intake 3. Tube supplements with consistent oral intake TOTAL ORAL INTAKE (levels 4-7) 4. Total oral intake of a single consistency 5. Total oral intake of multiple consistencies requiring special preparation 6. Total oral intake with no special preparation, but must avoid specific foods or liquid items 7. Total oral intake with no restrictions
Maintenance of functional capacities
Time frame: T4M : 4 months after Baseline T0 the end of the routine reeducation intervention
Assessed by establishing the FOIS (Functional Oral Intake Scale) score : Level from 1 to 7 : TUBE DEPENDENT (levels 1-3) 1. No oral intake 2. Tube dependent with minimal/inconsistent oral intake 3. Tube supplements with consistent oral intake TOTAL ORAL INTAKE (levels 4-7) 4. Total oral intake of a single consistency 5. Total oral intake of multiple consistencies requiring special preparation 6. Total oral intake with no special preparation, but must avoid specific foods or liquid items 7. Total oral intake with no restrictions
Maintenance of functional capacities
Time frame: T5M : 5 months after Baseline T0 the end of the routine reeducation intervention
Assessed by establishing the FOIS (Functional Oral Intake Scale) score : Level from 1 to 7 : TUBE DEPENDENT (levels 1-3) 1. No oral intake 2. Tube dependent with minimal/inconsistent oral intake 3. Tube supplements with consistent oral intake TOTAL ORAL INTAKE (levels 4-7) 4. Total oral intake of a single consistency 5. Total oral intake of multiple consistencies requiring special preparation 6. Total oral intake with no special preparation, but must avoid specific foods or liquid items 7. Total oral intake with no restrictions
Maintenance of functional capacities
Time frame: T6M : 6 months after BaselineT0 the end of the routine reeducation intervention
Assessed by establishing the FOIS (Functional Oral Intake Scale) score: Level from 1 to 7 : TUBE DEPENDENT (levels 1-3) 1. No oral intake 2. Tube dependent with minimal/inconsistent oral intake 3. Tube supplements with consistent oral intake TOTAL ORAL INTAKE (levels 4-7) 4. Total oral intake of a single consistency 5. Total oral intake of multiple consistencies requiring special preparation 6. Total oral intake with no special preparation, but must avoid specific foods or liquid items 7. Total oral intake with no restrictions
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Aug 2023.
Related trials for Swallowing Disorders
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Long-term Administration of K-CAB Tab./K-CAB ODT(Tegoprazan) 25 mg as Maintenance Therapy Following the Treatment of GERD
Maintenance Therapy Following Treatment for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(GERD)
Recruiting
The Esophageal String Test as a Diagnostic Screening Tool for Eosinophilic Esophagitis Among Africans With Dysphagia in Mali and the United States
Dysphagia, Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Recruiting
taVNS in Infants Severe Dysphagia
Dysphagia, Swallowing Disorders
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Early Feeding TL Trial
Total Laryngectomy
Active, not recruitingObservational study
RETHINK REFLUX Registry
Gastroesophageal Reflux
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Anais Galtier principal investigator
University Hospital, Toulouse
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Telephone follow-up in people with Swallowing Disorders, run by University Hospital, Toulouse at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Maintenance of functional capacities (time frame: Baseline T0 : At the end of the initial routine reeducation intervention). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Aug 2023.