Cardiogenic ShockNCT04689451
Feasibility and Safety of Total Percutaneous Closure of Femoral Arterial Access Sites in the Veno-arterial ECMO Patients
An observational study of Cardiogenic Shock and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation, run by Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine.
Trial summary
The most frequent access site for veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is the common femoral artery (CFA), using either an open or percutaneous technique. Currently, percutaneous closure devices for femoral arterial access sites are approved for use only when a 10-F or smaller sheath has been… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiogenic Shock, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation, Myocarditis
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2021to 31 Dec 2022
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: all patients who underwent VA-ECMO
Who may be able to join
- The study included all patients who underwent VA-ECMO and in whom Perclose ProGlide was deployed to achieve hemostasis during closure of the CFA site.
Who cannot join
- Patients were excluded if 24 hour and 30-day follow-up data regarding the access sites and other clinical outcomes were not available.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: A Trial to Compare the Feasibility and Safety of Total Percutaneous Closure of Femoral Arterial Access Sites in the Veno-arterial ECMO Patients With Surgical Arterial Repair
The most frequent access site for veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is the common femoral artery (CFA), using either an open or percutaneous technique. Currently, percutaneous closure devices for femoral arterial access sites are approved for use only when a 10-F or smaller sheath has been used. However, the availability of the Perclose ProGlide (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL) device has now made it possible to perform percutaneous vessel closure after using larger sheaths.The preclose technique using Perclose ProGlide, has been widely used in endovascular procedures. In a prospective randomized study, complication rates at the access site were similar in patients who underwent total percutaneous access (including percutaneous arteriotomy closure) than in those who underwent surgical cutdown and subsequent surgical closure. Total percutaneous closure of femoral arterial access sites increases patient comfort and decreases the rate of wound infections and lymphatic fistulas.[6,7] Furthermore, patients are mobilized and discharged earlier following the use of closure devices than with compression alone. Despite the above observations, no data have been published regarding percutaneous closure of femoral artery access sites in patients who have undergone VA-ECMO. In this study, we evaluated the safety and feasibility of a percutaneous closure technique using Perclose ProGlide to close the CFA access site after VA-ECMO.
- Conditions
- Cardiogenic Shock, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation, Myocarditis, Hypertension, Pulmonary, Pulmonary Embolism, Heart Arrest
- Keywords
- decannulation, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ProGlide, vascular complications
- Medical subject headings
- Shock, Cardiogenic, Myocarditis, Hypertension, Pulmonary, Pulmonary Embolism, Heart Arrest
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Perclose ProGlide | Perclose ProGlide group: use Perclose ProGlide to suture the artery | |
| Surgical Arterial Repair | Surgical Arterial Repair group : suture the artery by surgery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Perclose technical success
successful arterial closure of the CFA access site without the need for adjunctive successful arterial closure of the CFA access site without the need for adjunctive surgical or endovascular procedures.
Measured: 1day
Primary device failure
obvious closure site bleeding after 2 Perclose ProGlides deployed, and complete device failure was defined as closure site bleeding which need surgical intervention
Measured: 1day
Secondary outcomes (1)
Access-related complications
events that occurred at the arterial access site, including periprocedural bleeding equiring transfusion, acute lower limb ischemia, groin infection, device failure, arterial thrombosis, arterial dissection, pseudoaneurysm, femoral arterial stenosis, arteriovenous fistula, hematoma, and lymphocele in the periprocedural period
Measured: up to 24 hours after closure and during 30 days of follow-up.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Dec 2020
- Study start1 Feb 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cardiogenic ShockStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of MedicineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04689451
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- xuxin@GICU
- Status last verified
- Dec 2020
- First submitted
- 27 Dec 2020
- Last updated
- 30 Dec 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Dec 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Trial to Compare the Feasibility and Safety of Total Percutaneous Closure of Femoral Arterial Access Sites in the Veno-arterial ECMO Patients With Surgical Arterial Repair
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04689451
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- xuxin@GICU
- Conditions
- Cardiogenic Shock, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation, Myocarditis, Hypertension, Pulmonary, Pulmonary Embolism, Heart Arrest
- Keywords
- decannulation, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ProGlide, vascular complications
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The most frequent access site for veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is the common femoral artery (CFA), using either an open or percutaneous technique. Currently, percutaneous closure devices for femoral arterial access sites are approved for use only when a 10-F or smaller sheath has been used. However, the availability of the Perclose ProGlide (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL) device has now made it possible to perform percutaneous vessel closure after using larger sheaths.The preclose technique using Perclose ProGlide, has been widely used in endovascular procedures. In a prospective randomized study, complication rates at the access site were similar in patients who underwent total percutaneous access (including percutaneous arteriotomy closure) than in those who underwent surgical cutdown and subsequent surgical closure. Total percutaneous closure of femoral arterial access sites increases patient comfort and decreases the rate of wound infections and lymphatic fistulas.[6,7] Furthermore, patients are mobilized and discharged earlier following the use of closure devices than with compression alone. Despite the above observations, no data have been published regarding percutaneous closure of femoral artery access sites in patients who have undergone VA-ECMO. In this study, we evaluated the safety and feasibility of a percutaneous closure technique using Perclose ProGlide to close the CFA access site after VA-ECMO.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Perclose ProGlide | – | –Perclose ProGlide group: use Perclose ProGlide to suture the artery |
| Surgical Arterial Repair | – | –Surgical Arterial Repair group : suture the artery by surgery |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- all patients who underwent VA-ECMO
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- The study included all patients who underwent VA-ECMO and in whom Perclose ProGlide was deployed to achieve hemostasis during closure of the CFA site.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients were excluded if 24 hour and 30-day follow-up data regarding the access sites and other clinical outcomes were not available.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Perclose technical success
Time frame: 1day
successful arterial closure of the CFA access site without the need for adjunctive successful arterial closure of the CFA access site without the need for adjunctive surgical or endovascular procedures.
Primary device failure
Time frame: 1day
obvious closure site bleeding after 2 Perclose ProGlides deployed, and complete device failure was defined as closure site bleeding which need surgical intervention
1 secondary outcome
Access-related complications
Time frame: up to 24 hours after closure and during 30 days of follow-up.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Dec 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cardiogenic Shock
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Acid-base Disorders and Ventilation Settings in Cardiogenic Shock and Post-cardiac Arrest Patients: Comparison With VentilO Algorithm
Cardiac Arrest (CA), Cardiogenic Shock
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Hemodynamic Evaluation of Left Atrial Pressure in Relationship to Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure in Cardio Thoracic Patients
Cardiogenic Shock, Pulmonary Edema Cardiac Cause
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Capital Offload-Shock
Hypervolemia, Cardiogenic Shock
RecruitingObservational study
Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Registry
Cardiogenic Shock
RecruitingObservational study
Assessment of Support With Impella® Best Practices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
AMI Cardiogenic Shock
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cardiogenic Shock and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation, run by Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact xin xu, Master (13857138821, xin.8157@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Perclose technical success (time frame: 1day). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Dec 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.