PresbyopiaNCT04632784
Clinical Trial With Artiflex Presbyopic (Artiplus)
A study testing Artiflex Presbyopic (Artiplus) implantation in people with Presbyopia and Ametropia, run by Ophtec BV at 7 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the multifocal Artiflex Presbyopic (Artiplus) intraocular lens. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Presbyopia, Ametropia, Refractive Errors
- What is being tested?
- Artiflex Presbyopic (Artiplus) implantation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 49 participants
- Where
- 7 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 12 Nov 2021to 26 Nov 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Presbyopic adult
- Potential for binocular vision
- Subject wishes to be spectacle independent for near and far vision
- Refractive error that can be corrected with correction at PIOL plane from +2.0 to -15.0 D
- Subject requiring a presbyopic correction Patients with reading glasses of minimum +1D.
- Stable refraction (±0.75 D), as expressed by manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) for a minimum of 12 months prior to surgery, verified by consecutive refractions and/or medical records or prescription history
Show all 11Show fewer
- Expected best corrected visual acuity of 0.2 logMAR (0.63 Snellen decimal) or better after lens implantation
- Current contact lens wearer should demonstrate a stable refraction (± 0.5 D), expressed as subjective refraction spherical equivalent, on two consecutive examination dates performed at least 7 days apart. Before the first refraction, the contact lens wearer should not have worn lenses for at least 2 weeks in case of rigid and toric contact lenses, or 3 days for spherical soft contact lenses.
- Any subject, who is expected to have a residual postoperative cylindrical refractive error of below 0.75 D
- Ability to give informed consent
- Availability, willingness and sufficient cognitive awareness and physical ability to comply with examination procedures throughout the entire duration of the study
Who cannot join
- Pre-existing pathology or physiology which may be aggravated by the implant or where the implant may interfere with the possibility of examining or treating disease:
- Preoperative ocular or systemic condition or medication use that would be expected to present undue risk to the subject, that can predispose for future complications or confound the outcome(s) of the study. E.g. the systemic use of alpha-1a adrenergic receptor antagonists was suggested to increase the occurrence of intraoperative floppy iris syndrome, alter iris morphology - or more specifically reduce iris thickness at the site of potential IOL enclavation - and increase postoperative endothelial cell loss.
- Previous ocular surgery which might affect the outcome of the study
- Concurrent participation or participation during the last 30 days in another drug or device investigation
- Secondary surgical procedure planned during the first 6 months of the study (e.g. laser treatment to correct astigmatism)
- Amblyopia
Show all 30Show fewer
- Preoperative anterior chamber depth measurement of below 3.0 mm for subjects < 40 years old and 2.8 mm for subjects > 40 years old. Anterior chamber depth is being measured from corneal endothelium to the anterior pole of the crystalline lens. This will result in a critical distance between PIOL and endothelium of 1.5 mm or more as simulated with anterior segment imaging.
- White-to-white smaller than 10.5 mm
- Subjects not meeting the age specific minimum preoperative endothelial cell density as defined below:
- 31 to 35 years of age 2400 cells/mm2; 36 to 45 years of age 2200 cells/mm2; > 45 years of age 2000 cells/mm2
- Corneas with high rates of polymegethism (a coefficient of variation over 0.40) and pleomorphism (the presence of less than 50% hexagonal cells).
- Abnormal iris (e.g. convex, bulging or volcano shaped iris)
- Crystalline lens rise of 600 µm or more
- Abnormal cornea (keratoconus, opaque cornea, corneal scars, post corneal transplant, corneal dystrophy, or other)
- Ocular surface conditions which might influence the quality of vision and affect the outcome of the study
- Abnormal pupil (e.g. nonreactive, fixed)
- Ectopic pupil
- Pupil in photopic light conditions smaller than 2.6 mm
- Pupil in scotopic light conditions greater than 7.0 mm
- High preoperative intraocular pressure (>21 mm Hg)
- Cataract of any grade
- Glaucoma or family history of glaucoma (dependent on the evaluation of physician)
- Diabetes or diabetic retinopathy
- Acute or chronic inflammation
- Chronic or recurrent uveitis or family history of the same condition
- Retinal detachments or family history of retinal detachments
- Corticosteroid responder
- Pregnant or nursing
- Unstable refraction (≥ 0.5D of variability in refraction over the last 12 months)
- Aged under 18
Trial locations and contacts
7 sites in 2 countries.
7 sites in 2 countries
Spain4 sites
IMO
Barcelona, Catalonia
ICQO
Bilbao, Biscay
Hospital San Rafael
Madrid, Madrid
CIMO
Seville, Seville
South Korea3 sites
GM st. Mary's Eye clinic
Busan, Busan
Nune Eye Hospital Daegu
Seoul, Seoul
SU Yonsei Eye Clinic
Seoul, Seoul
About this study
Official title: Prospective Multicentre Clinical Trial With the Artiflex Presbyopic (Artiplus), an Iris-fixated Multifocal Intraocular Lens for the Correction of Presbyopia in Phakic Eyes
The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the multifocal Artiflex Presbyopic (Artiplus) intraocular lens.
Read the detailed description
The study is a prospective, open-label, single-arm, and multicentre clinical investigation with three years of follow-up. Artiflex Presbyopic (Artiplus) is a phakic intraocular lens to be implanted in the anterior chamber, intended for adult subjects and indicated for the optical correction of presbyopia and spherical error requiring a correction.
- Conditions
- Presbyopia, Ametropia, Refractive Errors, Myopia, Hyperopia
- Being tested
- Artiflex Presbyopic (Artiplus) implantation
- Keywords
- Artiflex Presbyopic, iris-fixated, phakic intraocular lens, PIOL, Ophtec, Artiplus
- Medical subject headings
- Presbyopia, Refractive Errors, Myopia, Hyperopia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Artiflex Presbyopic (Artiplus) implantationDevice
Implantation of iris-fixated multifocal Artiflex Presbyopic IOL (Artiplus)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Artiflex Presbyopic (Artiplus) | Experimental | 49 subjects have received the Artiflex Presbyopic lens (Artiplus) bilaterally and will be followed for 3 years. Receives: Device: Artiflex Presbyopic (Artiplus) implantation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Improvement in monocular and binocular uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA)
- Percentage of eyes that achieve UNVA of 0.3 logMAR or better
- Percentage of eyes that achieve UNVA of 0.0 logMAR or better
Measured: 3 years
Improvement in monocular and binocular corrected near visual acuity (CNVA)
- Percentage of eyes that achieve CNVA of 0.3 logMAR or better
- Percentage of eyes that achieve CNVA of 0.0 logMAR or better
Measured: 3 years
Improvement in monocular and binocular distance corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA)
- Percentage of eyes that achieve DCNVA of 0.3 logMAR or better
- Percentage of eyes that achieve DCNVA of 0.0 logMAR or better
Measured: 3 years
Improvement in monocular and binocular uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA)
- Percentage of eyes that achieve UIVA of 0.3 logMAR or better
- Percentage of eyes that achieve UIVA of 0.0 logMAR or better
Measured: 3 years
Improvement in monocular and binocular distance corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA)
- Percentage of eyes that achieve DCIVA of 0.3 logMAR or better
- Percentage of eyes that achieve DCIVA of 0.0 logMAR or better
Measured: 3 years
Improvement in monocular and binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA)
Percentage of eyes that achieve UDVA of 0.3 logMAR or better Percentage of eyes that achieve UDVA of 0.0 logMAR or better
Measured: 3 years
Improvement in monocular and binocular corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA)
- Percentage of eyes that achieve CDVA of 0.3 logMAR or better
- Percentage of eyes that achieve CDVA of 0.0 logMAR or better
Measured: 3 years
Defocus evaluation
Binocular defocus evaluation will be obtained by using the best-corrected distance refraction and then defocusing the image in 0.5 D increments from +1.5 to -5.0 D
Measured: 3 years
Predictability of the manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE)
The absolute difference between the actually obtained MRSE and the target MRSE
Measured: 3 years
Predictability of the manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE)
The percentage of eyes that achieves a MRSE of less than or equal to 0.5 D difference between the actual and target MRSE
Measured: 3 years
Predictability of the manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE)
The percentage of eyes that achieves a MRSE of less than or equal to 1.0 D difference between the actual and target MRSE
Measured: 3 years
Stability of manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE)
Mean change in MRSE between visits as determined by a paired analysis
Measured: 3 years
Stability of manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE)
The percentage of eyes that achieves a change in MRSE of less than or equal to 0.5 D between two consecutive refraction measurements
Measured: 3 years
Stability of manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE)
The percentage of eyes that achieves a change in MRSE of less than or equal to 1.0 D between two consecutive refraction measurements
Measured: 3 years
Evaluation of visual disturbances using a validated questionnaire
Assessing the percentage of subjects who experience different visual disturbances, by means of questionnaire
Measured: 3 years
Evaluation of visual disturbances using a validated questionnaire
Assessing the occurrence of the different visual disturbances by means of questionnaire
Measured: 3 years
Evaluation of visual disturbances using a validated questionnaire
Assessing the severity of the different visual disturbances by means of questionnaire
Measured: 3 years
Evaluation of visual disturbances using a validated questionnaire
Assessing the bothersomeness of the different visual disturbances by means of questionnaire
Measured: 3 years
Evaluation of visual disturbances using a validated questionnaire
Assessing the time of onset of visual disturbances by means of questionnaire
Measured: 3 years
Satisfaction questionnaire
- Percentage of subjects that is satisfied with the overall procedure
- Percentage of subjects that is satisfied with uncorrected near vision
- Percentage of subjects that is satisfied with uncorrected intermediate vision
- Percentage of subjects that is satisfied with uncorrected distance vision
Measured: 3 years
Endothelial cell density
Comparison of the preoperative and postoperative endothelial cell density
Measured: 3 years
Endothelial cell density
Endothelial cell loss over time
Measured: 3 years
Endothelial cell density
Additionally, a comparison between the scientific literature reported naturally occurring endothelial cell loss over time (approx. 0.6% per year; Bourne et al., 1997) and the study observed cell loss will be performed
Measured: 3 years
Adverse event (AEs) / complication rates
- Cumulative numbers of adverse events, e.g. cystoid macular edema (CME), hypopyon, endophthalmitis, lens dislocation, pupillary block, retinal detachment, necessary secondary surgical interventions
- Cumulative numbers of adverse events persistently present, e.g. corneal stroma edema, cystoid macular edema, iritis, raised intraocular pressure (IOP) requiring treatment, lens deposits
- The occurrence of adverse events will be compared to and should not exceed the reference safety and performance endpoint (SPE) rates as defined by ISO 11979-7:2018, Annex E, table E.1
Measured: 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Nov 2020
- Study start12 Nov 2021
- Primary completion26 Nov 2023
- Study completion26 Nov 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PresbyopiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 49 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ophtec BV
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- J. Guell, MD, Principal investigator, Instituto de Microcirugía Ocular, Barcelona, Spain
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04632784
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AP01000816
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 30 Oct 2020
- Last updated
- 15 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Wanten JC, Cezon J, Nuijts RMMA, Duran de la Colina JA, Royo M, Choe CM, Choi JH, Park CS, Koh IH, Rodriguez DC, Bauer NJC, Guell JL. Six-month performance and safety of an iris-fixated multifocal intraocular lens for presbyopia correction in phakic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2025 Nov 1;51(11):963-971. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001722.
PubMed 40524363
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Multicentre Clinical Trial With the Artiflex Presbyopic (Artiplus), an Iris-fixated Multifocal Intraocular Lens for the Correction of Presbyopia in Phakic Eyes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04632784
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AP01000816
- Conditions
- Presbyopia, Ametropia, Refractive Errors, Myopia, Hyperopia
- Keywords
- Artiflex Presbyopic, iris-fixated, phakic intraocular lens, PIOL, Ophtec, Artiplus
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 49 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Ophtec BVIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 12 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the multifocal Artiflex Presbyopic (Artiplus) intraocular lens.
Detailed description
The study is a prospective, open-label, single-arm, and multicentre clinical investigation with three years of follow-up. Artiflex Presbyopic (Artiplus) is a phakic intraocular lens to be implanted in the anterior chamber, intended for adult subjects and indicated for the optical correction of presbyopia and spherical error requiring a correction.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Artiflex Presbyopic (Artiplus) | Experimental | Device: Artiflex Presbyopic (Artiplus) implantation49 subjects have received the Artiflex Presbyopic lens (Artiplus) bilaterally and will be followed for 3 years. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Presbyopic adult
- Potential for binocular vision
- Subject wishes to be spectacle independent for near and far vision
- Refractive error that can be corrected with correction at PIOL plane from +2.0 to -15.0 D
- Subject requiring a presbyopic correction Patients with reading glasses of minimum +1D.
Key exclusion criteria (30 listed)
- Pre-existing pathology or physiology which may be aggravated by the implant or where the implant may interfere with the possibility of examining or treating disease:
- Preoperative ocular or systemic condition or medication use that would be expected to present undue risk to the subject, that can predispose for future complications or confound the outcome(s) of the study. E.g. the systemic use of alpha-1a adrenergic receptor antagonists was suggested to increase the occurrence of intraoperative floppy iris syndrome, alter iris morphology - or more specifically reduce iris thickness at the site of potential IOL enclavation - and increase postoperative endothelial cell loss.
- Previous ocular surgery which might affect the outcome of the study
- Concurrent participation or participation during the last 30 days in another drug or device investigation
- Secondary surgical procedure planned during the first 6 months of the study (e.g. laser treatment to correct astigmatism)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Artiflex Presbyopic (Artiplus) implantationImplantation of iris-fixated multifocal Artiflex Presbyopic IOL (Artiplus) | Device | Artiflex Presbyopic (Artiplus) |
Primary outcome
Improvement in monocular and binocular uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA)
Time frame: 3 years
* Percentage of eyes that achieve UNVA of 0.3 logMAR or better * Percentage of eyes that achieve UNVA of 0.0 logMAR or better
Improvement in monocular and binocular corrected near visual acuity (CNVA)
Time frame: 3 years
* Percentage of eyes that achieve CNVA of 0.3 logMAR or better * Percentage of eyes that achieve CNVA of 0.0 logMAR or better
Improvement in monocular and binocular distance corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA)
Time frame: 3 years
* Percentage of eyes that achieve DCNVA of 0.3 logMAR or better * Percentage of eyes that achieve DCNVA of 0.0 logMAR or better
Improvement in monocular and binocular uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA)
Time frame: 3 years
* Percentage of eyes that achieve UIVA of 0.3 logMAR or better * Percentage of eyes that achieve UIVA of 0.0 logMAR or better
Improvement in monocular and binocular distance corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA)
Time frame: 3 years
* Percentage of eyes that achieve DCIVA of 0.3 logMAR or better * Percentage of eyes that achieve DCIVA of 0.0 logMAR or better
Improvement in monocular and binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA)
Time frame: 3 years
Percentage of eyes that achieve UDVA of 0.3 logMAR or better Percentage of eyes that achieve UDVA of 0.0 logMAR or better
Improvement in monocular and binocular corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA)
Time frame: 3 years
* Percentage of eyes that achieve CDVA of 0.3 logMAR or better * Percentage of eyes that achieve CDVA of 0.0 logMAR or better
Defocus evaluation
Time frame: 3 years
Binocular defocus evaluation will be obtained by using the best-corrected distance refraction and then defocusing the image in 0.5 D increments from +1.5 to -5.0 D
Predictability of the manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE)
Time frame: 3 years
The absolute difference between the actually obtained MRSE and the target MRSE
Predictability of the manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE)
Time frame: 3 years
The percentage of eyes that achieves a MRSE of less than or equal to 0.5 D difference between the actual and target MRSE
Predictability of the manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE)
Time frame: 3 years
The percentage of eyes that achieves a MRSE of less than or equal to 1.0 D difference between the actual and target MRSE
Stability of manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE)
Time frame: 3 years
Mean change in MRSE between visits as determined by a paired analysis
Stability of manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE)
Time frame: 3 years
The percentage of eyes that achieves a change in MRSE of less than or equal to 0.5 D between two consecutive refraction measurements
Stability of manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE)
Time frame: 3 years
The percentage of eyes that achieves a change in MRSE of less than or equal to 1.0 D between two consecutive refraction measurements
Evaluation of visual disturbances using a validated questionnaire
Time frame: 3 years
Assessing the percentage of subjects who experience different visual disturbances, by means of questionnaire
Evaluation of visual disturbances using a validated questionnaire
Time frame: 3 years
Assessing the occurrence of the different visual disturbances by means of questionnaire
Evaluation of visual disturbances using a validated questionnaire
Time frame: 3 years
Assessing the severity of the different visual disturbances by means of questionnaire
Evaluation of visual disturbances using a validated questionnaire
Time frame: 3 years
Assessing the bothersomeness of the different visual disturbances by means of questionnaire
Evaluation of visual disturbances using a validated questionnaire
Time frame: 3 years
Assessing the time of onset of visual disturbances by means of questionnaire
Satisfaction questionnaire
Time frame: 3 years
* Percentage of subjects that is satisfied with the overall procedure * Percentage of subjects that is satisfied with uncorrected near vision * Percentage of subjects that is satisfied with uncorrected intermediate vision * Percentage of subjects that is satisfied with uncorrected distance vision
Endothelial cell density
Time frame: 3 years
Comparison of the preoperative and postoperative endothelial cell density
Endothelial cell density
Time frame: 3 years
Endothelial cell loss over time
Endothelial cell density
Time frame: 3 years
Additionally, a comparison between the scientific literature reported naturally occurring endothelial cell loss over time (approx. 0.6% per year; Bourne et al., 1997) and the study observed cell loss will be performed
Adverse event (AEs) / complication rates
Time frame: 3 years
* Cumulative numbers of adverse events, e.g. cystoid macular edema (CME), hypopyon, endophthalmitis, lens dislocation, pupillary block, retinal detachment, necessary secondary surgical interventions * Cumulative numbers of adverse events persistently present, e.g. corneal stroma edema, cystoid macular edema, iritis, raised intraocular pressure (IOP) requiring treatment, lens deposits * The occurrence of adverse events will be compared to and should not exceed the reference safety and performance endpoint (SPE) rates as defined by ISO 11979-7:2018, Annex E, table E.1
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Oct 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40524363Wanten JC, Cezon J, Nuijts RMMA, Duran de la Colina JA, Royo M, Choe CM, Choi JH, Park CS, Koh IH, Rodriguez DC, Bauer NJC, Guell JL. Six-month performance and safety of an iris-fixated multifocal intraocular lens for presbyopia correction in phakic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2025 Nov 1;51(11):963-971. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001722.
Related trials for Presbyopia
Recruiting
Evaluation of Functional Superiority of the Morrow eProgressive
Presbyopia
Recruiting
VisDura VisAbility™ Micro Insert System Pre-market Clinical Trial
Presbyopia
Recruiting
Volumetric Visual Fields at Intermediate and Near Distances in Presbyopic Patients Using Occupational and General-Purpose Progressive Addition Lenses
Presbyopia
Recruiting
Volumetric Visual Fields at Different Distances in Presbyopic Patients Using Occupational (PC-133 and PC-200) and General-Purpose Progressive Addition Lenses
Presbyopia
Recruiting
Proof-of-Concept for a Novel Optical Aperture Contact Lens in Presbyopia and Keratoconus
Keratoconus, Presbyopia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
J. Guell, MD principal investigator
Instituto de Microcirugía Ocular, Barcelona, Spain
7 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Artiflex Presbyopic (Artiplus) implantation in people with Presbyopia and Ametropia, run by Ophtec BV at 7 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 30 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 7 sites in Spain, South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Improvement in monocular and binocular uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) (time frame: 3 years). The study lists 24 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04632784, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Oct 2026.