Spasticity as Sequela of StrokeNCT04437056
Nerve Transfers in Post-stroke Spasticity
A study testing Cognitive nerve transfers to spastic upper extremity muscles in stroke patients in people with Spasticity as Sequela of Stroke and Nerve Transfers, run by Medical University of Vienna at 1 site in Austria.
Trial summary
Stroke is nowadays a leading cause of disability with devastating sequelae. Upper limb spasticity is one of them. Nevertheless, not all the muscles are equally affected, as some may turn spastic or paretic and other remain intact. This unique pathophysiological mosaic dictates a precise therapeutic plan. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Spasticity as Sequela of Stroke, Nerve Transfers
- What is being tested?
- Cognitive nerve transfers to spastic upper extremity muscles in stroke patients
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteAustria
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2020to 31 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Are undergoing nerve transfers
- Age from 18 to 75 years old
- Minimum of 1 year interval after stroke
- Are able to understand German or English
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Muscle scale for donor nerves: M4 or M5
- Walking patients, with or without crutches
Show all 11Show fewer
- Good general health condition and social support
- For the control group:
- Age 18-75 years old
- Indication for ulnar nerve release and submuscular transposition for compression neuropathy in the elbow
- No other neurological disorders
Who cannot join
- Stroke earlier than 3 years at the time of first consultation
- Lower limb spasticity and patients mobile with wheel chair
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Outcome Measurements After Cognitive Nerve Transfers to Spastic Muscles in Stroke Patients
Stroke is nowadays a leading cause of disability with devastating sequelae. Upper limb spasticity is one of them. Nevertheless, not all the muscles are equally affected, as some may turn spastic or paretic and other remain intact. This unique pathophysiological mosaic dictates a precise therapeutic plan. Existing spasticity treatment has significant drawbacks due to its unspecific targeting and short duration. A causal, life-lasting treatment, precisely adapted to every single patient's needs and to disease pattern, is currently missing. Hyperselective muscle denervation and subsequent cognitive reinnervation with appropriate unaffected donor nerves may break the pathological spastic circuit and provide volitional muscle control. With this pioneering study we will perform cognitive nerve transfers to spastic muscles and will prospectively investigate their effects on clinical, electrophysiological, molecular-biological and histological level. Accurate donor nerve selection will be for the first time quantified through motor unit number estimation with high-density needle electromyography. This revolutionary concept can open the window to a new era of therapeutic possibilities for stroke victims.
- Conditions
- Spasticity as Sequela of Stroke, Nerve Transfers
- Being tested
- Cognitive nerve transfers to spastic upper extremity muscles in stroke patients
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cognitive nerve transfers to spastic upper extremity muscles in stroke patientsProcedure or surgery
Based on the fact that upper motor neuron syndrome after stroke is presented with variable clinical features, usually without affecting in the same way the entire upper extremity, we aim to investigate the efficacy of nerve transfers to spastic muscles after stroke using as donor nerves that innervate unaffected ipsilateral volitionally controlled muscles.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Stroke patients with upper limb spasticity | Other | Patients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity will be operated for cognitive nerve transfers to spastic muscles to allow for volitional muscle reinnervation and disrupture of spasticity. Adequate healthy nerve donors from the ipsilateral arm will be determined clinically and electrophysiologically. Receives: Procedure: Cognitive nerve transfers to spastic upper extremity muscles in stroke patients |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI-9) score
Patients can reach a score for CAHAI 9 between 9 to 63. The lower the score, the greater impairment.
Measured: 0-24 months
Modified Ashworth Scale
A score of 1 indicates no resistance, and 5 indicates rigidity. A 1+ scoring category indicates resistance through less than half of the movement. Scores range from 0-4, with 6 choices .
Measured: 0-24 months
Changes in electrophysiological muscle activity after nerve transfers
Low frequency-dependent depression of H-wave (in mV)
Measured: 0-24 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
Changes in muscle satellite cell population (%) in spastic muscles and comparison with healthy control group
Muscle biopsies from spastic muscles will be obtained during the surgery of nerve transfers. The muscle satellite cell population (%) will be calculated with the use of Flow Cytometry and be compared to the one of healthy muscles of control group. There will be no recruitment procedure for the control group. Routinely, when we carry out surgery for ulnar nerve release in the elbow and nerve transposition, a part of the flexor carpi ulnaris muscle needs to be excised and discarded. After obtaining informed consent from patients for further use of their biological material, we will collect these muscles and use them as control group.
Measured: During surgery- 24 months
The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
The total score on the ARAT ranges from 0 to 57, with the lowest score indicating that no movements can be performed, and the upper score indicating normal performance.
Measured: 0-24 months
The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score
Scores range from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability).
Measured: 0-24 months
Motor Unit Number Estimation of donor and spastic muscles
High density electromyography with fine needle electrodes will be applied to allow an accurate estimation of motor units (absolute number) in donor muscles, in spastic muscles and in newly-innervated muscles
Measured: 0-24 months
Comparison of collagen content between spastic and healthy muscles
Muscle biopsies from spastic muscles will be obtained during the surgery of nerve transfers. Collagen content of spastic muscles (%) will be calculated with the use of Picrosirius red staining and bright field light microscopy and be compared with healthy muscles of control group. There will be no recruitment procedure for the control group. Routinely, when we carry out surgery for ulnar nerve release in the elbow and nerve transposition, a part of the flexor carpi ulnaris muscle needs to be excised and discarded. After obtaining informed consent from patients for further use of their biological material, we will collect these muscles and use them as control group.
Measured: During surgery- 12 months
Changes in sarcomere length (μm) in spastic muscles
Biopsy of a muscle fascicle from spastic muscles will be obtained during the surgery of nerve transfers with the use of dedicated clamps and will be fixed in formalin. The sarcomere length will be calculated with the use of fractional laser. The sarcomere length of spastic muscles will be compared with the sarcomere length of healthy control group muscles.
Measured: During surgery- 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jun 2020
- Study start1 Sep 2020
- Primary completion31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Spasticity as Sequela of StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Medical University of ViennaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of Vienna
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Imperial College London, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Olga Politikou, Medical University of Vienna
- Investigators
- Oskar Aszmann, Prof, Study director, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04437056
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EK 2319/2019
- Status last verified
- Apr 2022
- First submitted
- 1 Jun 2020
- Last updated
- 12 Apr 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Urban PP, Wolf T, Uebele M, Marx JJ, Vogt T, Stoeter P, Bauermann T, Weibrich C, Vucurevic GD, Schneider A, Wissel J. Occurence and clinical predictors of spasticity after ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2010 Sep;41(9):2016-20. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.581991. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
PubMed 20705930Wissel J, Manack A, Brainin M. Toward an epidemiology of poststroke spasticity. Neurology. 2013 Jan 15;80(3 Suppl 2):S13-9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182762448.
PubMed 23319481Sommerfeld DK, Gripenstedt U, Welmer AK. Spasticity after stroke: an overview of prevalence, test instruments, and treatments. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Sep;91(9):814-20. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31825f13a3.
PubMed 22760104Zheng MX, Hua XY, Feng JT, Li T, Lu YC, Shen YD, Cao XH, Zhao NQ, Lyu JY, Xu JG, Gu YD, Xu WD. Trial of Contralateral Seventh Cervical Nerve Transfer for Spastic Arm Paralysis. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 4;378(1):22-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1615208. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
PubMed 29262271Qiu YQ, Du MX, Yu BF, Jiang S, Feng JT, Shen YD, Xu WD. Contralateral Lumbar to Sacral Nerve Rerouting for Hemiplegic Patients After Stroke: A Clinical Pilot Study. World Neurosurg. 2019 Jan;121:12-18. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.118. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
PubMed 30266703Khalifeh JM, Dibble CF, Van Voorhis A, Doering M, Boyer MI, Mahan MA, Wilson TJ, Midha R, Yang LJS, Ray WZ. Nerve transfers in the upper extremity following cervical spinal cord injury. Part 1: Systematic review of the literature. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Jul 12;31(5):629-640. doi: 10.3171/2019.4.SPINE19173. Print 2019 Nov 1.
PubMed 31299644Faturi FM, Lopes Santos G, Ocamoto GN, Russo TL. Structural muscular adaptations in upper limb after stroke: a systematic review. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2019 Jan;26(1):73-79. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2018.1517511. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
PubMed 30222075Smith LR, Pichika R, Meza RC, Gillies AR, Baliki MN, Chambers HG, Lieber RL. Contribution of extracellular matrix components to the stiffness of skeletal muscle contractures in patients with cerebral palsy. Connect Tissue Res. 2021 May;62(3):287-298. doi: 10.1080/03008207.2019.1694011. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
PubMed 31779492Mandeville RM, Brown JM, Sheean GL. Semi-quantitative electromyography as a predictor of nerve transfer outcome. Clin Neurophysiol. 2019 May;130(5):701-706. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.02.008. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
PubMed 30875537Barreca S, Gowland CK, Stratford P, Huijbregts M, Griffiths J, Torresin W, Dunkley M, Miller P, Masters L. Development of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory: theoretical constructs, item generation, and selection. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2004 Fall;11(4):31-42. doi: 10.1310/JU8P-UVK6-68VW-CF3W.
PubMed 15592988
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Apr 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Outcome Measurements After Cognitive Nerve Transfers to Spastic Muscles in Stroke Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04437056
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EK 2319/2019
- Conditions
- Spasticity as Sequela of Stroke, Nerve Transfers
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of ViennaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Imperial College London, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Stroke is nowadays a leading cause of disability with devastating sequelae. Upper limb spasticity is one of them. Nevertheless, not all the muscles are equally affected, as some may turn spastic or paretic and other remain intact. This unique pathophysiological mosaic dictates a precise therapeutic plan. Existing spasticity treatment has significant drawbacks due to its unspecific targeting and short duration. A causal, life-lasting treatment, precisely adapted to every single patient's needs and to disease pattern, is currently missing. Hyperselective muscle denervation and subsequent cognitive reinnervation with appropriate unaffected donor nerves may break the pathological spastic circuit and provide volitional muscle control. With this pioneering study we will perform cognitive nerve transfers to spastic muscles and will prospectively investigate their effects on clinical, electrophysiological, molecular-biological and histological level. Accurate donor nerve selection will be for the first time quantified through motor unit number estimation with high-density needle electromyography. This revolutionary concept can open the window to a new era of therapeutic possibilities for stroke victims.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Stroke patients with upper limb spasticity | Other | Procedure: Cognitive nerve transfers to spastic upper extremity muscles in stroke patientsPatients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity will be operated for cognitive nerve transfers to spastic muscles to allow for volitional muscle reinnervation and disrupture of spasticity. Adequate healthy nerve donors from the ipsilateral arm will be determined clinically and electrophysiologically. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Are undergoing nerve transfers
- Age from 18 to 75 years old
- Minimum of 1 year interval after stroke
- Are able to understand German or English
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Muscle scale for donor nerves: M4 or M5
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Stroke earlier than 3 years at the time of first consultation
- Lower limb spasticity and patients mobile with wheel chair
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive nerve transfers to spastic upper extremity muscles in stroke patientsBased on the fact that upper motor neuron syndrome after stroke is presented with variable clinical features, usually without affecting in the same way the entire upper extremity, we aim to investigate the efficacy of nerve transfers to spastic muscles after stroke using as donor nerves that innervate unaffected ipsilateral volitionally controlled muscles. | Procedure or surgery | Stroke patients with upper limb spasticity |
Primary outcome
Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI-9) score
Time frame: 0-24 months
Patients can reach a score for CAHAI 9 between 9 to 63. The lower the score, the greater impairment.
Modified Ashworth Scale
Time frame: 0-24 months
A score of 1 indicates no resistance, and 5 indicates rigidity. A 1+ scoring category indicates resistance through less than half of the movement. Scores range from 0-4, with 6 choices .
Changes in electrophysiological muscle activity after nerve transfers
Time frame: 0-24 months
Low frequency-dependent depression of H-wave (in mV)
6 secondary outcomes
Changes in muscle satellite cell population (%) in spastic muscles and comparison with healthy control group
Time frame: During surgery- 24 months
The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
Time frame: 0-24 months
The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score
Time frame: 0-24 months
Motor Unit Number Estimation of donor and spastic muscles
Time frame: 0-24 months
Comparison of collagen content between spastic and healthy muscles
Time frame: During surgery- 12 months
Changes in sarcomere length (μm) in spastic muscles
Time frame: During surgery- 12 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Apr 2022.
- Background: PubMed 20705930Urban PP, Wolf T, Uebele M, Marx JJ, Vogt T, Stoeter P, Bauermann T, Weibrich C, Vucurevic GD, Schneider A, Wissel J. Occurence and clinical predictors of spasticity after ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2010 Sep;41(9):2016-20. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.581991. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
- Background: PubMed 23319481Wissel J, Manack A, Brainin M. Toward an epidemiology of poststroke spasticity. Neurology. 2013 Jan 15;80(3 Suppl 2):S13-9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182762448.
- Background: PubMed 22760104Sommerfeld DK, Gripenstedt U, Welmer AK. Spasticity after stroke: an overview of prevalence, test instruments, and treatments. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Sep;91(9):814-20. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31825f13a3.
- Background: PubMed 29262271Zheng MX, Hua XY, Feng JT, Li T, Lu YC, Shen YD, Cao XH, Zhao NQ, Lyu JY, Xu JG, Gu YD, Xu WD. Trial of Contralateral Seventh Cervical Nerve Transfer for Spastic Arm Paralysis. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 4;378(1):22-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1615208. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
- Background: PubMed 30266703Qiu YQ, Du MX, Yu BF, Jiang S, Feng JT, Shen YD, Xu WD. Contralateral Lumbar to Sacral Nerve Rerouting for Hemiplegic Patients After Stroke: A Clinical Pilot Study. World Neurosurg. 2019 Jan;121:12-18. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.118. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
- Background: PubMed 31299644Khalifeh JM, Dibble CF, Van Voorhis A, Doering M, Boyer MI, Mahan MA, Wilson TJ, Midha R, Yang LJS, Ray WZ. Nerve transfers in the upper extremity following cervical spinal cord injury. Part 1: Systematic review of the literature. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Jul 12;31(5):629-640. doi: 10.3171/2019.4.SPINE19173. Print 2019 Nov 1.
- Background: PubMed 30222075Faturi FM, Lopes Santos G, Ocamoto GN, Russo TL. Structural muscular adaptations in upper limb after stroke: a systematic review. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2019 Jan;26(1):73-79. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2018.1517511. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
- Background: PubMed 31779492Smith LR, Pichika R, Meza RC, Gillies AR, Baliki MN, Chambers HG, Lieber RL. Contribution of extracellular matrix components to the stiffness of skeletal muscle contractures in patients with cerebral palsy. Connect Tissue Res. 2021 May;62(3):287-298. doi: 10.1080/03008207.2019.1694011. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
- Background: PubMed 30875537Mandeville RM, Brown JM, Sheean GL. Semi-quantitative electromyography as a predictor of nerve transfer outcome. Clin Neurophysiol. 2019 May;130(5):701-706. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.02.008. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
- Background: PubMed 15592988Barreca S, Gowland CK, Stratford P, Huijbregts M, Griffiths J, Torresin W, Dunkley M, Miller P, Masters L. Development of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory: theoretical constructs, item generation, and selection. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2004 Fall;11(4):31-42. doi: 10.1310/JU8P-UVK6-68VW-CF3W.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Spasticity as Sequela of Stroke
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Study to Estimate How Often Post-stroke Spasticity Occurs and to Provide a Standard Guideline on the Best Way to Monitor Its Development
Spasticity as Sequela of Stroke
Recruiting
Cryoneurolysis for Spasticity Treatment: Long-term Clinical Outcomes and Mechanisms in the Central Nervous System
Spasticity as Sequela of Stroke
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Phenol and Botulinum Toxin vs Botulinum Toxin Alone for Post-Stroke Upper-Limb Spasticity
Spasticity as Sequela of Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Improving STEP in Stroke Patients
Stroke, Hemiplegia Following Ischemic Stroke
Recruiting
Radiosurgery Treatment for Spasticity Associated With Stroke, SCI & Cerebral Palsy
Spasticity as Sequela of Stroke, Spastic Cerebral Palsy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Oskar Aszmann, Prof study director
Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cognitive nerve transfers to spastic upper extremity muscles in stroke patients in people with Spasticity as Sequela of Stroke and Nerve Transfers, run by Medical University of Vienna at 1 site in Austria.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Austria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI-9) score (time frame: 0-24 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04437056, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Apr 2022.