HepatectomySAFER-LNCT03715517
Spinal Anesthesia For Enhanced Recovery After Liver Surgery
A study testing Continuous thoracic epidural analgesia, Spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine and Bupivacaine 0.75% in Dextrose Inj 8.25% in people with Hepatectomy and Pain, Postoperative, run by University of Manitoba at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
This project proposes to compare epidural versus spinal anesthesia in patients having liver resection surgery. The investigators hypothesize that spinal anesthesia will result in improved blood pressure control postoperatively and reduce the amount of intravenous fluids required after surgery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatectomy, Pain, Postoperative, Liver Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- Continuous thoracic epidural analgesia, Spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine and Bupivacaine 0.75% in Dextrose Inj 8.25%
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 128 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 4 Oct 2018to 31 Dec 2031
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female, Adults aged ≥ 18 years (there will be no upper age restriction);
- American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification (ASA-PS) of I to III;
- Undergoing subcostal or midline laparotomy for elective liver resection surgery under general anesthesia; if the planned procedure is a combined operation (i.e., concomitant extrahepatic surgery) , the associated procedure should not add more than one hour to the surgical time of the primary hepatic resection procedure alone;
- Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
- Provision of signed and dated informed consent form
- Body mass index (BMI) between 17 and 40 kg·m-², inclusive;
Show all 9Show fewer
- Negative result on serum pregnancy test at Screening and negative urine pregnancy test at Baseline (for women of childbearing potential, defined as those who have not undergone a hysterectomy or been postmenopausal for at least 12 consecutive months); and not currently breastfeeding, or planning to do so within 7 d following surgery;
- Stated willingness and ability to comply with all study and/or follow-up evaluations and communicate clearly with the Investigator and staff; and
- Voluntary participation and ability to provide written informed consent prior to any study procedures.
Who cannot join
- Emergency surgery;
- Age < 18 years;
- Planned laparoscopic hepatic resection;
- Planned laparotomy incision other than (right) subcostal, midline, or extended midline;
- Patients with obvious non-resectable disease prior to signing informed consent;
- Liver transplant recipient or previous hepatic resection or living-donor hepatectomy surgery;
Show all 16Show fewer
- Major surgery (open abdominal and/or thoracic) under general anesthesia ≤ 30 d preoperatively;
- Contraindications to neuraxial (spinal or epidural) anesthesia: (a) anticipated difficult intubation; (b) coagulation or hemostatic abnormalities within 30 d of surgery (defined as thrombocytopenia [platelet count < 100 × 10⁹ L-¹]; INR > 1.4; or activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT] > 40 s); (c) bleeding diathesis; (d) ongoing use (≤ 7 d before surgery) or planned perioperative use of antiplatelet agents (apart from acetylsalicylic acid 81 mg) or anticoagulants (excluding deep-vein thrombosis prophylaxis); (e) recent (≤ 30 d preoperatively) systemic infection or current (≤ 48 h) fever (≥ 38.4 °C), or evidence of infection (including superficial cutaneous infection in the thoracic and/or lumbar regions); (f) history of neurologic disorder affecting the spinal cord or the hemithorax or below; or impaired bladder/bowel function; (g) acute or subacute (≤ 90 d preoperatively) intracranial hemorrhage; or (h) technical contraindications to epidural placement: (i) local skin or soft tissue infection at proposed site for thoracic epidural insertion; (ii) previous cervicothoracic, thoracic, or thoracolumbar spinal surgery; (iii) history of spinal tumor, fracture or infection; or (iv) recent (≤ 14 d preoperatively) epidural corticosteroid injection;
- Significant cardiac arrhythmias (including pacemaker-dependence) or clinically significant cardiovascular disease (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional classification III-IV);
- Volume overload (hyperhydration), particularly in cases of pulmonary edema or acute decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF);
- Acute kidney injury (AKI) and/or chronic kidney disease (CKD) based on the 2012 Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) AKI (excluding the oliguria criterion) and CKD guideline definitions: AKI: increase in serum creatinine (SCr) (≥ 26.5 μmol·L-¹ within 48 h or ≥ 1.5× baseline within 7 d); CKD: abnormalities of kidney structure or function, present for > 3 mo, defined as either of the following present for > 3 mo: (1) ≥ 1 marker(s) of kidney damage: (a) albuminuria (24-h albumin-creatinine ratio [ACR] ≥ 30 mg·g-¹ [≥ 3 mg·mmol-¹]), (b) urine sediment abnormalities, (c) electrolyte and other abnormalities due to tubular disorders, (d) abnormalities detected by histology, (e) structural abnormalities detected by imaging, (f) history of kidney transplantation; and/or decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR < 60 mL-¹·min-¹·1.73 m-², estimated using the 2009 CKD-EPI creatinine equation [eGFR_creat]);
- Severe hypernatremia ([Na⁺] ≥ 155 mmol·L-¹) and/or hyperchloremia ([Cl-] ≥ 125 mmol·L-¹);
- Chronic pain; current (≤ 30 d preoperatively) and/or prior chronic (for a period of ≥ 90 d) opioid use; or history of alcohol, opiate, and/or other drug abuse or dependence;
- Use of supraphysiologic glucocorticoid (GC) doses (≥ 7.5 mg·day-¹ of prednisone or equivalent): recent (≤ 30 d), prolonged (> 2 consecutive weeks), or multiple courses totalling > 3 weeks in the preceding 6 months;
- Known allergy or sensitivity (e.g., glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase [G6PD] deficiency) to amide local anesthetics, opioids, or acetaminophen, or hypersensitivity to other materials to be used in the study (e.g., latex [epidural catheter adapter], epidural dressing or tape); or
- Altered mental status or educational, psychiatric, or communication (language, literacy) barriers that would impede accurate assessment of postoperative pain and/or ability to complete questionnaire instruments.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of Manitoba
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0Z2
Alex Grunfeld, MD, 204-787-1125, alexander.grunfeld@umanitoba.ca
About this study
Official title: Spinal Anesthesia for Enhanced Recovery After Liver Surgery
This project proposes to compare epidural versus spinal anesthesia in patients having liver resection surgery. The investigators hypothesize that spinal anesthesia will result in improved blood pressure control postoperatively and reduce the amount of intravenous fluids required after surgery. Spinal anesthesia is expected to provide the same pain control benefits as epidurals, with faster recovery of function. Spinal anesthesia may be a simple and effective way to improve and enhance the recovery in the increasing number of patients requiring liver resection.
Read the detailed description
Hepatic resection surgery (hepatectomy) for primary or metastatic malignancy is a major operation involving large, painful upper abdominal incisions, as well as considerable postoperative physiological derangements.
Uncontrolled postoperative incisional pain results in significant respiratory impairment, delayed mobilization, and augmentation of the surgically-induced stress response, placing patients at increased risk of postoperative complications and chronic post-surgical pain. Acute pain management with high-dose parenteral opioids further compounds this risk. Multimodal opioid-sparing therapy, and regional anesthesia in particular, is therefore an essential component of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways and patient-centred care.
Regional anesthesia using neuraxial block (intraoperative spinal anesthesia or thoracic epidural anesthesia) followed by postoperative continuous thoracic epidural analgesia (CTEA; postoperative administration of epidural local anesthetic and/or opioid) is the best method for treating pain following large abdominal surgeries, including liver resection, and has been shown to improve postoperative respiratory function and decrease respiratory complications in other surgeries.
However, the effects of intraoperative neuraxial block and postoperative CTEA on fluid balance, systemic hemodynamics, and functional recovery after hepatic resection surgery remain controversial. CTEA is frequently associated with postoperative hypotension, resulting in increased perioperative intravenous (IV) fluid administration, red blood cell transfusion, and vasopressor use in liver resection patients. For major hepatectomies, CTEA may also be an independent risk factor for postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), presumably due to impairment of renal autoregulation. Excessive IV fluid administration in the postoperative period is associated with significant weight gain, often necessitating diuretic therapy; delayed return of gastrointestinal function; increased need for packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusion due to hemodilution; increased infective complications due to this increased pRBC transfusion rate; and increased length of hospital stay.
In addition, concerns remain about the use of CTEA following liver resection surgery due to the potentially increased risk of epidural hematoma formation in the setting of postoperative coagulopathy. This concern has resulted in unplanned delays in epidural catheter removal postoperatively, due to persistent coagulation abnormalities, prolonging hospitalization by 1-3 d in up to 15% of patients.
These concerns about the consequences of excess fluid administration and the safety of CTEA for liver resection surgery have prompted the use of alternative and/or ancillary analgesic techniques, particularly for major resections and in patients with preoperative liver dysfunction, for whom a prolonged period of postoperative coagulopathy is anticipated.
Intraoperative spinal anesthesia (SA) using local anesthetic (LA) and/or opioid (most commonly intrathecal morphine [ITM]) for neuraxial block without CTEA is frequently used as postoperative analgesia for various surgeries. Spinal anesthesia using ITM without LA has been reported in four randomized and three non-randomized studies of patients undergoing liver resections. ITM has provided superior analgesia to IV patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) with opioids, and equivalent analgesia to epidural infusions. Compared with CTEA and/or IV-PCA, ITM was associated with reduced IV fluid administration; earlier mobilization, and resumption of normal dietary intake; decreased incidence of respiratory complications; and decreased hospital length of stay.
Spinal anesthesia using both LA and ITM may provide an additional benefit by providing a degree of preemptive analgesia, as well as by decreasing the stress and inflammatory response, thereby possibly decreasing the incidence of surgical stress-related complications such as postoperative delirium. High-spinal anesthesia (HSA) uses larger doses of LA to achieve a "high" block for this purpose. HSA combined with ITM has been used in cardiac surgery, and decreases the stress and inflammatory response to surgery; facilitates early extubation; improves postoperative analgesia; decreases the incidence of postoperative delirium; and decreases intensive care unit (ICU) readmissions. Neither the use of HSA (with or without ITM) for analgesia following non-cardiac surgical procedures, nor the effectiveness of SA with ITM versus CTEA following hepatic resection surgery has been investigated to date.
- Conditions
- Hepatectomy, Pain, Postoperative, Liver Neoplasms
- Being tested
- Continuous thoracic epidural analgesia, Spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine, Bupivacaine 0.75% in Dextrose Inj 8.25%, Morphine, Bupivacaine 0.25% Preservative-Free Injectable Solution
- Keywords
- Injections, Spinal, Analgesia, Epidural, Anesthesia, Spinal, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Postoperative Period
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Postoperative, Liver Neoplasms, Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Continuous thoracic epidural analgesiaProcedure or surgery
Needle/catheter: 17 Ga. × 80 mm Tuohy epidural needle (Perican®, B. Braun Medical Inc., Bethlehem, PA, USA); Arrow FlexTip Plus® 19 Ga. epidural catheter (Arrow International Inc., Reading, PA, USA)
Level of insertion and patient positioning: T6-T8, upright sitting position for insertion of needle and catheter (to 5 cm beyond loss-of-resistance point) and for injection of test dose (3 mL 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:200,000); supine for injection of bolus dose
Confirmation of correct placement: Loss of resistance to air or saline; negative aspiration of the epidural catheter; negative test dose; and ease of injection of an initial bolus dose
Spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphineProcedure or surgery
Needle/catheter: 25 Ga. × 90 mm high-flow Whitacre spinal needle (Becton-Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA)
Level of insertion and patient positioning: L2-L3, lateral decubitus position during injection; immediately post-injection, patient is placed supine in <5% degree of Trendelenburg
Confirmation of correct placement: Aspiration of cerebrospinal fluid
Bupivacaine 0.75% in Dextrose Inj 8.25%Drug
Also called Spinal heavy bupivacaine
0.25 mg⋅kg-¹ hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.75%
MorphineDrug
Also called Intrathecal morphine
3 mcg⋅kg-¹ intrathecal morphine (preservative-free)
Bupivacaine 0.25% Preservative-Free Injectable SolutionDrug
Also called Bupivacaine 0.25% epidural solution
0.25 mg⋅kg-¹ bupivacaine 0.25%
Bupicavaine 0.125% epidural solutionDrug
Also called Bupivacaine 0.125% preservative-free injectable solution
Epidural solution, bupivacaine 0.125% with hydromorphone 10 mcg·mL-¹, infusion range 0.075-0.125 mL⋅kg-¹⋅h-¹
Hydromorphone 10 mcg/mL epidural solutionDrug
Epidural solution, bupivacaine 0.125% with hydromorphone 10 mcg·mL-¹, infusion range 0.075-0.125 mL⋅kg-¹⋅h-¹
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intrathecal morphine | Experimental | Spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine
Bolus (pre-induction): High-spinal anesthesia with 0.25 mg⋅kg-¹ hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.75% plus 3 mcg⋅kg-¹ intrathecal morphine (preservative-free)
Postoperative analgesia: IV-PCA hydromorphone (bolus: 0.2 mg [range: 0.1-0.4 mg]; 5 min lockout; no infusion) Receives: Procedure: Spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine; Drug: Bupivacaine 0.75% in Dextrose Inj 8.25%; Drug: Morphine |
| Thoracic epidural analgesia | Active comparator | Continuous thoracic epidural analgesia
Bolus (pre-induction): 0.25 mg⋅kg-¹ bupivacaine 0.25% plus 1 mcg⋅kg-¹ hydromorphone (0.1 mL⋅kg-¹)
Infusion (initial): 0.25 mg⋅kg-¹⋅h-¹ bupivacaine 0.25% plus 1 mcg⋅kg-¹⋅h-¹ hydromorphone (0.1 mL⋅kg-¹⋅h-¹)
Infusion (range): 0.19-0. 3 mg⋅kg-¹⋅h-¹ bupivacaine 0.25% plus 0.75-1.25 mcg⋅kg-¹⋅h-¹ hydromorphone (0.075-0.125 mL⋅kg-¹⋅h-¹) (3-10 mL⋅h-¹)
Postoperative analgesia: (1) Epidural solution, bupivacaine 0.125% with hydromorphone 10 mcg·mL-¹, infusion range as above (0.075-0.125 mL⋅kg-¹⋅h-¹) (3-10 mL⋅h-¹), continued for a maximum of 72 h postoperatively; (2) IV-PCA hydromorphone (bolus: 0.2 mg [range: 0.1-0.4 mg]; 5 min lockout; no infusion). Receives: Procedure: Continuous thoracic epidural analgesia; Drug: Bupivacaine 0.25% Preservative-Free Injectable Solution; Drug: Bupicavaine 0.125% epidural solution; Drug: Hydromorphone 10 mcg/mL epidural solution |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cumulative 72-hour volume of intravenous fluids and blood products administered
Intraoperative plus cumulative postoperative intravenous (IV) fluid volume administered, total (mL) = sum of volumes of IV crystalloid, IV colloid, and non-albumin blood products (packed red blood cells [pRBC], fresh-frozen plasma [FFP], and platelets) administered
Measured: Intraoperatively and during the first 72 hours postoperatively or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier
Area under the curve over 72 hours of the summed pain intensity difference scores at rest (AUC-SPID-PAR_0-72h)
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Summed Pain Intensity Difference at rest (SPID-PAR) (calculated as Area Under the Curve [AUC] using the trapezoidal rule) over 0 to 72 hours (AUC-SPID-PAR_0-72h) after surgery. Pain intensity (PI) is assessed preoperatively and at 2, 6-12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 hours after surgery or until hospital discharge, whichever came first, using the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents the absence of pain and 10 is the "worst possible pain". Pain intensity difference (PID_t) is calculated as the difference in pain intensity from time 0 to each time point t. SPID_t is calculated using the trapezoidal rule as the area under the curve (AUC) for Pain Intensity Difference over the time interval 0 to t hours, respectively, divided by the length of the time interval (t hours). A positive value is a decrease (improvement) of the pain.
Measured: 72 hours after surgery or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier
Cumulative 72-hour opioid consumption (OC_0-72h)
Total perioperative epidural, intravenous, and oral opioid requirements measured in oral morphine equivalents (OME, mg).
Measured: Intraoperatively and during the first 72 hours postoperatively or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier
Secondary outcomes (23)
Vasopressor-free days to day 30
Vasopressor-free days to 30 days after surgery will be defined as the number of days alive and not on vasopressors before 30 days. If the patient is on vasopressors at day 30 or dies prior to day 30, vasopressor-free days will be 0.
Measured: During index hospital admission (censored at the earliest of hospital discharge, in-hospital death, or 30 days postoperatively)
Cumulative intraoperative vasopressor and/or inotrope consumption
Cumulative norepinephrine (NE)-equivalent time-weighted dose (mcg·kg-¹·min-¹ of anesthesia time) of vasopressors and/or inotropes (phenylephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine, and/or epinephrine).
Measured: Intraoperatively (from anesthesia start time to anesthesia end time)
Cumulative perioperative vasopressor and/or inotrope consumption
Cumulative norepinephrine (NE)-equivalent time-weighted dose (mcg·kg-¹·min-¹ of vasopressor and/or inotrope infusion duration) of vasopressors and/or inotropes (phenylephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine, and/or epinephrine).
Measured: Intraoperatively and during the first 7 days after surgery or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier
Cumulative 72-hour volume of intravenous fluids administered
Intraoperative plus cumulative postoperative intravenous (IV) fluid volume administered, excluding non-albumin blood products, total (mL) = sum of volumes of IV crystalloid and IV colloid administered
Measured: Intraoperatively and during the first 72 hours postoperatively
Area under the curve over 72 hours of the summed pain intensity difference scores of movement-evoked pain (MEP) (AUC-SPID-MEP_0-72h)
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Summed Pain Intensity Difference of movement-evoked pain (SPID-MEP) (calculated as Area Under the Curve [AUC] using the trapezoidal rule) over 0 to 72 hours after surgery (AUC-SPID-MEP_0-72h)
Measured: 72 hours after surgery or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier
Cumulative incidence (proportion) of rescue analgesia (parenteral opioid) use (%)
Rescue analgesia (parenteral opioid) use is defined as receipt of supplemental (i.e., in addition to that defined by the intervention protocols) doses of fentanyl, morphine, and/or hydromorphone via the intravenous (IV) route, either via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) or nurse/physician administration.
Measured: 72 hours after surgery or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier
Cumulative fluid balance (CFB) at 72 hours
Cumulative fluid balance (CFB) is defined as the sum of current daily fluid balance (DFB) and the sum of DFB from all preceding days. DFB (mL) = (total daily fluid input - total daily fluid output). Daily fluid input includes: (1) resuscitation fluids (isotonic crystalloid [at a rate >1 L/6 h]; colloids [albumin, hydroxyethyl starch]); (2) blood products (packed red blood cells; frozen plasma; platelets; cryoprecipitate); (3) maintenance and replacement fluids (dextrose-containing crystalloid; isotonic crystalloid [at a rate ≤1 L/6 h]); (4) nutrition (enteral nutrition [i.e., tube feeds]; parenteral nutrition; oral fluid intake); and (5) fluid creep (volume due to concentrated electrolytes; volume used to keep venous access open; intermittent and continuous medication). Daily fluid output includes: (1) blood loss; (2) urine output; (3) dialysis ultrafiltrate (if applicable); (4) losses through drains; and (5) losses through enteric (e.g., nasogastric) tubes.
Measured: 72 hours after surgery or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier
Percentage fluid overload (% FO) at 72 hours
Percentage fluid overload (% FO) is defined as the ratio between cumulative fluid balance and the initial body weight, in percentage: % FO = [(total fluid in (L) - total fluid out (L)) / admission body weight (kg) × 100].
Measured: 72 hours after surgery or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier
Volume-related weight gain (VRWG) at 72 hours
Volume-related weight gain at time t (VRWG_t) is defined as the percentage body weight gain at time t, calculated as the difference between the baseline body weight and body weight at time t divided by baseline body weight (t = 0): VRWG_t (%) = [(body weight [kg]_t - body weight [kg]_0) / body weight [kg]_0 × 100%].
Measured: 72 hours after surgery or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier
Quality of recovery, as measured by the change from baseline 15-item Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) scale score over the first 72 hours postoperatively
Patient-reported quality of recovery (QoR), as assessed using the 15-item Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) scale, with the change from baseline in the total QoR-15 score (range 0-150) at 72 hours postoperatively defining the analysis endpoint. The QoR-15 is a 15-item patient-completed questionnaire including items measuring pain, physical comfort, psychological support, emotional state, and independence in activities of daily living over the preceding 24 hours. Items are rated on a 10-point scale, with higher subscale (item) and total scale values indicating a better outcome. The scale's validity (content, criterion, and construct), reliability (test-retest and internal consistency [inter-item and split-half coefficients]), responsiveness (minimal clinically important difference [MCID] = 8.0), acceptability, and feasibility properties have been well-established.
Measured: 72 hours after surgery or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier
Time to mobilization (h)
Defined as time to first out-of-bed mobilization (sitting out of bed, standing or walking).
Measured: 7 days after surgery or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier
Time to gastrointestinal (GI) recovery (h)
Defined as the later of (1) time to solid diet tolerance (recovery of upper GI function), and (2) time to first flatus or bowel movement.
Measured: 7 days after surgery or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier
Time to removal of urinary catheter (h)
Measured: 7 days after surgery or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier
Time to adequate pain control with PO medications (h)
Measured: 7 days after surgery or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier
Sleep disturbance, as measured by the change from baseline Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Short Form v1.0 - Sleep Disturbance 8a scale T-score over the first 7 days postoperatively
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Short Form v1.0 - Sleep Disturbance (SD) 8a scale assesses self-reported perceptions of sleep quality, sleep depth, and restoration associated with sleep. The 8-item self-report version (Short Form [SF]) of the PROMIS® SD 8a scale included in this study queries sleep disturbance symptomatology based on the past 7 days, with each item rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (almost always). All item scores are summed to calculate a total raw score where higher scores indicate more severe sleep disturbance symptomatology. Psychometric evaluations of the 8-item PROMIS® SF SD 8a in a wide range of patient populations have provided support for its high reliability (test-retest, internal consistency) and validity (convergent, divergent, face, construct). A smaller between-group increase from baseline (preoperative) to 7-day postoperative PROMIS® SF SD 8a T-scores indicates a better outcome.
Measured: 7 days after surgery or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier
Overall Benefit of Analgesia Score (OBAS) at 72 hours
The Overall Benefit of Analgesia Score (OBAS) is a patient-reported outcome measure of seven pain-related quality-of-life indicators: (1) pain intensity at rest (scored 0-4, 0 = minimal pain, to 4 = maximum imaginable pain); patient-reported distress with respect to five opioid-related adverse effects (each scored 0-4, 0 = not at all, to 4 = very much): (2) vomiting, (3) itching, (4) sweating, (5) freezing, and (6) dizziness; and (7) patient satisfaction with pain treatment (scored 0-4, 0 = not at all, to 4 = very much). To calculate the OBAS score, the scores for items 1-6 and 4 minus the score for item 7 are summed for a total scale score range of 0 to 28, with lower values indicating a better outcome.
Measured: 72 hours after surgery or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier
Index hospitalization length of stay
Duration (days) of index hospitalization from date of index operation to date of hospital discharge (censored at the earliest of hospital discharge, in-hospital death, or 30 days postoperatively).
Measured: During index hospital admission (censored at the earliest of hospital discharge, in-hospital death, or 30 days postoperatively)
Analgesic-related adverse events: incidence rate ratio of severe respiratory depression
Severe respiratory depression is defined as respiratory rate (RR) < 8 and/or hypoxemia (Spo2 < 90%) related to excessive somnolence and/or alveolar hypoventilation.
Measured: During index hospital admission (censored at the earliest of hospital discharge, in-hospital death, or 30 days postoperatively)
Analgesic-related adverse events: incidence rate ratio of sedation
Severe opioid-induced sedation, as defined by Pasero-McCaffery Opioid-induced Sedation Scale (POSS) score of 3 or 4. The POSS is graded on a 5-point scale (S = sleep, easy to arouse; 1 = awake and alert; 2 = slightly drowsy, easily aroused; 3 = frequently drowsy, arousable, drifts off to sleep during conversation; 4 = somnolent, minimal or no response to verbal or physical stimulation), with scores of S, 1, and 2 considered acceptable levels of sedation, and scores of 3 or 4 considered unacceptable levels of sedation.
Measured: During index hospital admission (censored at the earliest of hospital discharge, in-hospital death, or 30 days postoperatively)
Analgesic-related adverse events: cumulative incidence (proportion) of postoperative delirium
Delirium will be evaluated via trained nursing assessments using the 3-min Confusion Assessment Method (3D-CAM). The diagnosis of delirium by 3D-CAM requires a positive response to (1) acute onset or fluctuating course; and (2) inattention; and either (3) disorganized thinking or (4) altered level of consciousness. To reduce the likelihood of fluctuations or temporal changes, all assessments were completed between 11:00 AM and 2:00 PM and for each participant, within a 2-hour time period.
Measured: During index hospital admission (censored at the earliest of hospital discharge, in-hospital death, or 30 days postoperatively)
Number (count) of surgical complications with Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III
Postoperative surgical complications are assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification (none, I, II, III, IV, or V) and classified by system.
Measured: During index hospital admission (censored at the earliest of hospital discharge, in-hospital death, or 30 days postoperatively)
Number (count) of non-surgical complications based on the Postoperative Morbidity Survey (POMS)
Postoperative non-surgical complications are assessed using the Postoperative Morbidity Survey (POMS) based on retrospective review of medical charts and patient telephone follow-up at 30 days.
Measured: Postoperative non-surgical complications are assessed using the Postoperative Morbidity Survey (POMS) based on retrospective review of medical charts and patient telephone follow-up at 30 days.
Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) score Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) score Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) score
Postoperative surgical and non-surgical complications are graded using the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI), a continuous scale ranking the severity of any combination of postoperative complications from 0 to 100 in each patient.
Measured: During index hospital admission (censored at the earliest of hospital discharge, in-hospital death, or 30 days postoperatively)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Oct 2018
- Study start4 Oct 2018
- Primary completion31 Jul 2031 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2031 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HepatectomyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of ManitobaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 128 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Manitoba
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Alex Grunfeld, University of Manitoba
- Investigators
- Alex Grunfeld, MD, Principal investigator, University of Manitoba
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03715517
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- B2018:048
- Acronym
- SAFER-L
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 15 Oct 2018
- Last updated
- 5 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Spinal Anesthesia for Enhanced Recovery After Liver Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03715517
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SAFER-L / B2018:048
- Conditions
- Hepatectomy, Pain, Postoperative, Liver Neoplasms
- Keywords
- Injections, Spinal, Analgesia, Epidural, Anesthesia, Spinal, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Postoperative Period
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 128 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of ManitobaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 4 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2031 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2031 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This project proposes to compare epidural versus spinal anesthesia in patients having liver resection surgery. The investigators hypothesize that spinal anesthesia will result in improved blood pressure control postoperatively and reduce the amount of intravenous fluids required after surgery. Spinal anesthesia is expected to provide the same pain control benefits as epidurals, with faster recovery of function. Spinal anesthesia may be a simple and effective way to improve and enhance the recovery in the increasing number of patients requiring liver resection.
Detailed description
Hepatic resection surgery (hepatectomy) for primary or metastatic malignancy is a major operation involving large, painful upper abdominal incisions, as well as considerable postoperative physiological derangements.
Uncontrolled postoperative incisional pain results in significant respiratory impairment, delayed mobilization, and augmentation of the surgically-induced stress response, placing patients at increased risk of postoperative complications and chronic post-surgical pain. Acute pain management with high-dose parenteral opioids further compounds this risk. Multimodal opioid-sparing therapy, and regional anesthesia in particular, is therefore an essential component of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways and patient-centred care.
Regional anesthesia using neuraxial block (intraoperative spinal anesthesia or thoracic epidural anesthesia) followed by postoperative continuous thoracic epidural analgesia (CTEA; postoperative administration of epidural local anesthetic and/or opioid) is the best method for treating pain following large abdominal surgeries, including liver resection, and has been shown to improve postoperative respiratory function and decrease respiratory complications in other surgeries.
However, the effects of intraoperative neuraxial block and postoperative CTEA on fluid balance, systemic hemodynamics, and functional recovery after hepatic resection surgery remain controversial. CTEA is frequently associated with postoperative hypotension, resulting in increased perioperative intravenous (IV) fluid administration, red blood cell transfusion, and vasopressor use in liver resection patients. For major hepatectomies, CTEA may also be an independent risk factor for postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), presumably due to impairment of renal autoregulation. Excessive IV fluid administration in the postoperative period is associated with significant weight gain, often necessitating diuretic therapy; delayed return of gastrointestinal function; increased need for packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusion due to hemodilution; increased infective complications due to this increased pRBC transfusion rate; and increased length of hospital stay.
In addition, concerns remain about the use of CTEA following liver resection surgery due to the potentially increased risk of epidural hematoma formation in the setting of postoperative coagulopathy. This concern has resulted in unplanned delays in epidural catheter removal postoperatively, due to persistent coagulation abnormalities, prolonging hospitalization by 1-3 d in up to 15% of patients.
These concerns about the consequences of excess fluid administration and the safety of CTEA for liver resection surgery have prompted the use of alternative and/or ancillary analgesic techniques, particularly for major resections and in patients with preoperative liver dysfunction, for whom a prolonged period of postoperative coagulopathy is anticipated.
Intraoperative spinal anesthesia (SA) using local anesthetic (LA) and/or opioid (most commonly intrathecal morphine [ITM]) for neuraxial block without CTEA is frequently used as postoperative analgesia for various surgeries. Spinal anesthesia using ITM without LA has been reported in four randomized and three non-randomized studies of patients undergoing liver resections. ITM has provided superior analgesia to IV patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) with opioids, and equivalent analgesia to epidural infusions. Compared with CTEA and/or IV-PCA, ITM was associated with reduced IV fluid administration; earlier mobilization, and resumption of normal dietary intake; decreased incidence of respiratory complications; and decreased hospital length of stay.
Spinal anesthesia using both LA and ITM may provide an additional benefit by providing a degree of preemptive analgesia, as well as by decreasing the stress and inflammatory response, thereby possibly decreasing the incidence of surgical stress-related complications such as postoperative delirium. High-spinal anesthesia (HSA) uses larger doses of LA to achieve a "high" block for this purpose. HSA combined with ITM has been used in cardiac surgery, and decreases the stress and inflammatory response to surgery; facilitates early extubation; improves postoperative analgesia; decreases the incidence of postoperative delirium; and decreases intensive care unit (ICU) readmissions. Neither the use of HSA (with or without ITM) for analgesia following non-cardiac surgical procedures, nor the effectiveness of SA with ITM versus CTEA following hepatic resection surgery has been investigated to date.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intrathecal morphine | Experimental | Procedure: Spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine, Drug: Bupivacaine 0.75% in Dextrose Inj 8.25%, Drug: MorphineSpinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine Bolus (pre-induction): High-spinal anesthesia with 0.25 mg⋅kg-¹ hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.75% plus 3 mcg⋅kg-¹ intrathecal morphine (preservative-free) Postoperative analgesia: IV-PCA hydromorphone (bolus: 0.2 mg [range: 0.1-0.4 mg]; 5 min lockout; no infusion) |
| Thoracic epidural analgesia | Active comparator | Procedure: Continuous thoracic epidural analgesia, Drug: Bupivacaine 0.25% Preservative-Free Injectable Solution, Drug: Bupicavaine 0.125% epidural solution, Drug: Hydromorphone 10 mcg/mL epidural solutionContinuous thoracic epidural analgesia Bolus (pre-induction): 0.25 mg⋅kg-¹ bupivacaine 0.25% plus 1 mcg⋅kg-¹ hydromorphone (0.1 mL⋅kg-¹) Infusion (initial): 0.25 mg⋅kg-¹⋅h-¹ bupivacaine 0.25% plus 1 mcg⋅kg-¹⋅h-¹ hydromorphone (0.1 mL⋅kg-¹⋅h-¹) Infusion (range): 0.19-0. 3 mg⋅kg-¹⋅h-¹ bupivacaine 0.25% plus 0.75-1.25 mcg⋅kg-¹⋅h-¹ hydromorphone (0.075-0.125 mL⋅kg-¹⋅h-¹) (3-10 mL⋅h-¹) Postoperative analgesia: (1) Epidural solution, bupivacaine 0.125% with hydromorphone 10 mcg·mL-¹, infusion range as above (0.075-0.125 mL⋅kg-¹⋅h-¹) (3-10 mL⋅h-¹), continued for a maximum of 72 h postoperatively; (2) IV-PCA hydromorphone (bolus: 0.2 mg [range: 0.1-0.4 mg]; 5 min lockout; no infusion). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Male or female, Adults aged ≥ 18 years (there will be no upper age restriction);
- American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification (ASA-PS) of I to III;
- Undergoing subcostal or midline laparotomy for elective liver resection surgery under general anesthesia; if the planned procedure is a combined operation (i.e., concomitant extrahepatic surgery) , the associated procedure should not add more than one hour to the surgical time of the primary hepatic resection procedure alone;
- Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
- Provision of signed and dated informed consent form
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Emergency surgery;
- Age < 18 years;
- Planned laparoscopic hepatic resection;
- Planned laparotomy incision other than (right) subcostal, midline, or extended midline;
- Patients with obvious non-resectable disease prior to signing informed consent;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous thoracic epidural analgesiaNeedle/catheter: 17 Ga. × 80 mm Tuohy epidural needle (Perican®, B. Braun Medical Inc., Bethlehem, PA, USA); Arrow FlexTip Plus® 19 Ga. epidural catheter (Arrow International Inc., Reading, PA, USA) Level of insertion and patient positioning: T6-T8, upright sitting position for insertion of needle and catheter (to 5 cm beyond loss-of-resistance point) and for injection of test dose (3 mL 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:200,000); supine for injection of bolus dose Confirmation of correct placement: Loss of resistance to air or saline; negative aspiration of the epidural catheter; negative test dose; and ease of injection of an initial bolus dose | Procedure or surgery | Thoracic epidural analgesia |
| Spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphineNeedle/catheter: 25 Ga. × 90 mm high-flow Whitacre spinal needle (Becton-Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) Level of insertion and patient positioning: L2-L3, lateral decubitus position during injection; immediately post-injection, patient is placed supine in <5% degree of Trendelenburg Confirmation of correct placement: Aspiration of cerebrospinal fluid | Procedure or surgery | Intrathecal morphine |
| Bupivacaine 0.75% in Dextrose Inj 8.25%Also: Spinal heavy bupivacaine0.25 mg⋅kg-¹ hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.75% | Drug | Intrathecal morphine |
| MorphineAlso: Intrathecal morphine3 mcg⋅kg-¹ intrathecal morphine (preservative-free) | Drug | Intrathecal morphine |
| Bupivacaine 0.25% Preservative-Free Injectable SolutionAlso: Bupivacaine 0.25% epidural solution0.25 mg⋅kg-¹ bupivacaine 0.25% | Drug | Thoracic epidural analgesia |
| Bupicavaine 0.125% epidural solutionAlso: Bupivacaine 0.125% preservative-free injectable solutionEpidural solution, bupivacaine 0.125% with hydromorphone 10 mcg·mL-¹, infusion range 0.075-0.125 mL⋅kg-¹⋅h-¹ | Drug | Thoracic epidural analgesia |
| Hydromorphone 10 mcg/mL epidural solutionEpidural solution, bupivacaine 0.125% with hydromorphone 10 mcg·mL-¹, infusion range 0.075-0.125 mL⋅kg-¹⋅h-¹ | Drug | Thoracic epidural analgesia |
Primary outcome
Cumulative 72-hour volume of intravenous fluids and blood products administered
Time frame: Intraoperatively and during the first 72 hours postoperatively or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier
Intraoperative plus cumulative postoperative intravenous (IV) fluid volume administered, total (mL) = sum of volumes of IV crystalloid, IV colloid, and non-albumin blood products (packed red blood cells [pRBC], fresh-frozen plasma [FFP], and platelets) administered
Area under the curve over 72 hours of the summed pain intensity difference scores at rest (AUC-SPID-PAR_0-72h)
Time frame: 72 hours after surgery or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Summed Pain Intensity Difference at rest (SPID-PAR) (calculated as Area Under the Curve [AUC] using the trapezoidal rule) over 0 to 72 hours (AUC-SPID-PAR_0-72h) after surgery. Pain intensity (PI) is assessed preoperatively and at 2, 6-12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 hours after surgery or until hospital discharge, whichever came first, using the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents the absence of pain and 10 is the "worst possible pain". Pain intensity difference (PID_t) is calculated as the difference in pain intensity from time 0 to each time point t. SPID_t is calculated using the trapezoidal rule as the area under the curve (AUC) for Pain Intensity Difference over the time interval 0 to t hours, respectively, divided by the length of the time interval (t hours). A positive value is a decrease (improvement) of the pain.
Cumulative 72-hour opioid consumption (OC_0-72h)
Time frame: Intraoperatively and during the first 72 hours postoperatively or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier
Total perioperative epidural, intravenous, and oral opioid requirements measured in oral morphine equivalents (OME, mg).
23 secondary outcomes
Vasopressor-free days to day 30
Time frame: During index hospital admission (censored at the earliest of hospital discharge, in-hospital death, or 30 days postoperatively)
Cumulative intraoperative vasopressor and/or inotrope consumption
Time frame: Intraoperatively (from anesthesia start time to anesthesia end time)
Cumulative perioperative vasopressor and/or inotrope consumption
Time frame: Intraoperatively and during the first 7 days after surgery or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier
Cumulative 72-hour volume of intravenous fluids administered
Time frame: Intraoperatively and during the first 72 hours postoperatively
Area under the curve over 72 hours of the summed pain intensity difference scores of movement-evoked pain (MEP) (AUC-SPID-MEP_0-72h)
Time frame: 72 hours after surgery or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier
Cumulative incidence (proportion) of rescue analgesia (parenteral opioid) use (%)
Time frame: 72 hours after surgery or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier
Cumulative fluid balance (CFB) at 72 hours
Time frame: 72 hours after surgery or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier
Percentage fluid overload (% FO) at 72 hours
Time frame: 72 hours after surgery or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier
Volume-related weight gain (VRWG) at 72 hours
Time frame: 72 hours after surgery or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier
Quality of recovery, as measured by the change from baseline 15-item Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) scale score over the first 72 hours postoperatively
Time frame: 72 hours after surgery or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier
Time to mobilization (h)
Time frame: 7 days after surgery or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier
Time to gastrointestinal (GI) recovery (h)
Time frame: 7 days after surgery or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier
Time to removal of urinary catheter (h)
Time frame: 7 days after surgery or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier
Time to adequate pain control with PO medications (h)
Time frame: 7 days after surgery or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier
Sleep disturbance, as measured by the change from baseline Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Short Form v1.0 - Sleep Disturbance 8a scale T-score over the first 7 days postoperatively
Time frame: 7 days after surgery or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier
Overall Benefit of Analgesia Score (OBAS) at 72 hours
Time frame: 72 hours after surgery or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier
Index hospitalization length of stay
Time frame: During index hospital admission (censored at the earliest of hospital discharge, in-hospital death, or 30 days postoperatively)
Analgesic-related adverse events: incidence rate ratio of severe respiratory depression
Time frame: During index hospital admission (censored at the earliest of hospital discharge, in-hospital death, or 30 days postoperatively)
Analgesic-related adverse events: incidence rate ratio of sedation
Time frame: During index hospital admission (censored at the earliest of hospital discharge, in-hospital death, or 30 days postoperatively)
Analgesic-related adverse events: cumulative incidence (proportion) of postoperative delirium
Time frame: During index hospital admission (censored at the earliest of hospital discharge, in-hospital death, or 30 days postoperatively)
Number (count) of surgical complications with Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III
Time frame: During index hospital admission (censored at the earliest of hospital discharge, in-hospital death, or 30 days postoperatively)
Number (count) of non-surgical complications based on the Postoperative Morbidity Survey (POMS)
Time frame: Postoperative non-surgical complications are assessed using the Postoperative Morbidity Survey (POMS) based on retrospective review of medical charts and patient telephone follow-up at 30 days.
Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) score Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) score Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) score
Time frame: During index hospital admission (censored at the earliest of hospital discharge, in-hospital death, or 30 days postoperatively)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Feb 2026.
Related trials for Hepatectomy
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
NIVO+IPI Neoadjuvant Therapy for Recurrent Resectable HCC
Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC), Recurrent Hepatocellular Cancer
Not yet recruiting
RAPID for Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases
Colorectal Liver Metastases (CRCLM), Colorectal Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 4
Remimazolam Versus Propofol for Maintenance of Anaesthesia During Major Hepatectomy Under Low Central Venous Pressure
Intraoperative Hypotension, Hepatectomy
Recruiting
Implementation of a Pain Management Plan in Major Open Abdominal Surgeries.
Abdomen Cancer, Pancreas Adenocarcinoma (MSI-H)
Recruiting
Novel Method to Assess Hepatic Regeneration and Predict Hepatic Related Morbidity After Partial Hepatectomy
Liver Cancer Adult, Liver Regeneration
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Alex Grunfeld, MD principal investigator
University of Manitoba
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Continuous thoracic epidural analgesia, Spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine and Bupivacaine 0.75% in Dextrose Inj 8.25% in people with Hepatectomy and Pain, Postoperative, run by University of Manitoba at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Alex Grunfeld, MD (204-787-1125, alexander.grunfeld@umanitoba.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cumulative 72-hour volume of intravenous fluids and blood products administered (time frame: Intraoperatively and during the first 72 hours postoperatively or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs earlier). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Feb 2026.