AzTrials
AzTrials

PolypharmacyOLD-NH-QC-DeMoNCT03688542

Opportunities and Limits to Deprescribing in Nursing Homes:Quality Circle Deprescribing Module

A study testing Quality Circle Deprescribing Module in people with Polypharmacy and Inappropriate Prescribing, run by Anne Niquille at 1 site in Switzerland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Older people residing in nursing homes (NH) are frequently polymedicated and often prescribed potentially inappropriate medications. Deprescribing has been proposed as a way to reduce the number of drugs they receive and their exposure to harmful treatments. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Polypharmacy, Inappropriate Prescribing
What is being tested?
Quality Circle Deprescribing Module
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
56 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
25 Sep 2017to 1 Jul 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Nursing homes taking part in the study must have
  • a geriatric of psycho-geriatric mission;
  • been part of their cantonal pharmaceutical assistance program for at least a year.

Who cannot join

  • None

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Switzerland1 site
  • Centre de Pharamacie Communautaire

    Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, 1011

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Older people residing in nursing homes (NH) are frequently polymedicated and often prescribed potentially inappropriate medications. Deprescribing has been proposed as a way to reduce the number of drugs they receive and their exposure to harmful treatments.

The objectives of this study are 1) To evaluate the effect of a deprescribing-specific interdisciplinary quality circle module on the use of potentially inappropriate medication in nursing-home residents. 2) To determine the effective strategies to reach and implement deprescribing consensus resulting of said quality circle module.

Being tested
Quality Circle Deprescribing Module
Keywords
Deprescribing, Inappropriate Medication, Nursing Homes

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Quality Circle Deprescribing ModuleOther

    The Quality Circle Deprescribing Module consist of a discussion bringing together nurses, physicians and responsible pharmacist to create a local deprescribing consensus for frequently used drug classes, as well as implementation strategies for the consensus..

Study groups in NCT03688542
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
InterventionExperimentalNursing Homes allocated to the Intervention arm will enact the Quality Circle Deprescribing Module and create a local deprescribing consensus and implementation strategy.
Receives: Other: Quality Circle Deprescribing Module
ControlNo interventionNursing Homes allocated to the Control arm will not enact the intervention.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Potentially Inappropriate Galenic Units

    The primary outcome is the percentage, at follow-up, of potentially inappropriate galenic units at follow-up, relative to the total number of galenic units used in the nursing home.

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Number of Potentially Inappropriate Defined Daily Doses (DDDs) Per Average Resident and Per Day

    Sum of Defined Daily Doses identified as potentially inappropriate (PIM, see protocol for assessement method), divided by the total number of days spent in the NH

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Number of Potentially Inappropriate DDD to Avoid

    Sum of Defined Daily Doses identified as "to avoid" (see protocol for assessement method), divided by the total number of days spent in the NH.

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Number of Potentially Inappropriate DDD to Reevaluate

    Sum of Defined Daily Doses identified as "to reevaluate" (see protocol for assessement method), divided by the total number of days spent in the NH.

    Measured: 12 months

  3. Number of Hospital Days

    The number of days spent in the hospital by average resident

    Measured: 12 months

  4. Mortality Rate

    Number of residents of the nursing home having died during the considered year, divided by the total number of residents having stayed in the nursing home.

    Measured: 12 months

  5. Number of Falls Per Average Resident and Per Year

    Number of falls per average resident and per year

    Measured: 12 months

  6. Percentage of Residents With at Least One Day of Physical Restraints Use

    Number of residents of the nursing home with at least one day of physical restraints use during the considered year, divided by the total number of residents having stayed in the nursing home.

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Sep 2018
  2. Study start25 Sep 2017
  3. Primary completion1 Jul 2020
  4. Study completion1 Jul 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
56 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03688542
Sponsor's protocol ID
OLD-NH-QC-DeMo-2017
Acronym
OLD-NH-QC-DeMo
Status last verified
Mar 2021
First submitted
26 Sep 2018
Last updated
21 Apr 2021
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Mena S, Moullin JC, Schneider M, Niquille A. Implementation of interprofessional quality circles on deprescribing in Swiss nursing homes: an observational study. BMC Geriatr. 2023 Oct 3;23(1):620. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04335-w.

    PubMed 37789286
  • Cateau D, Ballabeni P, Niquille A. Effects of an interprofessional deprescribing intervention in Swiss nursing homes: the Individual Deprescribing Intervention (IDeI) randomised controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2021 Nov 19;21(1):655. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02465-7.

    PubMed 34798826
  • Cateau D, Ballabeni P, Niquille A. Effects of an interprofessional Quality Circle-Deprescribing Module (QC-DeMo) in Swiss nursing homes: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2021 May 1;21(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02220-y.

    PubMed 33933030
  • Cateau D, Ballabeni P, Mena S, Bugnon O, Niquille A. Deprescribing in nursing homes: Protocol for nested, randomised controlled hybrid trials of deprescribing interventions. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Apr;17(4):786-794. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.05.026. Epub 2020 May 27.

    PubMed 32622774

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Quality Circle Deprescribing Module in people with Polypharmacy and Inappropriate Prescribing, run by Anne Niquille at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Apr 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Potentially Inappropriate Galenic Units (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03688542, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Apr 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in