Music TherapyMUSiCCNCT03497559
Music Use for Sedation In Critically Ill Children
A study testing Music in people with Music Therapy and Critical Care, run by University of Alberta at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Stress induced by pain and anxiety is common in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients and can impede the delivery of care as well as their recovery. Sedation/analgesia in PICU is usually achieved using narcotics and benzodiazepines. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 month to 16 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Music Therapy, Critical Care, Analgesia
- What is being tested?
- Music
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 30 Mar 2018to 30 Apr 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 month to 16 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Admitted to the Stollery Children's Hospital PICU/PCICU.
- Receiving mechanical ventilation for > 24 hours.
- Parental consent
Who cannot join
- Known hearing deficit
- Major craniotomy-facial abnormality
- Traumatic Brain injury
- Infants < 1 month or < 3 kg.
- Extracorporeal Life Support with neck cannulation.
- Receiving non-invasive mechanical ventilation.
- Nor receiving sedation/analgesia.
- Enrolled in another intervention RCT.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial on Music Use for Sedation In Critically Ill Children
Stress induced by pain and anxiety is common in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients and can impede the delivery of care as well as their recovery. Sedation/analgesia in PICU is usually achieved using narcotics and benzodiazepines. Excessive use of these drugs can put patients at risk for hemodynamic and respiratory instability, prolonged mechanical ventilation, withdrawal symptoms, and delirium. Non-pharmacologic measures for analgesia and anxiolysis may reduce the total medication requirement and their side effects. The use of non-pharmacologic interventions, including music, has been recommended by sedation guidelines for critically ill patients; however, it is not clear how these interventions should be provided. We plan to conduct a pilot 3-arm RCT to determine the feasibility of a music intervention and assess its effects on sedation/analgesia requirements in children admitted to PICU. Children will be randomly assigned to receive music, noise cancellation or control. Music will be delivered by headphones and an iPod. Music will consist on classical music selected by the study's pediatric music therapist. The noise cancellation group will receive the same headphones but without music. Clinical care of the participants, including use of sedation and analgesia drugs, will not be protocolized. Primary outcomes of this pilot trial is feasibility. Secondary outcomes are drug requirements for sedation and analgesia, and incidence of delirium. These requirements will be captured as a daily intensity score and intermittent dose (PRN) frequency. Mixed-effects models will be used to analyze the effect of the music on sedation/analgesia requirements.
Read the detailed description
Aim and Objectives Overall Research Question Does music reduce sedation requirements in critically ill children? Purpose statement We plan to conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) to determine the feasibility of a pediatric music medicine trial, and to study the effects of music on sedation requirements in children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).
Objectives: a) To demonstrate the feasibility of a music RCT in pediatric critical care; b) To estimate the effect of music on the sedation requirements of critically ill children; c) to obtain information about standard deviation and mean treatment effect for future sample size calculation for a larger trial.
Hypothesis:
We hypothesize that: a) A RCT of music in critically ill children will be feasible; b) Music will result in a 20 % reduction in sedation requirements.
Methodology Study design: We propose a pilot 3 arm RCT. Randomization will be done by a computer-based program to ensure allocation concealment. A total of 30 patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive music, noise cancellation or control.
Setting: Pediatric Intensive Care Units (Cardiac and General) at the Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta.
Study Population: critically ill children on mechanical ventilation and receiving sedation and/or analgesia.
Intervention After consent and randomization, patients will be started on the assigned intervention (music/noise cancellation/control) 24-48 hours after admission to the PICU. Based on the neonatal and adult studies, in the music and noise cancellation groups the intervention will be delivered during 30 minutes, at least 3 times a day. The control group will receive usual care. Music will be delivered with the use of noise cancellation headphones and an iPod touch (Apple, California). Music selection will be chosen based on the patient's age. Classical music has been selected by a pediatric music therapist based on its observed properties to settle and calm children. In the noise cancellation group the intervention will be provided with the same headphones connected to an iPod with a silent recording. Children will be assessed with the Sedation behavior scale (SBS) before and during the intervention.29 Signs of agitation or an increase in the SBS will indicate failure of the intervention. Patients will remain on protocol for a maximum of 7 days as long as they are on invasive mechanical ventilation. A parent survey will be conducted at the end of the study. This survey will be conducted on paper or electronically (REDCap, Research Electronic Data Capture) as per the parents' preference.
Concomitant interventions: Clinical care will not be protocolized, and will be according to usual care. Sedative administration will not be directed by the study protocol; it will be up to the attending PICU physician. Assessment of the patients' sedation status and withdrawal symptoms will be conducted every 6 hours by the bedside nurse. Sedation status will be assessed with the use of the SBS while withdrawal will be assessed with the Withdrawal Assessment Tool (WAT-1) score; both are well validated tools .29-32 Demographic variables: To assess if the groups are comparable, including known risk factors, we will record the following: demographic variables (sex, weight, age, diagnosis, operative status, Paediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) score, inotrope score, Paediatric logistic organ dysfunction (PELOD) score, baseline SBS, invasive procedures, presence of invasive lines and tubes).
Outcome variables: Feasibility, sedation requirements and delirium. Adverse events Adverse events such as significant negative change in vital signs and/or any other sign of intolerance (agitation) to the intervention will be recorded. We will also record any skin or ear problems (pressure injuries) thought to be associated with the use of headphones.
Study procedures: Patients admitted to the Stollery Children's Hospital PICU and needing mechanical ventilation will be screened for eligibility and approached for consent. After consent, patient demographics will be recorded. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to the music, the noise cancellation or the control group. During randomization we will stratify patients by age. As a patient qualifies for the trial, a study number and a randomization number will be assigned. Based on the randomization code the research nurse will proceed with one of the interventions, or control, as described above.
Masking: The research nurse will provide the iPods with music or silent recording based on group allocation and will not disclose this information to the healthcare team or the family. However, it is impossible to blind the use of headphones vs. control. The statistician analyzing the data will be blinded to the group allocation.
Sample size justification: The primary outcome used to determine sample size for a future larger RCT is daily Sedation Intensity Score (SIS). The minimal clinically important difference determined by our survey is a reduction in sedation requirements of 20%.8 This pilot study including 10 patients in each group (total 30 patients) will allow us to obtain pediatric information to calculate a sample size for the larger trial.
Analysis Baseline characteristics will be analyzed by descriptive methods. Analysis will be conducted on intention to treat basis and as per protocol. Mixed-effects models will be used to analyze the primary effect of the music on sedation requirements. Statistical tests will be 2-sided with 0.05 level of significance.
Data collection: Variables will be recorded in an anonymized database using REDCap, Research Electronic Data Capture.34
Expected outcomes and Impact This pilot study is a necessary first step toward the conduct of a larger music trial in critically ill children. To obtain funding from major agencies we need to demonstrate the tolerability and feasibility of the intervention and patient recruitment at our centre. This pilot study will also allow formal sample size calculation for a larger trial and will allow us to obtain feedback from major stakeholders including families.
- Conditions
- Music Therapy, Critical Care, Analgesia, Ventilators, Mechanical
- Being tested
- Music
- Medical subject headings
- Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MusicOther
Also called Noise cancellation
Classical music
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Music | Experimental | Patients will received 30 minutes of classical music 3 times per day . Music will be delivered with noise cancellation headphones. Receives: Other: Music |
| Noise cancellation | Sham comparator | Patients will received 30 minutes of silent recording 3 times per day . Music will be delivered with noise cancellation headphones. Receives: Other: Music |
| Control | No intervention | Patients will receive standard of care. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility of a music intervention study in critically ill children. Feasibility is defined as a consent rate of 70%.
The primary outcomes is feasibility of a music intervention study in critically ill children. In order to determine feasibility we will collect information on: number of eligible patients, number of patients enrolled, rate of enrollment, time to complete participation, protocol adherence and reasons for protocol deviation.
Measured: 1 year
Feasibility of for enrolment music intervention study in critically ill children.
Feasibility of enrolment is defined as an average enrolment of 5 patients per month.
Measured: 1 year
Feasibility of a music intervention study in critically ill children with a protocol adherence of 80%.
Protocol adherence is defined as receiving the allocated intervention for 30 minutes 3 times/day at least 80% of the time patient remains in the study.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (3)
Effects of music on sedation requirements measured with the Sedation Intensity Score
Information on sedation. Data on sedation requirements are necessary to calculate the sample size for a future, larger, trial. Sedation requirements will be captured as a daily intensity score and intermittent dose (PRN) frequency. The sedative drug intensity score aggregates the amount of sedation/analgesia from different drug classes using a weight-adjusted dose of each sedative administered during 4-hour time blocks.14 Every sedation amount, for each drug, is placed in quartiles created by using the patient data during the time the patient are involved in the study. The values are then summed over the six 4-hour blocks to obtain the daily score. The Sedation Intensity Score is numeric and has no units.
Measured: 7 days
Effect of music on delirium measured with the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD) instrument
Delirium will be assesed twice a day (as per usual care) with the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD) instrument. Those patients with a score > 9 in two consecutive measurements will be considered to have PICU delirium.34
critically ill children
Measured: 7 days
Effects of music on sedation requirements measured with Sedation frequency (number of intermittent [PRN] doses)
Dose frequency will be captured by the administration of a (PRN) dose of any of the sedative drugs. This way of capturing sedation requirements enables us to account for the administration of different and non-equivalent types of drugs.14 The unit of measurement is average number of doses/4 hours.
Measured: 7 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Apr 2018
- Study start30 Mar 2018
- Primary completion11 Apr 2019
- Study completion30 Apr 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Music TherapyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of AlbertaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Double blind randomized controlled trial
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alberta
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Women and Children's Health Research Institute, Canada, World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Gonzalo Garcia Guerra, University of Alberta
- Investigators
- Gonzalo Garcia Guerra, MD, MSc, Principal investigator, University of Alberta
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03497559
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RES0036130
- Acronym
- MUSiCC
- Status last verified
- May 2019
- First submitted
- 26 Mar 2018
- Last updated
- 13 May 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Garcia Guerra G, Joffe A, Sheppard C, Hewson K, Dinu IA, de Caen A, Jou H, Hartling L, Vohra S; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Music Use for Sedation in Critically ill Children (MUSiCC trial): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Feb 25;6:31. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-0563-x. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 32128249
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 May 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial on Music Use for Sedation In Critically Ill Children
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03497559
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MUSiCC / RES0036130
- Conditions
- Music Therapy, Critical Care, Analgesia, Ventilators, Mechanical
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of AlbertaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Women and Children's Health Research Institute, Canada, World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies
- Study start
- 30 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 11 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Apr 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Stress induced by pain and anxiety is common in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients and can impede the delivery of care as well as their recovery. Sedation/analgesia in PICU is usually achieved using narcotics and benzodiazepines. Excessive use of these drugs can put patients at risk for hemodynamic and respiratory instability, prolonged mechanical ventilation, withdrawal symptoms, and delirium. Non-pharmacologic measures for analgesia and anxiolysis may reduce the total medication requirement and their side effects. The use of non-pharmacologic interventions, including music, has been recommended by sedation guidelines for critically ill patients; however, it is not clear how these interventions should be provided. We plan to conduct a pilot 3-arm RCT to determine the feasibility of a music intervention and assess its effects on sedation/analgesia requirements in children admitted to PICU. Children will be randomly assigned to receive music, noise cancellation or control. Music will be delivered by headphones and an iPod. Music will consist on classical music selected by the study's pediatric music therapist. The noise cancellation group will receive the same headphones but without music. Clinical care of the participants, including use of sedation and analgesia drugs, will not be protocolized. Primary outcomes of this pilot trial is feasibility. Secondary outcomes are drug requirements for sedation and analgesia, and incidence of delirium. These requirements will be captured as a daily intensity score and intermittent dose (PRN) frequency. Mixed-effects models will be used to analyze the effect of the music on sedation/analgesia requirements.
Detailed description
Aim and Objectives Overall Research Question Does music reduce sedation requirements in critically ill children? Purpose statement We plan to conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) to determine the feasibility of a pediatric music medicine trial, and to study the effects of music on sedation requirements in children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).
Objectives: a) To demonstrate the feasibility of a music RCT in pediatric critical care; b) To estimate the effect of music on the sedation requirements of critically ill children; c) to obtain information about standard deviation and mean treatment effect for future sample size calculation for a larger trial.
Hypothesis:
We hypothesize that: a) A RCT of music in critically ill children will be feasible; b) Music will result in a 20 % reduction in sedation requirements.
Methodology Study design: We propose a pilot 3 arm RCT. Randomization will be done by a computer-based program to ensure allocation concealment. A total of 30 patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive music, noise cancellation or control.
Setting: Pediatric Intensive Care Units (Cardiac and General) at the Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta.
Study Population: critically ill children on mechanical ventilation and receiving sedation and/or analgesia.
Intervention After consent and randomization, patients will be started on the assigned intervention (music/noise cancellation/control) 24-48 hours after admission to the PICU. Based on the neonatal and adult studies, in the music and noise cancellation groups the intervention will be delivered during 30 minutes, at least 3 times a day. The control group will receive usual care. Music will be delivered with the use of noise cancellation headphones and an iPod touch (Apple, California). Music selection will be chosen based on the patient's age. Classical music has been selected by a pediatric music therapist based on its observed properties to settle and calm children. In the noise cancellation group the intervention will be provided with the same headphones connected to an iPod with a silent recording. Children will be assessed with the Sedation behavior scale (SBS) before and during the intervention.29 Signs of agitation or an increase in the SBS will indicate failure of the intervention. Patients will remain on protocol for a maximum of 7 days as long as they are on invasive mechanical ventilation. A parent survey will be conducted at the end of the study. This survey will be conducted on paper or electronically (REDCap, Research Electronic Data Capture) as per the parents' preference.
Concomitant interventions: Clinical care will not be protocolized, and will be according to usual care. Sedative administration will not be directed by the study protocol; it will be up to the attending PICU physician. Assessment of the patients' sedation status and withdrawal symptoms will be conducted every 6 hours by the bedside nurse. Sedation status will be assessed with the use of the SBS while withdrawal will be assessed with the Withdrawal Assessment Tool (WAT-1) score; both are well validated tools .29-32 Demographic variables: To assess if the groups are comparable, including known risk factors, we will record the following: demographic variables (sex, weight, age, diagnosis, operative status, Paediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) score, inotrope score, Paediatric logistic organ dysfunction (PELOD) score, baseline SBS, invasive procedures, presence of invasive lines and tubes).
Outcome variables: Feasibility, sedation requirements and delirium. Adverse events Adverse events such as significant negative change in vital signs and/or any other sign of intolerance (agitation) to the intervention will be recorded. We will also record any skin or ear problems (pressure injuries) thought to be associated with the use of headphones.
Study procedures: Patients admitted to the Stollery Children's Hospital PICU and needing mechanical ventilation will be screened for eligibility and approached for consent. After consent, patient demographics will be recorded. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to the music, the noise cancellation or the control group. During randomization we will stratify patients by age. As a patient qualifies for the trial, a study number and a randomization number will be assigned. Based on the randomization code the research nurse will proceed with one of the interventions, or control, as described above.
Masking: The research nurse will provide the iPods with music or silent recording based on group allocation and will not disclose this information to the healthcare team or the family. However, it is impossible to blind the use of headphones vs. control. The statistician analyzing the data will be blinded to the group allocation.
Sample size justification: The primary outcome used to determine sample size for a future larger RCT is daily Sedation Intensity Score (SIS). The minimal clinically important difference determined by our survey is a reduction in sedation requirements of 20%.8 This pilot study including 10 patients in each group (total 30 patients) will allow us to obtain pediatric information to calculate a sample size for the larger trial.
Analysis Baseline characteristics will be analyzed by descriptive methods. Analysis will be conducted on intention to treat basis and as per protocol. Mixed-effects models will be used to analyze the primary effect of the music on sedation requirements. Statistical tests will be 2-sided with 0.05 level of significance.
Data collection: Variables will be recorded in an anonymized database using REDCap, Research Electronic Data Capture.34
Expected outcomes and Impact This pilot study is a necessary first step toward the conduct of a larger music trial in critically ill children. To obtain funding from major agencies we need to demonstrate the tolerability and feasibility of the intervention and patient recruitment at our centre. This pilot study will also allow formal sample size calculation for a larger trial and will allow us to obtain feedback from major stakeholders including families.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Double blind randomized controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Music | Experimental | Other: MusicPatients will received 30 minutes of classical music 3 times per day . Music will be delivered with noise cancellation headphones. |
| Noise cancellation | Sham comparator | Other: MusicPatients will received 30 minutes of silent recording 3 times per day . Music will be delivered with noise cancellation headphones. |
| Control | No intervention | –Patients will receive standard of care. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 month to 16 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Admitted to the Stollery Children's Hospital PICU/PCICU.
- Receiving mechanical ventilation for > 24 hours.
- Parental consent
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Known hearing deficit
- Major craniotomy-facial abnormality
- Traumatic Brain injury
- Infants < 1 month or < 3 kg.
- Extracorporeal Life Support with neck cannulation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MusicAlso: Noise cancellationClassical music | Other | Music, Noise cancellation |
Primary outcome
Feasibility of a music intervention study in critically ill children. Feasibility is defined as a consent rate of 70%.
Time frame: 1 year
The primary outcomes is feasibility of a music intervention study in critically ill children. In order to determine feasibility we will collect information on: number of eligible patients, number of patients enrolled, rate of enrollment, time to complete participation, protocol adherence and reasons for protocol deviation.
Feasibility of for enrolment music intervention study in critically ill children.
Time frame: 1 year
Feasibility of enrolment is defined as an average enrolment of 5 patients per month.
Feasibility of a music intervention study in critically ill children with a protocol adherence of 80%.
Time frame: 1 year
Protocol adherence is defined as receiving the allocated intervention for 30 minutes 3 times/day at least 80% of the time patient remains in the study.
3 secondary outcomes
Effects of music on sedation requirements measured with the Sedation Intensity Score
Time frame: 7 days
Effect of music on delirium measured with the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD) instrument
Time frame: 7 days
Effects of music on sedation requirements measured with Sedation frequency (number of intermittent [PRN] doses)
Time frame: 7 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 May 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32128249Garcia Guerra G, Joffe A, Sheppard C, Hewson K, Dinu IA, de Caen A, Jou H, Hartling L, Vohra S; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Music Use for Sedation in Critically ill Children (MUSiCC trial): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Feb 25;6:31. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-0563-x. eCollection 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Music Therapy
RecruitingPhase 2
Gaze-Contingent Music Therapy Augmentation of CBT for Pediatric Anxiety
Psychiatric Disorders, Anxiety Disorders
Active, not recruiting
Musical Intervention for Dental Anxiety
Dental Anxiety
Recruiting
Music Therapy in Post-Stroke Patients: A Clinical Trial
CVA (Cerebrovascular Accident), Ictus
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Music Therapy and Sedation for Pain and Anxiety During Oocyte Retrieval
ANXIETY
Recruiting
Fighting Addictions, Improving Lives: COmprehensive Drug Rehabilitation With Music
Substance Use Disorder (SUD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gonzalo Garcia Guerra, MD, MSc principal investigator
University of Alberta
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Music in people with Music Therapy and Critical Care, run by University of Alberta at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility of a music intervention study in critically ill children. Feasibility is defined as a consent rate of 70%. (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03497559, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 May 2019.