AzTrials
AzTrials

Substance Use Disorder (SUD)FALCONCT07028983

Fighting Addictions, Improving Lives: COmprehensive Drug Rehabilitation With Music

A study testing Active Music Group (AMG), Music Listening Group (MLG) and Treatment as Usual (TAU) in people with Substance Use Disorder (SUD), run by NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS at 11 sites in 8 countries.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

FALCO is a parallel pragmatic randomized control trial addressing long-term effects of music therapy (MT) on substance use disorder (SUD). 600 participants will be recruited from multiple European countries (see Locations). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Substance Use Disorder (SUD)
What is being tested?
Active Music Group (AMG), Music Listening Group (MLG) and Treatment as Usual (TAU)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
600 participants
Where
11 sitesin 8 countries
Study dates
1 Jul 2025to 30 Jun 2037
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • patients seeking or receiving treatment at the recruitment site for an existing substance use disorder based on ICD-10 criteria
  • ≥18 years old
  • not currently undergoing detoxification (detoxification has been completed or is not currently planned at the time of recruitment)
  • any type of substance use including polysubstance and alcohol use

Who cannot join

  • exclusively nicotine dependence
  • psychotic episode in the last 3 months
  • insufficient language skills to participate in treatment without the use of a translator
  • hearing impairment that considerably impairs hearing of music played at a moderate volume (not relevant if hearing is sufficiently compensated by a hearing aid)
  • existing diagnosis of dementia
  • is currently receiving music therapy or has received music therapy (i.e. at planned and reoccurring intervals, not counting single random occurrences) during the past year

Trial locations and contacts

11 sites in 8 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Christian Gold, PhD contact

+47 975 01 757

chgo@norceresearch.no

11 sites in 8 countries

Norway3 sites, 1 recruiting
  • University of Bergen / NORCE Research AS

    Bergen, 5838

    Lars Tuastad, PhD, +47 454 88 282, lars.tuastad@uib.no

    Alexandra Savinova, MSc, asav@norceresearch.no

    Recruiting
  • Sykehuset Innlandet

    Innlandet

    Suspended
  • Stavanger Universitetssjukehus

    Stavanger

    Suspended

Other trials in Norway

Spain2 sites, 1 recruiting
  • Fundacio Sanitaria d'Igualada

    Barcelona

    Daniel Vega, daniel.vegamo@gmail.com

    Emma Segura, emmasg15@gmail.com

    Recruiting
  • IDIBGI

    Girona

    Withdrawn

Other trials in Spain

Austria1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Anton Proksch Institut

    Vienna

    Rudolf Maisriml, rudolf.maisriml@api.or.at

    Oliver Scheibenbogen

    Recruiting

Other trials in Austria

Israel1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Herzog College

    Jerusalem

    Tali Gottfried, PhD, taligott@herzog.ac.il

    Michal Meltzer, mmeltzer13@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Israel

Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
  • University of Pavia

    Pavia

    Camilla Figini, camilla.figini@unipv.it

    Laura Fusar Poli

    Recruiting

Other trials in Italy

Palestinian Territories1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Palestinian National Rehabilitation Centre

    Bethlehem

    Saed Bilbaisi, MD, +972562401408, drsaed2005@gmail.com

    Not yet recruiting

Other trials in Palestinian Territories

Poland1 site, 1 recruiting
  • WOTU / University of Gdansk

    Gdansk

    Pawel Wozniakowski, p.wozniakowski@wotu.pl

    Łucja Bieleninik, lucja.bieleninik@ug.edu.pl

    Recruiting

Other trials in Poland

Switzerland1 site, 1 recruiting
  • CAD

    Zurich

    Marcus Herdener, marcus.herdener@bli.uzh.ch

    Boris Quednow, quednow@bli.uzh.ch

    Recruiting

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: Fighting Addictions, Improving Lives Through COmprehensive Drug Rehabilitation With Music (FALCO): International Randomised Controlled Trial

FALCO is a parallel pragmatic randomized control trial addressing long-term effects of music therapy (MT) on substance use disorder (SUD).

600 participants will be recruited from multiple European countries (see Locations). They will be randomized into one of the following intervention arms: Active Music Group (AMG), Music Listening Group (MLG) or Treatment as Usual (TAU) as offered locally.

Read the detailed description

Substance use disorder (SUD) is associated with a high global burden of disease: 4.2% of all disability-adjusted life years lost (DALYs, a combined measure of years of life lost and years lived with disability) are due to alcohol and 1.3% due to illicit drugs. Remarkably, approved pharmacological treatment options are not available for most SUDs, and non-pharmacological approaches are still the backbone of SUD treatment.

Music therapy (MT) is a non-pharmacological intervention recommended i some SUD guidelines. In MT, defined as the clinical and evidence-based use of music interventions to accomplish individualized goals within a therapeutic relationship by a credentialed professional, a music therapist uses music and musical activities to support individuals or groups in reaching specific therapeutic goals. This includes activities such as music listening and active music making, which are tailored to participants' cultural context and individual needs.

The FALCO-trial is a parallel 3-arm assessor- and statistician-blinded pragmatic multinational randomized clinical trial. The interventions of interest in the trial (AMG, MLG) are non-pharmacological psychosocial interventions. Both AMG and MLG will be conducted by appropriately qualified music therapists, in groups, with weekly sessions lasting up to 90 minutes. Participants will continue to receive TAU as offered locally.

The primary objective of the study is to determine effects of AMG and MLG versus TAU on addiction severity in people with SUD at one year after randomization.

Being tested
Active Music Group (AMG), Music Listening Group (MLG), Treatment as Usual (TAU)
Keywords
substance use disorder, addiction, recovery, music therapy, mental health, brain health
Medical subject headings
Substance-Related Disorders, Behavior, Addictive, Psychological Well-Being

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Active Music Group (AMG)Behavioural

    Active music group is a music therapy intervention where participants actively make/play music in groups. The sessions will be conducted by an appropriately qualified music therapist.

  • Music Listening Group (MLG)Behavioural

    Music listening group is a music therapy intervention where participants partake in music listening in groups. The sessions will be conducted by an appropriately qualified music therapist.

  • Treatment as Usual (TAU)Behavioural

    Treatment as usual as provided locally, which may include pharmacological and/or non-pharmacological interventions (e.g. mindfulness-based intervention, structured physical activity).

Study groups in NCT07028983
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Active Music Group(AMG) + Treatment as Usual(TAU)ExperimentalParticipants will partake in an active music group, as well as undergo treatment as usual as offered locally.
Receives: Behavioral: Active Music Group (AMG)
Music Listening Group(MLG) + Treatment as Usual(TAU)ExperimentalParticipants will partake in a music listening group, as well as undergo treatment as usual as offered locally.
Receives: Behavioral: Music Listening Group (MLG)
Treatment as Usual (TAU)Active comparatorTreatment as usual, as offered locally and not facilitated by the study.
Receives: Behavioral: Treatment as Usual (TAU)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Addiction Severity assessed by the the European Addiction Severity Index (EuropASI)

    The survey covers a broad concept of addiction, including changes that typically require a long time, across seven domains (general medical condition, professional and financial situation, substance use, other drug consumption, legal problems, family and social relations, psychological condition).

    It has been adapted specifically for use in European contexts. The scale is clinician-based and includes 164 items, with a fine-grained Composite score of 0 (best) to 1 (worst).

    Measured: Baseline, 1 year, 2 years.

Secondary outcomes (23)
  1. Recovery assessed by the Substance Use Recovery Evaluator (SURE)

    The scale captures five factors (substance use, material resources, outlook on life, self-care, relationships) using 21 items. Each question scores between 1-3. Total score ranges between 21-63, with a higher score indicating better recovery.

    The scale is patient-reported and was developed with strong user involvement.

    Measured: Baseline, 1 year, 2 years.

  2. Substance use severity assessed by Drug Disorder Identification Test (DUDIT-C)

    This scale is a patient-reported short screening tool that can be used repeatedly. It consists of 11 questions, including 9 ranging from 0-4 and 2 from 0-2, producing a DUDIT sum score of 0-40. In addition, a DUDIT-C sum score of the first 4 items can range from 0-16. Higher scores indicate higher substance use severity. A score of 0 indicates self-reported abstinence, scores ≥ 7 indicate heavy use.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years.

  3. Substance use severity assessed by Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT-C)

    This scale is a patient-reported short screening tool that can be used repeatedly. It consists of 10 questions, each ranging from 0-4, producing an AUDIT sum score of 0-40. In addition, an AUDIT-C sum score of the first 3 items can range from 0-12. Higher scores indicate higher substance use severity. A score of 0 indicates self-reported alcohol abstinence, scores ≥ 3/4 (women/men) indicate alcohol misuse.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years.

  4. Quality of life assessed by EuroQol (EQ-5D)

    EQ-5D is a patient-reported scale with 5 items plus a visual analogue scale (VAS).

    The 5-item scale ranges from "less than 0" (worse than death; depending on country-specific weights) to 1 (best). The VAS provides a global one-item rating of current perceived health ranging from 0 (worst possible) to 100 (best possible health).

    Measured: Baseline, 1 year, 2 years.

  5. Depressive symptoms assessed by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

    MADRS is a clinician-administered ten-item interview measuring symptoms of depression. The scale assesses severity of depressive symptoms (rating symptoms on a 7-point scale). Scores range from 0-6, with a maximum score of 60. A higher score indicates more severe depression.

    Measured: Baseline, 1 year, 2 years.

  6. Attrition assessed by clinicians

    Clinicians will judge whether a participant is still participating, has decided to withdraw from the study, or contact has been lost. Importantly, participants will not be regarded as withdrawn if they decide to withdraw from interventions or from some assessment procedures.

    Measured: 3 Months, 1 year, 2 years.

  7. Adverse effects assessed by clinicians

    We will ask participants to describe any adverse events, and clinicians will then rate whether these were serious or non-serious and related or non-related.

    Measured: 3 months, 1 year, 2 years.

  8. Employment monitored by public records

    Patients' participation in the study ends after two years. From public records that are unaffected by loss of contact, employment will be monitored until 10 years after randomisation.

    Measured: 10 years.

  9. Hospitalisation monitored by health records

    Patients' participation in the study ends after two years. From electronic health records unaffected by loss of contact, hospitalisation will be monitored until 10 years after randomisation.

    Measured: 10 years.

  10. Criminal record monitored by public records

    Patients' participation in the study ends after two years. From public records that are unaffected by loss of contact, criminal record will be monitored until 10 years after randomisation.

    Measured: 10 years.

  11. Survival monitored by public records

    Patients' participation in the study ends after two years. From public records that are unaffected by loss of contact, survival will be monitored until 10 years after randomisation.

    Measured: 10 years.

  12. Motivation for change assessed by the Importance, Confidence, Readiness Ruler (ICR)

    The ICR is a patient-reported scale that assesses overall motivation to change, including readiness to change. It has 3 items and is rated on a 10-point Likert scale, and total scores range from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate higher motivation to change.

    Measured: 1 week, 3 months, 1 year.

  13. Craving assessed by the Craving Scale

    The Craving Scale is a 3-item patient-reported scale. Scores range from 0-9. High scores indicate higher cravings.

    Measured: Baseline, 1week, 3 months, 1 year.

  14. Social connectedness assessed by the Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale (IOS)

    The IOS is a patient-reported single-item visual scale of closeness. scores range from 1-7, with higher score indicating higher social connectedness.

    Measured: 1 week, 3 months, 1 year.

  15. Motivation for change assessed by the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment (URICA)

    A more comprehensive patient-reported scale than the brief ICR mentioned above. URICA has 32 items and measures the extent to which individuals identify with different stages of change (precontemplation, contemplation, action, maintenance). Each subscale consists of eight items using 5-point Likert scales ranging from 1 to 5 (resulting in scores ranging from 8 to 40). Subscale scores can be used to trace changes in attitudes related to the specific stages of change. The subscales are combined arithmetically (Contemplation + Action + Maintenance - Precontemplation) to yield a Readiness to Change score, with a possible range of 16-80 and higher scores indicating greater readiness for change.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 1 year.

  16. Anhedonia assessed by the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS)

    SHAPS is a patient-reported scale. It measures the capacity to derive pleasure from four different hedonic experiences: interest/pastimes, social interaction, sensory experience and food/drink. The scale has 14 items, each scoring 0 to 3, producing a sum score ranging from 0 to 42. Higher scores represent higher anhedonia level and a lower hedonic tone.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 1 year.

  17. Sleep quality assessed by the Sleep Condition Indicator (SCI)

    The SCI has 8 questions covering various sleep aspects such as: sleep onset delay, night-time awakenings, extent of the problem and its effect on daytime activities, mood and relations. Responses are scored from 0 (poor state) to 4 (no/minor problems). A total score of ≤ 16 indicates probable insomnia. Maxmimum score is 32.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 1 year.

  18. Substance use measured by hair samples

    Objective measures of substance use will be assessed through hair testing. Three strands of hair as thick as a matchstick will be collected from the occiput as close to the scalp as possible. The 3 cm most proximal to the scalp will be analysed. The levels of substance use will be quantitatively determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) using a protocol deriving the maximum amount of high-quality valid information from the smallest amount of hair.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 1 year.

  19. Brain pathology measured from blood samples

    Neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) will be used as potential functional biomarkers of individual substance use burden of the brain. NfL and GFAP analysis: Serum will be collected in silica tubes. After 30min clotting time, the samples will be centrifuged with 1500g for 15min at room temperature. Storage temperature will be -80°C. NfL and GFAP concentrations will be measured in triplicates using simple-plex assays (ProteinSimple, CA, USA) on Ella microfluidic system (BioTechne, MN, USA).

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 1 year.

  20. Cognitive function assessed by four tests from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB)

    The selected CANTAB tasks:

    1. Rapid Visual Information Processing (RVP): This task focuses on sustained attention.
    2. Spatial Working Memory (SWM): This task mainly assesses visuospatial working memory.
    3. Paired Associates Learning (PAL): This task measures visuospatial declarative learning and memory.
    4. Intra-Dimensional/Extra-Dimensional Set-Shifting (ID/ED):

    This test covers rule acquisition and reversal, featuring visual discrimination and attentional set-shifting analogous to the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 1 year.

  21. Social cognition assessed by the video-based online test COgnition of Social Interaction in MOvies (COSIMO)

    COSIMO will measure cognitive empathy and mental perspective taking. Performance will be assessed as number of correct answers.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 1 year.

  22. Creativity assessed by a shortened version of the Test of Creative Imagery Abilities (TCIA)

    The shortened version of TCIA will be used to measure creative imagery abilities. Participants will be asked to view simple graphite images, generate transformation ideas and draw their favorite idea on paper with no time limit, with the possibility of elaborating or changing the selected image. They will also be asked to write what their drawing represents.

    The level of creative imagery will be measured by scoring the drawings according to three characteristics: vividness, originality, and transformative ability.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 1 year.

  23. Structural brain scans indicating cognitive impairment

    1. Morphometric analysis (MRI-Voxel Based Morphometry, VBM): This analysis permits statistical estimation of whole-brain voxel-level local changes in volume.
    2. Cortical folding and cortical thickness: Geometrical representations for the cortical surfaces of each patient will be reconstructed and compared based on 3d/T1-images.
    3. Diffusion Tensor Imaging (MRI-DTI) analysis: DTI will provide precise indices related to tissue white-matter integrity and microstructure reorganization.
    4. DRI fiber tracking:

    Tracking and reconstruction of white-matter tracks allow to study the larger scale patterns of connectivity and differences in the major association paths in the brain.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 1 year.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Jun 2025
  2. Study start1 Jul 2025
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2037 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
600 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07028983
Sponsor's protocol ID
107278
Other IDs
101155881, REF-1131-52304
Acronym
FALCO
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
11 Jun 2025
Last updated
23 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: De-identified curated data will be made available permanently in publicly accessible repositories (e.g. OSF.io) using FAIR principles (e.g. using digital object identifiers \[DOIs\]; open, non-proprietary data formats; clear, consistent meta-data, using international standards for data structure where available; and licensed for re-use through CC BY). To balance the needs of trial participants for protection of their sensitive health data (in accordance with informed consent) and the needs of the scientific community for data availability, we will follow the principle "as closed as necessary, as open as possible". Results summaries will also be posted at Clinicaltrials.gov after the project end.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in