DiverticulitisDACSCODNCT03337984
Damage Control Surgery in the Treatment of Complicated Diverticulitis
An observational study of Diverticulitis, run by University of Roma La Sapienza at 9 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
To evaluate the use of damage control surgery by performing bowel resection and laparostomy in the treatment of Hinchey III or IV diverticulitis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Diverticulitis
- How many people
- 121 participants
- Where
- 9 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2017to 30 Dec 2020
- How long will I take part?
- 6 Months
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients operated on for Hinchey III or IV class and treated by damage control surgery procedure
Who may be able to join
- Patients undergoing surgery for Hinchey III and IV stage scheduled for immediate Hartmann's procedure and ICU recovery
Who cannot join
- None
Trial locations and contacts
9 sites in 1 country.
9 sites in 1 country
Italy9 sites
Policlinico Abano Terme
Abano Terme, Veneto, 35031
Ospedale Civile di Adria
Adria, Rovigo
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedale Riuniti Ancona
Ancona, The Marches, 60121
Ospedale San Donato
Arezzo, Tuscany, 52100
Ospedale San Giovanni Battista
Foligno, Umbria, 06034
Azienda Ospedaliera Cardarelli
Naples, Campania
Azienda Ospedaliera Pisana Policlinico Universitario Cisanello
Pisa, Tuscany, 56121
Policlinico San Pietro
Ponte San Pietro, Bergamo
Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria
Terni, Umbria
About this study
Official title: Damage Control Surgery in the Treatment of Hinchey Stage III and IV Diverticulitis: an Italian Nationwide Survey
To evaluate the use of damage control surgery by performing bowel resection and laparostomy in the treatment of Hinchey III or IV diverticulitis.
Read the detailed description
Despite the progress in the resuscitation modalities of septic patients, Hartmann procedure (HP) is still considered the safest treatment for generalized peritonitis as a consequence of a complicated acute diverticulitis (stages III and IV of the Hinchey's classification). Almost the half of those patients do not have their stoma reversed because of its association with significant morbidity and mortality. To date, the use of resection with primary anastomosis (PA) is a matter of debate, as it is reported in the literature that it is substantially equivalent to HP in terms of morbidity and length of postoperative stay. For these reason, PA is often reserved for younger patients with few co-morbidities and a lesser degree of peritoneal contamination. In the last decade, Damage Control Surgery has been emerging as a valid alternative to HP and RA in patients presenting a severe sepsis caused by purulent or fecal peritonitis in acute diverticulitis. Initially described for the treatment of major abdominal injuries, indications for DCS have subsequently been extended to septic shock, abdominal compartment syndrome and impossibility to perform a primary closure. However, there is still no consensus about the use of DCS in perforated acute diverticulitis.
The aim of this study was to describe "how-to-use" the Damage Control Surgery in patients with purulent and fecal peritonitis following a severe acute diverticulitis and report the impact on patients' outcomes after the application of this technique in several Italian centers of emergency surgery
- Conditions
- Diverticulitis
- Keywords
- Diverticulitis, Damage Control Surgery
- Medical subject headings
- Diverticulitis
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mortality
Mortality rate related to treatment
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Morbidity
Complications rate arranged by Clavien-Dindo classification I to IV
Measured: 6 months
Lenght of stay (LOS)
Days of stay as inpatient
Measured: 6 months
ICU lenght of stay
Days of stay as
Measured: 12 months
Number of Hartmann's procedure
Observed to expected (O:E) ratio of Hartmann's procedures
Measured: 1 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Nov 2017
- Study start1 Sep 2017
- Primary completion30 Dec 2020
- Study completion30 Dec 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (20)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for DiverticulitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Roma La SapienzaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Other
- Enrolment
- 121 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 6 Months
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Roma La Sapienza
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Gianluca Costa, University of Roma La Sapienza
- Investigators
- Gianluca Costa, MD, PhD, Study director, University of Roma La Sapienza, Sant' Andrea University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03337984
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EM-SURG AOSA 2017_1
- Acronym
- DACSCOD
- Status last verified
- May 2021
- First submitted
- 12 Jun 2017
- Last updated
- 18 May 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Individual participant data (IPD) will probably be shared with other researchers
Publications
Costa G, La Torre M, Frezza B, Fransvea P, Tomassini F, Ziparo V, Balducci G. Changes in the surgical approach to colonic emergencies during a 15-year period. Dig Surg. 2014;31(3):197-203. doi: 10.1159/000365254. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
PubMed 25170867Ince M, Stocchi L, Khomvilai S, Kwon DS, Hammel JP, Kiran RP. Morbidity and mortality of the Hartmann procedure for diverticular disease over 18 years in a single institution. Colorectal Dis. 2012 Aug;14(8):e492-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03004.x.
PubMed 22356208Turley RS, Barbas AS, Lidsky ME, Mantyh CR, Migaly J, Scarborough JE. Laparoscopic versus open Hartmann procedure for the emergency treatment of diverticulitis: a propensity-matched analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Jan;56(1):72-82. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182749cf5.
PubMed 23222283Benz D, Balogh ZJ. Damage control surgery: current state and future directions. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2017 Dec;23(6):491-497. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000465.
PubMed 29035926Girard E, Abba J, Boussat B, Trilling B, Mancini A, Bouzat P, Letoublon C, Chirica M, Arvieux C. Damage Control Surgery for Non-traumatic Abdominal Emergencies. World J Surg. 2018 Apr;42(4):965-973. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4262-6.
PubMed 28948335Bruns BR, Ahmad SA, O'Meara L, Tesoriero R, Lauerman M, Klyushnenkova E, Kozar R, Scalea TM, Diaz JJ. Nontrauma open abdomens: A prospective observational study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Apr;80(4):631-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000958.
PubMed 26808023Weber DG, Bendinelli C, Balogh ZJ. Damage control surgery for abdominal emergencies. Br J Surg. 2014 Jan;101(1):e109-18. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9360. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
PubMed 24273018Khan A, Hsee L, Mathur S, Civil I. Damage-control laparotomy in nontrauma patients: review of indications and outcomes. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Sep;75(3):365-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31829cb65e.
PubMed 23928745Subramanian A, Balentine C, Palacio CH, Sansgiry S, Berger DH, Awad SS. Outcomes of damage-control celiotomy in elderly nontrauma patients with intra-abdominal catastrophes. Am J Surg. 2010 Dec;200(6):783-8; discussion 788-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.07.027.
PubMed 21146021Cirocchi R, Arezzo A, Vettoretto N, Cavaliere D, Farinella E, Renzi C, Cannata G, Desiderio J, Farinacci F, Barberini F, Trastulli S, Parisi A, Fingerhut A. Role of damage control surgery in the treatment of Hinchey III and IV sigmoid diverticulitis: a tailored strategy. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014 Nov;93(25):e184. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000184.
PubMed 25437034Cassini D, Miccini M, Manoochehri F, Gregori M, Baldazzi G. Emergency Hartmann's Procedure and Its Reversal: A Totally Laparoscopic 2-Step Surgery for the Treatment of Hinchey III and IV Diverticulitis. Surg Innov. 2017 Dec;24(6):557-565. doi: 10.1177/1553350617722226. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
PubMed 28748737Bridoux V, Regimbeau JM, Ouaissi M, Mathonnet M, Mauvais F, Houivet E, Schwarz L, Mege D, Sielezneff I, Sabbagh C, Tuech JJ. Hartmann's Procedure or Primary Anastomosis for Generalized Peritonitis due to Perforated Diverticulitis: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Trial (DIVERTI). J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Dec;225(6):798-805. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
PubMed 28943323Coccolini F, Montori G, Ceresoli M, Catena F, Moore EE, Ivatury R, Biffl W, Peitzman A, Coimbra R, Rizoli S, Kluger Y, Abu-Zidan FM, Sartelli M, De Moya M, Velmahos G, Fraga GP, Pereira BM, Leppaniemi A, Boermeester MA, Kirkpatrick AW, Maier R, Bala M, Sakakushev B, Khokha V, Malbrain M, Agnoletti V, Martin-Loeches I, Sugrue M, Di Saverio S, Griffiths E, Soreide K, Mazuski JE, May AK, Montravers P, Melotti RM, Pisano M, Salvetti F, Marchesi G, Valetti TM, Scalea T, Chiara O, Kashuk JL, Ansaloni L. The role of open abdomen in non-trauma patient: WSES Consensus Paper. World J Emerg Surg. 2017 Aug 14;12:39. doi: 10.1186/s13017-017-0146-1. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 28814969Kafka-Ritsch R, Birkfellner F, Perathoner A, Raab H, Nehoda H, Pratschke J, Zitt M. Damage control surgery with abdominal vacuum and delayed bowel reconstruction in patients with perforated diverticulitis Hinchey III/IV. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Oct;16(10):1915-22. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1977-4. Epub 2012 Jul 28.
PubMed 22843083Perathoner A, Klaus A, Muhlmann G, Oberwalder M, Margreiter R, Kafka-Ritsch R. Damage control with abdominal vacuum therapy (VAC) to manage perforated diverticulitis with advanced generalized peritonitis--a proof of concept. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010 Jun;25(6):767-74. doi: 10.1007/s00384-010-0887-8. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
PubMed 20148255
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 May 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Damage Control Surgery in the Treatment of Hinchey Stage III and IV Diverticulitis: an Italian Nationwide Survey
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03337984
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DACSCOD / EM-SURG AOSA 2017_1
- Conditions
- Diverticulitis
- Keywords
- Diverticulitis, Damage Control Surgery
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 121 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Roma La SapienzaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To evaluate the use of damage control surgery by performing bowel resection and laparostomy in the treatment of Hinchey III or IV diverticulitis.
Detailed description
Despite the progress in the resuscitation modalities of septic patients, Hartmann procedure (HP) is still considered the safest treatment for generalized peritonitis as a consequence of a complicated acute diverticulitis (stages III and IV of the Hinchey's classification). Almost the half of those patients do not have their stoma reversed because of its association with significant morbidity and mortality. To date, the use of resection with primary anastomosis (PA) is a matter of debate, as it is reported in the literature that it is substantially equivalent to HP in terms of morbidity and length of postoperative stay. For these reason, PA is often reserved for younger patients with few co-morbidities and a lesser degree of peritoneal contamination. In the last decade, Damage Control Surgery has been emerging as a valid alternative to HP and RA in patients presenting a severe sepsis caused by purulent or fecal peritonitis in acute diverticulitis. Initially described for the treatment of major abdominal injuries, indications for DCS have subsequently been extended to septic shock, abdominal compartment syndrome and impossibility to perform a primary closure. However, there is still no consensus about the use of DCS in perforated acute diverticulitis.
The aim of this study was to describe "how-to-use" the Damage Control Surgery in patients with purulent and fecal peritonitis following a severe acute diverticulitis and report the impact on patients' outcomes after the application of this technique in several Italian centers of emergency surgery
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Other
- Target follow-up
- 6 Months
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients operated on for Hinchey III or IV class and treated by damage control surgery procedure
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients undergoing surgery for Hinchey III and IV stage scheduled for immediate Hartmann's procedure and ICU recovery
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- None
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Mortality
Time frame: 6 months
Mortality rate related to treatment
4 secondary outcomes
Morbidity
Time frame: 6 months
Lenght of stay (LOS)
Time frame: 6 months
ICU lenght of stay
Time frame: 12 months
Number of Hartmann's procedure
Time frame: 1 month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 May 2021.
- Background: PubMed 25170867Costa G, La Torre M, Frezza B, Fransvea P, Tomassini F, Ziparo V, Balducci G. Changes in the surgical approach to colonic emergencies during a 15-year period. Dig Surg. 2014;31(3):197-203. doi: 10.1159/000365254. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
- Background: PubMed 22356208Ince M, Stocchi L, Khomvilai S, Kwon DS, Hammel JP, Kiran RP. Morbidity and mortality of the Hartmann procedure for diverticular disease over 18 years in a single institution. Colorectal Dis. 2012 Aug;14(8):e492-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03004.x.
- Background: PubMed 23222283Turley RS, Barbas AS, Lidsky ME, Mantyh CR, Migaly J, Scarborough JE. Laparoscopic versus open Hartmann procedure for the emergency treatment of diverticulitis: a propensity-matched analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Jan;56(1):72-82. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182749cf5.
- Background: PubMed 29035926Benz D, Balogh ZJ. Damage control surgery: current state and future directions. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2017 Dec;23(6):491-497. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000465.
- Background: PubMed 28948335Girard E, Abba J, Boussat B, Trilling B, Mancini A, Bouzat P, Letoublon C, Chirica M, Arvieux C. Damage Control Surgery for Non-traumatic Abdominal Emergencies. World J Surg. 2018 Apr;42(4):965-973. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4262-6.
- Background: PubMed 26808023Bruns BR, Ahmad SA, O'Meara L, Tesoriero R, Lauerman M, Klyushnenkova E, Kozar R, Scalea TM, Diaz JJ. Nontrauma open abdomens: A prospective observational study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Apr;80(4):631-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000958.
- Background: PubMed 24273018Weber DG, Bendinelli C, Balogh ZJ. Damage control surgery for abdominal emergencies. Br J Surg. 2014 Jan;101(1):e109-18. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9360. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
- Background: PubMed 23928745Khan A, Hsee L, Mathur S, Civil I. Damage-control laparotomy in nontrauma patients: review of indications and outcomes. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Sep;75(3):365-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31829cb65e.
- Background: PubMed 21146021Subramanian A, Balentine C, Palacio CH, Sansgiry S, Berger DH, Awad SS. Outcomes of damage-control celiotomy in elderly nontrauma patients with intra-abdominal catastrophes. Am J Surg. 2010 Dec;200(6):783-8; discussion 788-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.07.027.
- Background: PubMed 25437034Cirocchi R, Arezzo A, Vettoretto N, Cavaliere D, Farinella E, Renzi C, Cannata G, Desiderio J, Farinacci F, Barberini F, Trastulli S, Parisi A, Fingerhut A. Role of damage control surgery in the treatment of Hinchey III and IV sigmoid diverticulitis: a tailored strategy. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014 Nov;93(25):e184. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000184.
- Background: PubMed 28748737Cassini D, Miccini M, Manoochehri F, Gregori M, Baldazzi G. Emergency Hartmann's Procedure and Its Reversal: A Totally Laparoscopic 2-Step Surgery for the Treatment of Hinchey III and IV Diverticulitis. Surg Innov. 2017 Dec;24(6):557-565. doi: 10.1177/1553350617722226. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
- Background: PubMed 28943323Bridoux V, Regimbeau JM, Ouaissi M, Mathonnet M, Mauvais F, Houivet E, Schwarz L, Mege D, Sielezneff I, Sabbagh C, Tuech JJ. Hartmann's Procedure or Primary Anastomosis for Generalized Peritonitis due to Perforated Diverticulitis: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Trial (DIVERTI). J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Dec;225(6):798-805. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Individual participant data (IPD) will probably be shared with other researchers
Related trials for Diverticulitis
RecruitingObservational study
AIDE: Decision Support for Anastomosis or Colostomy in Emergency Surgery for Complicated Acute Diverticulitis
Complicated Diverticulitis, Acute Diverticulitis
Not yet recruiting
Improving the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Diverticulitis in Routine Care
Diverticulitis
RecruitingPhase 2
APLAUD Trial (Antibiotics vs PLacebo for Acute Uncomplicated Diverticulitis)
Acute Uncomplicated Diverticulitis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Analysis of the Role of the Microbiota in Diverticular Disease
Diverticular Disease of Colon, Acute Diverticulitis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Differentiating Right-sided Epiploic Appendagitis From Diverticulitis
Epiploic Appendagitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gianluca Costa, MD, PhD study director
University of Roma La Sapienza, Sant' Andrea University Hospital
9 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Diverticulitis, run by University of Roma La Sapienza at 9 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 9 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mortality (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03337984, which also lists 20 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 May 2021.