AzTrials
AzTrials

Shock, SepticPhase 2VITAMINSNCT03333278

The Vitamin C, Hydrocortisone and Thiamine in Patients With Septic Shock Trial

A Phase 2 study testing Vitamin C, Thiamine and Hydrocortisone, in people with Shock, Septic and Critically Ill, run by Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre at 8 sites in 3 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Sepsis has been characterised as a dysregulated host response to infection. Adjunctive therapies targeting the inflammatory cascade are being increasingly explored, although to date, have failed to demonstrate consistent benefit, and sepsis continues to manifest poor outcomes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Shock, Septic, Critically Ill, Vasoplegic Syndrome
What is being tested?
Vitamin C, Thiamine and Hydrocortisone,
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
216 participants
Where
8 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
2 May 2018to 6 Oct 2019
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient in the intensive care unit (ICU) with septic shock:
  • Blood lactate >2 mmol/L, despite adequate fluid resuscitation AND
  • need for continuous vasopressor therapy to keep mean arterial pressure (MAP) >65 mmHg for >2 hours

Who cannot join

  • Age < 18 years
  • Pregnancy
  • DNR (do not resuscitate)/DNI (do not intubate) orders
  • Death is deemed to be imminent or inevitable during this admission, and either the attending physician, patient or substitute decision-maker is not committed to active treatment
  • Patients with known HIV infection
  • Patients with known glucose-6 phosphate dehydrogenase (G-6PD) deficiency
Show all 22Show fewer
  • Patients transferred from another ICU or hospital with a diagnosis of a septic shock for > 24 hours
  • Patients with a diagnosis of a septic shock for > 24 hours
  • Patients with known or suspected
  • a. history of oxalate nephropathy or hyperoxaluria
  • b. short bowel syndrome or severe fat-malabsorption
  • c. acute beri-beri disease
  • d. acute Wernicke's encephalopathy
  • e. malaria
  • f. scurvy
  • g. Addison's disease
  • h. Cushing's disease
  • Clinician expects to prescribe systemic glucocorticoids for an indication other than septic shock (not including nebulised or inhaled corticosteroid)
  • Patient is receiving treatment for systemic fungal infection or has documented Strongyloides infection at the time of randomisation
  • Patient with known chronic iron overload due to iron storage and other diseases
  • Patient previously enrolled in this study
  • Clinician expects to prescribe high dose vitamin C for another indication

Trial locations and contacts

8 sites in 3 countries.

8 sites in 3 countries

Australia6 sites
  • Monash Health (Monash Medical Centre and Dandenong Hospital)

    Clayton, Victoria, 3468

  • Geelong University Hospital

    Geelong, Victoria

  • Austin Health

    Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084

  • Alfred Hospital

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3004

  • Western Health (Footscray & Sunshine Hospital)

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3021

  • Royal Melbourne Hospital

    Melbourne, Victoria, 3050

Other trials in Australia

Brazil1 site
  • Cancer Institute of the State of São Paulo

    São Paulo, 01246-000

Other trials in Brazil

New Zealand1 site
  • Wellington Hospital

    Wellington

Other trials in New Zealand

About this study

Official title: The VitamIn C, HydrocorTisone and ThiAMINe in Patients With Septic Shock Trial (VITAMINS Trial) - A Prospective, Feasibility, Pilot, Multi-centre, Randomised, Open-label Controlled Trial

Sepsis has been characterised as a dysregulated host response to infection. Adjunctive therapies targeting the inflammatory cascade are being increasingly explored, although to date, have failed to demonstrate consistent benefit, and sepsis continues to manifest poor outcomes. Hospital mortality in patients with septic shock remains as high as 22% in Australia and New Zealand. From a global perspective, 31 million sepsis and 19 million severe sepsis cases are expected to be treated in hospitals all over the world per year.

To date, experimental data have reported that both high dose intravenous vitamin C and corticosteroids attenuate the acceleration of the inflammatory cascade and possibly reduce the endothelial injury characteristic of sepsis, enhance the release of endogenous catecholamines and improve vasopressor responsiveness.

Therefore, the investigators plan to conduct a feasibility pilot prospective, multi-centre, randomised, open-label, trial in ICU patients with septic shock to test whether the intravenous administration of high dose Vitamin C (6g/d), Thiamine (400mg/d) and Hydrocortisone (200mg/d) leads to a more rapid resolution shock and vasopressor dependence.

Read the detailed description

The investigators plan to conduct a feasibility pilot prospective, multi-centre, randomised, open-label, trial in ICU patients with septic shock to test whether the intravenous administration of high dose Vitamin C (6g/d), Thiamine (400mg/d) and Hydrocortisone (200mg/d) for a maximum of ten days leads to a more rapid resolution shock and vasopressor dependence.

Hypothesis:

Treatment with a combination of intravenous Vitamin C, Thiamine and Hydrocortisone reduces duration of vasopressor (measured by hours alive and vasopressor free) use censored at 7 days compared to standard care with Hydrocortisone alone.

This is a prospective, feasibility, pilot, multi-centre, randomised, open-label controlled trial. This study will be performed in seven Victorian ICUs in Australia. Patients admitted to an ICU of the participating hospitals with the primary diagnosis of septic shock will be screened for inclusion into this study.

Rationale:

Experimental data have demonstrated that both corticosteroids and intravenous vitamin C attenuate the release of pro-inflammatory mediators, reduce the endothelial injury characteristic of sepsis (thereby reducing endothelial permeability and improving microcirculatory flow), augment the release of endogenous catecholamines and enhance vasopressor responsiveness. In animal models, these effects have resulted in reduced organ injury and increased survival. However, their effect in critically ill humans is unknown.

Previous research suggests that vitamin C and glucocorticoids may act synergistically and improve vasopressor responsiveness in patients with sepsis and septic shock.

Randomisation:

ICU patients will be enrolled as soon as possible but no later than 24 hours after fulfilling the criteria for septic shock. Patients will be allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either the treatment group, receiving intravenous Vitamin C (1.5g every 6 hours), Thiamine (200mg every 12 hours) and Hydrocortisone (50mg every 6 hours), or to the control group, receiving Hydrocortisone (50mg every 6 hours) alone.

Treatment allocation will occur using a computerized system and concealed allocation. The clinical staff involved in patient care will administer the additional drugs to those allocated to the treatment arm of the trial as soon as possible after the identification of septic shock and randomization.

Patients readmitted to ICU during the same hospital stay will not receive any further doses of study drugs.

Study Treatment will continue until:

  • Septic shock resolves
  • The patient leaves the ICU
  • Contraindications to Vitamin C, Thiamine or Hydrocortisone therapy arise
  • Death occurs
  • A maximum of 10 days of treatment has been administered
  • Serious adverse events suspected to be secondary to the intervention therapy develop.

Study Drugs

This study will be an open label study:

Intervention group:

  • 1500mg Vitamin C is will be diluted in 100ml of Normal Saline (0.9% NaCl) and infused over 1 hour. The dosing schedule is 1500mg every 6 hours for the duration of study treatment.
  • 200mg Thiamine will be diluted in 100ml of Normal Saline (0.9% NaCl) and infused over 1 hour. The dosing schedule is 200mg every 12 hours. Patients in the control group of the study can receive thiamine if clinically indicated at the discretion of the attending ICU staff specialist.

In both groups (treatment and control), patients will be treated with hydrocortisone 50mg IV q 6 hourly for the duration of study treatment. After shock resolution and/or a maximum fo 7 days Hydrocortisone will be tapered off or stopped.

Statistical analysis:

Originally, the investigators assumed a mean (SD) duration of vasopressor dependency of 50 (28) hours and estimated a required sample size of 120 patients (60 per group) to identify a clinically relevant decrease of vasopressor dependency and an increase in days alive and vasopressor free at 7 days of 25% (20 hours) (i.e. increase from 41 to 55 hours of days alive and vasopressor free at day 7) with a power of 90% at an alpha level of 0.05.

The investigators have recalculated the sample size based on the pooled standard deviation of hours alive and vasopressor free of the first 59 participants. The pooled standard deviation of hours alive and vasopressor free at 7 days for the 59 patients is 51.6 hours.

To have a 90% power (2 sided p-value of 0.05) to detect a 25-hour difference based on a standard deviation of 51.6, the trial will require 180 patients (90 per group). Allowing for a 20% inflation for non-normality and dropout/withdrawal, the required total sample size is 216 (108 per group). The robustness of the sample size estimate will be further assessed after recruitment of 108 patients (50% of the sample size).

Consent: The major ethical issues associated with this study relate involve the recruitment of participants who are dependent on medical care and in need of immediate intervention for the management of life-threatening haemodynamic instability.

  1. Informed consent from participant or substitute/medical treatment decision maker: Where possible, and as authorised by law, which varies between jurisdictions, consent will be obtained from the participant himself or from the participant's legal surrogate if the patient lacks decision-making capacity.
  2. Consent to continue: Where it is not possible or practicable for the patient or the legal surrogate to consider the study and give consent immediately, the patient may be enrolled with a waiver of consent (or medical research procedures in an emergency in Victoria) and consent obtained from the participant's legal surrogate as soon as possible, provided the procedure is in accord with the requirements of the site's Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) and applicable legislation. When appropriate, the participant's legal surrogate, and, in turn, the participant, will be informed of the study and will be able to withdraw consent for ongoing participation at any time.
  3. Verbal/Telephone consent: In cases where the participant's legal surrogate cannot attend the hospital to sign the consent form within the time constraints of the study, consent for patient participation in the study may be obtained over the telephone in accordance with local HREC guidelines. The telephone conversation must be documented in the patient's medical record. As soon as the participant's legal surrogate is able to attend the hospital, they will be asked to sign a consent form and note that telephone consent was already provided.

Once subjects are recovered and are able to consider the information sheet, they will be offered the opportunity to withdraw from study follow-up. If a participant dies due to the nature of their critical illness before consent was able to be obtained from the person responsible/medical treatment decision maker, then consent will not be sought and data collected will be used. This is in line with the process followed by other similar intensive care studies conducted previously and approved by the relevant HRECs all where consent to continue has been utilised.

Being tested
Vitamin C, Thiamine, Hydrocortisone,
Keywords
Critical Care, Shock, Septic, Ascorbic Acid, Adult
Medical subject headings
Shock, Septic, Critical Illness, Vasoplegia, Sepsis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Vitamin CDrug

    Also called Ascorbic acid

    Ascorbic acid 1.5g every 6 hours i.v. while in ICU, until shock resolution for a maximum of ten days

  • ThiamineDrug

    Also called Vitamin B1

    Thiamine 200mg every 12 hours i.v. while in ICU, until shock resolution for a maximum of ten days

  • Hydrocortisone,Drug

    Also called Solu Cortef

    Hydrocortisone 50mg every 6 hours i.v while in ICU, until shock resolution or for a maximum of 7 days, then tapered or stopped.

Study groups in NCT03333278
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
VitaminsActive comparatorintravenous: Ascorbic acid (Vitamin C: 1.5g every 6 hours) Thiamine (Vitamin B1: 200mg every 12 hours) Hydrocortisone (50mg every 6 hours)
Receives: Drug: Vitamin C; Drug: Thiamine; Drug: Hydrocortisone,
ControlOtherHydrocortisone (50mg every 6 hours)
Receives: Drug: Hydrocortisone,

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time alive and free of vasopressors at day 7 (168 hours) after randomization.

    This is defined by the patient being alive at discontinuation of all vasopressors for at least 4 hours in the presence of a MAP>65 mmHg for the same 4 hour period as recorded in the ICU charts and censored at 7 days. If a patient dies while on vasopressor therapy, in such a patient, the time alive and vasopressor free time will be 0 - This approach will correct for the competing effect of mortality on duration of vasopressor therapy.

    Measured: 7 days (168 hours)

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. ICU mortality

    Patient died during the ICU admission

    Measured: 90 days after randomization

  2. Alive and ICU-free days at day 28 calculated as the number of days alive and out of the ICU to day 28

    Alive and ICU-free days calculated as the number of days alive and out of the ICU to day 28

    Measured: 28 days after randomization

  3. Hospital mortality

    Patient died during the hospital admission

    Measured: 90 days after randomization

  4. 28-day mortality

    Patient died within 28 days after randomization

    Measured: 28 days after randomization

  5. 90-day mortality

    Patient died within 90 days after randomization

    Measured: 90 days after randomization

  6. Delta of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at 72 hours

    defined as the initial total SOFA* score minus the day three (72 hours) SOFA score

    *total SOFA = Sequential Organ Failure Assessment = sum of each organ system point score. The score is based on six different scores, one each for the respiratory, cardiovascular, hepatic, coagulation, renal and neurological systems. The organ scores are ranging from 0-4, with the best score being 0 and the worst being 4 points. The maximal (and worst) total SOFA score is 24 points.

    Measured: 72 hours after randomization

  7. Hospital length of stay

    Duration the patient stayed in the hospital

    Measured: 90 days after randomization

  8. 28 day cumulative vasopressor free hours

    Cumulative vasopressor free hours from shock resolution to day28 post randomisation

    Measured: 28 days after randomization

  9. 28 day cumulative invasive mechanical ventilation free hours

    Cumulative invasive mechanical ventilation-free hours during the 28 day period post randomisation

    Measured: 28 days after randomization

  10. RRT duration

    Length of renal replacement therapy dependency during the 28 day period post randomisation

    Measured: 28 days after randomization

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Nov 2017
  2. Study start2 May 2018
  3. Primary completion16 Jul 2019
  4. Study completion6 Oct 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Multi-centre, Randomised, Open-label controlled Trial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
216 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03333278
Sponsor's protocol ID
HREC17Austin238
Acronym
VITAMINS
Status last verified
Oct 2019
First submitted
29 Oct 2017
Last updated
10 Oct 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Data Sharing Policy is available from the website.

Publications

  • Fujii T, Luethi N, Young PJ, Frei DR, Eastwood GM, French CJ, Deane AM, Shehabi Y, Hajjar LA, Oliveira G, Udy AA, Orford N, Edney SJ, Hunt AL, Judd HL, Bitker L, Cioccari L, Naorungroj T, Yanase F, Bates S, McGain F, Hudson EP, Al-Bassam W, Dwivedi DB, Peppin C, McCracken P, Orosz J, Bailey M, Bellomo R; VITAMINS Trial Investigators. Effect of Vitamin C, Hydrocortisone, and Thiamine vs Hydrocortisone Alone on Time Alive and Free of Vasopressor Support Among Patients With Septic Shock: The VITAMINS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020 Feb 4;323(5):423-431. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.22176.

    PubMed 31950979
  • Fujii T, Udy AA, Deane AM, Luethi N, Bailey M, Eastwood GM, Frei D, French C, Orford N, Shehabi Y, Young PJ, Bellomo R; VITAMINS trial investigators. Vitamin C, Hydrocortisone and Thiamine in Patients with Septic Shock (VITAMINS) trial: study protocol and statistical analysis plan. Crit Care Resusc. 2019 Jun;21(2):119-125.

    PubMed 31142242

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Vitamin C, Thiamine and Hydrocortisone, in people with Shock, Septic and Critically Ill, run by Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre at 8 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 8 sites in Australia, Brazil, New Zealand. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time alive and free of vasopressors at day 7 (168 hours) after randomization. (time frame: 7 days (168 hours)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03333278, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Oct 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in