Aortic CoarctationLOVE-COARCTNCT03262753
Long-term Outcomes and Vascular Evaluation After Coarctation of the Aorta Treatment
An observational study of Aortic Coarctation and Arterial Stiffness, run by Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central at 1 site in Portugal.
Trial summary
Background: Coarctation of the aorta (CoA) can be treated using surgery, balloon angioplasty or stent implantation. Although short-term results are excellent with all three treatment modalities, long term cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality remain high, likely due to persistently abnormal vascular function. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 8 to 35 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Aortic Coarctation, Arterial Stiffness, PULSE WAVE VELOCITY
- What is being tested?
- Surgery, Balloon dilation and Stent
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 90 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePortugal
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2013to 30 Dec 2017
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 8 to 35 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Study population: Patients with isthmic coarctation of the aorta, treated after 1994, submitted to only one of either of the three procedures described above.
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of isthmic coarctation of the aorta;
- Current age between 8 (to allow cooperation with study procedures) and 35 years (to avoid confounding by aging-related vascular dysfunction); and
- Treatment for CoA after 1994, after which all three modalities were in clinical use.
Who cannot join
- Residual CoA defined by a systolic upper-to-lower extremity BP gradient> 20mmHg;
- Co-morbidities that may independently affect vascular function, including associated significant congenital heart disease, history of known vasculopathy, genetic syndromes or other cardiovascular risk factors;
- History of two treatment types for CoA; and
- CoA types likely representing a different entity or patients amenable to one single treatment type (surgery), including atypical CoA site (such as mid-thoracic or abdominal), severe hypoplasia of the aortic arch, and an age of treatment <1 year of age.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Centro de Investigação Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central contact
Portugal1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Hospital de Santa Marta, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central
Lisbon, 1169-024
José D Martins, MD MSc, +351918338690, jose.martins@chlc.min-saude.pt
About this study
Official title: LOVE-COARCT Study: Long-term Outcomes and Vascular Evaluation After Coarctation of the Aorta Treatment
Background: Coarctation of the aorta (CoA) can be treated using surgery, balloon angioplasty or stent implantation. Although short-term results are excellent with all three treatment modalities, long term cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality remain high, likely due to persistently abnormal vascular function. The effects of treatment modality on long term vascular function remain uncharacterized. The goal of this study is to assess vascular function in this patient population for comparison among the treatment modalities. Methods: Vascular function in large and small arteries will be prospectively assessed fusing multiple non-invasive modalities, and the results will be compared among the three groups of CoA patients previously treated using surgery, balloon angioplasty or stent implantation after frequency matching for confounding variables. A comprehensive vascular function assessment protocol was created to be used in 7 centers. The primary outcome is arterial stiffness measured by arterial tonometry. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were carefully established after consideration of several potential confounders. Sample size was calculated for the primary outcome variable. Conclusions: Treatment modalities for CoA may have distinct impact on large and small arterial vascular function. The results of this study will help identify the treatment modality that is associated with the most optimal level of vascular function, which, in the long term may reduce CV risk.
Read the detailed description
Study overview. This cross-sectional prospective observational study of patients with CoA previously treated using one of three treatment modalities assesses if treatment type is associated with differences in vascular function. The three treatment groups will be frequency-matched for key confounding variables.
Study feasibility. The investigators assembled a multi-disciplinary team with proven expertise in epidemiology, clinical trial design, congenital heart disease, non-invasive imaging, interventional cardiology, vascular function assessment, preventive cardiology and statistical analysis. A multicenter design is used to ensure sufficient statistical power in evaluating the hypothesis.
Participating centers and study core laboratories. Patients are recruited at six large pediatric cardiac centers from Portugal and USA.
Screening procedures. The medical records of potentially eligible patients are screened by a local study investigator using a pre-specified screening form to ensure that they satisfy our selection criteria.
Overview of the study workflow. Study procedures will occur in a one- or two-day visit. Upon arrival for testing, formal consent for participation will be obtained. Assessment of arterial stiffness, endothelial function, and blood sampling for biomarkers will be done while fasting. Cardiopulmonary stress test will be performed on the same day. CMR and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABMP) will be arranged for the same or for the following day. When the study tests cannot be completed at the first visit, they will be completed within 3 months of the first visit. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board or Institutional Ethics Committee at each participating center, and informed consent and assent will be obtained, depending on age, from patients and their parents/legal guardians before trial enrollment.
Recruitment. A review of the patient database at each participating institution will be performed to assemble a cohort of patients with CoA who have previously undergone treatment with balloon dilation, surgery or stenting. Study data will be collected and managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools hosted at Boston Children's Hospital.
Data collection. A retrospective chart review will be performed to collect demographic and clinical data including severity of coarctation, type and details of CoA treatment and presence of associated conditions.
Diagnostic procedures.
Arterial Stiffness Plan \& Rationale:
Measurements: Carotid-femoral PWV (cfPWV) will be measured using applanation tonometry. Segmental PWV is measured using CMR. Segmental measures of arterial distensibility will be measured using CMR. Other parameters that describe arterial stiffness reflect the relationship of arterial change in diameter to change in pressure and include aortic strain (relative change in diameter), compliance (absolute change in diameter in response to a change in pressure), distensibility (relative change in diameter in response to a change in pressure), and the aortic stiffness β index (distensibility using the logarithmic conversion of the relative pressure). Applanation tonometry, which uses a probe or tonometer to record the pulse wave with a transducer, is the most widely accepted method for estimating PWV and both the NIHem (Cardiovascular Engineering, Inc., Norwood, MA USA) and the SphygmoCor (AtCor Medical, West Ryde, NSW, Australia) devices have been validated in large cohort trials. Both devices will be used, based on local availability.
Endothelial Function Measurements: Endothelium-dependent reactive hyperaemia index and augmentation index will be measured using the EndoPAT 2000 system (Itamar Medical, Caesarea, Israel). The protocol includes measures to minimize the influence of the autonomic nervous system.
Pulse Waveform Analysis: Central aortic pressure and pulse pressure will be measured using applanation tonometry). Augmentation index will be measured using applanation tonometry and Endo-PAT. CAP, PP and AIx can be measured non-invasively using radial or carotid applanation tonometry (and Endo-PAT for AIx), calibrated by the peripheral diastolic and mean arterial pressure. Both the NIHem system and the SphygmoCor device were used.
Blood Pressure Phenotype will be measured using conventional standard techniques including auscultatory right arm BP measurement, measurement of BP gradient between arm and leg, BP response during treadmill exercise stress testing (ET) and ABPM. Based on the auscultatory BP and ABPM results, the appropriate children and adult guidelines will be used to classify patients. Patients currently on antihypertensive medication will be classified as hypertensive.
Biomarkers: The researchers will measure biomarkers of endothelial function (total oxides of nitrogen- NOx and ADMA), inflammation (hs-CRP), vascular wall function (VCAM-1 and IL-1β) and vascular remodeling (MMP-2; MMP-9 and TGF-beta1). NOx will be determined by chemiluminescence (Sievers NOAnalyzer 280i) and all remaining measurements will be performed with appropriate enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits: ADMA (Sunred Biological Technology, Shanghai, China); hs-CRP (BoosterBio, Pleasanton, USA); VCAM-1; IL-1β; MMP-9; MMP-2 and TGFβ-1 (RayBiotech, Inc. Norcross, USA).
Left Ventricular Mass Assessment by CMR. The altered blood pressure phenotype that persists after CoA treatment represents an increase in afterload that leads to LV hypertrophy. Our CMR protocol will include sequences that allow this quantification.
Cardiovascular Health Assessment: The researchers will assess health factors (blood pressure, total cholesterol, plasma glucose), behaviors (smoking, body mass index BMI, physical activity and diet) and family history of cardiovascular disease and risk factors. A questionnaire was implemented to assess family history of CV disease and ICVH according to the procedures and recommendations of the American Heart Association.
Statistical Considerations. The treatment groups will be frequency-matched for documented confounders. The confounding variables will include: (a) Age at treatment; (b) Current age; (c) Bicuspid aortic valve as it is associated with impaired aortic elasticity. Because of the relatively large number of matching variables and three treatment groups, matching individual subjects was not feasible. During analysis, the treatment groups will be compared for each of these confounding variables and appropriate adjustments made, if needed. Differences in the confounding variables across the three treatment groups will be evaluated using Fisher's exact test for severity of coarctation and the Kruskal-Wallis test for age at treatment, current age and bicuspid aortic valve. The primary outcome variable will be carotid-femoral PWV assessed by tonometry. Differences in cfPVW across groups will be explored using one-way analysis of variance. If differences in matching variables are detected among the groups, adjustment will be made using analysis of covariance. Post-hoc analyses will be performed as necessary.
Sample size estimates were obtained based on prior data that show that ascending- descending PWV measured by CMR is 3.3±0.6 m/s in normal subjects and 4.7±1.1 m/sec after CoA surgery.22, 70 Sample size estimates for comparison of PVW between three equal sized treatment groups (assuming overall significance level=0.05 and power=0.8) are shown in table 2. The investigators plan on recruiting 24 to 30 patients in each group for a total sample size of 72 to 90.
- Conditions
- Aortic Coarctation, Arterial Stiffness, PULSE WAVE VELOCITY, Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vascular Endothelium
- Being tested
- Surgery, Balloon dilation, Stent
- Medical subject headings
- Aortic Coarctation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SurgeryProcedure or surgery
Primary end-to-end surgical treatment of coarctation of the aorta
Balloon dilationProcedure or surgery
Primary balloon dilation treatment of coarctation of the aorta
StentProcedure or surgery
Primary stent dilation treatment of coarctation of the aorta
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| surgery | Primary end-to-end surgical treatment of coarctation of the aorta Receives: Procedure: Surgery | |
| balloon dilation | Primary balloon dilation treatment of coarctation of the aorta Receives: Procedure: Balloon dilation | |
| stent | Primary stent dilation treatment of coarctation of the aorta Receives: Procedure: Stent |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Vascular function
Arterial stiffness assessed with carotid-femoral PWV measurements by tonometry
Measured: 6 months to 35 years after primary treatment
Secondary outcomes (10)
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance functional indexes
Ascending-descending aorta PWV and aorta strain, distensibility, compliance and aortic stiffness β index measured by CMR
Measured: 6 months to 35 years after primary treatment
Endothelial function
Endothelial function determined by endothelial pulse amplitude testing
Measured: 6 months to 35 years after primary treatment
Pulse wave form
Pulse wave form analysis using arterial tonometry
Measured: 6 months to 35 years after primary treatment
Blood pressure phenotype
Blood pressure phenotype at rest, during ambulatory measurement, and at peak exercise
Measured: 6 months to 35 years after primary treatment
Left ventricular mass
Left ventricular mass assessed by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
Measured: 6 months to 35 years after primary treatment
Left ventricular systolic function
Left ventricular systolic function assessed by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
Measured: 6 months to 35 years after primary treatment
Biomarkers of endothelial function
biomarkers of endothelial function (total oxides of nitrogen- NOx and ADMA),
Measured: 6 months to 35 years after primary treatment
Biomarkers of vascular inflammation
biomarkers of inflammation (hs-CRP).
Measured: 6 months to 35 years after primary treatment
Biomarkers of vascular wall function
biomarkers of vascular wall function (VCAM-1 and IL-1β)
Measured: 6 months to 35 years after primary treatment
Biomarkers of vascular remodeling
biomarkers of vascular remodeling (MMP-2; MMP-9 and TGF-beta1).
Measured: 6 months to 35 years after primary treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Aug 2017
- Study start1 Jun 2013
- Primary completion30 Sep 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (78)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Aortic CoarctationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Centro de Estudos de Doenças Crónicas, Baylor College of Medicine, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Nebraska, Boston Children's Hospital, Instituto Superior Técnico de Lisboa, Caselas, Ressonância Magnética, S.A.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- José D Martins, MD MSc, Principal investigator, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa CentralMiguel Mota Carmo, MD PhD, Study chair, Centro de Estudos de Doenças Crónicas da Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Universidade Nova de Lisboa
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03262753
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CHLC.CI.69.2012
- Acronym
- LOVE-COARCT
- Status last verified
- Aug 2017
- First submitted
- 8 Aug 2017
- Last updated
- 25 Aug 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Trends in infant mortality attributable to birth defects--United States, 1980-1995. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1998 Sep 25;47(37):773-8.
PubMed 9769135Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, Falkner BE, Graves J, Hill MN, Jones DW, Kurtz T, Sheps SG, Roccella EJ. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Circulation. 2005 Feb 8;111(5):697-716. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000154900.76284.F6.
PubMed 15699287Prakash A, Adlakha H, Rabideau N, Hass CJ, Morris SA, Geva T, Gauvreau K, Singh MN, Lacro RV. Segmental Aortic Stiffness in Children and Young Adults With Connective Tissue Disorders: Relationships With Age, Aortic Size, Rate of Dilation, and Surgical Root Replacement. Circulation. 2015 Aug 18;132(7):595-602. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014934. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
PubMed 26115544Takagi H, Manabe H, Kawai N, Goto SN, Umemoto T. Circulating matrix metalloproteinase-9 concentrations and abdominal aortic aneurysm presence: a meta-analysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009 Sep;9(3):437-40. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.208835. Epub 2009 Jun 12.
PubMed 19525292Barbaro NR, Fontana V, Modolo R, De Faria AP, Sabbatini AR, Fonseca FH, Anhe GF, Moreno H. Increased arterial stiffness in resistant hypertension is associated with inflammatory biomarkers. Blood Press. 2015 Feb;24(1):7-13. doi: 10.3109/08037051.2014.940710. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
PubMed 25061978Forbes TJ, Kim DW, Du W, Turner DR, Holzer R, Amin Z, Hijazi Z, Ghasemi A, Rome JJ, Nykanen D, Zahn E, Cowley C, Hoyer M, Waight D, Gruenstein D, Javois A, Foerster S, Kreutzer J, Sullivan N, Khan A, Owada C, Hagler D, Lim S, Canter J, Zellers T; CCISC Investigators. Comparison of surgical, stent, and balloon angioplasty treatment of native coarctation of the aorta: an observational study by the CCISC (Congenital Cardiovascular Interventional Study Consortium). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Dec 13;58(25):2664-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.053.
PubMed 22152954Brown ML, Burkhart HM, Connolly HM, Dearani JA, Cetta F, Li Z, Oliver WC, Warnes CA, Schaff HV. Coarctation of the aorta: lifelong surveillance is mandatory following surgical repair. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Sep 10;62(11):1020-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.06.016. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
PubMed 23850909Martins JD, De Sousa L, Matos P, Pinto FF. Percutaneous closure of a large coronary fistula. Rev Port Cardiol. 2009 Sep;28(9):1017-8. No abstract available.
PubMed 19998812Hager A, Kanz S, Kaemmerer H, Schreiber C, Hess J. Coarctation Long-term Assessment (COALA): significance of arterial hypertension in a cohort of 404 patients up to 27 years after surgical repair of isolated coarctation of the aorta, even in the absence of restenosis and prosthetic material. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Sep;134(3):738-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.04.027.
PubMed 17723827Bocelli A, Favilli S, Pollini I, Bini RM, Ballo P, Chiappa E, Zuppiroli A. Prevalence and long-term predictors of left ventricular hypertrophy, late hypertension, and hypertensive response to exercise after successful aortic coarctation repair. Pediatr Cardiol. 2013 Mar;34(3):620-9. doi: 10.1007/s00246-012-0508-0. Epub 2012 Sep 30.
PubMed 23052661Meyer AA, Joharchi MS, Kundt G, Schuff-Werner P, Steinhoff G, Kienast W. Predicting the risk of early atherosclerotic disease development in children after repair of aortic coarctation. Eur Heart J. 2005 Mar;26(6):617-22. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi037. Epub 2004 Dec 16.
PubMed 15618050Lam YY, Mullen MJ, Kaya MG, Gatzoulis MA, Li W, Henein MY. Left ventricular long axis dysfunction in adults with "corrected" aortic coarctation is related to an older age at intervention and increased aortic stiffness. Heart. 2009 May;95(9):733-9. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2008.158287. Epub 2008 Dec 18.
PubMed 19095712Shang Q, Sarikouch S, Patel S, Schuster A, Steinmetz M, Ou P, Danford DA, Beerbaum P, Kutty S. Assessment of ventriculo-vascular properties in repaired coarctation using cardiac magnetic resonance-derived aortic, left atrial and left ventricular strain. Eur Radiol. 2017 Jan;27(1):167-177. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4373-8. Epub 2016 May 23.
PubMed 27215582Mizia-Stec K, Trojnarska O, Szczepaniak-Chichel L, Gabriel M, Bartczak A, Cieplucha A, Chudek J, Grajek S, Tykarski A, Gasior Z. Asymmetric dimethylarginine and vascular indices of atherosclerosis in patients after coarctation of aorta repair. Int J Cardiol. 2012 Jul 26;158(3):364-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.01.037. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
PubMed 21334083Brili S, Tousoulis D, Antoniades C, Aggeli C, Roubelakis A, Papathanasiu S, Stefanadis C. Evidence of vascular dysfunction in young patients with successfully repaired coarctation of aorta. Atherosclerosis. 2005 Sep;182(1):97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.01.030. Epub 2005 Feb 24.
PubMed 16115479
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Aug 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- LOVE-COARCT Study: Long-term Outcomes and Vascular Evaluation After Coarctation of the Aorta Treatment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03262753
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LOVE-COARCT / CHLC.CI.69.2012
- Conditions
- Aortic Coarctation, Arterial Stiffness, PULSE WAVE VELOCITY, Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vascular Endothelium
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa CentralUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Centro de Estudos de Doenças Crónicas, Baylor College of Medicine, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Nebraska, Boston Children's Hospital, Instituto Superior Técnico de Lisboa, Caselas, Ressonância Magnética, S.A.
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background: Coarctation of the aorta (CoA) can be treated using surgery, balloon angioplasty or stent implantation. Although short-term results are excellent with all three treatment modalities, long term cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality remain high, likely due to persistently abnormal vascular function. The effects of treatment modality on long term vascular function remain uncharacterized. The goal of this study is to assess vascular function in this patient population for comparison among the treatment modalities. Methods: Vascular function in large and small arteries will be prospectively assessed fusing multiple non-invasive modalities, and the results will be compared among the three groups of CoA patients previously treated using surgery, balloon angioplasty or stent implantation after frequency matching for confounding variables. A comprehensive vascular function assessment protocol was created to be used in 7 centers. The primary outcome is arterial stiffness measured by arterial tonometry. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were carefully established after consideration of several potential confounders. Sample size was calculated for the primary outcome variable. Conclusions: Treatment modalities for CoA may have distinct impact on large and small arterial vascular function. The results of this study will help identify the treatment modality that is associated with the most optimal level of vascular function, which, in the long term may reduce CV risk.
Detailed description
Study overview. This cross-sectional prospective observational study of patients with CoA previously treated using one of three treatment modalities assesses if treatment type is associated with differences in vascular function. The three treatment groups will be frequency-matched for key confounding variables.
Study feasibility. The investigators assembled a multi-disciplinary team with proven expertise in epidemiology, clinical trial design, congenital heart disease, non-invasive imaging, interventional cardiology, vascular function assessment, preventive cardiology and statistical analysis. A multicenter design is used to ensure sufficient statistical power in evaluating the hypothesis.
Participating centers and study core laboratories. Patients are recruited at six large pediatric cardiac centers from Portugal and USA.
Screening procedures. The medical records of potentially eligible patients are screened by a local study investigator using a pre-specified screening form to ensure that they satisfy our selection criteria.
Overview of the study workflow. Study procedures will occur in a one- or two-day visit. Upon arrival for testing, formal consent for participation will be obtained. Assessment of arterial stiffness, endothelial function, and blood sampling for biomarkers will be done while fasting. Cardiopulmonary stress test will be performed on the same day. CMR and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABMP) will be arranged for the same or for the following day. When the study tests cannot be completed at the first visit, they will be completed within 3 months of the first visit. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board or Institutional Ethics Committee at each participating center, and informed consent and assent will be obtained, depending on age, from patients and their parents/legal guardians before trial enrollment.
Recruitment. A review of the patient database at each participating institution will be performed to assemble a cohort of patients with CoA who have previously undergone treatment with balloon dilation, surgery or stenting. Study data will be collected and managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools hosted at Boston Children's Hospital.
Data collection. A retrospective chart review will be performed to collect demographic and clinical data including severity of coarctation, type and details of CoA treatment and presence of associated conditions.
Diagnostic procedures.
Arterial Stiffness Plan \& Rationale:
Measurements: Carotid-femoral PWV (cfPWV) will be measured using applanation tonometry. Segmental PWV is measured using CMR. Segmental measures of arterial distensibility will be measured using CMR. Other parameters that describe arterial stiffness reflect the relationship of arterial change in diameter to change in pressure and include aortic strain (relative change in diameter), compliance (absolute change in diameter in response to a change in pressure), distensibility (relative change in diameter in response to a change in pressure), and the aortic stiffness β index (distensibility using the logarithmic conversion of the relative pressure). Applanation tonometry, which uses a probe or tonometer to record the pulse wave with a transducer, is the most widely accepted method for estimating PWV and both the NIHem (Cardiovascular Engineering, Inc., Norwood, MA USA) and the SphygmoCor (AtCor Medical, West Ryde, NSW, Australia) devices have been validated in large cohort trials. Both devices will be used, based on local availability.
Endothelial Function Measurements: Endothelium-dependent reactive hyperaemia index and augmentation index will be measured using the EndoPAT 2000 system (Itamar Medical, Caesarea, Israel). The protocol includes measures to minimize the influence of the autonomic nervous system.
Pulse Waveform Analysis: Central aortic pressure and pulse pressure will be measured using applanation tonometry). Augmentation index will be measured using applanation tonometry and Endo-PAT. CAP, PP and AIx can be measured non-invasively using radial or carotid applanation tonometry (and Endo-PAT for AIx), calibrated by the peripheral diastolic and mean arterial pressure. Both the NIHem system and the SphygmoCor device were used.
Blood Pressure Phenotype will be measured using conventional standard techniques including auscultatory right arm BP measurement, measurement of BP gradient between arm and leg, BP response during treadmill exercise stress testing (ET) and ABPM. Based on the auscultatory BP and ABPM results, the appropriate children and adult guidelines will be used to classify patients. Patients currently on antihypertensive medication will be classified as hypertensive.
Biomarkers: The researchers will measure biomarkers of endothelial function (total oxides of nitrogen- NOx and ADMA), inflammation (hs-CRP), vascular wall function (VCAM-1 and IL-1β) and vascular remodeling (MMP-2; MMP-9 and TGF-beta1). NOx will be determined by chemiluminescence (Sievers NOAnalyzer 280i) and all remaining measurements will be performed with appropriate enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits: ADMA (Sunred Biological Technology, Shanghai, China); hs-CRP (BoosterBio, Pleasanton, USA); VCAM-1; IL-1β; MMP-9; MMP-2 and TGFβ-1 (RayBiotech, Inc. Norcross, USA).
Left Ventricular Mass Assessment by CMR. The altered blood pressure phenotype that persists after CoA treatment represents an increase in afterload that leads to LV hypertrophy. Our CMR protocol will include sequences that allow this quantification.
Cardiovascular Health Assessment: The researchers will assess health factors (blood pressure, total cholesterol, plasma glucose), behaviors (smoking, body mass index BMI, physical activity and diet) and family history of cardiovascular disease and risk factors. A questionnaire was implemented to assess family history of CV disease and ICVH according to the procedures and recommendations of the American Heart Association.
Statistical Considerations. The treatment groups will be frequency-matched for documented confounders. The confounding variables will include: (a) Age at treatment; (b) Current age; (c) Bicuspid aortic valve as it is associated with impaired aortic elasticity. Because of the relatively large number of matching variables and three treatment groups, matching individual subjects was not feasible. During analysis, the treatment groups will be compared for each of these confounding variables and appropriate adjustments made, if needed. Differences in the confounding variables across the three treatment groups will be evaluated using Fisher's exact test for severity of coarctation and the Kruskal-Wallis test for age at treatment, current age and bicuspid aortic valve. The primary outcome variable will be carotid-femoral PWV assessed by tonometry. Differences in cfPVW across groups will be explored using one-way analysis of variance. If differences in matching variables are detected among the groups, adjustment will be made using analysis of covariance. Post-hoc analyses will be performed as necessary.
Sample size estimates were obtained based on prior data that show that ascending- descending PWV measured by CMR is 3.3±0.6 m/s in normal subjects and 4.7±1.1 m/sec after CoA surgery.22, 70 Sample size estimates for comparison of PVW between three equal sized treatment groups (assuming overall significance level=0.05 and power=0.8) are shown in table 2. The investigators plan on recruiting 24 to 30 patients in each group for a total sample size of 72 to 90.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| surgery | – | Procedure: SurgeryPrimary end-to-end surgical treatment of coarctation of the aorta |
| balloon dilation | – | Procedure: Balloon dilationPrimary balloon dilation treatment of coarctation of the aorta |
| stent | – | Procedure: StentPrimary stent dilation treatment of coarctation of the aorta |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 8 to 35 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
- Study population
- Patients with isthmic coarctation of the aorta, treated after 1994, submitted to only one of either of the three procedures described above.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Diagnosis of isthmic coarctation of the aorta;
- Current age between 8 (to allow cooperation with study procedures) and 35 years (to avoid confounding by aging-related vascular dysfunction); and
- Treatment for CoA after 1994, after which all three modalities were in clinical use.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Residual CoA defined by a systolic upper-to-lower extremity BP gradient> 20mmHg;
- Co-morbidities that may independently affect vascular function, including associated significant congenital heart disease, history of known vasculopathy, genetic syndromes or other cardiovascular risk factors;
- History of two treatment types for CoA; and
- CoA types likely representing a different entity or patients amenable to one single treatment type (surgery), including atypical CoA site (such as mid-thoracic or abdominal), severe hypoplasia of the aortic arch, and an age of treatment <1 year of age.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SurgeryPrimary end-to-end surgical treatment of coarctation of the aorta | Procedure or surgery | surgery |
| Balloon dilationPrimary balloon dilation treatment of coarctation of the aorta | Procedure or surgery | balloon dilation |
| StentPrimary stent dilation treatment of coarctation of the aorta | Procedure or surgery | stent |
Primary outcome
Vascular function
Time frame: 6 months to 35 years after primary treatment
Arterial stiffness assessed with carotid-femoral PWV measurements by tonometry
10 secondary outcomes
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance functional indexes
Time frame: 6 months to 35 years after primary treatment
Endothelial function
Time frame: 6 months to 35 years after primary treatment
Pulse wave form
Time frame: 6 months to 35 years after primary treatment
Blood pressure phenotype
Time frame: 6 months to 35 years after primary treatment
Left ventricular mass
Time frame: 6 months to 35 years after primary treatment
Left ventricular systolic function
Time frame: 6 months to 35 years after primary treatment
Biomarkers of endothelial function
Time frame: 6 months to 35 years after primary treatment
Biomarkers of vascular inflammation
Time frame: 6 months to 35 years after primary treatment
Biomarkers of vascular wall function
Time frame: 6 months to 35 years after primary treatment
Biomarkers of vascular remodeling
Time frame: 6 months to 35 years after primary treatment
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Aug 2017.
- Background: PubMed 9769135Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Trends in infant mortality attributable to birth defects--United States, 1980-1995. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1998 Sep 25;47(37):773-8.
- Background: PubMed 15699287Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, Falkner BE, Graves J, Hill MN, Jones DW, Kurtz T, Sheps SG, Roccella EJ. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Circulation. 2005 Feb 8;111(5):697-716. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000154900.76284.F6.
- Background: PubMed 26115544Prakash A, Adlakha H, Rabideau N, Hass CJ, Morris SA, Geva T, Gauvreau K, Singh MN, Lacro RV. Segmental Aortic Stiffness in Children and Young Adults With Connective Tissue Disorders: Relationships With Age, Aortic Size, Rate of Dilation, and Surgical Root Replacement. Circulation. 2015 Aug 18;132(7):595-602. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014934. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
- Background: PubMed 19525292Takagi H, Manabe H, Kawai N, Goto SN, Umemoto T. Circulating matrix metalloproteinase-9 concentrations and abdominal aortic aneurysm presence: a meta-analysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009 Sep;9(3):437-40. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.208835. Epub 2009 Jun 12.
- Background: PubMed 25061978Barbaro NR, Fontana V, Modolo R, De Faria AP, Sabbatini AR, Fonseca FH, Anhe GF, Moreno H. Increased arterial stiffness in resistant hypertension is associated with inflammatory biomarkers. Blood Press. 2015 Feb;24(1):7-13. doi: 10.3109/08037051.2014.940710. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
- Background: PubMed 22152954Forbes TJ, Kim DW, Du W, Turner DR, Holzer R, Amin Z, Hijazi Z, Ghasemi A, Rome JJ, Nykanen D, Zahn E, Cowley C, Hoyer M, Waight D, Gruenstein D, Javois A, Foerster S, Kreutzer J, Sullivan N, Khan A, Owada C, Hagler D, Lim S, Canter J, Zellers T; CCISC Investigators. Comparison of surgical, stent, and balloon angioplasty treatment of native coarctation of the aorta: an observational study by the CCISC (Congenital Cardiovascular Interventional Study Consortium). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Dec 13;58(25):2664-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.053.
- Background: PubMed 23850909Brown ML, Burkhart HM, Connolly HM, Dearani JA, Cetta F, Li Z, Oliver WC, Warnes CA, Schaff HV. Coarctation of the aorta: lifelong surveillance is mandatory following surgical repair. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Sep 10;62(11):1020-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.06.016. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
- Background: PubMed 19998812Martins JD, De Sousa L, Matos P, Pinto FF. Percutaneous closure of a large coronary fistula. Rev Port Cardiol. 2009 Sep;28(9):1017-8. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 17723827Hager A, Kanz S, Kaemmerer H, Schreiber C, Hess J. Coarctation Long-term Assessment (COALA): significance of arterial hypertension in a cohort of 404 patients up to 27 years after surgical repair of isolated coarctation of the aorta, even in the absence of restenosis and prosthetic material. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Sep;134(3):738-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.04.027.
- Background: PubMed 23052661Bocelli A, Favilli S, Pollini I, Bini RM, Ballo P, Chiappa E, Zuppiroli A. Prevalence and long-term predictors of left ventricular hypertrophy, late hypertension, and hypertensive response to exercise after successful aortic coarctation repair. Pediatr Cardiol. 2013 Mar;34(3):620-9. doi: 10.1007/s00246-012-0508-0. Epub 2012 Sep 30.
- Background: PubMed 15618050Meyer AA, Joharchi MS, Kundt G, Schuff-Werner P, Steinhoff G, Kienast W. Predicting the risk of early atherosclerotic disease development in children after repair of aortic coarctation. Eur Heart J. 2005 Mar;26(6):617-22. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi037. Epub 2004 Dec 16.
- Background: PubMed 19095712Lam YY, Mullen MJ, Kaya MG, Gatzoulis MA, Li W, Henein MY. Left ventricular long axis dysfunction in adults with "corrected" aortic coarctation is related to an older age at intervention and increased aortic stiffness. Heart. 2009 May;95(9):733-9. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2008.158287. Epub 2008 Dec 18.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Aortic Coarctation
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Angiotensin-II Receptor Blocker on Cardiovascular Remodeling (VALUE Trial)
Coarctation of Aorta, High Blood Pressure
Enrolling by invitation
Effects of Exercise in Patients With Repaired Coarctation of the Aorta
Coarctation of the Aorta, Coarctation of Aorta
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
The Arch Watch Study: An Integrated Evaluation of Hemodynamics in Infants With Suspected Coarctation of the Aorta
Coarctation of the Aorta, Aortic Arch Obstruction
RecruitingObservational study
Valvular Aortic Stenosis Prognosis Study
Morality
Not yet recruiting
First-in-human Clinical Trial to Assess Safety and Efficacy of the CardiaZn Bioresorbable Stent in Children With Pulmonary Artery Stenosis and Aortic Coarctation
Aortic Coarctation, Pulmonary Artery Stenosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Centro de Investigação Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central contact
José D Martins, MD MSc principal investigator
Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central
Miguel Mota Carmo, MD PhD study chair
Centro de Estudos de Doenças Crónicas da Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Universidade Nova de Lisboa
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Aortic Coarctation and Arterial Stiffness, run by Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central at 1 site in Portugal.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Portugal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact José D Martins, MD, MSc (+351918338690, jose.martins@chlc.min-saude.pt), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Vascular function (time frame: 6 months to 35 years after primary treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03262753, which also lists 78 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Aug 2017.