AzTrials
AzTrials

Social PerceptionEarly Phase 1NCT02238379

Intranasal Oxytocin Administration and the Neural Correlates of Social and Non-Social Visual Perception

A Early Phase 1 study testing Oxytocin in people with Social Perception, run by Yale University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this study is to investigate the effects of oxytocin on social behavior and brain activity using EEG and the event-related potential (ERP) technique. The value of EEG is its high temporal specificity, enabling precision in the timing of social behavior to be addressed. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 64 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Social Perception
What is being tested?
Oxytocin
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
26 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Sep 2014to Dec 2015
Phase
Early Phase 1
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 64 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adults ages 18-64
  • Good medical health
  • Ability to understand and speak English

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy
  • Medical Illnesses: Moderate or severe acute or chronic medical illnesses (e.g. cardiac disease, diabetes, epilepsy, influenza).
  • Cardiovascular risk factors: History of hypertension with baseline blood pressure above 140 mm Hg (systolic) over 90 mm Hg (diastolic). Also any history of syncope and/or baseline blood pressure below 100 mm Hg (systolic).
  • CNS disease: Known history of brain abnormalities (e.g., neoplasms, subarachnoid cysts), cerebrovascular disease, infectious disease (e.g., abscess), other central nervous system disease, or history of head trauma which resulted in a persistent neurologic deficit or loss of consciousness > 3 minutes.
  • Medication status: Individuals on stable doses of a neuroleptic and/or an antidepressant medication for at least the past 6 weeks will be allowed to participate in this study. The use of other psychotropic medications will not be allowed. Females taking contraceptive hormones will not be able to participate in the study.
  • A history of seizures or current use of anticonvulsants; history of head injury with loss of consciousness

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Yale Child Study Center

    New Haven, Connecticut, 06520

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Oxytocin Pilot: Oxytocin and Face Perception

The objective of this study is to investigate the effects of oxytocin on social behavior and brain activity using EEG and the event-related potential (ERP) technique. The value of EEG is its high temporal specificity, enabling precision in the timing of social behavior to be addressed. In order to elicit social responses in the human brain, a variety of social and emotional visual stimuli will be presented during EEG recording, namely infant and adult faces and houses. Brain responses after intranasal oxytocin will then be compared with placebo, to examine the effect of intranasal oxytocin on central nervous system activity. We hypothesize that intranasal oxytocin will enhance the neural response to social stimuli (infant and adult faces) but not to non-social stimuli (houses).

Being tested
Oxytocin, Placebo
Keywords
Intranasal oxytocin, Social perception, EEG/ERP

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • OxytocinDrug

    Also called Pitocin

    24 International Units of Oxytocin in a Nasal Spray

  • PlaceboOther

    Placebo will contain all ingredients except the active oxytocin in the Nasal Spray.

Study groups in NCT02238379
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
OxytocinExperimentalEach participant will receive both the oxytocin nasal spray in one visit AND the placebo nasal spray in another visit (randomized) in this design.
Receives: Drug: Oxytocin
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorEach participant will receive both the oxytocin nasal spray in one visit AND the placebo nasal spray in another visit (randomized) in this design.
Receives: Other: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Amplitude Social

    The investigators will analyze the amplitude (i.e., size) of visually elicited event-related potential (ERP) components to the social stimuli (infant and adult faces). This assessment will be completed after administration of the intervention (oxytocin) and the placebo to compare the neural response. The investigators hypothesize that the intervention will modulate the amplitude of the neural response to social stimuli given its previously identified role in social interactions, most likely increasing the size of the ERPs.

    Measured: Duration of 30 minutes

  2. Amplitude Non-Social

    The investigators analyze the amplitude (i.e., size) of visually elicited event-related potential (ERP) components to the non-social stimuli (houses). This assessment will be completed after administration of the intervention (oxytocin) and the placebo to compare the neural response. The investigators hypothesize that there will be no difference between the intervention and placebo during the non-social condition on the amplitude of the ERPs.

    Measured: Duration of 30 minutes

  3. Latency Social

    The investigators analyze the latency (i.e., efficiency of processing) of visually elicited ERP components to the social stimuli (infant and adult faces). This assessment will be completed after administration of the intervention (oxytocin) and the placebo to compare the neural response. The investigators hypothesize that there will be more efficient processing (i.e., earlier latency) of ERPs during the social condition following administration of the intervention relative to the placebo condition.

    Measured: Duration of 30 minutes

  4. Latency Non-Social

    The investigators will analyze the latency (i.e., efficiency of processing) of visually elicited ERP components to the non-social stimuli (houses). This assessment will be completed after administration of the intervention (oxytocin) and the placebo to compare the neural response. The investigators hypothesize that there will be no difference between the intervention and placebo on ERP latency measures in the non-social condition.

    Measured: Duration of 30 minutes

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Depression

    The investigators will assess depression by employing the Beck Depression Inventory (Beck et al., 1961). Specifically addressing whether the level of depression symptomatology in participants and whether this is associated with the neural correlates of social and non-social perception during both intervention and placebo visits. It is not yet known the extent to which variation in depression symptoms are associated with this methodology, although prior research has suggested depression modulates the neural response to social cues. This measure includes a question regarding suicidal ideation and therefore it is acknowledged there may be a safety issue in response to the questionnaire. Scores range from 0-63, with higher scores indicating greater levels of depression (scores 29+ indicates severe depression).

    Measured: Within 20 minutes of study visit commencing

  2. Smoking

    Participants will complete a CO breathalyzer and the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (Heatherton, Kozlowski, Frecker, \& Fagerstrom, 1991) to assess smoking behavior. These measures are included to characterize the sample in respect of substance use.

    Measured: Within 30 minutes of study visit commencing

  3. Anxiety

    The investigators will assess anxiety using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Spielberger et al., 1970). Specifically, it will be explored whether participant anxiety symptoms are associated with the neural correlates of social and non-social perception during both intervention and placebo visits. It is not yet known the extent to which variation in anxiety symptoms are associated with this methodology, although prior research has suggested anxiety modulates the neural response to social cues. Scores range from 20-80 and a higher score on both state and trait measures indicate higher levels of anxiety. A potential clinical cut off has been proposed for participants scoring over 39-40 as being high anxious.

    Measured: Within 20 minutes of study visit commencing

  4. Stress

    The investigators will measure current levels of stress by using the Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen et al., 1983). It is not yet known the extent to which variation in perceived stress is associated with this methodology, but it is anticipated stress will be associated with levels of depression and anxiety in the sample. The PSS consists of 14 items, with scores ranging from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating higher levels of perceived stress. A score of 21+ is considered to indicate that participants have higher than average stress.

    Measured: Within 20 minutes of study visit commencing

  5. Early Experience

    The investigators will employ the Parental Bonding Instrument (Parker, Tupling, \& Brown, 1979) to assess the early relationship experiences participants have with their caregivers. Existing research employing intranasal oxytocin suggests that the quality of early relationships may impact the strength of any modulation of brain or behavior by oxytocin administration and therefore this variable will be included in the analyses in support of this hypothesis. There are 12 items that capture parental care and 13 items that capture parental overprotection. Items are scored on a 4-point likert scale from "very like" to "very unlike". The PBI is typically scored by identifying optimal (High Care Scores, Low Protection Scores) and less optimal (Low Care Scores, Low Protection Scores) scores on the mother and father subscales (NB: protection refers to overprotection). For the care items, scores can range from 0 to 36; for overprotection items, scores can range from 0 to 39.

    Measured: Within 20 minutes of study visit commencing

  6. Number of Participants Endorsing Substance Use

    The investigators will employ the ASI Lite (McLellan, Luborsky, Woody, \& O'Brien, 1980) to assess for current substance use. This measure is included to characterize the sample in respect of substance use; however the ASI Lite did not provide a measure of substance dependance and therefore we report the data from the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview substance dependance module (Sheehan et al., 1998) to provide a specific indication of the presence of absence of substance dependance.

    Measured: Within 30 minutes of study visit commencing

  7. Number of Participants Testing Positive for Alcohol Use Following a Breathalyzer

    Participants will complete an alcohol breathalyzer to characterize the alcohol use status of the sample.

    Measured: Within 30 minutes of study visit commencing

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Sep 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2014
  3. Primary completionDec 2015
  4. Study completionDec 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
26 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02238379
Sponsor's protocol ID
1309012677
Status last verified
Jan 2018
First submitted
4 Sep 2014
Last updated
17 Jan 2018

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Early Phase 1 study testing Oxytocin in people with Social Perception, run by Yale University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 May 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Amplitude Social (time frame: Duration of 30 minutes). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jan 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in