AzTrials
AzTrials

EndometriosisPhase 3NCT02143713

Global Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Elagolix in Women With Moderate to Severe Endometriosis-associated Pain

A Phase 3 study testing Elagolix in people with Endometriosis, run by AbbVie.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A randomized study evaluating the continued safety and efficacy of elagolix in the management of moderate to severe endometriosis associated pain in adult pre-menopausal women who completed 6 months treatment in pivotal Study M12-671 (NCT01931670). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Endometriosis
What is being tested?
Elagolix
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
496 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
27 May 2014to 23 May 2017
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subject has completed the 6-Month Treatment Period in pivotal study M12-671.
  • Agrees to use required birth control methods during the study through Month 6 of the Post-treatment Follow-up period

Who cannot join

  • Clinically significant gynecological condition
  • Bone mineral density (BMD) loss greater than or equal to 8 percent in the spine, femoral neck or total hip
  • Plans to become pregnant in the next 18 months

About this study

Official title: Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Elagolix in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Endometriosis-Associated Pain

A randomized study evaluating the continued safety and efficacy of elagolix in the management of moderate to severe endometriosis associated pain in adult pre-menopausal women who completed 6 months treatment in pivotal Study M12-671 (NCT01931670).

Read the detailed description

The study consists of 2 periods: a 6 month Treatment Period and a post treatment follow-up period of up to 12 months.

Participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study who met all entry criteria continued to receive the same dose, either elagolix 150 mg once daily (QD) or elagolix 200 mg twice daily (BID) for up to an additional 6 months in this extension study; participants who received placebo in the pivotal study were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either elagolix 150 mg QD or elagolix 200 mg BID for up to 6 months.

An electronic diary will be used to collect endometriosis-associated pain, uterine bleeding, and analgesic medication use for endometriosis associated pain on a daily basis.

Conditions
Endometriosis
Being tested
Elagolix
Keywords
Endometriosis-associated pain, Elagolix, Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Antagonist, Dysmenorrhea (DYS), Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain (NMPP), Dyspareunia
Medical subject headings
Endometriosis, Dysmenorrhea, Dyspareunia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ElagolixDrug

    Also called Orilissa™

    Elagolix tablets administered orally

Study groups in NCT02143713
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Elagolix 150 mg QDExperimentalParticipants received elagolix 150 mg tablets once a day (QD) for 6 months.
Receives: Drug: Elagolix
Elagolix 200 mg BIDExperimentalParticipants received elagolix 200 mg tablets twice a day (BID) for 6 months.
Receives: Drug: Elagolix

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With a Response for Dysmenorrhea at Month 6 Based on Daily Assessment

    Response was defined as a reduction of -0.85 or more from baseline in dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) as well as no increase in rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain (defined as a < 15% increase in average rescue analgesic pill count and no additional analgesic). The response threshold represents a clinically meaningful response that was determined in pivotal Study M12-671.

    Participants recorded rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain daily and dysmenorrhea and its impact on daily activities each day of their period in an electronic diary (e-Diary). Dysmenorrhea was assessed according to the following:

    • 0: No discomfort
    • 1: Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do
    • 2: Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do
    • 3: Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do.

    Analgesic use and pain scores were averaged over the 35 days prior to each visit.

    Measured: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and Month 6

  2. Percentage of Participants With a Response for Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain at Month 6 Based on Daily Assessment

    Response was defined as a reduction of -0.43 or greater from baseline for non-menstrual pelvic pain as well as no increase in rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain (defined as a < 15% increase in average pill count of rescue analgesics and no additional analgesics). The response threshold represents a clinically meaningful response that was determined in pivotal Study M12-671.

    Participants recorded rescue analgesic medication for endometriosis-associated pain and assessed non-menstrual pelvic pain and its impact on their daily activities each day in an e-Diary according to the following response options:

    • 0: No discomfort
    • 1: Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do
    • 2: Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do
    • 3: Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do.

    Pain scores and analgesic use were averaged over the 35 days prior to each visit.

    Measured: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and Month 6

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. Percentage of Participants With a Response for Dysmenorrhea at Each Month Based on Daily Assessment

    Response was defined as a reduction of -0.85 or more from baseline in dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) as well as no increase in rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain (defined as a < 15% increase in average rescue analgesic pill count and no additional analgesic). The response threshold represents a clinically meaningful response that was determined in pivotal Study M12-671.

    Participants recorded rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain daily and dysmenorrhea and its impact on daily activities each day of their period in an electronic diary (e-Diary). Dysmenorrhea was assessed according to the following:

    • 0: No discomfort
    • 1: Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do
    • 2: Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do
    • 3: Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do.

    Analgesic use and pain scores were averaged over the 35 days prior to each visit.

    Measured: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5

  2. Percentage of Participants With a Response for Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain at Each Month Based on Daily Assessment

    Response was defined as a reduction of -0.43 or greater from baseline for non-menstrual pelvic pain as well as no increase in rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain (defined as a < 15% increase in average pill count of rescue analgesics and no additional analgesics). The response threshold represents a clinically meaningful response that was determined in pivotal Study M12-671.

    Participants recorded rescue analgesic medication for endometriosis-associated pain and assessed non-menstrual pelvic pain and its impact on their daily activities each day in an e-Diary according to the following response options:

    • 0: No discomfort
    • 1: Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do
    • 2: Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do
    • 3: Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do.

    Pain scores and analgesic use were averaged over the 35 days prior to each visit.

    Measured: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5

  3. Percentage of Participants With a Response for Dyspareunia at Each Month Based on Daily Assessment

    Response was defined as a reduction of -0.29 or more from baseline in dyspareunia (pain during sexual intercourse) as well as no increase in rescue analgesic use for endometriosis-associated pain (defined as a < 15% increase in average rescue analgesic pill count and no additional analgesics).

    Participants recorded rescue analgesic medication for endometriosis-associated pain and assessed dyspareunia each day in an e-Diary. Dyspareunia was assessed according to the following:

    • 0: None; No discomfort during sexual intercourse
    • 1: Mild; Able to tolerate the discomfort during sexual intercourse
    • 2: Moderate; Intercourse was interrupted due to pain
    • 3: Severe; Avoided intercourse because of pain
    • Not applicable; I was not sexually active for reasons other than endometriosis or did not have sexual intercourse.

    Pain scores and analgesic use were averaged over the 35 days prior to each visit. Responses of "Not Applicable" were excluded.

    Measured: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6

  4. Percent Change From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Based on Daily Assessment

    Participants assessed dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) and its impact on their daily activities each day of their period in an e-Diary according to the following response options:

    • 0: No discomfort
    • 1: Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do
    • 2: Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do
    • 3: Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do.

    Pain scores were averaged over the 35 days prior to each visit.

    Measured: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6

  5. Percent Change From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Based on Daily Assessment

    Participants assessed non-menstrual pelvic pain and its impact on their daily activities each day in an e-Diary according to the following response options:

    • 0: No discomfort
    • 1: Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do
    • 2: Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do
    • 3: Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do.

    Pain scores were averaged over the 35 days prior to each visit.

    Measured: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6

  6. Percent Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Based on Daily Assessment

    Participants assessed dyspareunia each day in an e-Diary according to the following response options:

    • 0: None; No discomfort during sexual intercourse
    • 1: Mild; Able to tolerate the discomfort during sexual intercourse
    • 2: Moderate; Intercourse was interrupted due to pain
    • 3: Severe; Avoided intercourse because of pain
    • Not applicable; I was not sexually active for reasons other than endometriosis or did not have sexual intercourse.

    Pain scores were averaged over the 35 days prior to each visit. Responses of "Not Applicable" were excluded.

    Measured: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6

  7. Change From Baseline in Any Rescue Analgesic Use

    Permitted rescue analgesics varied by country and were limited to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) (naproxen 500 mg), or opioid analgesics (hydrocodone 5 mg + acetaminophen 300 mg or 325 mg, or codeine 30 mg + acetaminophen 300 mg, or codeine 30 mg, or tramadol 37.5 mg + acetaminophen 325 mg). Use of rescue analgesic medications taken for endometriosis-associated pain was recorded by the participant daily in the e-Diary as the total number of pills/tablets of each type taken within a 24-hour period. Any rescue analgesic use (NSAID and/or opioid) was calculated as the total number of pills divided by the number of days in the window (i.e. average daily pill count) over the 35-day window prior to and including the reference study day.

    Measured: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6

  8. Change From Baseline in NSAID Rescue Analgesic Use

    Permitted rescue analgesics varied by country and were limited to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) (naproxen 500 mg), or opioid analgesics (hydrocodone 5 mg + acetaminophen 300 mg or 325 mg, or codeine 30 mg + acetaminophen 300 mg, or codeine 30 mg, or tramadol 37.5 mg + acetaminophen 325 mg). Use of rescue analgesic medications taken for endometriosis-associated pain was recorded by the participant daily in the e-Diary as the total number of pills/tablets of each type taken within a 24-hour period. NSAID rescue analgesic use was calculated as the total number of NSAID pills divided by the number of days in the window (i.e. average daily pill count) over the 35-day window prior to and including the reference study day.

    Measured: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6

  9. Change From Baseline in Opioid Rescue Analgesic Use

    Permitted rescue analgesics varied by country and were limited to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) (naproxen 500 mg), or opioid analgesics (hydrocodone 5 mg + acetaminophen 300 mg or 325 mg, or codeine 30 mg + acetaminophen 300 mg, or codeine 30 mg, or tramadol 37.5 mg + acetaminophen 325 mg). Use of rescue analgesic medications taken for endometriosis-associated pain was recorded by the participant daily in the e-Diary as the total number of pills/tablets of each type taken within a 24-hour period. Opioid rescue analgesic use was calculated as the total number of opioid pills divided by the number of days in the window (i.e. average daily pill count) over the 35-day window prior to and including the reference study day.

    Measured: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6

  10. Percent Change From Baseline in Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Assessed With Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    The NRS measured endometriosis-associated pain with and without menstruation on an 11-point scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain ever. Participants were asked to assess their endometriosis pain over the past 24 hours at it's worst at approximately the same time every day in the e-Diary. Pain scores were averaged over the 35 days prior to each visit.

    Measured: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6

  11. Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved

    The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a questionnaire-based assessment of the change in endometriosis pain since the initiation of study drug. The participant was asked to select from one of seven response categories:

    1. Very Much Improved
    2. Much Improved
    3. Minimally Improved
    4. Not Changed
    5. Minimally Worse
    6. Much Worse
    7. Very Much Worse

    Measured: Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6

  12. Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Pain Dimension

    The EHP-30 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-30 consists of two parts: a core questionnaire containing 5 scales that are applicable to all women with endometriosis and includes pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image, and a modular part containing 6 scales which do not necessarily apply to all women with endometriosis.

    Each question in the core questionnaire is scored on the following scale: 0 = Never, 1 = Rarely, 2 = Sometimes, 3 = Often, 4 = Always.

    The pain dimension consists of 11 questions. The dimension score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 = best possible health status as measured by the questionnaire; 100 = worst possible health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 3, and 6

  13. Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Sexual Intercourse Dimension

    The EHP-30 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-30 consists of two parts: a core questionnaire containing 5 scales that are applicable to all women with endometriosis and a modular part containing 6 scales which do not necessarily apply to all women with endometriosis; only 1 modular questionnaire (sexual intercourse [5 items]) was used in this study.

    The Sexual Intercourse dimension consists of 5 questions, each answered on the following scale: 0 = Never, 1 = Rarely, 2 = Sometimes, 3 = Often, 4 = Always, or Not Applicable (not scored). The dimension score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 = best possible health status as measured by the questionnaire; 100 = worst possible health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and months 1, 3, and 6

  14. Change From Baseline in Health-Related Productivity Questionnaire (HRPQ): Hours of Work Lost in Workplace and Household

    The HRPQ consists of 9 questions measuring the impact of endometriosis-associated pain and its treatment on work productivity and daily activities in the home.

    Absenteeism: Number of hours of intended work lost due to illness or treatment. Presenteeism: Number of hours of work where output was impacted by illness or treatments.

    Total hours lost is the sum of hours missed due to absenteeism plus presenteeism.

    Measured: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and Month 6

  15. Number of Participants With Non-study Health Visits During the Treatment Period

    The Health Resource Use Questionnaire (HRUQ) was used to collect information on non-study-related health visits that participants had during the study.

    Measured: 6 months

  16. Number of Days in Hospital During the Treatment Period

    The Health Resource Use Questionnaire (HRUQ) was used to collect information on non-study-related health visits that participants had during the study, including physician visits, hospitalizations and types of procedures received.

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 May 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start27 May 2014
  3. Primary completion22 Jun 2016
  4. Study completion23 May 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
496 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02143713
Sponsor's protocol ID
M12-821
Other IDs
2013-001047-31
Status last verified
Jul 2021
First submitted
19 May 2014
Last updated
13 Jul 2021
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Surrey E, Taylor HS, Giudice L, Lessey BA, Abrao MS, Archer DF, Diamond MP, Johnson NP, Watts NB, Gallagher JC, Simon JA, Carr BR, Dmowski WP, Leyland N, Singh SS, Rechberger T, Agarwal SK, Duan WR, Schwefel B, Thomas JW, Peloso PM, Ng J, Soliman AM, Chwalisz K. Long-Term Outcomes of Elagolix in Women With Endometriosis: Results From Two Extension Studies. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;132(1):147-160. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002675.

    PubMed 29889764
  • Beck D, Winzenborg I, Liu M, Degner J, Mostafa NM, Noertersheuser P, Shebley M. Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Combination with Low-Dose Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate in Women with Uterine Fibroids. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2022 Apr;61(4):577-587. doi: 10.1007/s40262-021-01096-w. Epub 2021 Dec 8.

    PubMed 34878624
  • Stodtmann S, Nader A, Polepally AR, Suleiman AA, Winzenborg I, Noertersheuser P, Ng J, Mostafa NM, Shebley M. Validation of a quantitative systems pharmacology model of calcium homeostasis using elagolix Phase 3 clinical trial data in women with endometriosis. Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jul;14(4):1611-1619. doi: 10.1111/cts.13040. Epub 2021 May 7.

    PubMed 33963686
  • Abbas Suleiman A, Nader A, Winzenborg I, Beck D, Polepally AR, Ng J, Noertersheuser P, Mostafa NM. Exposure-Safety Analyses Identify Predictors of Change in Bone Mineral Density and Support Elagolix Labeling for Endometriosis-Associated Pain. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2020 Nov;9(11):639-648. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12560. Epub 2020 Oct 8.

    PubMed 32945631
  • Winzenborg I, Polepally AR, Nader A, Mostafa NM, Noertersheuser P, Ng J. Effect of Elagolix Exposure on Clinical Efficacy End Points in Phase III Trials in Women With Endometriosis-Associated Pain: An Application of Markov Model. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2020 Aug;9(8):466-475. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12545. Epub 2020 Jul 31.

    PubMed 32621325
  • Winzenborg I, Nader A, Polepally AR, Liu M, Degner J, Klein CE, Mostafa NM, Noertersheuser P, Ng J. Population Pharmacokinetics of Elagolix in Healthy Women and Women with Endometriosis. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018 Oct;57(10):1295-1306. doi: 10.1007/s40262-018-0629-6.

    PubMed 29476499

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Elagolix in people with Endometriosis, run by AbbVie.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 Sep 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants With a Response for Dysmenorrhea at Month 6 Based on Daily Assessment (time frame: Baseline (defined as baseline of Study M12-671 for participants who received elagolix in the pivotal study and baseline of the extension study M12-821 for participants who received placebo in the pivotal study) and Month 6). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02143713, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jul 2021.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in