Colorectal Peritoneal CarcinomatosisPhase 3NCT01524094
Cytoreduction and Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Versus Systemic Chemotherapy in Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
A Phase 3 study testing Systemic chemotherapy alone (oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, isovorin) and Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, isovorin) in people with Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, run by Uppsala University at 1 site in Sweden.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to see if there is a difference in survival between two different treatment strategies for colorectal peritoneal surface disease. The control arm administered the currently considered standard treatment which is palliative systemic chemotherapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
- What is being tested?
- Systemic chemotherapy alone (oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, isovorin) and Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, isovorin)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 49 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSweden
- Study dates
- Jun 2003to Jan 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Metastatic disease to the peritoneum from colon or rectum (at least two isolated sites of disease)
- verified primary tumor of adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum
- Potential resectability as judged by the treating surgeon
- Patient is available for follow-up according to the study protocol
- Signed informed consent
Who cannot join
- Extraabdominal metastases or liver metastases
- Paraaortic or other inoperable lymph node metastases
- Clear indication for surgery only (such as obstruction, bleeding or peritonitis)
- Prior treatment of either arm in the study
- Clinical or histopathological diagnosis of Peritoneal Pseudomyxoma
- Age > 80
Show all 9Show fewer
- Contraindications for chemotherapy
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Ongoing infection
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Sweden1 site
Akademiska Sjukhuset (Uppsala University Hospital)
Uppsala, SE-751 85
About this study
Official title: A Randomised Phase-III Study Comparing Cytoreductive Surgery Plus Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Versus Modern Systemic Chemotherapy in Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis.
The purpose of this study is to see if there is a difference in survival between two different treatment strategies for colorectal peritoneal surface disease. The control arm administered the currently considered standard treatment which is palliative systemic chemotherapy. The experimental arm received the combination treatment cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. The investigators hypothesis is that the combination treatment will improve the overall survival.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
- Being tested
- Systemic chemotherapy alone (oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, isovorin), Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, isovorin)
- Keywords
- colorectal cancer, cytoreductive surgery, intraperitoneal chemotherapy, systemic chemotherapy, Peritoneal Metastatic Disease From the Colon or Rectum
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Systemic chemotherapy alone (oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, isovorin)Drug
Oxaliplatin 100 mg/ m2 as a 2 h iv infusion + 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/ m2 iv bolus + Isovorin 100 mg/ m2 as a 2 h infusion followed by 5-fluorouracil 2400 mg/ m2 as a 46 h infusion. Each cycle is given every other week until 12 cycles have been administered.
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, isovorin)Procedure or surgery
Cytoreductive surgery has the goal of completely resecting all visible tumor tissue in the abdomen. Sequential postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy has the purpose of an adjuvant treatment to eradicate microscopic residual tumor and prevent recurrences in the abdomen. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of intraperitoneal 5-fluorouracil 550 mg/ m2 and intravenous isovorin 30 mg/ m2 day 1-6 med cycles every 4-6 weeks. Six cycles were planned.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: CRS plus postop intraperitoneal chemotherapy. | Experimental | Cytoreductive surgery and postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Receives: Procedure: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, isovorin) |
| Arm B: Systemic chemotherapy alone | Active comparator | Systemic chemotherapy alone Receives: Drug: Systemic chemotherapy alone (oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, isovorin) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall survival
Measured: 8 years
Secondary outcomes (6)
progression free survival
Measured: 8 years
Time to secondary treatment
Measured: 8 years
Radical resectability
Measured: 5 years
Quality of life
Measured: 7 years
Health costs
Measured: 8 years
Side effects of treatment
Measured: 6 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Feb 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2003
- Primary completionDec 2010
- Study completionJan 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colorectal Peritoneal CarcinomatosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Uppsala UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 49 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Uppsala University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Wilhelm Graf, M.D., Ph.D., Uppsala University
- Investigators
- Wilhelm Graf, M.D. Ph.D, Principal investigator, Uppsala University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01524094
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SPS-1
- Status last verified
- Jan 2012
- First submitted
- 18 Jan 2012
- Last updated
- 1 Feb 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Verwaal VJ, van Ruth S, de Bree E, van Sloothen GW, van Tinteren H, Boot H, Zoetmulder FA. Randomized trial of cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy and palliative surgery in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Oct 15;21(20):3737-43. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.187.
PubMed 14551293Assersohn L, Norman A, Cunningham D, Benepal T, Ross PJ, Oates J. Influence of metastatic site as an additional predictor for response and outcome in advanced colorectal carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 1999 Apr;79(11-12):1800-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690287.
PubMed 10206296Shepherd NA, Baxter KJ, Love SB. The prognostic importance of peritoneal involvement in colonic cancer: a prospective evaluation. Gastroenterology. 1997 Apr;112(4):1096-102. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(97)70119-7.
PubMed 9097991Graf W, Glimelius B, Pahlman L, Bergstrom R. Determinants of prognosis in advanced colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1991;27(9):1119-23. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(91)90307-y.
PubMed 1835620Elias D, Blot F, El Otmany A, Antoun S, Lasser P, Boige V, Rougier P, Ducreux M. Curative treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis arising from colorectal cancer by complete resection and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Cancer. 2001 Jul 1;92(1):71-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010701)92:13.0.co;2-9.
PubMed 11443611Saltz LB, Cox JV, Blanke C, Rosen LS, Fehrenbacher L, Moore MJ, Maroun JA, Ackland SP, Locker PK, Pirotta N, Elfring GL, Miller LL. Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000 Sep 28;343(13):905-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200009283431302.
PubMed 11006366Cashin PH, Mahteme H, Spang N, Syk I, Frodin JE, Torkzad M, Glimelius B, Graf W. Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal metastases: A randomised trial. Eur J Cancer. 2016 Jan;53:155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.09.017. Epub 2016 Jan 2.
PubMed 26751236
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Feb 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised Phase-III Study Comparing Cytoreductive Surgery Plus Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Versus Modern Systemic Chemotherapy in Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01524094
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SPS-1
- Conditions
- Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
- Keywords
- colorectal cancer, cytoreductive surgery, intraperitoneal chemotherapy, systemic chemotherapy, Peritoneal Metastatic Disease From the Colon or Rectum
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 49 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Uppsala UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2003
- Primary completion
- Dec 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Feb 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to see if there is a difference in survival between two different treatment strategies for colorectal peritoneal surface disease. The control arm administered the currently considered standard treatment which is palliative systemic chemotherapy. The experimental arm received the combination treatment cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. The investigators hypothesis is that the combination treatment will improve the overall survival.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: CRS plus postop intraperitoneal chemotherapy. | Experimental | Procedure: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, isovorin)Cytoreductive surgery and postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. |
| Arm B: Systemic chemotherapy alone | Active comparator | Drug: Systemic chemotherapy alone (oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, isovorin)Systemic chemotherapy alone |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Metastatic disease to the peritoneum from colon or rectum (at least two isolated sites of disease)
- verified primary tumor of adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum
- Potential resectability as judged by the treating surgeon
- Patient is available for follow-up according to the study protocol
- Signed informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Extraabdominal metastases or liver metastases
- Paraaortic or other inoperable lymph node metastases
- Clear indication for surgery only (such as obstruction, bleeding or peritonitis)
- Prior treatment of either arm in the study
- Clinical or histopathological diagnosis of Peritoneal Pseudomyxoma
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Systemic chemotherapy alone (oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, isovorin)Oxaliplatin 100 mg/ m2 as a 2 h iv infusion + 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/ m2 iv bolus + Isovorin 100 mg/ m2 as a 2 h infusion followed by 5-fluorouracil 2400 mg/ m2 as a 46 h infusion. Each cycle is given every other week until 12 cycles have been administered. | Drug | Arm B: Systemic chemotherapy alone |
| Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, isovorin)Cytoreductive surgery has the goal of completely resecting all visible tumor tissue in the abdomen. Sequential postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy has the purpose of an adjuvant treatment to eradicate microscopic residual tumor and prevent recurrences in the abdomen. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of intraperitoneal 5-fluorouracil 550 mg/ m2 and intravenous isovorin 30 mg/ m2 day 1-6 med cycles every 4-6 weeks. Six cycles were planned. | Procedure or surgery | Arm A: CRS plus postop intraperitoneal chemotherapy. |
Primary outcome
Overall survival
Time frame: 8 years
6 secondary outcomes
progression free survival
Time frame: 8 years
Time to secondary treatment
Time frame: 8 years
Radical resectability
Time frame: 5 years
Quality of life
Time frame: 7 years
Health costs
Time frame: 8 years
Side effects of treatment
Time frame: 6 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Feb 2012.
- Background: PubMed 14551293Verwaal VJ, van Ruth S, de Bree E, van Sloothen GW, van Tinteren H, Boot H, Zoetmulder FA. Randomized trial of cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy and palliative surgery in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Oct 15;21(20):3737-43. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.187.
- Background: PubMed 10206296Assersohn L, Norman A, Cunningham D, Benepal T, Ross PJ, Oates J. Influence of metastatic site as an additional predictor for response and outcome in advanced colorectal carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 1999 Apr;79(11-12):1800-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690287.
- Background: PubMed 9097991Shepherd NA, Baxter KJ, Love SB. The prognostic importance of peritoneal involvement in colonic cancer: a prospective evaluation. Gastroenterology. 1997 Apr;112(4):1096-102. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(97)70119-7.
- Background: PubMed 1835620Graf W, Glimelius B, Pahlman L, Bergstrom R. Determinants of prognosis in advanced colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1991;27(9):1119-23. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(91)90307-y.
- Background: PubMed 11443611Elias D, Blot F, El Otmany A, Antoun S, Lasser P, Boige V, Rougier P, Ducreux M. Curative treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis arising from colorectal cancer by complete resection and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Cancer. 2001 Jul 1;92(1):71-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010701)92:13.0.co;2-9.
- Background: PubMed 11006366Saltz LB, Cox JV, Blanke C, Rosen LS, Fehrenbacher L, Moore MJ, Maroun JA, Ackland SP, Locker PK, Pirotta N, Elfring GL, Miller LL. Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000 Sep 28;343(13):905-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200009283431302.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26751236Cashin PH, Mahteme H, Spang N, Syk I, Frodin JE, Torkzad M, Glimelius B, Graf W. Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal metastases: A randomised trial. Eur J Cancer. 2016 Jan;53:155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.09.017. Epub 2016 Jan 2.
Related trials for Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
RecruitingPhase 1
Individual Response to Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) Treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis From Peritoneal Mesothelioma or Atypical Mesothelial Proliferation or From Ovarian, Colorectal, or Appendiceal Histologies
Peritoneal Mesothelioma, Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Determining the Biodistribution of an Imaging Tracer (68Ga-FAPi-46) in Patients With Solid Tumors or Hematologic Cancers
Anal Carcinoma, Bladder Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Paricalcitol Versus Pirfenidone for Improving Surgical Resectability in Patients With Peritoneal Cancer
Peritoneal (Metastatic) Cancer, Peritoneal Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Dual Administration Of Intraperitoneal And Intravenous TROP2-Directed CAR-NK With TGF-Beta Receptor 2 (TGFBR2) Knock Out (KO) Therapy For Colorectal Cancer-Related Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Phase 1/2 Trial ("Chip-CRC Trial")
Colorectal Cancer, Peritoneal Metastases
RecruitingPhase 1
TLR9 Immunotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
Malignant Ascites, Colorectal Adenocarcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Wilhelm Graf, M.D. Ph.D principal investigator
Uppsala University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Systemic chemotherapy alone (oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, isovorin) and Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, isovorin) in people with Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, run by Uppsala University at 1 site in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Feb 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall survival (time frame: 8 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01524094, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Feb 2012.