AzTrials
AzTrials

Spontaneous AbortionNCT00878098

Study of DDT and Loss of Clinically-Recognized Pregnancies in South Africa

An observational study of Spontaneous Abortion and Malaria, run by National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) at 1 site in South Africa.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: In some countries, such as South Africa, the pesticide DDT is an important chemical for control of malaria-carrying mosquitoes. However, there is little evidence about the effects that it might have on human health. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 34 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Spontaneous Abortion, Malaria, Pregnancy Outcome
How many people
513 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Africa
Study dates
1 Jun 2009to 12 Jul 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 34 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

None listed.

Who cannot join

  • 1. Have two positive serum hCG tests at least one week apart, with the concentration of hCG in the second test being equal or lower than that of the first, and are still pregnant 4 weeks after the first blood test.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Africa1 site
  • Pretoria Academic Hospital

    Thulamela Municipality

Other trials in South Africa

About this study

Official title: Study of DDT and Loss of Clinically Recognized Pregnancies in South Africa

Background:

  • In some countries, such as South Africa, the pesticide DDT is an important chemical for control of malaria-carrying mosquitoes. However, there is little evidence about the effects that it might have on human health.
  • DDT has been associated with miscarriage and fetal loss in areas with high levels of exposure, but more research is needed to determine what levels of exposure are associated with loss of pregnancies.
Read more

Objectives:

  • To examine the relationship between pre-pregnancy levels of DDT in the blood and the loss of clinically recognized pregnancies.
  • To conduct a pilot study to evaluate data collection procedures for future research.

Eligibility:

  • Women between 20 and 30 years of age who are not currently pregnant and who reside in villages in the Vhembe District in the northeastern part of South Africa.

Design:

  • Evaluation of eligibility:
  1. Short physical examination, with questionnaire about medical history, current living conditions, and daily life.
  2. Several blood samples will be taken for study and to test for anemia, elevated lead levels, malaria, syphilis, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
  • Half of the women will come from villages that are currently being sprayed with DDT, and half will come from villages that are not being sprayed.
  • Evaluation before and during pregnancy for subjects who become pregnant:
  1. Blood and urine test, including urine pregnancy test.
  2. Questions about recent menstrual history and sexual activity.
  3. Questions about medical history, including treatment for malaria.
  • Pregnancy follow-up study, including blood draws, will be conducted regardless of whether the pregnancy is carried to term.
  • Researchers will assess and adjust study parameters as needed.
Read the detailed description

In this study, the primary goal is to examine the relationship between DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) levels and the odds of loss of clinically-recognized pregnancies amongst women in Limpopo, South Africa. The initial protocol (which will be referred to as Part 1) planned to enroll 2,400 non-pregnant women, draw blood for measurement of DDT exposure, and follow 1,200 pregnant participants to ascertain occurrence of miscarriage. An initial two-year pilot of 850 non-pregnant women was proposed to evaluate field procedures, recruitment strategies and the reproducibility of DDT levels. Of the 444 women enrolled in the first 10 months of the pilot of Part 1, only 27 have become pregnant. Although the field procedures have been well executed, the number of pregnancies has been low. Based upon the experience to date, the approach taken so far is unlikely to generate enough pregnancies to monitor the occurrence of miscarriages. Therefore, the revised protocol (referred to as Part 2) will modify enrollment criteria to include only pregnant women who are in the early stages of pregnancy, confirmed by rising human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) blood levels taken 1 week apart or pregnant women who have a pregnancy loss within 4 weeks of enrollment. Participants who were enrolled in Part 1 of the pilot, who are still not pregnant at implementation of Part 2 will be withdrawn from the study, while pregnant participants from Part 1 will continue to be followed. In Part 2, a total of 2,400 pregnant women will be enrolled. Only those who meet the follow-up criteria (n=1,200) will be followed to determine the outcome of pregnancy. The reproducibility study of DDT levels amongst a subset of 200 women will also be dropped and replaced with an analysis using specimens that were collected in Part 1.

Keywords
DDT, Malaria, Pregnancy Outcome, Spontaneous Abortion, HIV, Pregnancy
Medical subject headings
Abortion, Spontaneous, Malaria, Stillbirth, HIV Infections

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Apr 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Jun 2009
  3. Study completion12 Jul 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
513 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00878098
Sponsor's protocol ID
999909115
Other IDs
09-E-N115
Status last verified
12 Jul 2019
First submitted
7 Apr 2009
Last updated
18 Jul 2019
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Aneck-Hahn NH, Schulenburg GW, Bornman MS, Farias P, de Jager C. Impaired semen quality associated with environmental DDT exposure in young men living in a malaria area in the Limpopo Province, South Africa. J Androl. 2007 May-Jun;28(3):423-34. doi: 10.2164/jandrol.106.001701. Epub 2006 Dec 27.

    PubMed 17192596
  • Cooper GS, Klebanoff MA, Promislow J, Brock JW, Longnecker MP. Polychlorinated biphenyls and menstrual cycle characteristics. Epidemiology. 2005 Mar;16(2):191-200. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000152913.12393.86.

    PubMed 15703533
  • Bouwman H, Cooppan RM, Becker PJ, Ngxongo S. Malaria control and levels of DDT in serum of two populations in Kwazulu. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1991 Jun;33(2):141-55. doi: 10.1080/15287399109531514.

    PubMed 2051491

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Spontaneous Abortion and Malaria, run by National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) at 1 site in South Africa.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Africa. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00878098, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jul 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in