Emergency DepartmentNCT07909096
Development, Validation, and Clinical Trial of a Prediction Tool for High-Risk Emergency Department Revisits
A study testing ED-HIKRS in people with Emergency Department and Revisit, run by National Taiwan University Hospital.
Trial summary
Emergency department (ED) visits have grown tremendously in Taiwan over the past few years, reaching approximately 7 million visits in 2019. This growth in ED visits has led to unprecedented levels of ED crowding, resulting in delays in care and increased morbidity and mortality in the ED. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Emergency Department, Revisit
- What is being tested?
- ED-HIKRS
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 4,010 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Nov 2026to Dec 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ED patients aged 18 years at recruitment.
Who cannot join
- Inability to sign informed consent;
- Diagnosis of psychiatric disorders that would limit the ability to comply with the study protocol e.g., wearing a wristband for 7 days;
- Intending to leave ED against medical advice;
- Already enrolled or planning to enroll in a research study that would conflict with full participation in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Development, Validation, and Prospective Clinical Trial of a Tool for Predicting Serious Adverse Events in Return Emergency Department Visits
Emergency department (ED) visits have grown tremendously in Taiwan over the past few years, reaching approximately 7 million visits in 2019. This growth in ED visits has led to unprecedented levels of ED crowding, resulting in delays in care and increased morbidity and mortality in the ED. One of the complications of ED crowding is unsafe ED discharge leading to return ED visits. About 5-10% of the patients return to the ED within 3 days of the initial ED visit. Return visits are not only burdensome but also costly. Some return ED visits are even potentially dangerous, such as intensive care unit (ICU) admission, receiving emergency surgery or cardiac catheterization, and in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) during the revisit to the ED. These "high-risk" return ED visits are important in that they may reflect suboptimal initial ED care. Early identification of these high-risk events and appropriate interventions are critical for clinicians and patients. The investigators previously estimated that about 0.1% of the ED visits would become these high-risk ED visits.
High-risk revisits are relatively rare events, which require a large sample size for investigation. To this end, the increasing use of electronic health records (EHR) has opened the door to research rare events using big data. With the gradual adoption of EHR in major sections of the NTUH (outpatient in 2006; inpatient in 2007; and emergency department [ED] in 2009), investigators are now able to conduct clinical research using a wealth of data components in the EHR. For example, from 2013 to 2022, there have been >1 million ED visits to the NTUH. The large sample size also enables studies of rare but important events, such as serious adverse events in return ED visits.
Read more
In this proposal, the investigators aim to develop and validate a vital-sign trajectory model (GBTM) and a machine learning/artificial intelligence (ML/AI) based prediction model for the high-risk ED revisits. The investigators will develop and validate these predictive tools using the NTUH data from 2013 to 2022, totaling approximately 1 million ED visits. In phase 2 (prospective validation), the investigators will prospectively collect data, fine tune our model, and optimize the system structure. In phase 3 (intervention), the investigators will embed the model into our hospital information system (HIS) in real-time to identify high-risk patients on ED discharge. If a patient is classified as high-risk, the computer user interface will recommend re-evaluating the patient and observing. At the discretion of the treating physician, wearable smart wristbands will be distributed to borderline high-risk patients who are still sent home to augment vital signs monitoring for 7 days. A dedicated case manager will review the records daily and consult the treating physician if red flags occur. A telemedicine session will be initiated if needed. The detection and intervention components together form the response system, the Emergency Department High-risk Revisits Prevention System (ED-HIKRS). In the intervention phase, the investigators will enroll and randomize 10 attending physicians into the ED-HIKRS or the usual care arm for 5 months, with each of them treating 200 patients (patients clustered within physicians). The pragmatic trial will stop for 2 months as a wash-out period, and an interim analysis will be performed. The physicians will then cross over, and each of them will treat 200 patients for another 5 months. A total of 4,000 adult patients will be enrolled. The primary outcome is the rate of high-risk revisits (ICU admission, receiving emergency surgery, and IHCA within 7 days of ED discharge) or same outcomes within 24 hours of hospitalization through the ED revisit. The secondary outcomes include general ED revisit rates, revisit admission rates, and ED mortality during the revisit.
The proposed study is highly significant because it addresses high-risk ED revisits, an understudied yet increasingly important area. The two state-of-the-art models, if successful, can be readily implemented in the EHR system for real-time prediction. The intervention of ED-HIKRS, if successful, may possibly intercept unsafe ED discharges and prevent subsequent serious adverse events. Our long-term goal is to deploy our system in existing clinical workflows to assist clinicians. This model may be generalizable to other health care systems countrywide.
- Conditions
- Emergency Department, Revisit
- Being tested
- ED-HIKRS, Usual Care
- Medical subject headings
- Emergencies
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ED-HIKRSOther
In phase 3 (intervention), we will embed the model into our hospital information system (HIS) in real-time to identify high-risk patients on ED discharge. If a patient is classified as high-risk, the computer user interface will recommend re-evaluating the patient and observing. At the discretion of the treating physician, wearable smart wristbands will be distributed to borderline high-risk patients who are still sent home to augment vital signs monitoring for 7 days. A dedicated case manager will review the records daily and consult the treating physician if red flags occur. A telemedicine session will be initiated if needed. The detection and intervention components together form the response system, the Emergency Department High-risk Revisits Prevention System (ED-HIKRS)
Usual CareOther
Care as usual
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ED-HIKRS | Experimental | Not described Receives: Other: ED-HIKRS |
| Usual Care | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Other: Usual Care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The primary outcome is the rate of high-risk revisits (ICU admission, receiving emergency surgery, and IHCA within 7 days of ED discharge) or same outcomes within 24 hours of revisit hospitalization
Measured: During the stay in the emergency department (a median length of 3 hours) or within 24 hours of revisit hospitalization
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Nov 2026
- Study startNov 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionDec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Emergency DepartmentStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Taiwan University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 4,010 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Taiwan University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07909096
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 202206008RINA
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 26 Oct 2026
- Last updated
- 3 Nov 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Nov 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Development, Validation, and Prospective Clinical Trial of a Tool for Predicting Serious Adverse Events in Return Emergency Department Visits
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07909096
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 202206008RINA
- Conditions
- Emergency Department, Revisit
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 4,010 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- National Taiwan University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 2 Nov 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Emergency department (ED) visits have grown tremendously in Taiwan over the past few years, reaching approximately 7 million visits in 2019. This growth in ED visits has led to unprecedented levels of ED crowding, resulting in delays in care and increased morbidity and mortality in the ED. One of the complications of ED crowding is unsafe ED discharge leading to return ED visits. About 5-10% of the patients return to the ED within 3 days of the initial ED visit. Return visits are not only burdensome but also costly. Some return ED visits are even potentially dangerous, such as intensive care unit (ICU) admission, receiving emergency surgery or cardiac catheterization, and in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) during the revisit to the ED. These "high-risk" return ED visits are important in that they may reflect suboptimal initial ED care. Early identification of these high-risk events and appropriate interventions are critical for clinicians and patients. The investigators previously estimated that about 0.1% of the ED visits would become these high-risk ED visits.
High-risk revisits are relatively rare events, which require a large sample size for investigation. To this end, the increasing use of electronic health records (EHR) has opened the door to research rare events using big data. With the gradual adoption of EHR in major sections of the NTUH (outpatient in 2006; inpatient in 2007; and emergency department [ED] in 2009), investigators are now able to conduct clinical research using a wealth of data components in the EHR. For example, from 2013 to 2022, there have been >1 million ED visits to the NTUH. The large sample size also enables studies of rare but important events, such as serious adverse events in return ED visits.
In this proposal, the investigators aim to develop and validate a vital-sign trajectory model (GBTM) and a machine learning/artificial intelligence (ML/AI) based prediction model for the high-risk ED revisits. The investigators will develop and validate these predictive tools using the NTUH data from 2013 to 2022, totaling approximately 1 million ED visits. In phase 2 (prospective validation), the investigators will prospectively collect data, fine tune our model, and optimize the system structure. In phase 3 (intervention), the investigators will embed the model into our hospital information system (HIS) in real-time to identify high-risk patients on ED discharge. If a patient is classified as high-risk, the computer user interface will recommend re-evaluating the patient and observing. At the discretion of the treating physician, wearable smart wristbands will be distributed to borderline high-risk patients who are still sent home to augment vital signs monitoring for 7 days. A dedicated case manager will review the records daily and consult the treating physician if red flags occur. A telemedicine session will be initiated if needed. The detection and intervention components together form the response system, the Emergency Department High-risk Revisits Prevention System (ED-HIKRS). In the intervention phase, the investigators will enroll and randomize 10 attending physicians into the ED-HIKRS or the usual care arm for 5 months, with each of them treating 200 patients (patients clustered within physicians). The pragmatic trial will stop for 2 months as a wash-out period, and an interim analysis will be performed. The physicians will then cross over, and each of them will treat 200 patients for another 5 months. A total of 4,000 adult patients will be enrolled. The primary outcome is the rate of high-risk revisits (ICU admission, receiving emergency surgery, and IHCA within 7 days of ED discharge) or same outcomes within 24 hours of hospitalization through the ED revisit. The secondary outcomes include general ED revisit rates, revisit admission rates, and ED mortality during the revisit.
The proposed study is highly significant because it addresses high-risk ED revisits, an understudied yet increasingly important area. The two state-of-the-art models, if successful, can be readily implemented in the EHR system for real-time prediction. The intervention of ED-HIKRS, if successful, may possibly intercept unsafe ED discharges and prevent subsequent serious adverse events. Our long-term goal is to deploy our system in existing clinical workflows to assist clinicians. This model may be generalizable to other health care systems countrywide.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ED-HIKRS | Experimental | Other: ED-HIKRS |
| Usual Care | Active comparator | Other: Usual Care |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- ED patients aged 18 years at recruitment.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Inability to sign informed consent;
- Diagnosis of psychiatric disorders that would limit the ability to comply with the study protocol e.g., wearing a wristband for 7 days;
- Intending to leave ED against medical advice;
- Already enrolled or planning to enroll in a research study that would conflict with full participation in the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ED-HIKRSIn phase 3 (intervention), we will embed the model into our hospital information system (HIS) in real-time to identify high-risk patients on ED discharge. If a patient is classified as high-risk, the computer user interface will recommend re-evaluating the patient and observing. At the discretion of the treating physician, wearable smart wristbands will be distributed to borderline high-risk patients who are still sent home to augment vital signs monitoring for 7 days. A dedicated case manager will review the records daily and consult the treating physician if red flags occur. A telemedicine session will be initiated if needed. The detection and intervention components together form the response system, the Emergency Department High-risk Revisits Prevention System (ED-HIKRS) | Other | ED-HIKRS |
| Usual CareCare as usual | Other | Usual Care |
Primary outcome
The primary outcome is the rate of high-risk revisits (ICU admission, receiving emergency surgery, and IHCA within 7 days of ED discharge) or same outcomes within 24 hours of revisit hospitalization
Time frame: During the stay in the emergency department (a median length of 3 hours) or within 24 hours of revisit hospitalization
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Nov 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Emergency Department
Not yet recruiting
A Pre-post Study of a Lethal Means Safety Planning Intervention for Youth at Elevated Suicide Risk in the Emergency Department
Suicidal Ideas, Suicidal Ideation
Not yet recruiting
Miniature In-line Respirator
Brain Death, Respiration, Artificial
Recruiting
Development and Preliminary Validation of Intelligent Video Laryngoscope for Emergency Use
Critically Ill Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation
RecruitingObservational study
AIDE: Decision Support for Anastomosis or Colostomy in Emergency Surgery for Complicated Acute Diverticulitis
Complicated Diverticulitis, Acute Diverticulitis
Recruiting
Developing a Support Application for Food Pantries (SAFPAS) to Improve Client Access to Healthy Foods & Enhance Emergency Preparedness
Improving Healthy Food Access in Food Insecurity Populations in Normal and Emergency Situations
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ED-HIKRS in people with Emergency Department and Revisit, run by National Taiwan University Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Chu-Lin Tsai MD (+886-2-2312-3456 Ext. 262831, chulintsai@ntu.edu.tw), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The primary outcome is the rate of high-risk revisits (ICU admission, receiving emergency surgery, and IHCA within 7 days of ED discharge) or same outcomes within 24 hours of revisit hospitalization (time frame: During the stay in the emergency department (a median length of 3 hours) or within 24 hours of revisit hospitalization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Nov 2026.