Inguinal Hernia, Without Mention of Obstruction or GangreneNCT07902167
Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of a New Laparoscopic Non-mesh Hernia Needle Set Designed for Indirect Inguinal Hernia
A study testing non-mesh inguinal hernia needle and conventional needle set in people with Inguinal Hernia, Without Mention of Obstruction or Gangrene, run by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
This is a prospective, single-blinded and randomized clinical trial, and will be conducted at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Chiayi branch in Taiwan. 1. Why is this study being done? Inguinal hernia is a common condition in adults. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Inguinal Hernia, Without Mention of Obstruction or Gangrene
- What is being tested?
- non-mesh inguinal hernia needle and conventional needle set
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 96 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 4 Mar 2026to 30 Apr 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participant is willing and able to give written informed consent for participation in the trial.
- Adults (more than 18 years old) with inguinal hernia.
- Do not want to undergo traditional open hernia surgery, but willing to undergo single-port laparoscopy to determine the hernia type.
- For the indirect hernia, the participant is willing to undergo percutaneous internal ring suture by using either the ready-made or neoteric needle set decided by us randomly.
- If employees or students of the study institution are considered for participation, they may be enrolled only if all of the following conditions are met:
- They satisfy all inclusion criteria specified in this study protocol.
- The investigator and research personnel involved in recruitment are not the participant's direct supervisor, instructor, or evaluator, and have no responsibility for assessing the participant's academic, employment, or professional performance.
- Recruitment is conducted in a manner that minimizes the possibility of coercion or undue influence. Participants shall not be recruited through individual solicitation by their supervisors, instructors, or evaluators.
Who cannot join
- Pregnant women.
- Obesity: Body mass index (BMI) ≧35.
- Recurrent hernia after any hernia surgery.
- Insufficient level of language to understand all study requirements in opinion of the investigators.
- Hydroceles with multiple septations and complex anatomy.
- Incarcerated or strangulated hernias.
Show all 13Show fewer
- Known connective tissue disorders (e.g., Loeys-Dietz, Marfan syndrome).
- High bleeding tendency during surgery.
- Technical conversion triggers: large hernias, edema, poor visualization.
- Severe cardiopulmonary compromise.
- Extensive intra-abdominal adhesions (e.g., from prior surgeries or infections).
- Allergy to the materials of the medical devices used in this study (such as stainless steel and suture materials).
- Patients asked for mesh repair for their inguinal hernia initially.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of Laparoscopic Non-mesh Hernia Needle Set
This is a prospective, single-blinded and randomized clinical trial, and will be conducted at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Chiayi branch in Taiwan.
- Why is this study being done? Inguinal hernia is a common condition in adults. It can be classified into different types, and more than half of adult inguinal hernias are belonged to the "indirect" type. Traditionally, inguinal hernias are repaired with artificial mesh in adults. Since 2018, we use the laparoscopy-assisted percutaneous internal ring suture (PIRS), which has been proofed to be safe and effectiveness in repairing the pediatric indirect inguinal hernia, to treat the adult indirect inguinal hernias. More than 150 adult patients were treated by using this method with good results and low recurrence rate. However, conventional needles for the pediatric group are too short and weak to operate on the adult group. Now there is a new device, laparoscopic non-mesh hernia needle set, designed specifically for adults. We would like to evaluate whether this new device can: (1) Shorten the operation time; (2) Reduce postoperative pain; (3) Maintain a low recurrence rate
- What will happen to the participants
Read more
The participants, whose hernia confirmed to be the indirect type under laparoscopic inspection, would be randomly assigned to one of two groups:
(1) The control group: using conventional needle set for PIRS; (2) The experimental group: using laparoscopic non-mesh hernia needle set for PIRS.
Both groups would undergo the same surgical method except the needle devices. For the participants with inguinal hernias other than the indirect type, an adequate mesh repair be performed according to the Guideline of Hernia Surg (Hernia. 2018; 22(1): 17-18)
After surgery, three follow-up visits within six months would be arranged to all participants. Each visit will take about one hour. During these visits, we will:
(1) Record about recovery and pain conditions; (2) Check surgical wound; (3) Evaluate whether the hernia has recurred.
- What are the possible complications? The risks of surgery are similar whether the participants join the study or not. Possible complications include: (1) Postoperative pain; (2) Hernia recurrence; (3) Wound infection; (4) Bruising or bleeding under the skin at the needle site
This study will help us to determine whether the new needle set could decrease the complication rate.
- Participation in this study is completely voluntary. For the patients unwilling to participate this study, they will receive the standard procedures at present, including: (1) Open hernia repair with mesh, Lichtenstein method. (2) Laparoscopic hernia repair with mesh, TEP or TAPP. (3) Laparoscopic repair using the conventional hernia needle
Read the detailed description
Hernia, a common human disease, is defined as any organ or tissue leaving its normal location via congenital or acquired weak point, defect or fissure. Hernia frequently develops in inguinal (inguinal hernia), femoral (femoral hernia), umbilical (umbilical hernia), incision (incisional hernia) or diaphragmatic areas (diaphragmatic hernia).
Inguinal hernia accounts for more than 90% of all hernia. It is estimated 27% male and 3% female would be bothered by the inguinal hernia throughout the life. There were about 30 thousands of surgeries for hernia in Taiwan, and about 20 millions of surgeries for hernia worldwide annually. Inguinal hernia is classified into direct and indirect type. When testes passed through the inguinal canals into the scrotum before or after birth, the internal ring of inguinal canal would close gradually. Indirect type of inguinal hernia is abdominal organs or tissues enter the inguinal canal due to non-obliteration of internal ring. When inguinal hernia develops, one protruding mass would be seen on the groin area, and the patient feel pain and swelling. If the hernia could not be reduced spontaneously, the organ/tissue in the hernia sac would undergo blood supply disturbance, and organ/tissue necrosis, bowel perforation, even death follows. Surgery is usually suggested if one patient is diagnosed with inguinal hernia.
Open herniorrhaphy, which ligating the internal ring in the pre-peritoneal layer and then removing the hernia sac, is used to manage the indirect type of inguinal hernia traditionally. Incidence of inguinal hernia in children is about 5-6%, and almost is indirect type. Most patients are newborn to 6 years old. In 2006, Dr. Patkowski published percutaneous internal ring suture (PIRS) under laparoscopy. In PIRS the inner ring opening is closed by suture line in the pre-peritoneal layer under single-port laparoscopy. The hernia sac is remained without removal. It differs from the open herniorrhaphy is that the knots will tie the peritoneal layer and musculo-fascial layer at the same time, and patients were more painful after surgery. After 20-year observations, there was little difference found in the operation time and hernia recurrence rate between the open herniorrhaphy and PIRS. Surgical scars were smaller after PIRS, and it made PIRS being the routine surgery for indirect inguinal hernia in several children's hospitals in the America and Europe. In our hospital, there were more than 300 children with indirect inguinal hernia underwent single port laparoscopic PIRS since 2016. The operation time was less than 20 minutes in average. These children did not need admission, their recovery time was shorter, and the hernia recurrence rate was zero.
In adults, their inguinal hernia could be indirect, direct even mixed types. Inguinal hernia typing in adults often is not confirmed actually before surgery, yet the problem could be resolved during laparoscopy. Traditionally the main surgical method was to repair the inguinal hernia with mesh in the Hesselbach's triangle regardless of hernia type. The method could not satisfy every patient's requirement, and the overall hernia recurrence rate is 30-50%. In fact, 67-82% of adult cases with inguinal hernia belonged to the indirect type according to the published researches. Therefore, we thought single port laparoscopic PIRS could be utilized in adults also. In past 6 years, more than 100 adults underwent single port laparoscopic PIRS at our hospital for their indirect inguinal hernia. Hernia recurrence and chronic pain rate were 5%.
There is one new inguinal ring repair needle set developed recently, and which is suitable for single-port laparoscopic hernia surgery. The needle set is composed of puncture needle and suture guide needle. The puncture needle is composed of outer and inner sheath, and it can easily puncture and peel off the tissue. When the puncture needle arrives the inner ring of inguinal canal, removing the inner sheath, and outer sheath is left in the musculo-fascial layer. The suture guide needle is inserted into the outer sheath to tie and close the inner ring. The knot will naturally penetrate the muscular layer and stay on the peritoneal layer. In general, this hernia needle set can solve the inconvenience during the surgery and post-operative pain of patients.
This is a single-blind and randomized study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the new inguinal needle set in managing the adults' indirect inguinal hernia.
- Trial period: Two years.
- Grouping: Divided into control and study group (sample size: 48 cases more than 18 years old in each group)
- Random sampling: participants will be randomized equally to receive ready-made or new needle set for inguinal hernia.
- Control group: Patients with indirect inguinal hernia and undergoing laparoscopic percutaneous internal ring suture via ready-made needle set.
- Trial period: 2025-05-01 to 2027-04-30.
- Follow-up period after surgery: six months.
- Test execution location: Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Chiayi, Taiwan.
- Belonged to single center trial.
- Confidentiality of subject information: If the medical records would be used for reports and analysis, the subjects will be identified with codes and personal informations will be removed.
- Medical records would be used: (1) basic data: age, body height, body weight, BMI, hernia side, obliteration of the contralateral processus vaginalis, operation time, hospitalization days; (2) out-patient department follow up: post-operational pain severity and duration evaluated by Mankoski Pain Scale, analgesics kinds and frequencies, days for wound recovery, days for recovery of daily activities evaluated by Mankoski Pain Scale , hernia recurrence at the operational side.
- The primary endpoint: post-operational pain score
- Being tested
- non-mesh inguinal hernia needle, conventional needle set
- Medical subject headings
- Hernia, Inguinal, Gangrene
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
non-mesh inguinal hernia needleDevice
Non-mesh inguinal hernia needle is used for indirect inguinal hernia repair by laparoscopy. It is composed of puncture needle and suture needle.
conventional needle setDevice
Conventional needle set is used traditionally for percutaneous internal ring suture in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Chiayi, Taiwan.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Experimental | non-mesh inguinal needle set Receives: Device: non-mesh inguinal hernia needle |
| Control | Active comparator | conventional needle set Receives: Device: conventional needle set |
| Additional | No intervention | enrolled patients without indirect inguinal hernia |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
post operational pain
Evaluated by Mankoski Pain Scale (score 0-10, zero is equivalent to no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain) on the operation day and one week after surgery, and recording frequency and kinds of analgesics used after surgery by charts
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Secondary outcomes (4)
Operation time
The operation time, measured in minutes, is defined as the time elapsed from insertion of the trocar through the umbilicus to its removal from the umbilicus at the end of the operation.
Measured: During the surgery
Time to resumption of daily activities
The number of days from surgery until the patient resumes usual daily activities, including work, exercise, and household activities.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Ipsilateral inguinal hernia recurrence rate within six months after surgery
The proportion of patients who develop recurrent inguinal hernia on the operated side within six months after surgery. The recurrence rate will be calculated as the number of patients with recurrence divided by the total number of patients evaluated for recurrence, multiplied by 100%.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Wound infection rate
The proportion of patients who develop a surgical wound infection following surgery during the prespecified follow-up period. The wound infection rate will be calculated as the number of patients with a wound infection divided by the total number of patients evaluated for wound infection, multiplied by 100%.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Oct 2026
- Study start4 Mar 2026
- Primary completion30 Apr 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Apr 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Inguinal Hernia, Without Mention of Obstruction or GangreneStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Chang Gung Memorial HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Enrolled patients would undergo laparoscopy to confirm their inguinal hernia type. For the patients with indirect-type inguinal hernia, their internal ring of inguinal canal would be sutured by non-mesh inguinal needle set or conventional needle set randomly.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 96 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07902167
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 202500373A0C6001
- Other IDs
- NSTC 114-2823-8-182A-001
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 2 Mar 2026
- Last updated
- 28 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Wang SH, Lee CY, Hsieh WC, Yen JB, Tseng IM, Wong CH, Ho DR. Tailored treatment of female indirect inguinal hernias by using single-port laparoscopic percutaneous internal ring suture: a comparison between children and adults. Hernia. 2024 Aug;28(4):1365-1372. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03055-3. Epub 2024 May 22.
PubMed 38775981Wang SH, Yen JB, Hsu SL. The application of single-port laparoscopic percutaneous internal ring suture for the management of indirect inguinal hernia in female adults. Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 1;10(1):16244. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73171-4.
PubMed 33004858
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of Laparoscopic Non-mesh Hernia Needle Set
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07902167
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 202500373A0C6001
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 96 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Chang Gung Memorial HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 4 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Apr 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Oct 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective, single-blinded and randomized clinical trial, and will be conducted at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Chiayi branch in Taiwan.
- Why is this study being done? Inguinal hernia is a common condition in adults. It can be classified into different types, and more than half of adult inguinal hernias are belonged to the "indirect" type. Traditionally, inguinal hernias are repaired with artificial mesh in adults. Since 2018, we use the laparoscopy-assisted percutaneous internal ring suture (PIRS), which has been proofed to be safe and effectiveness in repairing the pediatric indirect inguinal hernia, to treat the adult indirect inguinal hernias. More than 150 adult patients were treated by using this method with good results and low recurrence rate. However, conventional needles for the pediatric group are too short and weak to operate on the adult group. Now there is a new device, laparoscopic non-mesh hernia needle set, designed specifically for adults. We would like to evaluate whether this new device can: (1) Shorten the operation time; (2) Reduce postoperative pain; (3) Maintain a low recurrence rate
- What will happen to the participants
The participants, whose hernia confirmed to be the indirect type under laparoscopic inspection, would be randomly assigned to one of two groups:
(1) The control group: using conventional needle set for PIRS; (2) The experimental group: using laparoscopic non-mesh hernia needle set for PIRS.
Both groups would undergo the same surgical method except the needle devices. For the participants with inguinal hernias other than the indirect type, an adequate mesh repair be performed according to the Guideline of Hernia Surg (Hernia. 2018; 22(1): 17-18)
After surgery, three follow-up visits within six months would be arranged to all participants. Each visit will take about one hour. During these visits, we will:
(1) Record about recovery and pain conditions; (2) Check surgical wound; (3) Evaluate whether the hernia has recurred.
- What are the possible complications? The risks of surgery are similar whether the participants join the study or not. Possible complications include: (1) Postoperative pain; (2) Hernia recurrence; (3) Wound infection; (4) Bruising or bleeding under the skin at the needle site
This study will help us to determine whether the new needle set could decrease the complication rate.
- Participation in this study is completely voluntary. For the patients unwilling to participate this study, they will receive the standard procedures at present, including: (1) Open hernia repair with mesh, Lichtenstein method. (2) Laparoscopic hernia repair with mesh, TEP or TAPP. (3) Laparoscopic repair using the conventional hernia needle
Detailed description
Hernia, a common human disease, is defined as any organ or tissue leaving its normal location via congenital or acquired weak point, defect or fissure. Hernia frequently develops in inguinal (inguinal hernia), femoral (femoral hernia), umbilical (umbilical hernia), incision (incisional hernia) or diaphragmatic areas (diaphragmatic hernia).
Inguinal hernia accounts for more than 90% of all hernia. It is estimated 27% male and 3% female would be bothered by the inguinal hernia throughout the life. There were about 30 thousands of surgeries for hernia in Taiwan, and about 20 millions of surgeries for hernia worldwide annually. Inguinal hernia is classified into direct and indirect type. When testes passed through the inguinal canals into the scrotum before or after birth, the internal ring of inguinal canal would close gradually. Indirect type of inguinal hernia is abdominal organs or tissues enter the inguinal canal due to non-obliteration of internal ring. When inguinal hernia develops, one protruding mass would be seen on the groin area, and the patient feel pain and swelling. If the hernia could not be reduced spontaneously, the organ/tissue in the hernia sac would undergo blood supply disturbance, and organ/tissue necrosis, bowel perforation, even death follows. Surgery is usually suggested if one patient is diagnosed with inguinal hernia.
Open herniorrhaphy, which ligating the internal ring in the pre-peritoneal layer and then removing the hernia sac, is used to manage the indirect type of inguinal hernia traditionally. Incidence of inguinal hernia in children is about 5-6%, and almost is indirect type. Most patients are newborn to 6 years old. In 2006, Dr. Patkowski published percutaneous internal ring suture (PIRS) under laparoscopy. In PIRS the inner ring opening is closed by suture line in the pre-peritoneal layer under single-port laparoscopy. The hernia sac is remained without removal. It differs from the open herniorrhaphy is that the knots will tie the peritoneal layer and musculo-fascial layer at the same time, and patients were more painful after surgery. After 20-year observations, there was little difference found in the operation time and hernia recurrence rate between the open herniorrhaphy and PIRS. Surgical scars were smaller after PIRS, and it made PIRS being the routine surgery for indirect inguinal hernia in several children's hospitals in the America and Europe. In our hospital, there were more than 300 children with indirect inguinal hernia underwent single port laparoscopic PIRS since 2016. The operation time was less than 20 minutes in average. These children did not need admission, their recovery time was shorter, and the hernia recurrence rate was zero.
In adults, their inguinal hernia could be indirect, direct even mixed types. Inguinal hernia typing in adults often is not confirmed actually before surgery, yet the problem could be resolved during laparoscopy. Traditionally the main surgical method was to repair the inguinal hernia with mesh in the Hesselbach's triangle regardless of hernia type. The method could not satisfy every patient's requirement, and the overall hernia recurrence rate is 30-50%. In fact, 67-82% of adult cases with inguinal hernia belonged to the indirect type according to the published researches. Therefore, we thought single port laparoscopic PIRS could be utilized in adults also. In past 6 years, more than 100 adults underwent single port laparoscopic PIRS at our hospital for their indirect inguinal hernia. Hernia recurrence and chronic pain rate were 5%.
There is one new inguinal ring repair needle set developed recently, and which is suitable for single-port laparoscopic hernia surgery. The needle set is composed of puncture needle and suture guide needle. The puncture needle is composed of outer and inner sheath, and it can easily puncture and peel off the tissue. When the puncture needle arrives the inner ring of inguinal canal, removing the inner sheath, and outer sheath is left in the musculo-fascial layer. The suture guide needle is inserted into the outer sheath to tie and close the inner ring. The knot will naturally penetrate the muscular layer and stay on the peritoneal layer. In general, this hernia needle set can solve the inconvenience during the surgery and post-operative pain of patients.
This is a single-blind and randomized study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the new inguinal needle set in managing the adults' indirect inguinal hernia.
- Trial period: Two years.
- Grouping: Divided into control and study group (sample size: 48 cases more than 18 years old in each group)
- Random sampling: participants will be randomized equally to receive ready-made or new needle set for inguinal hernia.
- Control group: Patients with indirect inguinal hernia and undergoing laparoscopic percutaneous internal ring suture via ready-made needle set.
- Trial period: 2025-05-01 to 2027-04-30.
- Follow-up period after surgery: six months.
- Test execution location: Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Chiayi, Taiwan.
- Belonged to single center trial.
- Confidentiality of subject information: If the medical records would be used for reports and analysis, the subjects will be identified with codes and personal informations will be removed.
- Medical records would be used: (1) basic data: age, body height, body weight, BMI, hernia side, obliteration of the contralateral processus vaginalis, operation time, hospitalization days; (2) out-patient department follow up: post-operational pain severity and duration evaluated by Mankoski Pain Scale, analgesics kinds and frequencies, days for wound recovery, days for recovery of daily activities evaluated by Mankoski Pain Scale , hernia recurrence at the operational side.
- The primary endpoint: post-operational pain score
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Enrolled patients would undergo laparoscopy to confirm their inguinal hernia type. For the patients with indirect-type inguinal hernia, their internal ring of inguinal canal would be sutured by non-mesh inguinal needle set or conventional needle set randomly.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Experimental | Device: non-mesh inguinal hernia needlenon-mesh inguinal needle set |
| Control | Active comparator | Device: conventional needle setconventional needle set |
| Additional | No intervention | –enrolled patients without indirect inguinal hernia |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Participant is willing and able to give written informed consent for participation in the trial.
- Adults (more than 18 years old) with inguinal hernia.
- Do not want to undergo traditional open hernia surgery, but willing to undergo single-port laparoscopy to determine the hernia type.
- For the indirect hernia, the participant is willing to undergo percutaneous internal ring suture by using either the ready-made or neoteric needle set decided by us randomly.
- If employees or students of the study institution are considered for participation, they may be enrolled only if all of the following conditions are met:
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Pregnant women.
- Obesity: Body mass index (BMI) ≧35.
- Recurrent hernia after any hernia surgery.
- Insufficient level of language to understand all study requirements in opinion of the investigators.
- Hydroceles with multiple septations and complex anatomy.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| non-mesh inguinal hernia needleNon-mesh inguinal hernia needle is used for indirect inguinal hernia repair by laparoscopy. It is composed of puncture needle and suture needle. | Device | Experimental |
| conventional needle setConventional needle set is used traditionally for percutaneous internal ring suture in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Chiayi, Taiwan. | Device | Control |
Primary outcome
post operational pain
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Evaluated by Mankoski Pain Scale (score 0-10, zero is equivalent to no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain) on the operation day and one week after surgery, and recording frequency and kinds of analgesics used after surgery by charts
4 secondary outcomes
Operation time
Time frame: During the surgery
Time to resumption of daily activities
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Ipsilateral inguinal hernia recurrence rate within six months after surgery
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Wound infection rate
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Oct 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 38775981Wang SH, Lee CY, Hsieh WC, Yen JB, Tseng IM, Wong CH, Ho DR. Tailored treatment of female indirect inguinal hernias by using single-port laparoscopic percutaneous internal ring suture: a comparison between children and adults. Hernia. 2024 Aug;28(4):1365-1372. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03055-3. Epub 2024 May 22.
- Results publication: PubMed 33004858Wang SH, Yen JB, Hsu SL. The application of single-port laparoscopic percutaneous internal ring suture for the management of indirect inguinal hernia in female adults. Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 1;10(1):16244. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73171-4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Inguinal Hernia, Without Mention of Obstruction or Gangrene
RecruitingPhase 1
Reversing InGuinal Hernia Trial: The Evaluation of Sex Hormones to Reverse Inguinal Hernias in Males
Inguinal Hernia Unilateral, Inguinal Hernia Bilateral
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing non-mesh inguinal hernia needle and conventional needle set in people with Inguinal Hernia, Without Mention of Obstruction or Gangrene, run by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
post operational pain (time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07902167, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Oct 2026.