AzTrials
AzTrials

AmputationusgNCT07875075

Core Muscle Function and Postural Control in Lower Extremity Amputees

An observational study of Amputation and Ultrasonography, run by Hacettepe University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary aim of this study is to determine the effect of amputation on core muscle groups by comparing core muscle thickness in individuals with lower extremity amputation to both their intact side and a healthy control group using ultrasonographic assessment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Amputation, Ultrasonography, Postural Control
How many people
32 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
4 Dec 2025to 4 Dec 2027
How long will I take part?
1 Day
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Study population: Amputees who applied to our faculty for prosthesis construction and control, and healthy individuals from relatives of the researcher reached by snowball method will constitute the sample of the study.

Who may be able to join

  • Being between 20-60 years of age
  • Having a unilateral transtibial or transfemoral amputation
  • Being at K1-K3 functional activity level
  • Being able to stand without the use of assistive devices
  • Using a prosthesis for at least 4 hours per day
  • Volunteering to participate in the study
  • Healthy individuals with demographic characteristics similar to the amputee group
  • Not having a regular exercise habit

Who cannot join

  • Having phantom or residual limb pain ≥6 according to the Numeric Rating Scale
  • Having bilateral lower extremity amputation
  • Having a Body Mass Index greater than 30
  • For the Healthy Control Group
  • Having central or peripheral vestibular disorders
  • Having lower extremity joint contractures
  • Using medications that affect balance
  • Having a Body Mass Index greater than 30

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Seher Özyürek, Prof. contact

0 232 4124935

seherozyurek@gmail.com

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation 15 July Health Campus, Mithatpaşa Street No: 56/15 İnciraltı 35340 - İZMİR

    Balçova, İzmir, 35130

    gökhan karakaş, M.Sc., g.karakass@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Investigation of the Relationship Between Core Muscle Function Assessed by Ultrasonography and Postural Control During Different Activities in Individuals With Lower Extremity Amputation

The primary aim of this study is to determine the effect of amputation on core muscle groups by comparing core muscle thickness in individuals with lower extremity amputation to both their intact side and a healthy control group using ultrasonographic assessment.

The secondary aim is to investigate the relationship between core muscle thickness and postural stability outcomes during different activities in individuals with lower extremity amputation, and to determine the effect of core muscles on postural control.

Read the detailed description

This study aims to investigate the effects of lower extremity amputation on core muscles and their relationship with postural control. The primary objective is to compare core muscle thickness in individuals with lower extremity amputation with both their intact side and a healthy control group using ultrasonographic assessment. The secondary objective is to examine the relationship between core muscle thickness and postural stability during different functional activities, and to determine the role of core muscles in postural control.

It is hypothesized that there are differences in core muscle thickness between the amputated and intact sides, as well as between amputees and healthy individuals. Additionally, core muscle function is expected to be associated with postural sway, limits of stability, functional tasks (such as sit-to-stand and stair negotiation), prosthesis adaptation, fear of falling, and the percentage of limb loss.

The study sample will consist of transtibial and transfemoral amputees who attend routine follow-up visits, along with a matched healthy control group. Ultrasonography will be used to objectively assess core muscle thickness, allowing the identification of muscle atrophy and asymmetrical loading. Postural control will be evaluated using a computerized balance system during various activities.

Statistical analyses will include descriptive statistics, normality tests, group comparisons, and correlation analyses. The findings are expected to contribute to the development of targeted rehabilitation programs focusing on core muscles to improve postural stability and reduce fall risk in individuals with lower extremity amputation.

Keywords
amputation, ultrasonography, balance, limits of stability, stiffness

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT07875075
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1) Experimental Group: individual with amputationParticipants in the amputee group will include individuals aged 20-60 years with unilateral transtibial or transfemoral amputation, classified as K1-K3 functional level, who are able to stand without assistive devices and use their prosthesis for at least 4 hours per day. All participants must provide voluntary informed consent. Individuals will be excluded if they have severe phantom or residual limb pain (≥6 on the Numeric Rating Scale), bilateral lower extremity amputation, or a body mass index greater than 30.
Control Group: Healthy SubjectsThe control group will consist of healthy individuals with demographic characteristics similar to the amputee group and without a regular exercise habit. Individuals will be excluded if they have central or peripheral vestibular disorders, lower extremity joint contractures, use medications affecting balance, or have a body mass index greater than 30.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diaphragm Thickening Fraction

    Diaphragm thickness will be assessed bilaterally at the zone of apposition using B-mode ultrasonography at the end of quiet expiration and during deep inspiration. Diaphragm thickening fraction will be calculated as [(thickness during deep inspiration - thickness at the end of quiet expiration) / thickness at the end of quiet expiration] × 100 and reported as a percentage (%). Three high-quality measurements will be obtained for each side, and the mean value will be used for analysis. Bilateral measurements will be used for side and group comparisons.

    Measured: Day 1

  2. Transversus Abdominis Activation Ratio

    Transversus abdominis muscle thickness will be assessed bilaterally using B-mode ultrasonography at the end of quiet expiration at rest and during the abdominal drawing-in maneuver. The activation ratio will be calculated by dividing muscle thickness during the abdominal drawing-in maneuver by muscle thickness at rest. Three high-quality measurements will be obtained for each side, and the mean value will be used for analysis. The activation ratio is dimensionless. Bilateral measurements will be used for side and group comparisons.

    Measured: Day 1

  3. Internal Oblique Activation Ratio

    Internal oblique muscle thickness will be assessed bilaterally using B-mode ultrasonography at the end of quiet expiration at rest and during the abdominal drawing-in maneuver. The activation ratio will be calculated by dividing muscle thickness during the abdominal drawing-in maneuver by muscle thickness at rest. Three high-quality measurements will be obtained for each side, and the mean value will be used for analysis. The activation ratio is dimensionless. Bilateral measurements will be used for side and group comparisons.

    Measured: Day 1

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. Standing Postural Sway

    Standing postural sway will be assessed using the Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance (mCTSIB) with the NeuroCom Balance Master. Center-of-gravity sway velocity will be measured during standing under four sensory conditions: eyes open on a firm surface, eyes closed on a firm surface, eyes open on a foam surface, and eyes closed on a foam surface. Sway velocity will be expressed in degrees per second (°/s), with lower values indicating better postural stability.

    Measured: Day 1

  2. Percentage of Remaining Limb

    The remaining limb length will be measured using a tape measure. The percentage of remaining limb will be calculated by dividing the remaining limb length by the total lower-extremity length and multiplying by 100. The result will be expressed as a percentage (%).

    Measured: Day 1

  3. Prosthesis Awareness

    Prosthesis awareness will be assessed using the amputee-adapted Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12). The questionnaire consists of 12 items evaluating awareness of the prosthesis during activities of daily living. Higher scores indicate a greater ability to forget the prosthesis during daily activities.

    Measured: Day 1

  4. Fear of Falling

    Fear of falling will be assessed using the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). The scale consists of 16 items scored from 1 to 4, with a total score ranging from 16 to 64. Higher scores indicate greater concern about falling.

    Measured: Day 1

  5. Reaction Time During Limits of Stability Test

    Reaction Time During Limits of Stability Test

    Reaction time will be assessed using the Limits of Stability test of the NeuroCom Balance Master. It represents the time between the visual cue and the initiation of voluntary movement toward the target and will be reported in seconds (s).

    Measured: Day 1

  6. Movement Velocity During Limits of Stability Test

    Movement velocity will be assessed using the Limits of Stability test of the NeuroCom Balance Master. It represents the average speed of center-of-gravity movement toward the target and will be reported in degrees per second (°/s).

    Measured: Day 1

  7. Endpoint Excursion During Limits of Stability Test

    Endpoint excursion will be assessed using the Limits of Stability test of the NeuroCom Balance Master. It represents the distance reached by the center of gravity during the initial movement toward the target and will be reported as a percentage (%).

    Measured: Day 1

  8. Maximum Excursion During Limits of Stability Test

    Maximum excursion will be assessed using the Limits of Stability test of the NeuroCom Balance Master. It represents the maximum distance reached by the center of gravity toward the target and will be reported as a percentage (%).

    Measured: Day 1

  9. Directional Control During Limits of Stability Test

    Directional control will be assessed using the Limits of Stability test of the NeuroCom Balance Master. It reflects the accuracy of center-of-gravity movement toward the intended target relative to extraneous movement and will be reported as a percentage (%).

    Measured: Day 1

  10. Weight Transfer Time During Sit-to-Stand

    Weight transfer time will be assessed using the Sit-to-Stand test of the NeuroCom Balance Master. It represents the time from the initiation of the test until the center of gravity is transferred over the feet and will be reported in seconds (s).

    Measured: Day 1

  11. Rising Index During Sit-to-Stand

    The rising index will be assessed using the Sit-to-Stand test on the NeuroCom Balance Master. It represents the force exerted by the lower extremities on the force platform during rising, normalized to body weight, and will be reported as a percentage (%).

    Measured: Day 1

  12. Postural Sway Velocity After Sit-to-Stand

    Postural sway velocity will be assessed using the Sit-to-Stand test on the NeuroCom Balance Master. It represents the center-of-gravity sway velocity during the first five seconds after rising to a standing position and will be reported in degrees per second (°/s).

    Measured: Day 1

  13. Weight-Bearing Asymmetry During Sit-to-Stand

    Weight-bearing asymmetry will be assessed using the Sit-to-Stand test on the NeuroCom Balance Master. It quantifies the asymmetry in load distribution between the right and left lower extremities during the sit-to-stand task and in the first five seconds of standing, and will be reported as a percentage (%).

    Measured: day 1

  14. Lift-Up Index During the Step Up/Over Task

    The lift-up index will be assessed using the Step Up/Over test on the NeuroCom Balance Master. It represents the force exerted by the stepping limb to raise the body onto the step, normalized to body weight, and will be reported as a percentage (%).

    Measured: Day 1

  15. Movement Time During the Step Up/Over Task

    Movement time will be assessed using the Step Up/Over test on the NeuroCom Balance Master. It represents the time required to complete the stepping movement and will be reported in seconds (s).

    Measured: day 1

  16. Impact Index During the Step Up/Over Task

    The impact index will be assessed using the Step Up/Over test on the NeuroCom Balance Master. It represents the force exerted on the force platform during landing, normalized to body weight, and will be reported as a percentage (%).

    Measured: Day 1

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Oct 2026
  2. Study start4 Dec 2025
  3. Primary completion4 Jul 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion4 Dec 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
32 participants (estimated)
Target duration
1 Day
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07875075
Sponsor's protocol ID
FTREK25/164
Acronym
usg
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
1 Oct 2026
Last updated
15 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Amputation and Ultrasonography, run by Hacettepe University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Seher Özyürek, Prof. (0 232 4124935, seherozyurek@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diaphragm Thickening Fraction (time frame: Day 1). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in