AKG and Brain Health in Aging

The allocation of one's limited capacities to deal with an abundance of environmental stimulation will be measured in a combined "Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test".Units of measure - score (from 0 to 10, bigger number is better). Reported as a %change from baseline.

The ability to store information until the amount of information to be stored exceeds one's capacity to hold that information will be measured using the "List Sorting Working Memory Test". Unit of measure - overall score (bigger number is better). Reported as a %change from baseline.

The capacity to plan, organize and monitor the executive of behaviors that are strategically directed in a goal-oriented manner will be measured using the "Dimensional Change Card Sort Test". Units of measure - score (from 0 to 10, bigger number is better). Reported as a %change from baseline.

Pattern Comparison Processing Speed Test assesses the amount of information that can be processed within a certain unit of time. Items are simple so as to purely measure processing speed. Units of measure - score (from 0 to 130, bigger number is better). Reported as a %change from baseline.

Cognitive processes involved in the acquisition, storage and retrieval of new information, will be measured using the "Picture Sequence Memory Test". Unit of measure - overall score (bigger number is better). Reported as a %change from baseline.

Weight and body composition using a bioimpedance scale and/or DXA scan. Reported as a %change from baseline, before and after completion of study

Picture Vocabulary Test measures receptive vocabulary administered in a computer-adaptive test (CAT) format. Respondents select the picture that most closely matches the meaning of the word, before and after treatment. Unit of measure - overall score (bigger number is better). Reported as a %change from baseline.

Self-reported cognitive function will be assessed using the PROMIS Short Form v2.0 Cognitive Function 4a, which measures participants' perceived cognitive abilities and difficulties in daily life.

Complete metabolic panel (General Chemistry 13 Panel and Lipid Panel from Piccolo Xpress). Reported as a %change from baseline, before and after completion of study

We will assess physical activity and classify it as sedentary, lightly active, active, or very active using the self-administered CHAMPS (Community Health Activities Model Program for Seniors) activities questionnaire. Outcome scores will be assessed using the weekly frequency of physical activity and calculated based on the standardized 6-point categorical duration scale, where scores range from a minimum of 0 hours per week (indicating complete inactivity) to an open-ended maximum number of hours. Higher scores indicate a better outcome, representing very active.

Sleep quality will be assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), which evaluates variables including "duration of sleep", "sleep disturbance", "sleep latency", "daytime dysfunction due to sleepiness", "sleep efficiency", "overall sleep quality", and "need meds to sleep". All variables will be scored from a minimum score of 0 (better) to a maximum score of 3 (worse) based on the answers in the questionnaire, to obtain a total score ranging from 0 to 21, with the total score ≤ 5 associated with good sleep quality, and > 5 associated with poor sleep quality.

After 24 weeks of the intervention, participants will complete the Global Rating of Change (GRC) to report whether they perceive any overall change following the study supplement or placebo. The GRC scale quantifies a patient's change in health status over time. We will utilize an 11-point Likert scale from -5 (very much worse) to +5 (very much improved), including 0 (unchanged), as the rating scale. Participants will be asked to rate their change based on one question: (1) "With respect to your cognition (thinking, attention, concentration, memory), how would you describe yourself now compared to the baseline that is starting treatment 24 weeks ago?"