Obsessive Compulsive BehaviorNExTNCT07859683
TMS + Exposure Therapy for Pediatric OCD: Second Phase
A study testing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: continuous theta burst to pre supplementary motor area and Exposure with Response Prevention in people with Obsessive Compulsive Behavior, run by Bradley Hospital at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to test transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for improving the outcomes of Exposure with Response Prevention (ERP) in youth and young adults with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). Researchers will compare two groups: ERP with active ("real") TMS vs. ERP with sham ("fake") TMS. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 21 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Obsessive Compulsive Behavior
- What is being tested?
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: continuous theta burst to pre supplementary motor area and Exposure with Response Prevention
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 31 Oct 2026to 31 Oct 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 21 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Between the ages of 12 and 21 years.
- Presence of OCD, as indicated by a score of > 16 on the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, indicating moderate or greater OCD symptoms.
- Presence of motor compulsions on CY-BOCS compulsion checklist
- English fluency to ensure comprehension of informed consent and study measures and instructions.
Who cannot join
- Decline to provide informed consent.
- Has a personal history, or a family history in a first-born relative, of any medical or psychiatric disorder, disease, condition, injury, symptoms or circumstance that, in the opinion of the principal investigator, may: (1) impact the risk profile of TMS; (2) reduce the subject's ability to fulfill the study requirements as per protocol; or (3) adversely impact the integrity of the data or the validity of the study results." Some examples include: epilepsy or seizure disorder(s), bipolar disorder or any psychiatric disorder associated with a risk of mania, intracranial pathology, traumatic brain injury, brain tumor, stroke, implanted medical devices or metallic objects in the head, or moderate-severe heart disease
- Pregnant according to the medical history or a urine pregnancy test; and menstruating females who are heterosexually active and not using a highly effective form of contraception (tubal ligation, FDA-approved hormonal contraceptive, or an IUD)
- Inability to undergo MRI.
- Is deemed to be at imminent risk of suicide according to the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) (i.e. answers YES to ≥ one (1) of the four screening questions) and/or in the medical opinion of the investigator
- History of, or risk factors for, neurocardiogenic syncope (history of syncope/ presyncope related to noxious stimuli, anxiety, micturation, or posture).
Show all 10Show fewer
- Concurrent psychotherapy of any kind for OCD.
- Concurrent TMS or receipt of any TMS experimental or clinical treatment less than 3 months prior to enrollment.
- Taking a medication deemed to pose high seizurogenic potential per physician review
- Taking a medication that has not reached stability criterion (same medication and dose for 6 weeks with no planned changes over the study period)
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55414
Christine Conelea, PhD, 612-261-3127, cconelea@umn.edu
- Recruiting
Emma Pendleton Bradley Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02915
Kristen Benito, PhD, 4014321054, kbenito@brownhealth.org
About this study
Official title: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Augment Exposure and Response Prevention for Pediatric OCD
The goal of this clinical trial is to test transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for improving the outcomes of Exposure with Response Prevention (ERP) in youth and young adults with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). Researchers will compare two groups: ERP with active ("real") TMS vs. ERP with sham ("fake") TMS. The first phase of this study found that active TMS+ERP normalized functioning in brain circuits that contribute to compulsive behavior. This second phase will test whether TMS-induced brain changes lead to improvements in OCD symptom severity. Participants will:
- Complete clinical interviews, questionnaires, and computerized tasks
- Complete two MRIs (brain scans)
- Receive daily TMS followed by ERP for two weeks (10 sessions)
Read the detailed description
Pediatric OCD is a public health problem and many remain symptomatic even after receiving efficacious treatments. The success of exposure and response prevention (ERP), a first-line behavioral treatment, depends on the ability to refrain from compulsions during exposure tasks. Improving this "therapy critical behavior" is a potentially important strategy for ERP augmentation. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can be leveraged to stimulate healthier functioning of brain circuits underlying therapy critical behaviors. The overall objective of this project is to test whether augmenting ERP with rTMS over cortical nodes of select cortico-striatal circuits implicated in compulsivity can normalize connectivity and enhance response prevention in youth and young adults with OCD. This project will use a masked RCT design to test whether ERP+TMS engages hypothesized circuits involved in compulsivity and whether this leads to clinical improvement. Youth ages 12-21 years with OCD will complete a full course of ERP plus randomly assigned TMS regimens of sham or continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) to the presupplementary motor area (pSMA; n=30 per group).
- Conditions
- Obsessive Compulsive Behavior
- Being tested
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: continuous theta burst to pre supplementary motor area, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Sham, Exposure with Response Prevention
- Keywords
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), Exposure Therapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Exposure with response prevention, Neuromodulation
- Medical subject headings
- Compulsive Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: continuous theta burst to pre supplementary motor areaDevice
Also called TMS, neuromodulation, cTBS
TMS will be delivered over the pre supplementary motor area (preSMA) using a continuous bursting pattern
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: ShamDevice
Also called TMS, neuromodulation
Sham stimulation will use the Magstim sham air-cooled coil, which produces auditory signals and appears identical to an active coil but contains a mu-metal shield that diverts the majority of the magnetic flux such that a minimal (<3%) magnetic field is delivered to the cortex
Exposure with Response PreventionBehavioural
Also called ERP, Exposure Therapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, CBT
ERP will be delivered daily, immediately following TMS
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ERP+cTBS | Experimental | Participants will receive two weeks (10 sessions) of continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS; a form of TMS) targeting the presupplementary motor area (pSMA), followed immediately by Exposure Plus Response Prevention (ERP). Receives: Device: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: continuous theta burst to pre supplementary motor area; Behavioral: Exposure with Response Prevention |
| ERP+Sham | Active comparator | Participants will receive two weeks (10 sessions) of sham ("fake") TMS, followed immediately by Exposure Plus Response Prevention (ERP). Receives: Device: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Sham; Behavioral: Exposure with Response Prevention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): connectivity of the pSMA-DLS circuit
correlation coefficient representing resting state connectivity between presupplementary motor area (pSMA) and dorsolateral striatum (DLS)
Measured: two weeks (post-treatment)
Observed Compulsive Behavior
Duration of time during which compulsions are observed during ERP sessions
Measured: two weeks
Child/Adult Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Inventory
Independent-Evaluator (IE) rated measure of OCD symptom severity. Rated on 0 (no symptoms) to 40 (most extreme symptoms) scale
Measured: six weeks (1-month follow-up)
Secondary outcomes (1)
Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Improvement
Independent-Evaluator (IE) rated measure of clinical improvement. Rated on 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse) scale
Measured: six weeks (1-month follow-up)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Oct 2026
- Study start31 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Aug 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Oct 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Obsessive Compulsive BehaviorStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Quadruple-masked Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) with parallel assignment
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bradley Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Minnesota, Butler Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kristen Benito, Bradley Hospital
- Investigators
- Kristen Benito, PhD, Principal investigator, Emma Pendleton Bradley HospitalChristine Conelea, Principal investigator, University of Minnesota
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07859683
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2113426
- Other IDs
- R33MH133666
- Acronym
- NExT
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 1 Oct 2026
- Last updated
- 19 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: We will share all de-identified data from study measures through the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Data Archive (NDA) using the data dictionaries available in NDA. As per NIMH Data Archive, data will be deidentified and assigned a Global Unique Identifier (GUID).
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Augment Exposure and Response Prevention for Pediatric OCD
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07859683
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NExT / 2113426
- Conditions
- Obsessive Compulsive Behavior
- Keywords
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), Exposure Therapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Exposure with response prevention, Neuromodulation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Bradley HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Minnesota, Butler Hospital
- Study start
- 31 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Oct 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Oct 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for improving the outcomes of Exposure with Response Prevention (ERP) in youth and young adults with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). Researchers will compare two groups: ERP with active ("real") TMS vs. ERP with sham ("fake") TMS. The first phase of this study found that active TMS+ERP normalized functioning in brain circuits that contribute to compulsive behavior. This second phase will test whether TMS-induced brain changes lead to improvements in OCD symptom severity. Participants will:
- Complete clinical interviews, questionnaires, and computerized tasks
- Complete two MRIs (brain scans)
- Receive daily TMS followed by ERP for two weeks (10 sessions)
Detailed description
Pediatric OCD is a public health problem and many remain symptomatic even after receiving efficacious treatments. The success of exposure and response prevention (ERP), a first-line behavioral treatment, depends on the ability to refrain from compulsions during exposure tasks. Improving this "therapy critical behavior" is a potentially important strategy for ERP augmentation. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can be leveraged to stimulate healthier functioning of brain circuits underlying therapy critical behaviors. The overall objective of this project is to test whether augmenting ERP with rTMS over cortical nodes of select cortico-striatal circuits implicated in compulsivity can normalize connectivity and enhance response prevention in youth and young adults with OCD. This project will use a masked RCT design to test whether ERP+TMS engages hypothesized circuits involved in compulsivity and whether this leads to clinical improvement. Youth ages 12-21 years with OCD will complete a full course of ERP plus randomly assigned TMS regimens of sham or continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) to the presupplementary motor area (pSMA; n=30 per group).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Quadruple-masked Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) with parallel assignment
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ERP+cTBS | Experimental | Device: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: continuous theta burst to pre supplementary motor area, Behavioral: Exposure with Response PreventionParticipants will receive two weeks (10 sessions) of continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS; a form of TMS) targeting the presupplementary motor area (pSMA), followed immediately by Exposure Plus Response Prevention (ERP). |
| ERP+Sham | Active comparator | Device: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Sham, Behavioral: Exposure with Response PreventionParticipants will receive two weeks (10 sessions) of sham ("fake") TMS, followed immediately by Exposure Plus Response Prevention (ERP). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 to 21 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Between the ages of 12 and 21 years.
- Presence of OCD, as indicated by a score of > 16 on the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, indicating moderate or greater OCD symptoms.
- Presence of motor compulsions on CY-BOCS compulsion checklist
- English fluency to ensure comprehension of informed consent and study measures and instructions.
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Decline to provide informed consent.
- Has a personal history, or a family history in a first-born relative, of any medical or psychiatric disorder, disease, condition, injury, symptoms or circumstance that, in the opinion of the principal investigator, may: (1) impact the risk profile of TMS; (2) reduce the subject's ability to fulfill the study requirements as per protocol; or (3) adversely impact the integrity of the data or the validity of the study results." Some examples include: epilepsy or seizure disorder(s), bipolar disorder or any psychiatric disorder associated with a risk of mania, intracranial pathology, traumatic brain injury, brain tumor, stroke, implanted medical devices or metallic objects in the head, or moderate-severe heart disease
- Pregnant according to the medical history or a urine pregnancy test; and menstruating females who are heterosexually active and not using a highly effective form of contraception (tubal ligation, FDA-approved hormonal contraceptive, or an IUD)
- Inability to undergo MRI.
- Is deemed to be at imminent risk of suicide according to the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) (i.e. answers YES to ≥ one (1) of the four screening questions) and/or in the medical opinion of the investigator
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: continuous theta burst to pre supplementary motor areaAlso: TMS, neuromodulation, cTBSTMS will be delivered over the pre supplementary motor area (preSMA) using a continuous bursting pattern | Device | ERP+cTBS |
| Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: ShamAlso: TMS, neuromodulationSham stimulation will use the Magstim sham air-cooled coil, which produces auditory signals and appears identical to an active coil but contains a mu-metal shield that diverts the majority of the magnetic flux such that a minimal (<3%) magnetic field is delivered to the cortex | Device | ERP+Sham |
| Exposure with Response PreventionAlso: ERP, Exposure Therapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, CBTERP will be delivered daily, immediately following TMS | Behavioural | ERP+Sham, ERP+cTBS |
Primary outcome
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): connectivity of the pSMA-DLS circuit
Time frame: two weeks (post-treatment)
correlation coefficient representing resting state connectivity between presupplementary motor area (pSMA) and dorsolateral striatum (DLS)
Observed Compulsive Behavior
Time frame: two weeks
Duration of time during which compulsions are observed during ERP sessions
Child/Adult Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Inventory
Time frame: six weeks (1-month follow-up)
Independent-Evaluator (IE) rated measure of OCD symptom severity. Rated on 0 (no symptoms) to 40 (most extreme symptoms) scale
1 secondary outcome
Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Improvement
Time frame: six weeks (1-month follow-up)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Oct 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. We will share all de-identified data from study measures through the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Data Archive (NDA) using the data dictionaries available in NDA. As per NIMH Data Archive, data will be deidentified and assigned a Global Unique Identifier (GUID).
Related trials for Obsessive Compulsive Behavior
RecruitingObservational study
Outcome Inference in the Sensory Preconditioning Task in Opioid-Use Disorder
Opioid-Related Disorders, Drug Addiction
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Attachment and Prognostic Factor: the Implicit Approach
Dependence Addictive
Recruiting
Fighting Addictions, Improving Lives: COmprehensive Drug Rehabilitation With Music
Substance Use Disorder (SUD)
Recruiting
Support Towards Addiction Recovery for Individuals With Criminal Legal System Involvement: The STAR Project
Addiction
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of Interventions to Promote Work-Life Balance Among Students at Gaming Schools
Internet Gaming Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Kristen Benito, PhD principal investigator
Emma Pendleton Bradley Hospital
Christine Conelea principal investigator
University of Minnesota
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: continuous theta burst to pre supplementary motor area and Exposure with Response Prevention in people with Obsessive Compulsive Behavior, run by Bradley Hospital at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Kristen Benito, PhD (4014321054, kbenito@brownhealth.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): connectivity of the pSMA-DLS circuit (time frame: two weeks (post-treatment)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Oct 2026.