Postoperative PainNCT07841951
Two Bupivacaine Concentrations for Recto-Intercostal Fascial Plane Block After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
A study testing Bupivacaine 0.25% - recto-intercostal fascial plane block, Bupivacaine 0.125% - recto-intercostal fascial plane block and Bupivacaine 0.25% - port-site infiltration in people with Postoperative Pain and Acute Pain, run by Medipol University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains clinically relevant, and current recommendations favour multimodal, opioid-sparing analgesia including regional techniques. The recto-intercostal fascial plane block (RIFPB) is a recently described technique in which local anesthetic is injected into the plane between… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Postoperative Pain, Acute Pain, Cholelithiasis
- What is being tested?
- Bupivacaine 0.25% - recto-intercostal fascial plane block, Bupivacaine 0.125% - recto-intercostal fascial plane block and Bupivacaine 0.25% - port-site infiltration
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 90 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 30 Jan 2027to 15 Jun 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged 18 to 75 years
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II
- Scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia
- Body weight above 60 kg
- Able and willing to provide written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Known allergy to local anesthetics or opioids
- Coagulopathy or use of anticoagulant medication
- Infection or skin lesion at the block injection site
- Alcohol or substance dependence, or chronic opioid use
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Advanced hepatic or renal failure
- Any condition that prevents understanding of the numeric rating scale or communication (e.g., cognitive impairment)
- Refusal to participate
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Istanbul Medipol University Mega Hospital Complex, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Istanbul
Burak Ömür, MD, +905056215056, bomur@medipol.edu.tr
About this study
Official title: Effect of Two Different Bupivacaine Concentrations in Recto-Intercostal Fascial Plane Block on Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Trial
Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains clinically relevant, and current recommendations favour multimodal, opioid-sparing analgesia including regional techniques. The recto-intercostal fascial plane block (RIFPB) is a recently described technique in which local anesthetic is injected into the plane between the rectus abdominis muscle and the 6th and 7th costal cartilages, targeting the anterior and lateral cutaneous branches of the sixth to ninth thoracic (T6-T9) thoracoabdominal nerves.
In the investigators' previous randomized controlled trial, bilateral RIFPB after laparoscopic cholecystectomy significantly reduced the need for rescue analgesia (17.9% versus 55.3%) and pain scores during the first 12 postoperative hours. That trial used 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine per side (60 mL, 150 mg in total), a dose approaching the recommended upper limit, and whether lower doses provide comparable analgesia remains unknown. Because fascial plane blocks depend on local anesthetic spread, large volumes are preferred, increasing the total dose and the risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST); lowering the concentration as volume increases has therefore been recommended. Equal-volume studies of transversus abdominis plane and erector spinae plane blocks suggest that lower concentrations provide comparable analgesia, but no study has compared concentrations for RIFPB.
Read more
This trial will compare, at a fixed volume of 25 mL per side (50 mL in total), bilateral RIFPB with 0.25% bupivacaine (125 mg), bilateral RIFPB with 0.125% bupivacaine (62.5 mg), and routine port-site infiltration with 25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine without a block (control) in adults undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. Ninety patients will be randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio.
The primary outcome is total rescue tramadol consumption during the first 24 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes include numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores at rest and on movement (coughing), the need for and time to first rescue analgesia, nausea, vomiting and pruritus, block-related complications and signs of LAST, patient satisfaction, and length of hospital stay.
The investigators hypothesize that RIFPB at either concentration will reduce rescue tramadol consumption and pain scores compared with control, and that the lower concentration will halve the total bupivacaine dose (62.5 mg instead of 125 mg), thereby reducing the risk of LAST.
Read the detailed description
Design. This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind (participant and outcomes assessor), controlled, three-arm, parallel-group, single-centre trial to be conducted at Istanbul Medipol University Mega Hospital Complex. The trial will start only after approval by the Istanbul Medipol University Clinical Research Ethics Committee and authorization by the Turkish Medicines and Medical Devices Agency (TİTCK), and will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice. Bupivacaine, licensed in Turkey, is used within its approved indication. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants before any study procedure.
Randomization and blinding. Before transfer to the operating room, patients will be allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three groups using a balanced sequence generated with the Research Randomizer program (www.randomizer.org). The allocation list will be kept by an anesthesiologist not otherwise involved in the conduct or assessment of the trial, who will prepare the study solutions under sterile conditions immediately before use (Group Y: 25 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine + 25 mL of 0.9% saline; Group D: 12.5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine + 37.5 mL of 0.9% saline) and supply them in identical, indistinguishable 25 mL syringes for each side, labelled only with the randomization number. As both solutions are clear and colourless, the anesthesiologist performing the block is also blinded to the concentration. All procedures are performed under general anesthesia, so participants are unaware of their allocation. All postoperative assessments will be performed by an anesthesiologist blinded to group allocation who takes no part in the intervention, and statistical analysis will be performed on a dataset with masked group codes. If knowledge of the allocation is required for patient safety (e.g., suspected local anesthetic systemic toxicity), it can be obtained immediately from the anesthesiologist who prepared the solution.
Groups. Group Y receives bilateral recto-intercostal fascial plane block (RIFPB) with 25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine per side (50 mL, 125 mg in total). Group D receives bilateral RIFPB with 25 mL of 0.125% bupivacaine per side (50 mL, 62.5 mg in total). Group K (control) receives no block and is managed with the institution's routine analgesic protocol, including port-site infiltration with 25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (62.5 mg) performed by the surgical team. The injected volume is identical in both block groups; only the concentration, and therefore the administered dose, differs. The investigators' previous trial used 30 mL per side for the block and 30 mL for port-site infiltration; in this trial the volume has been set at 25 mL to reduce the total local anesthetic dose. To allow the isolated effect of the block to be assessed, port-site infiltration is not performed in the block groups. The total single dose of bupivacaine (at most 125 mg) will not exceed the maximum single adult dose stated in the product information (150 mg) in any patient, and patients weighing 60 kg or less are not included.
Anesthesia and surgery. Standard monitoring (electrocardiography, non-invasive blood pressure and pulse oximetry) will be applied. After premedication with 2 mg of intravenous midazolam, general anesthesia will be induced with propofol (2-2.5 mg/kg), fentanyl (1-1.5 mcg/kg) and rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg), and maintained with sevoflurane in an oxygen-air mixture and a remifentanil infusion (0.05-2 mcg/kg/min). All patients will receive 4 mg of intravenous ondansetron for nausea prophylaxis, and 400 mg of intravenous ibuprofen and 100 mg of intravenous tramadol approximately 20 minutes before skin closure. Surgery will be performed by the same team using the conventional four-port technique.
Block technique. The block will be performed bilaterally at the end of surgery, before extubation, with the patient supine and under general anesthesia. Using a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe (11-12 MHz) and a 22-gauge, 80 mm block needle, the probe will be placed in a sagittal orientation 3-4 cm lateral and caudal to the epigastrium to visualize the rectus abdominis muscle and the 6th and 7th costal cartilages. With an in-plane technique in a caudal-to-cranial direction, hydrodissection with 5 mL of saline will be performed, 25 mL of the study solution will be injected on each side, and spread will be confirmed with ultrasound. Aspiration will be performed before injection and after every 5 mL, the drug will be given in fractionated doses, patients will be continuously monitored, and 20% lipid emulsion will be immediately available in the operating room.
Postoperative analgesia and assessment. All patients will receive 400 mg of intravenous ibuprofen every 8 hours. Pain will be assessed by the blinded assessor with the numeric rating scale (NRS; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain) at rest and on movement (coughing) at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours postoperatively. Rescue analgesia with 0.5-1 mg/kg of intravenous tramadol will be given whenever the NRS score is 4 or higher, up to a maximum daily tramadol dose of 400 mg. The standard 100 mg of tramadol given to all patients at the end of surgery is not included in the primary outcome. Patients with inadequate analgesia despite rescue tramadol will receive additional analgesic treatment at the discretion of the responsible physician, and this will be recorded. Nausea and vomiting will be treated according to routine clinical practice.
Withdrawal. Patients will be withdrawn if they are converted to open surgery after randomization, withdraw consent, or require postoperative mechanical ventilation or intensive care because of a serious surgical or anesthetic complication; if the study solution or intervention cannot be administered according to the protocol; or if the responsible investigator considers withdrawal necessary for patient safety. Withdrawn patients will continue to receive standard care.
Sample size. The sample size was calculated with G*Power 3.1, assuming that the primary outcome would be compared among the three groups with one-way analysis of variance. Considering the marked difference in rescue analgesic requirement between RIFPB and control in the investigators' previous trial (17.9% versus 55.3%), a medium-to-large effect size (f = 0.35), an alpha of 0.05 and 80% power yielded 84 patients (28 per group). Allowing for approximately 7% data loss, 30 patients per group (90 in total) will be enrolled.
Statistical analysis. Data will be analysed with SPSS 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Normality will be assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test; normally distributed variables will be presented as mean ± standard deviation and non-normally distributed variables as median (interquartile range). Normally distributed variables will be compared among the three groups using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc Bonferroni tests, and non-normally distributed variables, including 24-hour rescue tramadol consumption, using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Bonferroni-corrected Mann-Whitney U tests. Categorical variables will be presented as number (%) and compared with the chi-square test or, when any expected cell count is below 5, the Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test. NRS scores will be compared among groups at each time point with the Kruskal-Wallis test, and time to first rescue analgesia will be analysed with the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Between-group differences in the primary outcome will be reported with 95% confidence intervals. Bonferroni correction will be applied to pairwise comparisons; otherwise a p value below 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Analyses will include randomized patients who complete the 24-hour follow-up; withdrawn patients will be reported with reasons in the CONSORT flow diagram.
Ethical considerations. Patients in the control group will not be deprived of analgesic treatment; they will receive the institution's routine port-site infiltration and standard multimodal analgesia protocol, and rescue analgesia whenever the NRS score is 4 or higher. All drugs used are licensed in Turkey and used in routine clinical practice. Patient data will be stored in coded form. The study has no external funding and the investigators declare no conflict of interest.
- Conditions
- Postoperative Pain, Acute Pain, Cholelithiasis, Anesthesia
- Being tested
- Bupivacaine 0.25% - recto-intercostal fascial plane block, Bupivacaine 0.125% - recto-intercostal fascial plane block, Bupivacaine 0.25% - port-site infiltration
- Keywords
- RIFPB, fascial plane block, bupivacaine, local anesthetic concentration, postoperative analgesia, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, opioid consumption, regional anesthesia, ultrasound-guided nerve block, local anesthetic systemic toxicity, recto-intercostal fascial plane block
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Postoperative, Acute Pain, Cholelithiasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Bupivacaine 0.25% - recto-intercostal fascial plane blockDrug
Bilateral ultrasound-guided recto-intercostal fascial plane block (RIFPB) with a high-frequency linear probe (11-12 MHz) and a 22-gauge, 80 mm block needle. The probe is placed 3-4 cm lateral and caudal to the epigastrium to visualize the rectus abdominis muscle and the 6th and 7th costal cartilages; after in-plane hydrodissection with 5 mL of saline, 25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine is injected on each side (50 mL, 125 mg in total). The solution is prepared by diluting 25 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with 25 mL of 0.9% saline. Aspiration is performed before injection and after every 5 mL, and the drug is given in fractionated doses.
Bupivacaine 0.125% - recto-intercostal fascial plane blockDrug
Bilateral ultrasound-guided recto-intercostal fascial plane block (RIFPB) performed with the identical technique and the identical volume as in Group Y, using 25 mL of 0.125% bupivacaine per side (50 mL, 62.5 mg in total). The solution is prepared by diluting 12.5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with 37.5 mL of 0.9% saline.
Bupivacaine 0.25% - port-site infiltrationDrug
Routine institutional practice: infiltration of the laparoscopic port sites by the surgical team with 25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (62.5 mg). No fascial plane block is performed.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group Y - Recto-intercostal fascial plane block with 0.25% bupivacaine | Experimental | Bilateral ultrasound-guided recto-intercostal fascial plane block performed under general anesthesia at the end of surgery, before extubation, with 25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine per side (50 mL, 125 mg in total). Port-site infiltration is not performed. All participants receive the standard multimodal analgesia protocol and rescue intravenous tramadol 0.5-1 mg/kg whenever the numeric rating scale (NRS) score is 4 or higher. Receives: Drug: Bupivacaine 0.25% - recto-intercostal fascial plane block |
| Group D - Recto-intercostal fascial plane block with 0.125% bupivacaine | Experimental | Bilateral ultrasound-guided recto-intercostal fascial plane block performed under general anesthesia at the end of surgery, before extubation, with 25 mL of 0.125% bupivacaine per side (50 mL, 62.5 mg in total). The injected volume is identical to that of Group Y; only the concentration, and therefore the administered dose, differs. Port-site infiltration is not performed. All participants receive the standard multimodal analgesia protocol and rescue intravenous tramadol 0.5-1 mg/kg whenever the numeric rating scale (NRS) score is 4 or higher. Receives: Drug: Bupivacaine 0.125% - recto-intercostal fascial plane block |
| Group K - Control (port-site infiltration) | Active comparator | No fascial plane block is performed. Patients are managed with the institution's routine analgesic protocol, including port-site infiltration with 25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (62.5 mg) performed by the surgical team. All participants receive the standard multimodal analgesia protocol and rescue intravenous tramadol 0.5-1 mg/kg whenever the numeric rating scale (NRS) score is 4 or higher. Receives: Drug: Bupivacaine 0.25% - port-site infiltration |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Total rescue tramadol consumption during the first 24 postoperative hours
Cumulative dose of intravenous tramadol administered as rescue analgesia (milligrams) during the first 24 hours after extubation. Rescue tramadol 0.5-1 mg/kg intravenously is administered whenever the numeric rating scale (NRS) score is 4 or higher. The standard 100 mg of tramadol given to all patients before the end of surgery is not included.
Measured: 0 to 24 hours after extubation
Secondary outcomes (9)
Pain intensity at rest measured with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Pain at rest rated by the participant on an 11-point numeric rating scale, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicate greater pain.
Measured: 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours after extubation
Pain intensity on movement measured with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Pain on movement (coughing) rated by the participant on an 11-point numeric rating scale, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicate greater pain.
Measured: 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours after extubation
Proportion of participants requiring rescue analgesia
Number and percentage of participants in each group who receive at least one dose of rescue intravenous tramadol during the first 24 postoperative hours.
Measured: 0 to 24 hours after extubation
Time to first rescue analgesic request
Time in hours from extubation to administration of the first dose of rescue intravenous tramadol. Participants who require no rescue analgesia are censored at 24 hours.
Measured: 0 to 24 hours after extubation
Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and antiemetic requirement
Number and percentage of participants with at least one episode of nausea, with at least one episode of vomiting, and requiring antiemetic treatment during the first 24 postoperative hours.
Measured: 0 to 24 hours after extubation
Incidence of pruritus
Number and percentage of participants reporting pruritus during the first 24 postoperative hours.
Measured: 0 to 24 hours after extubation
Incidence of block-related complications and signs of local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST)
Number and percentage of participants with block-related complications (haematoma, intraperitoneal or vascular puncture, pneumothorax, infection at the injection site) or clinical signs of local anesthetic systemic toxicity (perioral numbness, tinnitus, altered mental status, seizure, arrhythmia, cardiovascular collapse).
Measured: From performance of the block until 24 hours after extubation
Patient satisfaction with postoperative analgesia
Satisfaction with postoperative pain management rated by the participant on a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 indicates very dissatisfied and 5 indicates very satisfied. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.
Measured: At 24 hours after extubation
Length of hospital stay
Time in days from the end of surgery until hospital discharge.
Measured: From end of surgery until hospital discharge, assessed up to 7 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Sep 2026
- Study start30 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 May 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Jun 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Postoperative PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Medipol UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Three parallel groups randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio; each participant receives a single allocated intervention at the end of surgery.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medipol University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Burak Omur, Medipol University
- Investigators
- Burak Ömür, Principal investigator, Medipol University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07841951
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RIFPB-DOZ-2026
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 20 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 29 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified individual participant data underlying the published results will be made available to qualified researchers whose proposed use of the data has been approved by the principal investigator.
Publications
Park YJ, Chu S, Yu E, Joo JD. Comparison of the efficacy of erector spinae plane block according to the difference in bupivacaine concentrations for analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective study. J Yeungnam Med Sci. 2023 Apr;40(2):172-178. doi: 10.12701/jyms.2022.00500. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
PubMed 36137572Nonphiaraj S, Siwakul P, Sangsungnern P, Intrapongpan J, Theeragul S, Nuwatkrisin K, Somdee W, Wanphon K. Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Using 0.125% versus 0.25% Bupivacaine for Postoperative Opioid Consumption in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial. J Pain Res. 2026 Feb 21;19:578126. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S578126. eCollection 2026.
PubMed 41755905Erdogan Ari D, Yildirim Ar A, Karadogan F, Ozcabi Y, Kocoglu A, Kilic F, Akgun FN. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing open inguinal hernia repair: 0.125% bupivacaine provides similar analgesic effect compared to 0.25% bupivacaine. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Feb;28:41-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.07.020. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
PubMed 26363806Bailey JG, Barry G, Volk T. Local anesthetic dosing for fascial plane blocks to avoid systemic toxicity: a narrative review. Can J Anaesth. 2025 Sep;72(9):1423-1447. doi: 10.1007/s12630-025-03034-x. Epub 2025 Sep 15.
PubMed 40954415Danisan HG, Omur B, Ince A, Golboyu BE, Ozdenkaya Y, Yanaral TU, Gezen C, Ciftci B. Efficacy of ultrasound-guided recto-intercostal fascial plane block for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2026 Jul;40(7):5760-5768. doi: 10.1007/s00464-026-12787-5. Epub 2026 Apr 17.
PubMed 42301457Tulgar S, Ciftci B, Ahiskalioglu A, Bilal B, Alver S, Sakul BU, Ansen G, Pence KB, Alici HA. Recto-intercostal fascial plane block: Another novel fascial plane block. J Clin Anesth. 2023 Oct;89:111163. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111163. Epub 2023 Jun 7. No abstract available.
PubMed 37295124
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Two Different Bupivacaine Concentrations in Recto-Intercostal Fascial Plane Block on Postoperative Analgesia After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07841951
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RIFPB-DOZ-2026
- Conditions
- Postoperative Pain, Acute Pain, Cholelithiasis, Anesthesia
- Keywords
- RIFPB, fascial plane block, bupivacaine, local anesthetic concentration, postoperative analgesia, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, opioid consumption, regional anesthesia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Medipol UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 May 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 Jun 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains clinically relevant, and current recommendations favour multimodal, opioid-sparing analgesia including regional techniques. The recto-intercostal fascial plane block (RIFPB) is a recently described technique in which local anesthetic is injected into the plane between the rectus abdominis muscle and the 6th and 7th costal cartilages, targeting the anterior and lateral cutaneous branches of the sixth to ninth thoracic (T6-T9) thoracoabdominal nerves.
In the investigators' previous randomized controlled trial, bilateral RIFPB after laparoscopic cholecystectomy significantly reduced the need for rescue analgesia (17.9% versus 55.3%) and pain scores during the first 12 postoperative hours. That trial used 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine per side (60 mL, 150 mg in total), a dose approaching the recommended upper limit, and whether lower doses provide comparable analgesia remains unknown. Because fascial plane blocks depend on local anesthetic spread, large volumes are preferred, increasing the total dose and the risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST); lowering the concentration as volume increases has therefore been recommended. Equal-volume studies of transversus abdominis plane and erector spinae plane blocks suggest that lower concentrations provide comparable analgesia, but no study has compared concentrations for RIFPB.
This trial will compare, at a fixed volume of 25 mL per side (50 mL in total), bilateral RIFPB with 0.25% bupivacaine (125 mg), bilateral RIFPB with 0.125% bupivacaine (62.5 mg), and routine port-site infiltration with 25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine without a block (control) in adults undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. Ninety patients will be randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio.
The primary outcome is total rescue tramadol consumption during the first 24 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes include numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores at rest and on movement (coughing), the need for and time to first rescue analgesia, nausea, vomiting and pruritus, block-related complications and signs of LAST, patient satisfaction, and length of hospital stay.
The investigators hypothesize that RIFPB at either concentration will reduce rescue tramadol consumption and pain scores compared with control, and that the lower concentration will halve the total bupivacaine dose (62.5 mg instead of 125 mg), thereby reducing the risk of LAST.
Detailed description
Design. This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind (participant and outcomes assessor), controlled, three-arm, parallel-group, single-centre trial to be conducted at Istanbul Medipol University Mega Hospital Complex. The trial will start only after approval by the Istanbul Medipol University Clinical Research Ethics Committee and authorization by the Turkish Medicines and Medical Devices Agency (TİTCK), and will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice. Bupivacaine, licensed in Turkey, is used within its approved indication. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants before any study procedure.
Randomization and blinding. Before transfer to the operating room, patients will be allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three groups using a balanced sequence generated with the Research Randomizer program (www.randomizer.org). The allocation list will be kept by an anesthesiologist not otherwise involved in the conduct or assessment of the trial, who will prepare the study solutions under sterile conditions immediately before use (Group Y: 25 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine + 25 mL of 0.9% saline; Group D: 12.5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine + 37.5 mL of 0.9% saline) and supply them in identical, indistinguishable 25 mL syringes for each side, labelled only with the randomization number. As both solutions are clear and colourless, the anesthesiologist performing the block is also blinded to the concentration. All procedures are performed under general anesthesia, so participants are unaware of their allocation. All postoperative assessments will be performed by an anesthesiologist blinded to group allocation who takes no part in the intervention, and statistical analysis will be performed on a dataset with masked group codes. If knowledge of the allocation is required for patient safety (e.g., suspected local anesthetic systemic toxicity), it can be obtained immediately from the anesthesiologist who prepared the solution.
Groups. Group Y receives bilateral recto-intercostal fascial plane block (RIFPB) with 25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine per side (50 mL, 125 mg in total). Group D receives bilateral RIFPB with 25 mL of 0.125% bupivacaine per side (50 mL, 62.5 mg in total). Group K (control) receives no block and is managed with the institution's routine analgesic protocol, including port-site infiltration with 25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (62.5 mg) performed by the surgical team. The injected volume is identical in both block groups; only the concentration, and therefore the administered dose, differs. The investigators' previous trial used 30 mL per side for the block and 30 mL for port-site infiltration; in this trial the volume has been set at 25 mL to reduce the total local anesthetic dose. To allow the isolated effect of the block to be assessed, port-site infiltration is not performed in the block groups. The total single dose of bupivacaine (at most 125 mg) will not exceed the maximum single adult dose stated in the product information (150 mg) in any patient, and patients weighing 60 kg or less are not included.
Anesthesia and surgery. Standard monitoring (electrocardiography, non-invasive blood pressure and pulse oximetry) will be applied. After premedication with 2 mg of intravenous midazolam, general anesthesia will be induced with propofol (2-2.5 mg/kg), fentanyl (1-1.5 mcg/kg) and rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg), and maintained with sevoflurane in an oxygen-air mixture and a remifentanil infusion (0.05-2 mcg/kg/min). All patients will receive 4 mg of intravenous ondansetron for nausea prophylaxis, and 400 mg of intravenous ibuprofen and 100 mg of intravenous tramadol approximately 20 minutes before skin closure. Surgery will be performed by the same team using the conventional four-port technique.
Block technique. The block will be performed bilaterally at the end of surgery, before extubation, with the patient supine and under general anesthesia. Using a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe (11-12 MHz) and a 22-gauge, 80 mm block needle, the probe will be placed in a sagittal orientation 3-4 cm lateral and caudal to the epigastrium to visualize the rectus abdominis muscle and the 6th and 7th costal cartilages. With an in-plane technique in a caudal-to-cranial direction, hydrodissection with 5 mL of saline will be performed, 25 mL of the study solution will be injected on each side, and spread will be confirmed with ultrasound. Aspiration will be performed before injection and after every 5 mL, the drug will be given in fractionated doses, patients will be continuously monitored, and 20% lipid emulsion will be immediately available in the operating room.
Postoperative analgesia and assessment. All patients will receive 400 mg of intravenous ibuprofen every 8 hours. Pain will be assessed by the blinded assessor with the numeric rating scale (NRS; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain) at rest and on movement (coughing) at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours postoperatively. Rescue analgesia with 0.5-1 mg/kg of intravenous tramadol will be given whenever the NRS score is 4 or higher, up to a maximum daily tramadol dose of 400 mg. The standard 100 mg of tramadol given to all patients at the end of surgery is not included in the primary outcome. Patients with inadequate analgesia despite rescue tramadol will receive additional analgesic treatment at the discretion of the responsible physician, and this will be recorded. Nausea and vomiting will be treated according to routine clinical practice.
Withdrawal. Patients will be withdrawn if they are converted to open surgery after randomization, withdraw consent, or require postoperative mechanical ventilation or intensive care because of a serious surgical or anesthetic complication; if the study solution or intervention cannot be administered according to the protocol; or if the responsible investigator considers withdrawal necessary for patient safety. Withdrawn patients will continue to receive standard care.
Sample size. The sample size was calculated with G*Power 3.1, assuming that the primary outcome would be compared among the three groups with one-way analysis of variance. Considering the marked difference in rescue analgesic requirement between RIFPB and control in the investigators' previous trial (17.9% versus 55.3%), a medium-to-large effect size (f = 0.35), an alpha of 0.05 and 80% power yielded 84 patients (28 per group). Allowing for approximately 7% data loss, 30 patients per group (90 in total) will be enrolled.
Statistical analysis. Data will be analysed with SPSS 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Normality will be assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test; normally distributed variables will be presented as mean ± standard deviation and non-normally distributed variables as median (interquartile range). Normally distributed variables will be compared among the three groups using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc Bonferroni tests, and non-normally distributed variables, including 24-hour rescue tramadol consumption, using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Bonferroni-corrected Mann-Whitney U tests. Categorical variables will be presented as number (%) and compared with the chi-square test or, when any expected cell count is below 5, the Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test. NRS scores will be compared among groups at each time point with the Kruskal-Wallis test, and time to first rescue analgesia will be analysed with the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Between-group differences in the primary outcome will be reported with 95% confidence intervals. Bonferroni correction will be applied to pairwise comparisons; otherwise a p value below 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Analyses will include randomized patients who complete the 24-hour follow-up; withdrawn patients will be reported with reasons in the CONSORT flow diagram.
Ethical considerations. Patients in the control group will not be deprived of analgesic treatment; they will receive the institution's routine port-site infiltration and standard multimodal analgesia protocol, and rescue analgesia whenever the NRS score is 4 or higher. All drugs used are licensed in Turkey and used in routine clinical practice. Patient data will be stored in coded form. The study has no external funding and the investigators declare no conflict of interest.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Three parallel groups randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio; each participant receives a single allocated intervention at the end of surgery.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group Y - Recto-intercostal fascial plane block with 0.25% bupivacaine | Experimental | Drug: Bupivacaine 0.25% - recto-intercostal fascial plane blockBilateral ultrasound-guided recto-intercostal fascial plane block performed under general anesthesia at the end of surgery, before extubation, with 25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine per side (50 mL, 125 mg in total). Port-site infiltration is not performed. All participants receive the standard multimodal analgesia protocol and rescue intravenous tramadol 0.5-1 mg/kg whenever the numeric rating scale (NRS) score is 4 or higher. |
| Group D - Recto-intercostal fascial plane block with 0.125% bupivacaine | Experimental | Drug: Bupivacaine 0.125% - recto-intercostal fascial plane blockBilateral ultrasound-guided recto-intercostal fascial plane block performed under general anesthesia at the end of surgery, before extubation, with 25 mL of 0.125% bupivacaine per side (50 mL, 62.5 mg in total). The injected volume is identical to that of Group Y; only the concentration, and therefore the administered dose, differs. Port-site infiltration is not performed. All participants receive the standard multimodal analgesia protocol and rescue intravenous tramadol 0.5-1 mg/kg whenever the numeric rating scale (NRS) score is 4 or higher. |
| Group K - Control (port-site infiltration) | Active comparator | Drug: Bupivacaine 0.25% - port-site infiltrationNo fascial plane block is performed. Patients are managed with the institution's routine analgesic protocol, including port-site infiltration with 25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (62.5 mg) performed by the surgical team. All participants receive the standard multimodal analgesia protocol and rescue intravenous tramadol 0.5-1 mg/kg whenever the numeric rating scale (NRS) score is 4 or higher. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Aged 18 to 75 years
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II
- Scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia
- Body weight above 60 kg
- Able and willing to provide written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Known allergy to local anesthetics or opioids
- Coagulopathy or use of anticoagulant medication
- Infection or skin lesion at the block injection site
- Alcohol or substance dependence, or chronic opioid use
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Bupivacaine 0.25% - recto-intercostal fascial plane blockBilateral ultrasound-guided recto-intercostal fascial plane block (RIFPB) with a high-frequency linear probe (11-12 MHz) and a 22-gauge, 80 mm block needle. The probe is placed 3-4 cm lateral and caudal to the epigastrium to visualize the rectus abdominis muscle and the 6th and 7th costal cartilages; after in-plane hydrodissection with 5 mL of saline, 25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine is injected on each side (50 mL, 125 mg in total). The solution is prepared by diluting 25 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with 25 mL of 0.9% saline. Aspiration is performed before injection and after every 5 mL, and the drug is given in fractionated doses. | Drug | Group Y - Recto-intercostal fascial plane block with 0.25% bupivacaine |
| Bupivacaine 0.125% - recto-intercostal fascial plane blockBilateral ultrasound-guided recto-intercostal fascial plane block (RIFPB) performed with the identical technique and the identical volume as in Group Y, using 25 mL of 0.125% bupivacaine per side (50 mL, 62.5 mg in total). The solution is prepared by diluting 12.5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with 37.5 mL of 0.9% saline. | Drug | Group D - Recto-intercostal fascial plane block with 0.125% bupivacaine |
| Bupivacaine 0.25% - port-site infiltrationRoutine institutional practice: infiltration of the laparoscopic port sites by the surgical team with 25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (62.5 mg). No fascial plane block is performed. | Drug | Group K - Control (port-site infiltration) |
Primary outcome
Total rescue tramadol consumption during the first 24 postoperative hours
Time frame: 0 to 24 hours after extubation
Cumulative dose of intravenous tramadol administered as rescue analgesia (milligrams) during the first 24 hours after extubation. Rescue tramadol 0.5-1 mg/kg intravenously is administered whenever the numeric rating scale (NRS) score is 4 or higher. The standard 100 mg of tramadol given to all patients before the end of surgery is not included.
9 secondary outcomes
Pain intensity at rest measured with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours after extubation
Pain intensity on movement measured with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours after extubation
Proportion of participants requiring rescue analgesia
Time frame: 0 to 24 hours after extubation
Time to first rescue analgesic request
Time frame: 0 to 24 hours after extubation
Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and antiemetic requirement
Time frame: 0 to 24 hours after extubation
Incidence of pruritus
Time frame: 0 to 24 hours after extubation
Incidence of block-related complications and signs of local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST)
Time frame: From performance of the block until 24 hours after extubation
Patient satisfaction with postoperative analgesia
Time frame: At 24 hours after extubation
Length of hospital stay
Time frame: From end of surgery until hospital discharge, assessed up to 7 days
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Oct 2026.
- Background: PubMed 36137572Park YJ, Chu S, Yu E, Joo JD. Comparison of the efficacy of erector spinae plane block according to the difference in bupivacaine concentrations for analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective study. J Yeungnam Med Sci. 2023 Apr;40(2):172-178. doi: 10.12701/jyms.2022.00500. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
- Background: PubMed 41755905Nonphiaraj S, Siwakul P, Sangsungnern P, Intrapongpan J, Theeragul S, Nuwatkrisin K, Somdee W, Wanphon K. Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Using 0.125% versus 0.25% Bupivacaine for Postoperative Opioid Consumption in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial. J Pain Res. 2026 Feb 21;19:578126. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S578126. eCollection 2026.
- Background: PubMed 26363806Erdogan Ari D, Yildirim Ar A, Karadogan F, Ozcabi Y, Kocoglu A, Kilic F, Akgun FN. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing open inguinal hernia repair: 0.125% bupivacaine provides similar analgesic effect compared to 0.25% bupivacaine. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Feb;28:41-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.07.020. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
- Background: PubMed 40954415Bailey JG, Barry G, Volk T. Local anesthetic dosing for fascial plane blocks to avoid systemic toxicity: a narrative review. Can J Anaesth. 2025 Sep;72(9):1423-1447. doi: 10.1007/s12630-025-03034-x. Epub 2025 Sep 15.
- Background: PubMed 42301457Danisan HG, Omur B, Ince A, Golboyu BE, Ozdenkaya Y, Yanaral TU, Gezen C, Ciftci B. Efficacy of ultrasound-guided recto-intercostal fascial plane block for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2026 Jul;40(7):5760-5768. doi: 10.1007/s00464-026-12787-5. Epub 2026 Apr 17.
- Background: PubMed 37295124Tulgar S, Ciftci B, Ahiskalioglu A, Bilal B, Alver S, Sakul BU, Ansen G, Pence KB, Alici HA. Recto-intercostal fascial plane block: Another novel fascial plane block. J Clin Anesth. 2023 Oct;89:111163. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111163. Epub 2023 Jun 7. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified individual participant data underlying the published results will be made available to qualified researchers whose proposed use of the data has been approved by the principal investigator.
Related trials for Postoperative Pain
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
Recruiting
Effect of Cryotherapeutic and Nanotherapeutic Sodium Hypochlorite on Post-Operative Endodontic Pain.
Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis, Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis
RecruitingPhase 2
REctus Sheath Trial
Acute Pain, Postoperative Pain, Acute
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Pectoral Nerve Block (PECS) Using Magnesium Sulfate Added to Dexamethasone on Quality of Recovery and Chronic Post-Mastectomy Pain
Breast Cancer, Postoperative Pain
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Pain in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section at Assuit University Hospital
Cesarean Section
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Burak Ömür principal investigator
Medipol University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Bupivacaine 0.25% - recto-intercostal fascial plane block, Bupivacaine 0.125% - recto-intercostal fascial plane block and Bupivacaine 0.25% - port-site infiltration in people with Postoperative Pain and Acute Pain, run by Medipol University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Burak Ömür, MD (+905056215056, bomur@medipol.edu.tr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Total rescue tramadol consumption during the first 24 postoperative hours (time frame: 0 to 24 hours after extubation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07841951, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Oct 2026.