Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI)BEACONNCT07841691
Optimising Antibiotic Use for Paediatric Lower Respiratory Tract Infections in Africa
A study testing CRP- and PREPARE-guided Antibiotic Prescription in people with Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) and Pneumonia, run by University of Witwatersrand, South Africa at 1 site in South Africa.
Trial summary
Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) remain a leading cause of hospitalisation and death among young children in Africa. Although viral infections account for a substantial proportion of LRTIs, antibiotics are frequently prescribed because distinguishing between viral and bacterial infections can be challenging. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 2 to 24 months
- Conditions the study is for
- Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI), Pneumonia, Bronchopneumonia
- What is being tested?
- CRP- and PREPARE-guided Antibiotic Prescription
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 400 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Africa
- Study dates
- 27 May 2026to 30 Jun 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 2 to 24 months
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Children between the ages of 2-24 months
- Clinician diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI)
Who cannot join
- Transferred from other hospitals with more than 24 hours of hospitalisation
- Hospitalisation within the preceding 30 days
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
South Africa1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital
Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2198
Lucy N Wilson, MBBCh, MMED, +27 72 326 7888, lucy.wilson@wits-vida.org
Ziyaad Dangor, PhD, ziyaad.dangor@wits-vida.org
About this study
Official title: Optimising Antibiotic Use for Young African Children Hospitalised With Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: the Role of Biomarkers, Clinical Severity Scoring and Clinician Attitudes
Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) remain a leading cause of hospitalisation and death among young children in Africa. Although viral infections account for a substantial proportion of LRTIs, antibiotics are frequently prescribed because distinguishing between viral and bacterial infections can be challenging. This contributes to unnecessary antibiotic exposure and the rising global public health challenge of antimicrobial resistance.
This pragmatic, unblinded randomised controlled study will evaluate whether the combination of point-of-care (POC) C-reactive protein (CRP) testing and the PREPARE clinical severity score can safely reduce antibiotic use among children aged 2 to 24 months hospitalised with LRTI at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital (CHBAH), South Africa. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention group, where antibiotic decisions are guided by serial POC CRP measurements and repeated PREPARE severity assessments, or a control group receiving routine clinical care.
Read more
The primary objective of the study is to compare antibiotic use during hospitalisation between the intervention and control groups. Secondary objectives are to evaluate the safety of this approach by comparing mortality, hospital readmission within 28 days, adverse events, need for invasive ventilation, duration of hospitalisation, and other clinical outcomes between study groups. In addition, the study will compare healthcare-related costs, including antibiotic expenditure and costs associated with hospitalisation.
A parallel mixed-methods component will explore clinician attitudes, beliefs, and determinants of antibiotic prescribing for children hospitalised with LRTI using surveys, focus groups discussions, and individual interviews informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Findings will help identify behavioural and system-level factors that influence antibiotic prescribing and inform future antimicrobial stewardship interventions.
This study aims to generate evidence on whether biomarker-guided and risk-stratified care can safely optimise antibiotic use among young African children hospitalised with LRTI while improving antimicrobial stewardship and reducing healthcare costs.
Read the detailed description
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged as one of the most pressing global health threats and is driven largely by the inappropriate use of antibiotics. Strengthening antibiotic stewardship is therefore a critical public health priority to slow the emergence of resistant pathogens and preserve the effectiveness of existing therapies. Stewardship in inherently complex, particularly in the management of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in children. Optimising appropriate antibiotic use requires good clinical acumen, diagnostic accuracy, and sound clinical decision-making. This decision-making is influenced by multiple environmental, social, behavioural and psychological factors.
LRTIs remain a leading cause of mortality and morbidity in children under five years of age, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite progress in pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine coverage, LRTIs continue to account for a significant proportion of paediatric hospital admissions and deaths. There has been a marked shift in the aetiology of LRTIs over the last two decades, with a now greater proportion of LRTIs attributable to respiratory viruses and a reduced proportion caused by bacterial infections. Data from The Pneumonia Etiology Research for Child Health (PERCH) study demonstrated that viruses accounted for approximately two-thirds of childhood pneumonia cases, while bacteria accounted for approximately one-quarter.
The World Health Organisation (WHO) pneumonia case definition is intentionally highly sensitive in order to reduce mortality, particularly in resource-limited settings. Importantly, the WHO definition does not differentiate between viral, bacterial or mixed aetiology LRTI. Consequently, many children fulfilling the criteria for severe pneumonia receive antibiotic treatment despite the predominance of viral causes. This challenge is particularly relevant in infants and young children where bronchiolitis and bronchopneumonia frequently present with overlapping clinical features and are often difficult to distinguish clinically.
Although bronchiolitis is generally managed with supportive care alone and bronchopneumonia is treated with antibiotics, clinicians frequently struggle to differentiate between these two conditions, resulting in over-prescribing of antibiotics. Diagnostic uncertainty, concerns regarding clinical deterioration, fear of missing serious bacterial infection, and limitations in available diagnostic tools all contribute to antibiotic prescribing decisions. While this approach may reduce the risk of undertreatment, it also contributes to unnecessary antibiotic exposure, increased healthcare costs, adverse drug effects, disruptions of the microbiome, and the development of antimicrobial resistance.
Clinical severity assessment tools may help identify children at higher risk of adverse outcomes. The Pneumonia Research Partnership to Assess WHO Recommendations (PREPARE) clinical severity score was derived from data obtained from more than 20 countries and has demonstrated good external validity in predicting pneumonia-related mortality among children aged 2-59 months hospitalised with pneumonia. The PREPARE score incorporates patient age, sex, weight-for-age z-score, body temperature, respiratory rate, level of consciousness, cyanosis, and oxygen saturation to produce a risk score that can assist with clinical risk stratification.
While risk assessment tools may identify children at risk of severe disease and adverse outcomes, they do not determine disease aetiology. Point-of-care (POC) biomarkers may assist clinicians in differentiating between viral and bacterial infections. C-reactive protein (CRP) is an inflammatory biomarker that has been evaluated as a tool to guide antibiotic prescribing practices. Studies conducted in Uganda and Tanzania have demonstrated that CRP-guided management strategies can safely reduce antibiotic prescribing among children with respiratory illnesses in outpatient settings. However, evidence regarding CRP-informed risk-differentiated care among African children hospitalised with LRTI is lacking.
The implementation of a clinical severity scoring system alongside serial POC CRP testing may provide a structured strategy to support safe antibiotic prescribing while reducing unnecessary antibiotic use. To our knowledge, no studies have assessed the safety of biomarker-guided and severity-score-guided withholding or early termination of antibiotics among young African children hospitalised with LRTI.
The primary component of this study is a 12-month pragmatic, unblinded randomised controlled trial conducted at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital (CHBAH), a large tertiary referral hospital in Soweto, South Africa. Children aged 2 to 24 months admitted with a clinician diagnoses of LRTI will be eligible for enrolment following written informed consent from a parent or legal guardian.
Participants will be randomised win a 1:1 ratio to either an intervention arm or routine care arm. Children allocated to the intervention arm will undergo a baseline assessment using a decision-making algorithm incorporating both the PREPARE clinical severity score and a POC CRP test. A conservative CRP threshold of less than 10mg/L together with a PREPARE score of 4 or less will be used to identify children who are at low risk of adverse outcomes and more likely to have viral disease. Repeat PREPARE assessments and POC CRP measurements will be performed on days 1, 2 and 3 following enrolment.
The intervention is intended to support clinical decision-making regarding antibiotic initiation, continuation and early termination. Treating clinicians will retain the authority to override the algorithm at any time based on the patient's clinical condition to ensure patient safety.
Children allocated to the control arm will receive routine clinical care according to existing hospital and unit-specific practices. A baseline PREPARE score will be recorded for research purposes, but clinical management decisions will not be guided by the study algorithm. Participants will be followed throughout hospitalisation and until 28 days following randomisation. Data collected will include antibiotic use, duration of antibiotic exposure, route of administration, clinical outcomes, need for respiratory support, adverse events, readmissions and mortality,
The primary outcome is antibiotic use during hospitalisation, including whether antibiotics were initiated or withheld, route of administration, and duration of therapy. Secondary outcomes include death within 28 days of randomisation, hospital readmission within 28 days, serious adverse events, escalation of care to invasive ventilation, hospitalisation exceeding seven days, duration of oxygen supplementation, duration of antibiotic exposure, duration of hospital stay, escalation of antibiotic therapy, post-discharge antibiotic use, and clinical complications including sepsis, lung abscess, and empyema.
In addition to the randomised trial, a mixed-methods study will explore clinician attitudes, beliefs and behaviours regarding antibiotic prescribing for children hospitalised with LRTI. Despite awareness of antimicrobial stewardship principles, clinicians continue to over-prescribe antibiotics because of diagnostic uncertainty, fear of adverse outcomes, time constraints, parental expectations, influence of colleagues and senior clinicians, and limitations in diagnostic resources.
The qualitative component will be guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and will involve surveys, focus group discussions and semi-structured interviews among registrars and paediatricians working at CHBAH. The study aims to identify behavioural, social and environmental determinants of prescribing practices and to better understand barriers and facilitators to appropriate antibiotic use.
A health economic analysis will also be undertaken to compare healthcare-related costs between the intervention and routine care groups, including antibiotic expenditure, duration of hospitalisation, level of care received, and costs associated with respiratory support. The study will determine whether the intervention leads to cost savings through reductions in antibiotic use and shorter hospital stays.
This study aims to determine the safety and effectiveness of combining point-of-care CRP testing with clinical severity assessment to support antibiotic prescribing decisions among children aged 2-24 months hospitalised with LRTI. In addition, it seeks to improve understanding of clinician prescribing behaviour and the contextual factors that influence antibiotic use. The findings will contribute to the evidence base for paediatric antimicrobial stewardship and may inform future implementation of biomarker-guided and severity-guided antibiotic prescribing strategies in resource-limited settings.
- Being tested
- CRP- and PREPARE-guided Antibiotic Prescription
- Keywords
- Antimicrobial stewardship, Antibiotic prescribing, Lower respiratory tract infection, Antibiotic use, Pneumonia, Bronchiolitis, Bronchopneumonia, C-Reactive Protein, CRP, Point-of-care testing, PREPARE score, Clinical severity score, Risk stratification, Hospitalised children, Childhood pneumonia, Antimicrobial resistance, Clinician attitudes, Implementation science, South Africa
- Medical subject headings
- Pneumonia, Bronchopneumonia, Bronchiolitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CRP- and PREPARE-guided Antibiotic PrescriptionDiagnostic test
Antibiotic prescribing is guided by serial point-of-care CRP measurements and repeated PREPARE clinical severity score assessments. A predefined algorithm incorporating CRP results and clinical severity assessment is used to support decisions regarding antibiotic initiation, continuation, and discontinuation in children hospitalised with lower respiratory tract infections.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention arm: CRP- and PREPARE-Guided Antibiotic Use | Experimental | Participants will receive antibiotic prescribing guidance based on serial point-of-care CRP measurements and repeated PREPARE clinical severity score assessments in addition to routine clinical care. Receives: Diagnostic Test: CRP- and PREPARE-guided Antibiotic Prescription |
| Control: Standard of Care | No intervention | Participants will receive routine clinical management according to existing hospital and unit-specific practice. Antibiotic prescribing decisions will be made by the treating clinical team without guidance from the study intervention, including point-of-care CRP testing and the PREPARE clinical severity score algorithm |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Antibiotic use during hospitalisation
Antibiotic use among children hospitalised with lower respiratory tract infection, including antibiotic initiation, route of administration, duration of therapy, and early discontinuation of antibiotics during the index hospital admission.
Measured: From randomisation (day of admission) until hospital discharge (up to 28 days post-randomisation)
Secondary outcomes (7)
Number of participants who die within 28 days of randomisation
Number of participants who die from any cause within 28 days after randomisation. This outcome will be compared between the intervention and routine care groups.
Measured: From randomisation through 28 days after randomisation
Antibiotic treatment cost per participant
Total cost of systemic antibiotic treatment received by each participant from randomisation until discharge (up to 28 days following randomisation) from the index hospitalisation. Antibiotic costs will be calculated using the antibiotics administered, duration of treatment, and applicable unit costs. Mean or median cost per participant will be compared between the intervention and routine care groups and reported in South African rand.
Measured: From randomisation until discharge from the index hospitalisation, up to 28 days
Number of participants readmitted to hospital within 28 days of randomisation
Number of participants who are readmitted to hospital for any cause following discharge from the index admission and within 28 days after randomisation. This outcome will be compared between the intervention and routine care groups.
Measured: From discharge from the index hospitalisation through 28 days after randomisation
Number of Participants Experiencing at Least One Adverse Event Within 28 Days of Randomisation
Number of participants who experience at least one adverse event within 28 days after randomisation, according to the adverse event definition specified in the study protocol. Participants experiencing more than one adverse event will be counted once for this participant-level outcome
Measured: From randomisation through 28 days after randomisation
Number of Participants Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
Number of participants who require escalation of care to invasive mechanical ventilation during the index hospital admission. This outcome will be compared between the intervention and routine care groups.
Measured: From randomisation until discharge from the index hospitalisation, up to 28 days
Number of Participants Hospitalised for More Than 7 Days
Number of participants whose index hospital admission exceeds 7 days. Duration of hospitalisation will be calculated from the date of hospital admission to the date of discharge.
Measured: During the index hospitalisation, assessed at discharge, up to 28 days
Hospitalisation cost per participant
Total hospitalisation cost per participant during the index hospital admission. Hospitalisation costs will be calculated using the duration and level of hospital care received and the applicable unit costs. Mean or median cost per participant will be compared between the intervention and routine care groups and reported in South African rand.
Measured: From randomisation until discharge from the index hospitalisation, up to 28 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Sep 2026
- Study start27 May 2026
- Primary completion26 May 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jun 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either an intervention group or a routine care control group. Children in the intervention group will receive antibiotic prescribing guidance based on serial point-of-care C-reactive protein (CRP) measurements and repeated PREPARE clinical severity score assessments in addition to routine clinical evaluation. Children in the control group will receive standard clinical care according to existing hospital practice and national treatment guidelines. Antibiotic use, outcomes and healthcare related costs will be compared between the two parallel study arms.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Witwatersrand, South Africa
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Lucy Wilson, University of Witwatersrand, South Africa
- Investigators
- Lucy N Wilson, MBBCh, MMED, FCPaed, Principal investigator, University of Witwatersrand, South AfricaDavid P Moore, PhD, Study director, University of Witwatersrand, South AfricaChris A Rees, PhD, Study chair, Emory UniversityZiyaad Dangor, PhD, Study chair, University of the Witwatersrand Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Analytics (Wits VIDA) Research Unit
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07841691
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- M250901
- Acronym
- BEACON
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 15 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 25 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: No plan has been established for sharing individual participant data. Participant confidentiality and privacy considerations limit the sharing of individual-level data
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Optimising Antibiotic Use for Young African Children Hospitalised With Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: the Role of Biomarkers, Clinical Severity Scoring and Clinician Attitudes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07841691
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BEACON / M250901
- Keywords
- Antimicrobial stewardship, Antibiotic prescribing, Lower respiratory tract infection, Antibiotic use, Pneumonia, Bronchiolitis, Bronchopneumonia, C-Reactive Protein
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Witwatersrand, South AfricaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 27 May 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 May 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) remain a leading cause of hospitalisation and death among young children in Africa. Although viral infections account for a substantial proportion of LRTIs, antibiotics are frequently prescribed because distinguishing between viral and bacterial infections can be challenging. This contributes to unnecessary antibiotic exposure and the rising global public health challenge of antimicrobial resistance.
This pragmatic, unblinded randomised controlled study will evaluate whether the combination of point-of-care (POC) C-reactive protein (CRP) testing and the PREPARE clinical severity score can safely reduce antibiotic use among children aged 2 to 24 months hospitalised with LRTI at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital (CHBAH), South Africa. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention group, where antibiotic decisions are guided by serial POC CRP measurements and repeated PREPARE severity assessments, or a control group receiving routine clinical care.
The primary objective of the study is to compare antibiotic use during hospitalisation between the intervention and control groups. Secondary objectives are to evaluate the safety of this approach by comparing mortality, hospital readmission within 28 days, adverse events, need for invasive ventilation, duration of hospitalisation, and other clinical outcomes between study groups. In addition, the study will compare healthcare-related costs, including antibiotic expenditure and costs associated with hospitalisation.
A parallel mixed-methods component will explore clinician attitudes, beliefs, and determinants of antibiotic prescribing for children hospitalised with LRTI using surveys, focus groups discussions, and individual interviews informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Findings will help identify behavioural and system-level factors that influence antibiotic prescribing and inform future antimicrobial stewardship interventions.
This study aims to generate evidence on whether biomarker-guided and risk-stratified care can safely optimise antibiotic use among young African children hospitalised with LRTI while improving antimicrobial stewardship and reducing healthcare costs.
Detailed description
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged as one of the most pressing global health threats and is driven largely by the inappropriate use of antibiotics. Strengthening antibiotic stewardship is therefore a critical public health priority to slow the emergence of resistant pathogens and preserve the effectiveness of existing therapies. Stewardship in inherently complex, particularly in the management of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in children. Optimising appropriate antibiotic use requires good clinical acumen, diagnostic accuracy, and sound clinical decision-making. This decision-making is influenced by multiple environmental, social, behavioural and psychological factors.
LRTIs remain a leading cause of mortality and morbidity in children under five years of age, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite progress in pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine coverage, LRTIs continue to account for a significant proportion of paediatric hospital admissions and deaths. There has been a marked shift in the aetiology of LRTIs over the last two decades, with a now greater proportion of LRTIs attributable to respiratory viruses and a reduced proportion caused by bacterial infections. Data from The Pneumonia Etiology Research for Child Health (PERCH) study demonstrated that viruses accounted for approximately two-thirds of childhood pneumonia cases, while bacteria accounted for approximately one-quarter.
The World Health Organisation (WHO) pneumonia case definition is intentionally highly sensitive in order to reduce mortality, particularly in resource-limited settings. Importantly, the WHO definition does not differentiate between viral, bacterial or mixed aetiology LRTI. Consequently, many children fulfilling the criteria for severe pneumonia receive antibiotic treatment despite the predominance of viral causes. This challenge is particularly relevant in infants and young children where bronchiolitis and bronchopneumonia frequently present with overlapping clinical features and are often difficult to distinguish clinically.
Although bronchiolitis is generally managed with supportive care alone and bronchopneumonia is treated with antibiotics, clinicians frequently struggle to differentiate between these two conditions, resulting in over-prescribing of antibiotics. Diagnostic uncertainty, concerns regarding clinical deterioration, fear of missing serious bacterial infection, and limitations in available diagnostic tools all contribute to antibiotic prescribing decisions. While this approach may reduce the risk of undertreatment, it also contributes to unnecessary antibiotic exposure, increased healthcare costs, adverse drug effects, disruptions of the microbiome, and the development of antimicrobial resistance.
Clinical severity assessment tools may help identify children at higher risk of adverse outcomes. The Pneumonia Research Partnership to Assess WHO Recommendations (PREPARE) clinical severity score was derived from data obtained from more than 20 countries and has demonstrated good external validity in predicting pneumonia-related mortality among children aged 2-59 months hospitalised with pneumonia. The PREPARE score incorporates patient age, sex, weight-for-age z-score, body temperature, respiratory rate, level of consciousness, cyanosis, and oxygen saturation to produce a risk score that can assist with clinical risk stratification.
While risk assessment tools may identify children at risk of severe disease and adverse outcomes, they do not determine disease aetiology. Point-of-care (POC) biomarkers may assist clinicians in differentiating between viral and bacterial infections. C-reactive protein (CRP) is an inflammatory biomarker that has been evaluated as a tool to guide antibiotic prescribing practices. Studies conducted in Uganda and Tanzania have demonstrated that CRP-guided management strategies can safely reduce antibiotic prescribing among children with respiratory illnesses in outpatient settings. However, evidence regarding CRP-informed risk-differentiated care among African children hospitalised with LRTI is lacking.
The implementation of a clinical severity scoring system alongside serial POC CRP testing may provide a structured strategy to support safe antibiotic prescribing while reducing unnecessary antibiotic use. To our knowledge, no studies have assessed the safety of biomarker-guided and severity-score-guided withholding or early termination of antibiotics among young African children hospitalised with LRTI.
The primary component of this study is a 12-month pragmatic, unblinded randomised controlled trial conducted at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital (CHBAH), a large tertiary referral hospital in Soweto, South Africa. Children aged 2 to 24 months admitted with a clinician diagnoses of LRTI will be eligible for enrolment following written informed consent from a parent or legal guardian.
Participants will be randomised win a 1:1 ratio to either an intervention arm or routine care arm. Children allocated to the intervention arm will undergo a baseline assessment using a decision-making algorithm incorporating both the PREPARE clinical severity score and a POC CRP test. A conservative CRP threshold of less than 10mg/L together with a PREPARE score of 4 or less will be used to identify children who are at low risk of adverse outcomes and more likely to have viral disease. Repeat PREPARE assessments and POC CRP measurements will be performed on days 1, 2 and 3 following enrolment.
The intervention is intended to support clinical decision-making regarding antibiotic initiation, continuation and early termination. Treating clinicians will retain the authority to override the algorithm at any time based on the patient's clinical condition to ensure patient safety.
Children allocated to the control arm will receive routine clinical care according to existing hospital and unit-specific practices. A baseline PREPARE score will be recorded for research purposes, but clinical management decisions will not be guided by the study algorithm. Participants will be followed throughout hospitalisation and until 28 days following randomisation. Data collected will include antibiotic use, duration of antibiotic exposure, route of administration, clinical outcomes, need for respiratory support, adverse events, readmissions and mortality,
The primary outcome is antibiotic use during hospitalisation, including whether antibiotics were initiated or withheld, route of administration, and duration of therapy. Secondary outcomes include death within 28 days of randomisation, hospital readmission within 28 days, serious adverse events, escalation of care to invasive ventilation, hospitalisation exceeding seven days, duration of oxygen supplementation, duration of antibiotic exposure, duration of hospital stay, escalation of antibiotic therapy, post-discharge antibiotic use, and clinical complications including sepsis, lung abscess, and empyema.
In addition to the randomised trial, a mixed-methods study will explore clinician attitudes, beliefs and behaviours regarding antibiotic prescribing for children hospitalised with LRTI. Despite awareness of antimicrobial stewardship principles, clinicians continue to over-prescribe antibiotics because of diagnostic uncertainty, fear of adverse outcomes, time constraints, parental expectations, influence of colleagues and senior clinicians, and limitations in diagnostic resources.
The qualitative component will be guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and will involve surveys, focus group discussions and semi-structured interviews among registrars and paediatricians working at CHBAH. The study aims to identify behavioural, social and environmental determinants of prescribing practices and to better understand barriers and facilitators to appropriate antibiotic use.
A health economic analysis will also be undertaken to compare healthcare-related costs between the intervention and routine care groups, including antibiotic expenditure, duration of hospitalisation, level of care received, and costs associated with respiratory support. The study will determine whether the intervention leads to cost savings through reductions in antibiotic use and shorter hospital stays.
This study aims to determine the safety and effectiveness of combining point-of-care CRP testing with clinical severity assessment to support antibiotic prescribing decisions among children aged 2-24 months hospitalised with LRTI. In addition, it seeks to improve understanding of clinician prescribing behaviour and the contextual factors that influence antibiotic use. The findings will contribute to the evidence base for paediatric antimicrobial stewardship and may inform future implementation of biomarker-guided and severity-guided antibiotic prescribing strategies in resource-limited settings.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either an intervention group or a routine care control group. Children in the intervention group will receive antibiotic prescribing guidance based on serial point-of-care C-reactive protein (CRP) measurements and repeated PREPARE clinical severity score assessments in addition to routine clinical evaluation. Children in the control group will receive standard clinical care according to existing hospital practice and national treatment guidelines. Antibiotic use, outcomes and healthcare related costs will be compared between the two parallel study arms.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention arm: CRP- and PREPARE-Guided Antibiotic Use | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: CRP- and PREPARE-guided Antibiotic PrescriptionParticipants will receive antibiotic prescribing guidance based on serial point-of-care CRP measurements and repeated PREPARE clinical severity score assessments in addition to routine clinical care. |
| Control: Standard of Care | No intervention | –Participants will receive routine clinical management according to existing hospital and unit-specific practice. Antibiotic prescribing decisions will be made by the treating clinical team without guidance from the study intervention, including point-of-care CRP testing and the PREPARE clinical severity score algorithm |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 2 to 24 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Children between the ages of 2-24 months
- Clinician diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI)
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Transferred from other hospitals with more than 24 hours of hospitalisation
- Hospitalisation within the preceding 30 days
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CRP- and PREPARE-guided Antibiotic PrescriptionAntibiotic prescribing is guided by serial point-of-care CRP measurements and repeated PREPARE clinical severity score assessments. A predefined algorithm incorporating CRP results and clinical severity assessment is used to support decisions regarding antibiotic initiation, continuation, and discontinuation in children hospitalised with lower respiratory tract infections. | Diagnostic test | Intervention arm: CRP- and PREPARE-Guided Antibiotic Use |
Primary outcome
Antibiotic use during hospitalisation
Time frame: From randomisation (day of admission) until hospital discharge (up to 28 days post-randomisation)
Antibiotic use among children hospitalised with lower respiratory tract infection, including antibiotic initiation, route of administration, duration of therapy, and early discontinuation of antibiotics during the index hospital admission.
7 secondary outcomes
Number of participants who die within 28 days of randomisation
Time frame: From randomisation through 28 days after randomisation
Antibiotic treatment cost per participant
Time frame: From randomisation until discharge from the index hospitalisation, up to 28 days
Number of participants readmitted to hospital within 28 days of randomisation
Time frame: From discharge from the index hospitalisation through 28 days after randomisation
Number of Participants Experiencing at Least One Adverse Event Within 28 Days of Randomisation
Time frame: From randomisation through 28 days after randomisation
Number of Participants Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
Time frame: From randomisation until discharge from the index hospitalisation, up to 28 days
Number of Participants Hospitalised for More Than 7 Days
Time frame: During the index hospitalisation, assessed at discharge, up to 28 days
Hospitalisation cost per participant
Time frame: From randomisation until discharge from the index hospitalisation, up to 28 days
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Sep 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. No plan has been established for sharing individual participant data. Participant confidentiality and privacy considerations limit the sharing of individual-level data
Related trials for Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI)
RecruitingPhase 1
A Clinical Trial of V175 and V175A in Healthy Adults
Lower Respiratory Tract Infection
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Ultrasound Findings in a Pediatric Population
Respiratory Tract Infections (RTI), Lung Ultrasound
Recruiting
The Impact of MeMed BV® on Management of Patients With Suspected Lower Respiratory Tract Infections (LRTI) in the Emergency Department (ED) and Urgent Care Center (UCC) ("JUPITER" TRIAL)
Lower Respiratory Tract Infection
Not yet recruiting
Multimodal Stewardship Programme to Improve Antibiotic Prescribing for Children With Lower Respiratory Tract Infections
Bronchitis, Acute, Community-acquired Pneumonia
RecruitingPhase 3
CLARITHROMYCIN TO PREVENT SECONDARY INFECTIONS IN PATIENTS WITH SEPSIS FOLLOWING LOWER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTIONS: THE CLASSIFY TRIAL
Sepsis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Lucy N Wilson, MBBCh, MMED, FCPaed principal investigator
University of Witwatersrand, South Africa
David P Moore, PhD study director
University of Witwatersrand, South Africa
Chris A Rees, PhD study chair
Emory University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CRP- and PREPARE-guided Antibiotic Prescription in people with Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) and Pneumonia, run by University of Witwatersrand, South Africa at 1 site in South Africa.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Africa. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Lucy N Wilson, MBBCH, MMED, FCPaed (+27 72 326 7888, lucy.wilson@wits-vida.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Antibiotic use during hospitalisation (time frame: From randomisation (day of admission) until hospital discharge (up to 28 days post-randomisation)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Sep 2026.