Critical Care MedicinePhase 1NCT07835802
The TTM and ASM Trial
A Phase 1 study testing Prophylactic ASM, Hypothermic and Normothermic in people with Critical Care Medicine and Emergency Medical Services, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) remains one of the major challenges in clinical care. Although improvements in resuscitation quality have increased the likelihood of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), most patients still fail to survive to hospital discharge, and neurological injury is the leading determinant of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Critical Care Medicine, Emergency Medical Services, Cardiac Arrest (CA)
- What is being tested?
- Prophylactic ASM, Hypothermic and Normothermic
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 17 Sep 2026to 31 Jul 2029
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Non-traumatic sudden cardiac arrest in adults
- Sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) for at least 5 minutes
- Admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), remaining comatose and unable to follow commands
- TIMECARD score indicating moderate-to-severe illness severity
- Randomization and initiation of the intervention can be completed within 12 hours after ROSC
Who cannot join
- Age < 18 years; pregnant or breastfeeding women
- TIMECARD score indicating mild risk
- Patients with terminal cancer or cancer for which active treatment has been declined
- Spontaneous hypothermia with a body temperature < 35°C; intracranial hemorrhage or massive bleeding
- Pre-arrest Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score of 3-4; receipt of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR; CPR with ECMO)
- Refusal of participation by the patient's family
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Taiwan1 site
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, 104
Min-Shan Tsai, 886-23123456 ext. 265632, mshanmshan@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Optimization of Neurological and Functional Recovery Following Cardiac Arrest
Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) remains one of the major challenges in clinical care.
Although improvements in resuscitation quality have increased the likelihood of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), most patients still fail to survive to hospital discharge, and neurological injury is the leading determinant of poor outcome. Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy caused by global cerebral hypoxia during cardiac arrest is a key contributor to long-term disability, and even survivors often experience substantial functional impairment, placing a significant burden on families and society. Targeted temperature management (TTM) has long been regarded as a cornerstone neuroprotective strategy; however, TTM and TTM2 trials reported no significant neurological difference between lower and higher temperature targets. However, these studies predominantly enrolled patients with relatively mild illness severity, and multiple real-world observational cohorts suggest that, among more severely ill resuscitated patients, lower target temperatures may still confer benefit. Consequently, the optimal temperature strategy in higher-risk subgroups remains uncertain. Seizures are another common manifestation of brain injury after cardiac arrest, occurring in approximately 20-30% of resuscitated patients and contributing to secondary neurological damage. Earlier trials evaluating prophylactic anti-seizure medication (ASM) (thiopental or diazepam/magnesium) did not demonstrate neurological benefit; however, these studies primarily focused on neuroprotection rather than seizure prevention, leaving a substantial evidence gap. Patients with moderate to severe disease severity-those at the highest risk of both cerebral injury and seizure occurrence-have never been specifically studied to determine whether personalized temperature selection or early short-term prophylactic ASM (e.g., valproic acid or levetiracetam) may provide clinical benefit. Accordingly, identifying the most appropriate temperature target for higher-risk patients and determining whether short-term prophylactic antiepileptic therapy can reduce seizure-related injury represent important unresolved questions in post-resuscitation care. The aim of this study is to conduct a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial to evaluate whether, among comatose patients with moderate to severe risk after ROSC, specific TTM temperature strategies combined with early short-term prophylactic ASM can reduce postresuscitation seizure incidence and improve neurological outcomes. By addressing a population underrepresented in prior clinical trials-those at highest risk and most likely to benefit-this study aims to generate clinically meaningful evidence to guide temperature selection and prophylactic ASM after cardiac arrest. Evaluating these interventions in combination may provide a more comprehensive understanding of whether they reduce seizure burden, mitigate brain injury, and improve functional recovery.
- Being tested
- Prophylactic ASM, Hypothermic, Normothermic, ASM as needed
- Keywords
- Cardiac Arrest, Targeted Temperature Management, Seizure, Anti-Seizure Medication, outcome
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Arrest, Seizures
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Prophylactic ASMDrug
Prophylactic treatment
HypothermicProcedure or surgery
TTM 33-34℃
NormothermicProcedure or surgery
TTM 36-37.5℃
ASM as neededDrug
as needed
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Hypothermic PPX | Experimental | hypothermia + Prophylactic treatment Receives: Drug: Prophylactic ASM; Procedure: Hypothermic |
| Normothermic PPX | Active comparator | Normothermic + Prophylactic treatment Receives: Drug: Prophylactic ASM; Procedure: Normothermic |
| Hypothermic PRN | Active comparator | hypothermia + as needed Receives: Procedure: Hypothermic; Drug: ASM as needed |
| Normothermic PRN | Active comparator | Normothermic + as needed Receives: Procedure: Normothermic; Drug: ASM as needed |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
clinical & electrical seizure occurrence
Measured: Within 7 days after ROSC
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Sep 2026
- Study start17 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Jul 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Jul 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Critical Care MedicineStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Taiwan University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Taiwan University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, National Taiwan University Clinical Trial Center, National Taiwan University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07835802
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 202603120MINE
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 17 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 7 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Optimization of Neurological and Functional Recovery Following Cardiac Arrest
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07835802
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 202603120MINE
- Keywords
- Cardiac Arrest, Targeted Temperature Management, Seizure, Anti-Seizure Medication, outcome
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- National Taiwan University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 17 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) remains one of the major challenges in clinical care.
Although improvements in resuscitation quality have increased the likelihood of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), most patients still fail to survive to hospital discharge, and neurological injury is the leading determinant of poor outcome. Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy caused by global cerebral hypoxia during cardiac arrest is a key contributor to long-term disability, and even survivors often experience substantial functional impairment, placing a significant burden on families and society. Targeted temperature management (TTM) has long been regarded as a cornerstone neuroprotective strategy; however, TTM and TTM2 trials reported no significant neurological difference between lower and higher temperature targets. However, these studies predominantly enrolled patients with relatively mild illness severity, and multiple real-world observational cohorts suggest that, among more severely ill resuscitated patients, lower target temperatures may still confer benefit. Consequently, the optimal temperature strategy in higher-risk subgroups remains uncertain. Seizures are another common manifestation of brain injury after cardiac arrest, occurring in approximately 20-30% of resuscitated patients and contributing to secondary neurological damage. Earlier trials evaluating prophylactic anti-seizure medication (ASM) (thiopental or diazepam/magnesium) did not demonstrate neurological benefit; however, these studies primarily focused on neuroprotection rather than seizure prevention, leaving a substantial evidence gap. Patients with moderate to severe disease severity-those at the highest risk of both cerebral injury and seizure occurrence-have never been specifically studied to determine whether personalized temperature selection or early short-term prophylactic ASM (e.g., valproic acid or levetiracetam) may provide clinical benefit. Accordingly, identifying the most appropriate temperature target for higher-risk patients and determining whether short-term prophylactic antiepileptic therapy can reduce seizure-related injury represent important unresolved questions in post-resuscitation care. The aim of this study is to conduct a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial to evaluate whether, among comatose patients with moderate to severe risk after ROSC, specific TTM temperature strategies combined with early short-term prophylactic ASM can reduce postresuscitation seizure incidence and improve neurological outcomes. By addressing a population underrepresented in prior clinical trials-those at highest risk and most likely to benefit-this study aims to generate clinically meaningful evidence to guide temperature selection and prophylactic ASM after cardiac arrest. Evaluating these interventions in combination may provide a more comprehensive understanding of whether they reduce seizure burden, mitigate brain injury, and improve functional recovery.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Hypothermic PPX | Experimental | Drug: Prophylactic ASM, Procedure: Hypothermichypothermia + Prophylactic treatment |
| Normothermic PPX | Active comparator | Drug: Prophylactic ASM, Procedure: NormothermicNormothermic + Prophylactic treatment |
| Hypothermic PRN | Active comparator | Procedure: Hypothermic, Drug: ASM as neededhypothermia + as needed |
| Normothermic PRN | Active comparator | Procedure: Normothermic, Drug: ASM as neededNormothermic + as needed |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Non-traumatic sudden cardiac arrest in adults
- Sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) for at least 5 minutes
- Admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), remaining comatose and unable to follow commands
- TIMECARD score indicating moderate-to-severe illness severity
- Randomization and initiation of the intervention can be completed within 12 hours after ROSC
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age < 18 years; pregnant or breastfeeding women
- TIMECARD score indicating mild risk
- Patients with terminal cancer or cancer for which active treatment has been declined
- Spontaneous hypothermia with a body temperature < 35°C; intracranial hemorrhage or massive bleeding
- Pre-arrest Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score of 3-4; receipt of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR; CPR with ECMO)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Prophylactic ASMProphylactic treatment | Drug | Hypothermic PPX, Normothermic PPX |
| HypothermicTTM 33-34℃ | Procedure or surgery | Hypothermic PPX, Hypothermic PRN |
| NormothermicTTM 36-37.5℃ | Procedure or surgery | Normothermic PPX, Normothermic PRN |
| ASM as neededas needed | Drug | Hypothermic PRN, Normothermic PRN |
Primary outcome
clinical & electrical seizure occurrence
Time frame: Within 7 days after ROSC
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Oct 2026.
Related trials for Critical Care Medicine
Not yet recruitingObservational study
The Irish Perioperative OutcomeS (IPOS) Study
Outcomes Following Major Surgery in Older Adults
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4
Synthetic Angiotensin II/Giapreza in Pediatric Patients With Refractory Hypotension
Vasodilatory Shock
RecruitingObservational study
CytOSorb TreatMent Of Critically Ill PatientS Registry
Septic Shock, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 2
Prevent Cardiac Surgery Associated AKI Trial
Renal Failure, Coronary Artery Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Critical Hyperacute Assessment Research On Neurobiomarker Kinetics in Acute Brain Injury
Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Brain Injuries, Acute
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Prophylactic ASM, Hypothermic and Normothermic in people with Critical Care Medicine and Emergency Medical Services, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Min-Shan Tsai (886-23123456 ext. 265632, mshanmshan@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
clinical & electrical seizure occurrence (time frame: Within 7 days after ROSC). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Oct 2026.