AzTrials
AzTrials

Functional Ankle InstabilityNCT07817342

Effects of an Exercice Program of 4-w for the Improvement of Functional Ankle Instability in Basketball Players

A study testing Therapeutic exercise and Regular training in people with Functional Ankle Instability, run by CEU San Pablo University at 1 site in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Objective: to investigate the effects of a four weeks exercise program for the improvement of the ankle range of movement, balance, strength and subjective symptomps in young basketball player with functional ankle instability. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 to 25 years, men only
Conditions the study is for
Functional Ankle Instability
What is being tested?
Therapeutic exercise and Regular training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
24 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
3 Nov 2023to 10 Jan 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 to 25 years
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male basketball players with at least 6 training sesion for week.
  • Aged 16-25 years old.
  • At least one ankle sprain that caused unloading of support of the affected lower limb for more than one day.
  • A history of recurrent akle spraints and/or giving way sensations.
  • A score higest of 11 points in the Spanish version of the IdFAI.

Who cannot join

  • History of musculoskeletal surgery in any region of lower limb.
  • History of fractures in the ankle region, having required surgery or not.
  • Acute ankle sprain in the 6 weeks prior to the start of the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • Club Zentro Basket Madrid

    Madrid, Madrid, 28029

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Effects of a Four Week Exercise Program on the Improvement of Functional Ankle Instability in Young Basketball Players

Objective: to investigate the effects of a four weeks exercise program for the improvement of the ankle range of movement, balance, strength and subjective symptomps in young basketball player with functional ankle instability.

PICO: Is a four weeks exercise program effective to improve ankle range of motion, balance, strenght and subjective symtomps in young basketball players with functional ankle instability?

Read the detailed description

In this study, the research team will test an exercise program directed to a group of young basketball players compared to another group that simply performs their usual training.

Loaded ankle dorsiflexion, the modified star excursion balance test, the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool, and the foot-lift test were collected as outcome measures.

The measurements were carried out before the intervention, after and four weeks after finishing the intervention.

Being tested
Therapeutic exercise, Regular training
Keywords
Therapeutic exercise, Functional ankle instability, Physiotherapy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Therapeutic exerciseOther

    A three per week sessions of therapeutic exercise program during four weeks including movility, strength, motor control and plyometric exercises. This program was made simultaneously to the regular training of the basketball team.

  • Regular trainingOther

    Regular training program of the basketball team.

Study groups in NCT07817342
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ExperimentalOtherTherapeutic exercices and regular training
Receives: Other: Therapeutic exercise; Other: Regular training
ControlActive comparatorRegular training alone
Receives: Other: Regular training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Toe-to-wall distance

    It is an indirect measure of the ankle dorsiflexion. The assessor record the distance (cm) between the big toe and the while maintaining contact between the knee and wall without lifting the heel with a measuring tape.

    Measured: Preintervention, inmediately post-intervention and at four weeks post-intervention.

  2. Postero-medial Star Excursion Balance Test.

    The assessor measure the postero-medial distance (cm) of the Star Excursion Balance Test with a measuring tape.

    Measured: Preintervention, inmediately post-intervention and at four weeks post-intervention.

  3. Postero-lateral Star Excursion Balance Test

    The assessor measure the postero-lateral distance (cm) of the Star Excursion Balance Test with a measuring tape.

    Measured: Preintervention, inmediately post-intervention and at four weeks post-intervention.

  4. Anterior Star Excursion Balance Test

    The assessor measure the anterior distance (cm) of the Star Excursion Balance Test with a measuring tape.

    Measured: Preintervention, inmediately post-intervention and at four weeks post-intervention.

  5. Cumberlan Ankle Instability Tool

    Score of the Spanish version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT-Sv). It is a self-administer questionnaire to assess the severity of chronic ankle instability. It is scored from 0 to 30 with higher score indicating better ankle functionality.

    Measured: Preintervention, inmediately post-intervention and at four weeks post-intervention.

  6. Heel-rise test

    The number of times the subject can raise the heel in single-leg support is counted.

    Measured: Preintervention, inmediately post-intervention and at four weeks post-intervention.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Sep 2026
  2. Study start3 Nov 2023
  3. Primary completion10 Jan 2024
  4. Study completion10 Jan 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Intervention 1 (Experimental group): a progressive exercise program directed to improve movility, motor control, strength and plyometry. This program was made 3 times a week for four weeks and added to the regular training program. Intervention 2 (control group): This group only made the regular training program of the basketball team.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
24 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07817342
Sponsor's protocol ID
4_24_EPE4SJBIFT
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
27 Nov 2024
Last updated
14 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: The researches only will shared IPD data if requested by the journal. The researches want to respect the sensitive clinical data of the study participants.

Publications

  • Rodriguez-Fernandez AL, Rebollo-Roldan J, Jimenez-Rejano JJ, Gueita-Rodriguez J. Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(20):1888-94. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.984879. Epub 2015 Jul 9.

    PubMed 26292174
  • Hebert-Losier K, Wessman C, Alricsson M, Svantesson U. Updated reliability and normative values for the standing heel-rise test in healthy adults. Physiotherapy. 2017 Dec;103(4):446-452. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Mar 21.

    PubMed 28886865
  • Plisky PJ, Rauh MJ, Kaminski TW, Underwood FB. Star Excursion Balance Test as a predictor of lower extremity injury in high school basketball players. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Dec;36(12):911-9. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2006.2244.

    PubMed 17193868
  • Konor MM, Morton S, Eckerson JM, Grindstaff TL. Reliability of three measures of ankle dorsiflexion range of motion. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Jun;7(3):279-87.

    PubMed 22666642
  • Simon J, Donahue M, Docherty C. Development of the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability (IdFAI). Foot Ankle Int. 2012 Sep;33(9):755-63. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2012.0755.

    PubMed 22995264
  • Gribble PA, Delahunt E, Bleakley CM, Caulfield B, Docherty CL, Fong DT, Fourchet F, Hertel J, Hiller CE, Kaminski TW, McKeon PO, Refshauge KM, van der Wees P, Vicenzino W, Wikstrom EA. Selection criteria for patients with chronic ankle instability in controlled research: a position statement of the International Ankle Consortium. J Athl Train. 2014 Jan-Feb;49(1):121-7. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.1.14. Epub 2013 Dec 30.

    PubMed 24377963

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Therapeutic exercise and Regular training in people with Functional Ankle Instability, run by CEU San Pablo University at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Toe-to-wall distance (time frame: Preintervention, inmediately post-intervention and at four weeks post-intervention.). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07817342, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in