AzTrials
AzTrials

Aortic Valve StenosisBALANCENCT07794306

Balloon- Versus Self-Expanding Intraannular TAVI in Small Aortic Annuli

A study testing Meril Octapro+ THV System and Abbott Navitor/Navitor Vision THV system in people with Aortic Valve Stenosis, run by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf at 1 site in Germany.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

In Europe TAVI is now recommended for treatment of aortic valve stenosis from the age of 70 years. When performing TAVI in young patients, lifetime management becomes important in terms of anticipated TAVI-in-TAVI procedures when valve deterioration occures. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Aortic Valve Stenosis
What is being tested?
Meril Octapro+ THV System and Abbott Navitor/Navitor Vision THV system
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
510 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
26 Oct 2026to 31 Dec 2033
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants 18 years of age or older
  • Heart team consensus that isolated transfemoral TAVI is medically justified and advisable
  • Diagnosis of severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis and aortic annulus ≤ 430 mm² as seen in preoperative CT diagnostic
  • Anatomy is suitable for both BE and SE THVs according to Heart Team judgement
  • Participant provided written informed consent to participate in the trial
  • Ability of participant to understand patient information and to personally sign and date informed consent to participate in trial, before performing any trial-related procedures
  • Participant and treating physician agree that participant will return for all required postprocedural follow-up visits

Who cannot join

  • Uni- or bicuspid aortic valve pathology
  • Severe Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) calcification with prohibitive risk for BE THV as determined by heart team
  • Non-calcified aortic valve pathology or endocarditis
  • Expected life expectancy <12 months due to associated non-cardiac comorbidities
  • Currently participating in another investigational drug or device trial
  • Urgent or emergency TAVI

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Andreas Schaefer, PD Dr. med. contact

+4915222816250

and.schaefer@uke.de

Germany1 site
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg

    Hamburg, Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg, 20249

    Andreas Schaefer, PD Dr. med., +4915222816250, and.schaefer@uke.de

Other trials in Germany

About this study

In Europe TAVI is now recommended for treatment of aortic valve stenosis from the age of 70 years. When performing TAVI in young patients, lifetime management becomes important in terms of anticipated TAVI-in-TAVI procedures when valve deterioration occures. Especially small aortic annuli represent a special challenge in terms of postprocedural hemodynamics, however intra-annular transcatheter heart valve designs should be the devices of choice to facilitate future TAVI-in-TAVI procedures. Which intra-annular valve design offers ideal clinical and hemodynamic efficacy is unclear. Therefore, an investigator-initiated, randomized controlled trial (BALANCE trial: Balloon- vs. Self-expanding intraannular TAVI in small aortic annuli) was created to elucidate this topic.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, multi-center, national, randomized controlled, post-market trial.

The primary objectives of the trial are to demonstrate clinical and hemodynamic non-inferiority of the Octapro+ System when compared to subjects treated with the Navitor System at 30 days and12 months post-procedure.

Subjects will be randomized on a 2:1 basis to receive TAVI with either a Meril Balloon-expanding (BE) intraannular Transcatheter Heart Valve (THV) or an Abbott Self-expanding (SE) intraannular THV. Data will be collected at pre- and post-procedure, at discharge, at 30 days, and once a year until the 5-year follow-up is completed.

Product Names:

  • Meril Octapro+ THV System, (Commercially available in Germany)
  • Abbott Navitor/ Navitor Vision THV System (Commercially available in Europe/US.)

Currently, there is no comparative evidence for clinical and hemodynamic efficacy of the two available intra-annular THV principles (BE vs. SE) for treatment of AS in patients with small aortic annuli.

Being tested
Meril Octapro+ THV System, Abbott Navitor/Navitor Vision THV system
Keywords
TAVI, TAVR, Aortic valve stenosis, Bioprostheses, Transcatheter Heart Valves, Balloon-expanding, Self-expanding, Aortic annulus, Hemodynamics
Medical subject headings
Aortic Valve Stenosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Meril Octapro+ THV SystemDevice

    Also called Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

    TAVI treatment with Meril Octapro+ THV System

  • Abbott Navitor/Navitor Vision THV systemDevice

    Also called Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

    TAVI treatment with Abbott Navitor/Navitor Vision System

Study groups in NCT07794306
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intra-annular Balloon-expanding THVExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: Meril Octapro+ THV System
Intra-annular Self-expanding THVExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: Abbott Navitor/Navitor Vision THV system

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Early Safety according to VARC-3 Criteria

    • Freedom from all-cause mortality
    • Freedom from all stroke
    • Freedom from VARC type 2-4 bleeding
    • Freedom from major vascular, access-related, or cardiac structural complication
    • Freedom from acute kidney injury stage 3 or 4
    • Freedom from moderate or severe aortic regurgitation
    • Freedom from new permanent pacemaker due to procedure-related conduction abnormalities
    • Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device

    Measured: 30 Days

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Hemodynamic performance (Mean aortic gradient)

    • Transvalvular mean pressure gradient ( mmHg, Continuous Variable)

    Measured: 12 Months and 5 Years

  2. Paravalvular leakage ≥ moderate

    Rate of significant paravalvular leakage (≥ moderate)

    Measured: 12 months and 5 years

  3. Freedom from All-cause mortality, Disabling stroke and Rehospitalization

    Composite Endpoint

    Measured: 5 Years

  4. Rate of Bioprosthetic valve failure and dysfunction (Combined endpoint)

    • Valve mean gradient of 20 mm Hg or higher
    • Incidence of Nonstructural valve dysfunction, defined as severe prosthesis-patient mismatch or at least moderate aortic regurgitation
    • Incidence of Clinical valve thrombosis; endocarditis
    • Incidence of Aortic-valve reintervention

    Measured: 5 Years

  5. Rate of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation

    Implantation of a Permanent Pacemaker due to Conduction disturbances

    Measured: 5 Years

  6. Rate of Any Stroke

    Minor, Major and Disabling Stroke

    Measured: 5 Years

  7. New York Heart Association functional class compared to baseline

    Symptom relief (Dyspnea)

    Measured: 5 Years

  8. Left ventricular ejection fraction compared to baseline

    Left Ventricular Function parameter

    Measured: 5 Years

  9. Length of hospital stay at discharge

    Length of hospital stay at discharge

    Measured: 30 Days

  10. Technical success according to VARC-3 criteria

    • Freedom from mortality
    • Successful access, delivery of device and retrieval of the delivery system
    • Correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location
    • Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device or to a major vascular or access-related, or cardiac structural complication

    Measured: 30 Days

  11. Device success according to VARC-3 criteria

    • Technical success
    • Freedom from mortality
    • Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device or to a major vascular or access-related, or cardiac structural complication
    • Intended performance of the valve (mean gradient < 20 mm Hg, peak velocity < 3 m/s, Doppler velocity index ≥ 0.25, and less than moderate aortic regurgitation

    Measured: 30 Days

  12. Rate of New onset of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter

    New onset of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter

    Measured: 30 Days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Aug 2026
  2. Study start26 Oct 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Jul 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2033 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
510 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07794306
Sponsor's protocol ID
UHHamburg-Eppendorf
Acronym
BALANCE
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
27 Jul 2026
Last updated
31 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in