AzTrials
AzTrials

Severe Aortic Valve StenosisHYSPANIANCT07566624

Spanish Prospective Registry of Hydra THV for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

An observational study of Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis and Valvular Heart Disease, run by Fundación EPIC at 5 sites in Spain.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is designed to evaluate the success rate of transfemoral implantation of the Hydra THV biological aortic valve prosthesis in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. The device is used in accordance with its Instructions for Use as a CE-marked transcatheter heart valve system. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Hydra THV
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
100 participants
Where
5 sitesSpain
Study dates
7 Jul 2026to 1 Feb 2029
How long will I take part?
12 Months
Phase
Observational

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The Hydra THV valve is approved for the treatment of patients with aortic stenosis. Basically, patients will be eligible for inclusion in this clinical scenario, according to the instructions for use of the device.

Who may be able to join

  • Participants who meet ALL of the following conditions will be included:
  • Age ≥ 18 years and;
  • Severe aortic stenosis with indication for aortic valve replacement in which a Hydra THV device is implanted according to the instructions for use; and
  • Signed informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Patients who do NOT meet ANY of the following conditions will be included:
  • Express refusal by the participant to participate in the study.
  • Aortic stenosis patients who are not candidates for Hydra THV device implantation or in whom implantation of this device is performed for an indication other than aortic stenosis (especially pure native aortic valve insufficiency). Patients in whom the Hydra THV device is implanted to treat patients with degenerated aortic bioprostheses may be included in the study.
  • Participants in randomised clinical trials who have not reached the research endpoint.
  • Pregnant and/or breastfeeding women.

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

RAUL MORENO GOMEZ, MD, PhD contact

0034917277000

raulmorenog@hotmail.com

5 sites in 1 country

Spain5 sites, 5 recruiting
  • Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

    Barcelona, 08041

    Recruiting
  • Hospital Universitario La Paz

    Fuencarral-El Pardo, 28046

    Recruiting
  • Hospital Universitari de Salamanca

    Salamanca, 37007

    Recruiting
  • Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago

    Santiago de Compostela, 15706

    Recruiting
  • Hospital General Universitario de Toledo

    Toledo, 45007

    Recruiting

Other trials in Spain

About this study

This study is designed to evaluate the success rate of transfemoral implantation of the Hydra THV biological aortic valve prosthesis in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. The device is used in accordance with its Instructions for Use as a CE-marked transcatheter heart valve system.

The study will assess procedural success, device performance, and early clinical outcomes following implantation. Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) via the transfemoral approach will be followed to evaluate safety and effectiveness outcomes, including short- and mid-term clinical follow-up.

Read the detailed description

This study is designed to evaluate the success rate of transfemoral implantation of the Hydra THV biological aortic valve prosthesis in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. The device is used in accordance with its Instructions for Use as a CE-marked transcatheter heart valve system.

The study will assess procedural success, device performance, and early clinical outcomes following implantation. Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) via the transfemoral approach will be followed to evaluate safety and effectiveness outcomes, including short- and mid-term clinical follow-up.

Being tested
Hydra THV
Medical subject headings
Aortic Valve Stenosis, Heart Valve Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Hydra THVDevice

    Patients in whom the Hydra THV device is implanted to treat patients with degenerated aortic bioprostheses.

Study groups in NCT07566624
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Hydra Transcatheter Heart Valve (THV)Not described
Receives: Device: Hydra THV

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Assessment of the success rate of implantation

    Assessment of the success rate of implantation defined by:

    • Absence of mortality during the procedure or within 24 hours after implantation; and
    • Correct anatomical positioning of a single valve; and
    • Absence of mismatch, defined as effective aortic valve area > 0.85 cm²/m²and;
    • Mean gradient < 20 mm Hg or peak velocity < 3 m/s and;
    • Absence of moderate or severe aortic regurgitation

    Measured: 7 days

  2. Success of the procedure

    Composite outcome measures defined as a the absence of intra-procedural mortality or complications during implantation, such as: failure to implant the valve at the annulus level, the need to implant more than one valve (valve-in-valve implantation or implantation of a second valve due to embolisation of the first) or surgical intervention on the aortic valve due to severe aortic insufficiency or complications of the procedure.

    Measured: 7 days

Secondary outcomes (46)
  1. All cause mortality

    Incidence of all cause mortality

    Measured: 7 days

  2. All cause mortality

    Incidence of all cause mortality

    Measured: 30 days

  3. All cause mortality

    Incidence of all cause mortality

    Measured: 12 months

  4. Cardiovascular mortality

    Incidence of cardiovascular mortality

    Measured: 7 days

  5. Cardiovascular mortality

    Incidence of cardiovascular mortality

    Measured: 30 days

  6. Cardiovascular mortality

    Incidence of cardiovascular mortality

    Measured: 12 months

  7. Stroke

    Incidence of Stroke

    Measured: 7 days

  8. Stroke

    Incidence of Stroke

    Measured: 30 days

  9. Stroke

    Incidence of Stroke

    Measured: 12 months

  10. Stroke with disabling

    Incidence of Stroke with disabling

    Measured: 7 days

  11. Stroke with disabling

    Incidence of Stroke with disabling

    Measured: 30 days

  12. Stroke with disabling

    Incidence of Stroke with disabling

    Measured: 12 months

  13. Stroke with non disabling

    Incidence of Stroke with non disabling

    Measured: 7 days

  14. Stroke with non disabling

    Incidence of Stroke with non disabling

    Measured: 30 days

  15. Stroke with non disabling

    Incidence of Stroke with non disabling

    Measured: 12 months

  16. Acute myocardial infarction

    Incidence of acute myocardial infarction

    Measured: 7 days

  17. Acute myocardial infarction

    Incidence of acute myocardial infarction

    Measured: 30 days

  18. Acute myocardial infarction

    Incidence of acute myocardial infarction

    Measured: 12 months

  19. Coronary occlusion

    Incidence of coronary occlusion

    Measured: 7days

  20. Coronary occlusion

    Incidence of coronary occlusion

    Measured: 30 days

  21. Coronary occlusion

    Incidence of coronary occlusion

    Measured: 12 months

  22. Haemorrhagic complications

    Incidence of haemorrhagic complications

    Measured: 7 days

  23. Haemorrhagic complications

    Incidence of haemorrhagic complications

    Measured: 30 days

  24. Haemorrhagic complications

    Incidence of haemorrhagic complications

    Measured: 12 months

  25. Vascular complications

    Incidence of vascular complications

    Measured: 7 days

  26. Vascular complications

    Incidence of vascular complications

    Measured: 30 days

  27. Vascular complications

    Incidence of vascular complications

    Measured: 12 Months

  28. Acute renal failure

    Incidence of Acute renal failure

    Measured: 7 days

  29. Acute renal failure

    Incidence of Acute renal failure

    Measured: 30 days

  30. Acute renal failure

    Incidence of Acute renal failure

    Measured: 12 months

  31. Conduction disturbances

    Incidence of conduction disturbances

    Measured: 7 days

  32. Conduction disturbances

    Incidence of conduction disturbances

    Measured: 30 days

  33. Conduction disturbances

    Incidence of conduction disturbances

    Measured: 12 months

  34. Arrhythmias

    Incidence of Arrhythmias

    Measured: 7 days

  35. Arrhythmias

    Incidence of Arrhythmias

    Measured: 30 days

  36. Arrhythmias

    Incidence of Arrhythmias

    Measured: 12 months

  37. Implantation of a new permanent pacemaker

    Incidence of Implantation of a new permanent pacemaker

    Measured: 7 days

  38. Implantation of a new permanent pacemaker

    Incidence of Implantation of a new permanent pacemaker

    Measured: 30 days

  39. Implantation of a new permanent pacemaker

    Incidence of Implantation of a new permanent pacemaker

    Measured: 12 months

  40. Combined safety event at 30 days defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3) criteria

    Proportion of patients with freedom from: all-cause mortality, all stroke, VARC type 2-4 bleeding, major vascular, access-related, or cardiac structural complication, acute kidney injury stage 3 or 4, moderate or severe aortic regurgitation, new permanent pacemaker due to procedure related conduction abnormalities, surgery or intervention related to the device.

    Measured: 30 days

  41. New York Heart Association (NYHA)

    Proportion of patients with modification of NYHA, before the procedure and its modification after the procedure

    Measured: 7 days

  42. New York Heart Association (NYHA)

    Proportion of patients with modification of NYHA, before the procedure and its modification after the procedure

    Measured: 30 days

  43. New York Heart Association (NYHA)

    Proportion of patients with modification of NYHA before the procedure and its modification after the procedure

    Measured: 12 months

  44. Echocardiographic Valve Dysfunction Assessment

    Composite outcome measures defined as a: Effective aortic valve area and Mean transvalvular gradient and Degree of aortic regurgitation and Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and Pulmonary systolic pressure. Any of the following findings are considered evidence of dysfunction:

    Mean gradient ≥ 20 mmHg. Effective aortic valve area ≤ 0.9-1.1 cm2/m2. Moderate or severe para-valvular insufficiency

    Measured: 7 days

  45. Echocardiographic Valve Dysfunction Assessment

    Composite outcome measures defined as a: Effective aortic valve area and Mean transvalvular gradient and Degree of aortic regurgitation and Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and Pulmonary systolic pressure. Any of the following findings are considered evidence of dysfunction:

    Mean gradient ≥ 20 mmHg. Effective aortic valve area ≤ 0.9-1.1 cm2/m2. Moderate or severe para-valvular insufficiency

    Measured: 30 days

  46. Echocardiographic Valve Dysfunction Assessment

    Composite outcome measures defined as a: Effective aortic valve area and Mean transvalvular gradient and Degree of aortic regurgitation and Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and Pulmonary systolic pressure. Any of the following findings are considered evidence of dysfunction:

    Mean gradient ≥ 20 mmHg. Effective aortic valve area ≤ 0.9-1.1 cm2/m2. Moderate or severe para-valvular insufficiency

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 May 2026
  2. Study start7 Jul 2026
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2029 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Feb 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
Target duration
12 Months
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07566624
Sponsor's protocol ID
rEpic22-HYSPANIA
Acronym
HYSPANIA
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
27 Apr 2026
Last updated
22 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Senguttuvan NB, Jose J, Sonawane A, Bansal S, Gupta R, Chandra P. Clinical evaluation of the Hydra self-expanding THV: 30-day results from the GENESIS-II study. AsiaIntervention. 2025 Oct 10;11(3):155-163. doi: 10.4244/AIJ-D-24-00075. eCollection 2025 Oct.

    PubMed 41049310
  • Aidietis A, Srimahachota S, Dabrowski M, Bilkis V, Buddhari W, Cheung GSH, Nair RK, Mussayev AA, Mattummal S, Chandra P, Mahajan AU, Chmielak Z, Govindan SC, Jose J, Hiremath MS, Chandra S, Shetty R, Mohanan S, John JF, Mehrotra S, Sondergaard L. 30-Day and 1-Year Outcomes With HYDRA Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve: The Hydra CE Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan 10;15(1):93-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.09.004.

    PubMed 34991828
  • Sonawane A, Chandra P, Jose J, Bansal S, Gupta R, Sudhir K, Senguttuvan NB. Safety and performance of the Hydra self-expanding THV: 6 months outcomes from the GENESIS-II study. Indian Heart J. 2026 Jul-Aug;78(4):201-205. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2026.03.004. Epub 2026 Mar 10.

    PubMed 41819447
  • Marin-Cuartas M, Kawczynski MJ, de Waha S, Kiefer P, Falk V, Siepe M, Bowdish ME, Akowuah E, Verbrugghe P, Oosterlinck W, Klautz RJM, Lorusso R, Bidar E, Rahouma MM, Redfors B, Biondi-Zoccai G, Bhatt DL, Gaudino M, Borger MA, Heuts S. Updated 5-year outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis at low- to intermediate-surgical risk. Heart. 2026 Feb 11:heartjnl-2025-327092. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2025-327092. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 41672766
  • Praz F, Borger MA, Lanz J, Marin-Cuartas M, Abreu A, Adamo M, Ajmone Marsan N, Barili F, Bonaros N, Cosyns B, De Paulis R, Gamra H, Jahangiri M, Jeppsson A, Klautz RJM, Mores B, Perez-David E, Poss J, Prendergast BD, Rocca B, Rossello X, Suzuki M, Thiele H, Tribouilloy CM, Wojakowski W; ESC/EACTS Scientific Document Group. 2025 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2025 Nov 21;46(44):4635-4736. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf194. No abstract available.

    PubMed 40878295

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in