AzTrials
AzTrials

Postoperative ComplicationsNCT07768878

Enhanced Recovery After Urogynaecological Surgery - Early Urinary Catheter Removal in an Asian Population

A study testing Early indwelling catheter removal in people with Postoperative Complications, run by KK Women's and Children's Hospital at 1 site in Singapore.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

It is estimated that more than 50% of parous women are impaired by pelvic organ prolapse (POP). By 85 years of age, 11-19% of women will have undergone at least one operation for POP, and this is expected to increase due to Singapore's aging population. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 to 99 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Postoperative Complications
What is being tested?
Early indwelling catheter removal
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
97 participants
Where
1 siteSingapore
Study dates
1 Apr 2024to 23 Oct 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 to 99 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • type of operation: vaginal route surgery for the correction of pelvic organ prolapse (vaginal hysterectomy and/or pelvic floor repair and/or vault suspension and/or colpocleisis and/or manchester)
  • ADL (activities of daily living) independent
  • Community ambulant
  • good discharge support
  • age 21 years old and above (adult)
  • all ASA scores
  • all BMI
  • patients in KK Women's and Children's Hospital (single-centre)

Who cannot join

  • operations that are traditionally done as same day operation (MUS alone)
  • non-vaginal route, including laparoscopy/open/ mix of both
  • recurrent/chronic urinary retention
  • pre-op UDS (urodynamic studies): high RU (residual urine) >150ml
  • current urinary tract infection at time of op
  • bilateral hydronephrosis
  • neurological disorders affecting incontinence / neurological bladder

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Singapore1 site
  • KK Women's and Children's Hospital

    Singapore, Singapore, 229899

Other trials in Singapore

About this study

It is estimated that more than 50% of parous women are impaired by pelvic organ prolapse (POP). By 85 years of age, 11-19% of women will have undergone at least one operation for POP, and this is expected to increase due to Singapore's aging population. Currently, locally, patients remain inpatient for minimum 2 days post-operatively as removal of indwelling catheter (IDC) and trial of void is done on 1st to 2nd post operative day. However, there is a trend towards same-day surgery and same-day removal of IDC in western populations with good success (ranging 40-90% success). Inpatient stays can be prolonged due to voiding dysfunction after removal of IDC which require reinsertion of IDC and another trial of void the next day. Thus, the investigators seek to investigate if removal of IDC is feasible on first post-operative day. If successful, this will change current local practice, improve time to ambulation and reduce length of hospital stay and costs.

Early catheter removal after pelvic organ prolapse surgery reduces time to spontaneous void, post-void residual volume, length of admission, and pain score.

Read more

Aims:

  1. To investigate if early catheter removal reduces time to spontaneous void and post-void residual urine volume or risks of urinary retention
  2. To determine if early catheter removal results in earlier ambulation and shorter length of admission.
  3. To determine if patient satisfaction is improved with early catheter removal.
Read the detailed description

In Western populations, POP surgery has been shown to be successful as a same-day procedure. However, formal literature is scarce, especially in the Asian context. More research is available for general gynaecology operations. In a published meta-analysis, there was no significant difference in post-operative urinary retention if IDC was removed within 6 hours or after 6 hours post operatively. However, it was clear that earlier IDC removal reduces rates of urinary tract infection.

Specifically for urogynaecological operations, a published randomised controlled trial has shown that removal of IDC earlier on post operative day 0 did not prolong catheter use after obliterative and apical suspension procedures, and benefitted patients in enabling them to ambulate sooner and more often. A literature review failed to identify other relevant studies.

As the Asian elderly population has traditionally been perceived to hold a more conservative or passive stance towards enhanced recovery and post-operative care, it remains unknown whether early IDC removal will translate into earlier ambulation and discharge. It is also possible that rather than improved satisfaction with earlier IDC removal, the Asian population may be more anxious around their recovery process in the post-operative period. Hence, this study is needed to confirm whether earlier IDC removal will result in improved outcomes and patient satisfaction in the Asian population as has been shown in the Western population.

This study intends to evaluate whether earlier IDC removal can improve patient satisfaction and recovery time, reduce hospital cost, without causing complications (mainly re-catheterisation and urinary tract infections).

Study design: randomised controlled trial, single centre, healthy population Suitable patients will be identified by urogynaecology surgical team from outpatient clinic and via operative list, using inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Participants will be recruited by members of the study team (excluding clinical research coordinator and primary physician) either in outpatient clinic when consented for operation, which is usually around 2-3 weeks before operation. This will give participants ample time to consider their participation in the study.

Participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to have their IDC and vaginal pack removed on post operative day 0 or 1.

Two arms of the study:

  • removal of IDC and vaginal pack on post operative day 0 (6 hours after end of operation time)
  • removal of IDC and vaginal pack on post operative day 1 (IDC removal at 6am, vaginal pack removal at 8am)

The clinical research coordinator (CRC) will put participant's allocated group into a sealed envelope and staple in participant's case note pre-operatively. This is to ensure that the other members of the study group do not know as they will likely be involved in the participant's intra-operative and post-operative care.

Post-operatively when typing the operative note, the operative team will open the envelope and include into post-operative instructions when the IDC should be removed. It is at this point where the study can no longer be blinded.

The nursing team will remove IDC as per the operative note. The ward medical officer will be informed to remove vaginal pack as per the operative note.

Pain score and STAI-S score will be quantified at time of recruitment and time of removal of IDC (as part of a printed written questionnaire) and included in daily ward round entry with 0-10 pain scale. The study team will help with administration of questionnaires.

These will have been already included in participant's file upon admission. Data collected will be observational. There are no additional visits scheduled. The investigators anticipate to recruit two patients each week - thus expect to complete study recruitment over 18 months, accounting for public holidays.

The expected duration of patient participation is from time of listing for operation till 1 month after operation (at one month follow up appointment).

Being tested
Early indwelling catheter removal
Keywords
urogynaecology, enhanced recovery, trial off catheter
Medical subject headings
Postoperative Complications

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Early indwelling catheter removalOther

    Early indwelling catheter and vaginal pack removal on same day of operation, 6 hours post-operatively

Study groups in NCT07768878
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Study armActive comparatorRemove indwelling catheter and vaginal pack 6 hours post-operatively on post-operative day 0
Receives: Other: Early indwelling catheter removal
Control armNo interventionRemove indwelling catheter and vaginal pack on post-operative day 1 at 6am

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Successful spontaneous urine void

    time to spontaneous urine void

    Measured: From removal of indwelling catheter until successful spontaneous void, assessed up to 12 hours

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Ambulation

    time to ambulation

    Measured: From day of operation until day of ambulation, assessed up to 3 days

  2. Length of admission

    Time to discharge

    Measured: From day of admission until day of discharge, assessed up to 7 days

  3. Patient anxiety score - State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)

    20 is equivalent to no anxiety and 80 indicates the worst possible anxiety

    Measured: From time of enrolment until time of removal of indwelling catheter, assessed up to 3 months

  4. Patient satisfaction - pain score with Visual Analog Score

    Zero is equivalent to no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain.

    Measured: From time of enrolment until time of removal of indwelling catheter, assessed up to 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Aug 2026
  2. Study start1 Apr 2024
  3. Primary completion9 Oct 2025
  4. Study completion23 Oct 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
97 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07768878
Sponsor's protocol ID
2022-2758
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
10 Mar 2025
Last updated
17 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: IPD will not be shared with other researchers

Publications

  • Carter-Brooks CM, Zyczynski HM, Moalli PA, Brodeur PG, Shepherd JP. Early catheter removal after pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: a randomized trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Aug;29(8):1203-1212. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3641-3. Epub 2018 Mar 29.

    PubMed 29600401
  • Groth JM, Geisler PP, Glavind K. Same-day surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and hospital contact within 30 days. Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jan;33(1):123-131. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04852-5. Epub 2021 May 27.

    PubMed 34043047
  • Courtieu C, Cornille A, Vaast M, Lacombe S, Panel L. Prospective feasability study of ambulatory surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 May;236:36-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.01.019. Epub 2019 Mar 5.

    PubMed 30878895

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Early indwelling catheter removal in people with Postoperative Complications, run by KK Women's and Children's Hospital at 1 site in Singapore.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Singapore. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Successful spontaneous urine void (time frame: From removal of indwelling catheter until successful spontaneous void, assessed up to 12 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07768878, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Aug 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in