Colorectal CancerPhase 2/3NCT07736495
Protective Role of Alpha-Lipoic Acid in Chemotherapy-Induced Mucositis
A Phase 2/3 study testing alpha lipoic acid 600 mg twice daily in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents one of the most common cancers worldwide and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is still the mainstay of treatment. However, 5-FU is often implicated in inducing oral mucositis (OM), a painful inflammatory condition that may hinder oral intake, negatively impact quality of life and disrupt… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- alpha lipoic acid 600 mg twice daily
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 27 Jul 2026to 29 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age >18 years.
- Newly diagnosed chemotherapy naive CRC patients
- Planned to receive FOLFOX-6 protocol as adjuvant, neoadjuvant or palliative therapy.
- Adequate liver function (liver transaminases level < 3 times upper normal limits and total bilirubin < 1.5 times upper normal limits).
- Adequate kidney function (estimated glomerular filtration rate >60 ml/min).
- Adequate bone marrow function (WBCs count > 3000 cells/mm3, ANC count >1500 cells/mm3 and platelets count > 100,000 cells/mm3).
Who cannot join
- Presence of other primary cancers.
- Treatment with ALA for any other indication.
- Allergy to ALA.
- Pregnant or lactating women.
- Patients with previous mucositis for any reason.
- Patients who cannot tolerate oral intake.
- Patients receiving other dietary antioxidant supplements.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Nasser Institute for Research and Treatment.
Cairo
Ghada Ramadan Youssef, +2001097001838, ghada.ms2425015@pharma.asu.edu.eg
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Protective Effect of Alpha-Lipoic Acid Against 5-Fluorouracil-Induced Oral Mucositis in Colorectal Cancer Patients
Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents one of the most common cancers worldwide and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is still the mainstay of treatment. However, 5-FU is often implicated in inducing oral mucositis (OM), a painful inflammatory condition that may hinder oral intake, negatively impact quality of life and disrupt adherence with cancer treatment.
Oxidative stress and inflammation play a vital role in OM pathogenesis. Alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) is a powerful antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agent that has demonstrated protective effects towards chemotherapy-induced mucosal damage in preclinical studies.
Therefore, ALA may be a promising strategy to minimize or avoid 5-FU-induced oral mucositis in patients with colorectal cancer, which deserves additional clinical investigation.
Read the detailed description
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is characterized by abnormal growth of colon or rectum cells. It accounts for approximately 10% of all cancer cases, with the majority of cases occurring in older individuals aged 50 years and above .It is considered the third most common cancer globally (6.1%) after lung cancer in both female and male (11.6%), (breast cancer is the second common cancer in females) (11.6%) and (prostate cancer is the second common in males) (7.1%) .It is estimated that CRC cases will rise by 71.5% among males and by 60% among females by 2035. It stands as the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, accounting for 9.2% of all cases (9% male and 8% female).
Surgery remains the primary curative treatment for localized disease and is considered the most definitive treatment for colon cancer, while systemic chemotherapy is utilized across neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic settings. Commonly used chemotherapy protocols include 5-fluorouracil in combination with oxaliplatin or irinotecan. Hence, 5- fluorouracil (5-FU) is considered the backbone of CRC chemotherapy.
As an analogue of pyrimidine, the mechanism of 5-FU cytotoxicity is via competitive inhibition of thymidylate synthetase with consequent thymidine deficiency resulting in inhibition of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) synthesis. In addition, incorporation into ribonucleic acid (RNA) interferes with RNA processing and function.
However, despite its efficacy, the continuous infusion of 5-FU is frequently complicated with many toxicities including neutropenia, hand-foot syndrome (HFS), diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and mucositis due to non-selective cytotoxicity on rapidly dividing cells.
Oral mucositis is a debilitating inflammatory reaction of mucous membrane which is a significant problem in patients undergoing chemotherapeutic management, such as 5-FU. Patients experience symptoms ranging from oral pain and dysphagia to severe diarrhea and malnutrition, significantly compromising quality of life and treatment adherence. These effects can lead to chemotherapy dose modifications or interruption, eventually affecting therapeutic outcomes and contributing to infection-related death, emphasizing the need for effective management strategies. Several risk factors predispose patients to develop mucositis such as old age, female gender, overweight, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency, a critical enzyme for 5-FU catabolism, reduced drug clearance and genetic susceptibility.
While mucositis can affect the entire gastrointestinal tract, OM represents a significant clinical challenge owing to its impact on essential functions including speech, mastication, and swallowing, which disturbs nutritional intake and quality of life in cancer patients. The incidence of oral mucositis (OM) with 5-FU of grades 1 and 2 is nearly 93% in CRC cancers.
The pathophysiology of chemotherapy induced OM is comprised of a complex process of five stages, including initiation, signaling, amplification, ulceration, and healing.
During the initiation phase, tissue injury results in the death of the basal epithelial cells and the generation of reactive oxygen species due to dysfunction in the antioxidant protective pathway enzymes including glutathione (GSH), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, myeloperoxidase (MPO), and hydrogen peroxide thereby leading to oxidative stress. This oxidative stress is associated with elevated levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) and 4-hydroxynonenal, although visible symptoms are absent at this stage.
The signaling phase occurs within hours to several days after the initial insult, where upregulation of pro-apoptotic signaling pathways such as nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB) promotes pro-inflammatory cytokine production such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). In that stage mild erythema becomes evident.
During the signal amplification phase, occurring on days 3-5 depending on the regimen, inflammatory pathways such as TNF-α are amplified causing further cellular damage and death. Additionally, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) (especially MMP-1 and MMP-3) are activated, leading to degradation of the extracellular matrix and epithelial connective tissue interface, resulting in increased erythema and soreness.
The ulceration phase typically occurs around day 5-10 after chemotherapy or during the second week of radiotherapy. This phase is characterized by epithelial breakdown resulting in visible painful ulcers covered with a fibrinous pseudo membrane (grayish-white appearance). Bacterial colonization in the ulcer bed activates macrophages, stimulating release of TNF-α, IL-1β, thus exacerbating inflammation.
Finally, the healing phase starts once chemotherapy or radiotherapy is discontinued or completed, during which epithelial proliferation is initiated, thus restoring tissue integrity.
Chemotherapy-induced ROS play a key role in the development of OM, a fact that has led to the evaluation of the oxidative stress pathway as a potential target for OM prevention and management.
Studies investigating oxidative stress and the role of antioxidants, in the context of chemo induced OM, have assessed their effects on mitigating the severity of OM in various settings.
As in previous clinical study reported that curcumin, due to its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects, promoted rapid recovery and reduced OM severity in chemotherapy-induced cases.
In another previous clinical study reported that oral zinc sulfate reduces the incidence and severity of chemo induced OM, pain, and dry mouth by its antioxidant effect.
In another previous clinical study reported that silymarin reduced severity and delayed onset of mucositis by its antioxidant effect.
Despite these efforts, no standardized prophylactic therapy has been established. Current management remains mostly supportive, focusing on good oral hygiene, and analgesia.
Alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) (1,2-dithiolane-3-pentanoic acid, ALA) and its reduced form, dihydrolipoic acid (DHLA), are naturally occurring antioxidants found in both plants and animals. Clinically, it is a supplement for managing chronic diseases characterized by oxidative stress, notably diabetic neuropathy, demonstrating promise in slowing the onset of metabolic syndrome through antioxidant properties. The dosage range of ALA that can produce favorable effect is(600mg/day-1800mg/day) without experiencing any harmful adverse effects. The most common adverse effects reported with ALA are headache, heartburn, nausea, and vomiting.
ALA can mitigate ROS production by regenerating endogenous antioxidants such as glutathione, vitamin E, and C, in addition to its metal chelation activity, thus causing significant decline in the serum levels of oxidative stress markers such as MDA. A previous clinical study reported that ALA at a dose 300 mg twice daily for 4 months significantly decreased MDA in type-1 diabetic patients with subclinical left ventricular dysfunction. Another study reported that higher doses of ALA, 600 mg twice daily for 3 months, significantly decreased MDA in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Moreover, ALA exhibited strong anti-inflammatory effects. In a preclinical study, ALA significantly decreased IL-1β in lipopolysaccharide-induced endothelial fractalkine expression. In another study evaluating the protective effect of ALA against bone destruction in mice, ALA significantly decreased IL-1β levels .Moreover, ALA inhibited proinflammatory pathways mediated by NF-κB, TNF-α, and IL-6, while enhancing the activity of the anti-inflammatory protein nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), thereby reducing tissue damage .
Due to the previously mentioned benefits, ALA has been suggested as a potential candidate for mucositis prevention. A study that evaluated the protective effects of ALA against 5FU-Induced gastrointestinal mucositis in rats reported that ALA treatment decreased TNF-α/IL-1β, MDA, and (matrix metalloproteinases) MMPs/TIMP-1( tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1), while it increased SOD (superoxide dismutase) and GPx (glutathione peroxidase) compared to untreated controls ,ALA also ameliorated severe mucosal damage (degeneration of epithelial cells, edema, villus irregularities) in stomach and small intestine.
In a rat model of methotrexate induced oral mucositis, ALA significantly decreased MDA levels while restoring the antioxidant defense system by increasing activities of SOD and catalase, along with elevated GSH compared to the control group. ALA also markedly reduced the expression of TNF-α and caspase-3 expression in oral epithelial cells and improved histological appearance of the mucosa with less tissue degeneration and fewer ulcerations. Therefore, ALA, might be a potential protective agent against 5-FU-induced mucositis in CRC patients, by mitigating oxidative stress and inflammation.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Being tested
- alpha lipoic acid 600 mg twice daily, Placebo Tablet
- Keywords
- Alpha lipoic acid, Colorectal cancer, Oral Mucositis, 5-Fluorouracil, Oxidative stress, Inflammation
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms, Stomatitis, Inflammation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
alpha lipoic acid 600 mg twice dailyDrug
Thiotex Forte® 600 mg film coated tablets.
Placebo TabletOther
Placebo tablets /twice daily for 6 months
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ALA Group | Experimental | ALA Group: patients will receive Alpha lipoic acid 600mg oral tablet twice daily for 6 months Receives: Drug: alpha lipoic acid 600 mg twice daily |
| Control group | Placebo comparator | Control group will receive identical placebo oral tablet twice daily for 6 months Receives: Other: Placebo Tablet |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Serum levels of malondialdehyde (MDA)
serum level of MDA (oxidative stress biomarker) will be assessed at baseline, after 3 months and after 6 months
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (8)
Incidence of 5FU-induced oral mucositis
the number of patients who will develop oral mucositis will be recorded
Measured: 6 months
Time to develop grade 2 or more Oral Mucositis
Time in days from the start of chemotherapy till the first appearance of grade 2 or more mucositis will be recorded for each patient
Measured: 6 months
Duration of grade 3 or 4 Oral Mucositis
the time in days from the start of chemotherapy till the patient will develop grade 3 or 4 oral mucositis
Measured: 6 months
Number of participants with dose delay/ reduction in chemotherapy due to Oral Mucositis development.
Measured: 6 months
Assessment of pain score.
patients' level of pain will be assessed using visual analogue scale each cycle as the minimum value is zero which means no pain and the maximum value is 10 which means the worst pain level (higher scores mean a worse outcome )
Measured: 6 months
Assessment of serum levels of Interleukin 1β (IL-1β).
serum level of Interleukin 1β (IL-1β) will be measured at baseline and after 3 months then after 6 months
Measured: 6 months
Patient's quality of life using Patient-Reported Oral Mucositis Symptom (PROMS) scale
the quality of life will be assessed at baseline , after 3 months and after 6 months using Patient-Reported Oral Mucositis Symptom (PROMS) scale, this is a self-administered scale assessing the effect of oral mucositis pain on the patients' activities' in this scale, the minimum score is zero and the maximum score is 100 A patient with a high score reflects greater pain, increased functional impairment, and poorer well-being, while a low score indicates milder or absent mucositis symptoms and better oral function / quality of life.
Measured: 6 months
the safety of ALA
the incidence of adverse effects that will occur during the study will be recorded
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jul 2026
- Study start27 Jul 2026
- Primary completion27 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion29 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (37)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colorectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ain Shams UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ain Shams University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ghada Ramadan, Ain Shams University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07736495
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 454
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 26 Jul 2026
- Last updated
- 30 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Yan S, Lu J, Chen B, Yuan L, Chen L, Ju L, Cai W, Wu J. The Multifaceted Role of Alpha-Lipoic Acid in Cancer Prevention, Occurrence, and Treatment. Antioxidants (Basel). 2024 Jul 25;13(8):897. doi: 10.3390/antiox13080897.
PubMed 39199143Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs. 2005 Aug;14(7):798-804. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.x.
PubMed 16000093Werida RH, Elshafiey RA, Ghoneim A, Elzawawy S, Mostafa TM. Role of alpha-lipoic acid in counteracting paclitaxel- and doxorubicin-induced toxicities: a randomized controlled trial in breast cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2022 Sep;30(9):7281-7292. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07124-0. Epub 2022 May 21.
PubMed 35596774Vallianou N, Evangelopoulos A, Koutalas P. Alpha-lipoic Acid and diabetic neuropathy. Rev Diabet Stud. 2009 Winter;6(4):230-6. doi: 10.1900/RDS.2009.6.230. Epub 2009 Dec 30.
PubMed 20043035Sung MJ, Kim W, Ahn SY, Cho CH, Koh GY, Moon SO, Kim DH, Lee S, Kang KP, Jang KY, Park SK. Protective effect of alpha-lipoic acid in lipopolysaccharide-induced endothelial fractalkine expression. Circ Res. 2005 Oct 28;97(9):880-90. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000186522.89544.4D. Epub 2005 Sep 15.
PubMed 16166554Sonis ST, Elting LS, Keefe D, Peterson DE, Schubert M, Hauer-Jensen M, Bekele BN, Raber-Durlacher J, Donnelly JP, Rubenstein EB; Mucositis Study Section of the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer; International Society for Oral Oncology. Perspectives on cancer therapy-induced mucosal injury: pathogenesis, measurement, epidemiology, and consequences for patients. Cancer. 2004 May 1;100(9 Suppl):1995-2025. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20162.
PubMed 15108222Sonis ST. Mucositis as a biological process: a new hypothesis for the development of chemotherapy-induced stomatotoxicity. Oral Oncol. 1998 Jan;34(1):39-43. doi: 10.1016/s1368-8375(97)00053-5.
PubMed 9659518Shetty SS, Maruthi M, Dhara V, de Arruda JAA, Abreu LG, Mesquita RA, Teixeira AL, Silva TA, Merchant Y. Oral mucositis: Current knowledge and future directions. Dis Mon. 2022 May;68(5):101300. doi: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2021.101300. Epub 2021 Nov 7.
PubMed 34758917• Rosemann, E., Schaefer, H., Esmaty, A., Stintzing, S., & Karthaus, M. (2022). Incidence, severity, and onset of oral mucositis in 5-FU based chemotherapy for gastrointestinal cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 40(4_suppl), 77. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2022.40.4_suppl.077
• Roayaei, M., Andalib, Z., & Akhavan, A. (2022). The effect of oral zinc sulfate on prevention of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis in breast cancer patients treated with adriamycin and cyclophosphamide; a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Journal of Nephropharmacology, 12(1), e10533. https://doi.org/10.34172/npj.2022.10533
Pulito C, Cristaudo A, Porta C, Zapperi S, Blandino G, Morrone A, Strano S. Oral mucositis: the hidden side of cancer therapy. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Oct 7;39(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13046-020-01715-7.
PubMed 33028357Peterson DE, Boers-Doets CB, Bensadoun RJ, Herrstedt J; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Management of oral and gastrointestinal mucosal injury: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26 Suppl 5:v139-51. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv202. Epub 2015 Jul 4. No abstract available.
PubMed 26142468Nguyen H, Sangha S, Pan M, Shin DH, Park H, Mohammed AI, Cirillo N. Oxidative Stress and Chemoradiation-Induced Oral Mucositis: A Scoping Review of In Vitro, In Vivo and Clinical Studies. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Apr 27;23(9):4863. doi: 10.3390/ijms23094863.
PubMed 35563254Negarandeh R, Salehifar E, Saghafi F, Jalali H, Janbabaei G, Abdhaghighi MJ, Nosrati A. Evaluation of adverse effects of chemotherapy regimens of 5-fluoropyrimidines derivatives and their association with DPYD polymorphisms in colorectal cancer patients. BMC Cancer. 2020 Jun 16;20(1):560. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06904-3.
PubMed 32546132• Mutch, M. G., & Wells, K. O. (2016). Surgical approach to colon cancer. Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery, 27(4), 199-203. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.scrs.2016.04.018
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Protective Effect of Alpha-Lipoic Acid Against 5-Fluorouracil-Induced Oral Mucositis in Colorectal Cancer Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07736495
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 454
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Keywords
- Alpha lipoic acid, Colorectal cancer, Oral Mucositis, 5-Fluorouracil, Oxidative stress, Inflammation
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Ain Shams UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 27 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 29 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents one of the most common cancers worldwide and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is still the mainstay of treatment. However, 5-FU is often implicated in inducing oral mucositis (OM), a painful inflammatory condition that may hinder oral intake, negatively impact quality of life and disrupt adherence with cancer treatment.
Oxidative stress and inflammation play a vital role in OM pathogenesis. Alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) is a powerful antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agent that has demonstrated protective effects towards chemotherapy-induced mucosal damage in preclinical studies.
Therefore, ALA may be a promising strategy to minimize or avoid 5-FU-induced oral mucositis in patients with colorectal cancer, which deserves additional clinical investigation.
Detailed description
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is characterized by abnormal growth of colon or rectum cells. It accounts for approximately 10% of all cancer cases, with the majority of cases occurring in older individuals aged 50 years and above .It is considered the third most common cancer globally (6.1%) after lung cancer in both female and male (11.6%), (breast cancer is the second common cancer in females) (11.6%) and (prostate cancer is the second common in males) (7.1%) .It is estimated that CRC cases will rise by 71.5% among males and by 60% among females by 2035. It stands as the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, accounting for 9.2% of all cases (9% male and 8% female).
Surgery remains the primary curative treatment for localized disease and is considered the most definitive treatment for colon cancer, while systemic chemotherapy is utilized across neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic settings. Commonly used chemotherapy protocols include 5-fluorouracil in combination with oxaliplatin or irinotecan. Hence, 5- fluorouracil (5-FU) is considered the backbone of CRC chemotherapy.
As an analogue of pyrimidine, the mechanism of 5-FU cytotoxicity is via competitive inhibition of thymidylate synthetase with consequent thymidine deficiency resulting in inhibition of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) synthesis. In addition, incorporation into ribonucleic acid (RNA) interferes with RNA processing and function.
However, despite its efficacy, the continuous infusion of 5-FU is frequently complicated with many toxicities including neutropenia, hand-foot syndrome (HFS), diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and mucositis due to non-selective cytotoxicity on rapidly dividing cells.
Oral mucositis is a debilitating inflammatory reaction of mucous membrane which is a significant problem in patients undergoing chemotherapeutic management, such as 5-FU. Patients experience symptoms ranging from oral pain and dysphagia to severe diarrhea and malnutrition, significantly compromising quality of life and treatment adherence. These effects can lead to chemotherapy dose modifications or interruption, eventually affecting therapeutic outcomes and contributing to infection-related death, emphasizing the need for effective management strategies. Several risk factors predispose patients to develop mucositis such as old age, female gender, overweight, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency, a critical enzyme for 5-FU catabolism, reduced drug clearance and genetic susceptibility.
While mucositis can affect the entire gastrointestinal tract, OM represents a significant clinical challenge owing to its impact on essential functions including speech, mastication, and swallowing, which disturbs nutritional intake and quality of life in cancer patients. The incidence of oral mucositis (OM) with 5-FU of grades 1 and 2 is nearly 93% in CRC cancers.
The pathophysiology of chemotherapy induced OM is comprised of a complex process of five stages, including initiation, signaling, amplification, ulceration, and healing.
During the initiation phase, tissue injury results in the death of the basal epithelial cells and the generation of reactive oxygen species due to dysfunction in the antioxidant protective pathway enzymes including glutathione (GSH), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, myeloperoxidase (MPO), and hydrogen peroxide thereby leading to oxidative stress. This oxidative stress is associated with elevated levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) and 4-hydroxynonenal, although visible symptoms are absent at this stage.
The signaling phase occurs within hours to several days after the initial insult, where upregulation of pro-apoptotic signaling pathways such as nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB) promotes pro-inflammatory cytokine production such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). In that stage mild erythema becomes evident.
During the signal amplification phase, occurring on days 3-5 depending on the regimen, inflammatory pathways such as TNF-α are amplified causing further cellular damage and death. Additionally, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) (especially MMP-1 and MMP-3) are activated, leading to degradation of the extracellular matrix and epithelial connective tissue interface, resulting in increased erythema and soreness.
The ulceration phase typically occurs around day 5-10 after chemotherapy or during the second week of radiotherapy. This phase is characterized by epithelial breakdown resulting in visible painful ulcers covered with a fibrinous pseudo membrane (grayish-white appearance). Bacterial colonization in the ulcer bed activates macrophages, stimulating release of TNF-α, IL-1β, thus exacerbating inflammation.
Finally, the healing phase starts once chemotherapy or radiotherapy is discontinued or completed, during which epithelial proliferation is initiated, thus restoring tissue integrity.
Chemotherapy-induced ROS play a key role in the development of OM, a fact that has led to the evaluation of the oxidative stress pathway as a potential target for OM prevention and management.
Studies investigating oxidative stress and the role of antioxidants, in the context of chemo induced OM, have assessed their effects on mitigating the severity of OM in various settings.
As in previous clinical study reported that curcumin, due to its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects, promoted rapid recovery and reduced OM severity in chemotherapy-induced cases.
In another previous clinical study reported that oral zinc sulfate reduces the incidence and severity of chemo induced OM, pain, and dry mouth by its antioxidant effect.
In another previous clinical study reported that silymarin reduced severity and delayed onset of mucositis by its antioxidant effect.
Despite these efforts, no standardized prophylactic therapy has been established. Current management remains mostly supportive, focusing on good oral hygiene, and analgesia.
Alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) (1,2-dithiolane-3-pentanoic acid, ALA) and its reduced form, dihydrolipoic acid (DHLA), are naturally occurring antioxidants found in both plants and animals. Clinically, it is a supplement for managing chronic diseases characterized by oxidative stress, notably diabetic neuropathy, demonstrating promise in slowing the onset of metabolic syndrome through antioxidant properties. The dosage range of ALA that can produce favorable effect is(600mg/day-1800mg/day) without experiencing any harmful adverse effects. The most common adverse effects reported with ALA are headache, heartburn, nausea, and vomiting.
ALA can mitigate ROS production by regenerating endogenous antioxidants such as glutathione, vitamin E, and C, in addition to its metal chelation activity, thus causing significant decline in the serum levels of oxidative stress markers such as MDA. A previous clinical study reported that ALA at a dose 300 mg twice daily for 4 months significantly decreased MDA in type-1 diabetic patients with subclinical left ventricular dysfunction. Another study reported that higher doses of ALA, 600 mg twice daily for 3 months, significantly decreased MDA in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Moreover, ALA exhibited strong anti-inflammatory effects. In a preclinical study, ALA significantly decreased IL-1β in lipopolysaccharide-induced endothelial fractalkine expression. In another study evaluating the protective effect of ALA against bone destruction in mice, ALA significantly decreased IL-1β levels .Moreover, ALA inhibited proinflammatory pathways mediated by NF-κB, TNF-α, and IL-6, while enhancing the activity of the anti-inflammatory protein nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), thereby reducing tissue damage .
Due to the previously mentioned benefits, ALA has been suggested as a potential candidate for mucositis prevention. A study that evaluated the protective effects of ALA against 5FU-Induced gastrointestinal mucositis in rats reported that ALA treatment decreased TNF-α/IL-1β, MDA, and (matrix metalloproteinases) MMPs/TIMP-1( tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1), while it increased SOD (superoxide dismutase) and GPx (glutathione peroxidase) compared to untreated controls ,ALA also ameliorated severe mucosal damage (degeneration of epithelial cells, edema, villus irregularities) in stomach and small intestine.
In a rat model of methotrexate induced oral mucositis, ALA significantly decreased MDA levels while restoring the antioxidant defense system by increasing activities of SOD and catalase, along with elevated GSH compared to the control group. ALA also markedly reduced the expression of TNF-α and caspase-3 expression in oral epithelial cells and improved histological appearance of the mucosa with less tissue degeneration and fewer ulcerations. Therefore, ALA, might be a potential protective agent against 5-FU-induced mucositis in CRC patients, by mitigating oxidative stress and inflammation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ALA Group | Experimental | Drug: alpha lipoic acid 600 mg twice dailyALA Group: patients will receive Alpha lipoic acid 600mg oral tablet twice daily for 6 months |
| Control group | Placebo comparator | Other: Placebo TabletControl group will receive identical placebo oral tablet twice daily for 6 months |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age >18 years.
- Newly diagnosed chemotherapy naive CRC patients
- Planned to receive FOLFOX-6 protocol as adjuvant, neoadjuvant or palliative therapy.
- Adequate liver function (liver transaminases level < 3 times upper normal limits and total bilirubin < 1.5 times upper normal limits).
- Adequate kidney function (estimated glomerular filtration rate >60 ml/min).
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Presence of other primary cancers.
- Treatment with ALA for any other indication.
- Allergy to ALA.
- Pregnant or lactating women.
- Patients with previous mucositis for any reason.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| alpha lipoic acid 600 mg twice dailyThiotex Forte® 600 mg film coated tablets. | Drug | ALA Group |
| Placebo TabletPlacebo tablets /twice daily for 6 months | Other | Control group |
Primary outcome
Serum levels of malondialdehyde (MDA)
Time frame: 6 months
serum level of MDA (oxidative stress biomarker) will be assessed at baseline, after 3 months and after 6 months
8 secondary outcomes
Incidence of 5FU-induced oral mucositis
Time frame: 6 months
Time to develop grade 2 or more Oral Mucositis
Time frame: 6 months
Duration of grade 3 or 4 Oral Mucositis
Time frame: 6 months
Number of participants with dose delay/ reduction in chemotherapy due to Oral Mucositis development.
Time frame: 6 months
Assessment of pain score.
Time frame: 6 months
Assessment of serum levels of Interleukin 1β (IL-1β).
Time frame: 6 months
Patient's quality of life using Patient-Reported Oral Mucositis Symptom (PROMS) scale
Time frame: 6 months
the safety of ALA
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jul 2026.
- Background: PubMed 39199143Yan S, Lu J, Chen B, Yuan L, Chen L, Ju L, Cai W, Wu J. The Multifaceted Role of Alpha-Lipoic Acid in Cancer Prevention, Occurrence, and Treatment. Antioxidants (Basel). 2024 Jul 25;13(8):897. doi: 10.3390/antiox13080897.
- Background: PubMed 16000093Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs. 2005 Aug;14(7):798-804. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.x.
- Background: PubMed 35596774Werida RH, Elshafiey RA, Ghoneim A, Elzawawy S, Mostafa TM. Role of alpha-lipoic acid in counteracting paclitaxel- and doxorubicin-induced toxicities: a randomized controlled trial in breast cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2022 Sep;30(9):7281-7292. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07124-0. Epub 2022 May 21.
- Background: PubMed 20043035Vallianou N, Evangelopoulos A, Koutalas P. Alpha-lipoic Acid and diabetic neuropathy. Rev Diabet Stud. 2009 Winter;6(4):230-6. doi: 10.1900/RDS.2009.6.230. Epub 2009 Dec 30.
- Background: PubMed 16166554Sung MJ, Kim W, Ahn SY, Cho CH, Koh GY, Moon SO, Kim DH, Lee S, Kang KP, Jang KY, Park SK. Protective effect of alpha-lipoic acid in lipopolysaccharide-induced endothelial fractalkine expression. Circ Res. 2005 Oct 28;97(9):880-90. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000186522.89544.4D. Epub 2005 Sep 15.
- Background: PubMed 15108222Sonis ST, Elting LS, Keefe D, Peterson DE, Schubert M, Hauer-Jensen M, Bekele BN, Raber-Durlacher J, Donnelly JP, Rubenstein EB; Mucositis Study Section of the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer; International Society for Oral Oncology. Perspectives on cancer therapy-induced mucosal injury: pathogenesis, measurement, epidemiology, and consequences for patients. Cancer. 2004 May 1;100(9 Suppl):1995-2025. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20162.
- Background: PubMed 9659518Sonis ST. Mucositis as a biological process: a new hypothesis for the development of chemotherapy-induced stomatotoxicity. Oral Oncol. 1998 Jan;34(1):39-43. doi: 10.1016/s1368-8375(97)00053-5.
- Background: PubMed 34758917Shetty SS, Maruthi M, Dhara V, de Arruda JAA, Abreu LG, Mesquita RA, Teixeira AL, Silva TA, Merchant Y. Oral mucositis: Current knowledge and future directions. Dis Mon. 2022 May;68(5):101300. doi: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2021.101300. Epub 2021 Nov 7.
- Background• Rosemann, E., Schaefer, H., Esmaty, A., Stintzing, S., & Karthaus, M. (2022). Incidence, severity, and onset of oral mucositis in 5-FU based chemotherapy for gastrointestinal cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 40(4_suppl), 77. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2022.40.4_suppl.077
- Background• Roayaei, M., Andalib, Z., & Akhavan, A. (2022). The effect of oral zinc sulfate on prevention of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis in breast cancer patients treated with adriamycin and cyclophosphamide; a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Journal of Nephropharmacology, 12(1), e10533. https://doi.org/10.34172/npj.2022.10533
- Background: PubMed 33028357Pulito C, Cristaudo A, Porta C, Zapperi S, Blandino G, Morrone A, Strano S. Oral mucositis: the hidden side of cancer therapy. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Oct 7;39(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13046-020-01715-7.
- Background: PubMed 26142468Peterson DE, Boers-Doets CB, Bensadoun RJ, Herrstedt J; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Management of oral and gastrointestinal mucosal injury: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26 Suppl 5:v139-51. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv202. Epub 2015 Jul 4. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing alpha lipoic acid 600 mg twice daily in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ghada Ramadan Youssef (+20 01097001838, ghada.ms2425015@pharma.asu.edu.eg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Serum levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07736495, which also lists 37 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jul 2026.