AzTrials
AzTrials

Stress (Psychology)MSMNCT07732621

Effectiveness of A Mindfulness-centered Stress Management AI Chatbot to Reduce Stress and Enhance Mental Health Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in China

A study testing Mindfulness-centered stress management AI chatbot and Psychoeducation in people with Stress (Psychology), run by The University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of a mindfulness-centered stress management AI chatbot in reducing perceived stress and enhancing mental health among Chinese men who have sex with men (MSM). The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, men only
Conditions the study is for
Stress (Psychology)
What is being tested?
Mindfulness-centered stress management AI chatbot and Psychoeducation
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
76 participants
Where
1 siteHong Kong
Study dates
31 Jul 2026to 31 Mar 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Chinese
  • Self-identify as MSM.
  • Own a smartphone to ensure compatibility with the intervention platform.
  • Mild to moderate perceived stress, defined as Chinese Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14) score < 43.

Who cannot join

  • Diagnosed with an acute severe mental disorder, such as psychosis, major depressive disorder, or anxiety disorder;
  • Currently receiving psychotherapy at enrollment.
  • Report moderately severe to severe depressive symptoms, defined as a PHQ-9 total score greater than 14.
  • Unable to provide online informed consent or complete study procedures.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Hong Kong1 site
  • The University of Hong Kong

    Hong Kong

    Shuochi Wei, 852-68744705, weisc@connect.hku.hk

Other trials in Hong Kong

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness of A Mindfulness-centered Stress Management AI Chatbot to Reduce Stress and Enhance Mental Health Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in China: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of a mindfulness-centered stress management AI chatbot in reducing perceived stress and enhancing mental health among Chinese men who have sex with men (MSM).

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Read more
  1. Does the AI chatbot show a greater reduction in perceived stress compared to standardized psychoeducational materials?
  2. Does the AI chatbot improve mental health outcomes, including depressive and anxiety symptoms, subjective well-being, and emotion regulation?

Researchers will compare the AI chatbot to a control group receiving psychoeducational materials to see if the chatbot works to reduce stress and improve mental health.

Participants will:

  1. Be randomized to use the AI chatbot (recommended at least 2 sessions per week, 10-15 minutes per session) or read psychoeducational materials (2 times per week) for 4 weeks.
  2. Complete online self-report questionnaires at baseline, post-intervention (Week 4), and 4-week follow-up.
Read the detailed description

Chinese MSM often experience unique social stress factors related to stigma, discrimination, and the pressures of concealing their sexual identity. These ongoing challenges are closely linked to elevated levels of anxiety, depressive symptoms, and general psychological distress. While traditional face-to-face therapy can be effective, common barriers such as waiting lists, costs, and privacy concerns frequently prevent individuals from seeking care. To help bridge this gap, the trial evaluates an accessible, private, and real-time AI tool that delivers safe, low-intensity mental health preventive support directly to a user's smartphone.

The investigational tool is a web-based chatbot built on a open-source Chinese large language model and tailored using Retrieval-Augmented Generation technology. This design ensures that the chatbot's responses are empathetic, culturally sensitive, and tailored to MSM-related stress and mental health topics. During conversations, the chatbot guides users through brief, evidence-based mindfulness practices-such as grounding, cognitive defusion, self-compassion, and sleep support-designed for 10-to-20-minute sessions. The tool focuses strictly on stress management and coping skills; it is not intended to provide clinical diagnosis, formal psychotherapy, or emergency crisis intervention.

The research follows a randomized controlled trial design spanning four weeks of intervention followed by a post-study assessment four weeks later. Adult participants with mild-to-moderate stress are recruited via major social media platforms, including Xiaohongshu, Weibo, and WeChat. After completing online consent and baseline surveys, participants are randomly assigned to either the intervention group or a control group. Those in the intervention group attend a brief online orientation and gain access to the AI chatbot, which they are recommended to use at least twice a week. Participants in the control group receive non-interactive educational readings on general stress management twice weekly. Researchers measure changes in stress levels, anxiety, depression, emotion regulation, rumination, and coping strategies across three key evaluation points.

Being tested
Mindfulness-centered stress management AI chatbot, Psychoeducation
Keywords
stress, sexual minority, mindfulness

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Mindfulness-centered stress management AI chatbotBehavioural

    An investigational, web-based conversational AI chatbot providing preventive, low-intensity psychological support for Chinese MSM experiencing mild-to-moderate stress. It has the following functions: (1) Built on a Chinese open-source LLM optimized through RAG to deliver culturally adapted, empathetic responses addressing minority stress, stigma, and identity concealment. (2) Delivers interactive, 10-20 min guided mindfulness-based stress reduction exercises (grounding, self-compassion, sleep-support, etc).

  • PsychoeducationBehavioural

    Participants receive standardized, text-based psychoeducational readings covering general stress, coping concepts, and mental health awareness. The delivery contains no interactive features, conversational elements, or guided mindfulness coaching.

Study groups in NCT07732621
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Mindfulness-centered stress management AI chatbotExperimentalParticipants will receive mindfulness-centered stress management AI chatbot.
Receives: Behavioral: Mindfulness-centered stress management AI chatbot
PsychoeducationActive comparatorParticipants will receive psychoeducation reading materials.
Receives: Behavioral: Psychoeducation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Score of Perceived Stress

    Chinese version of Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14). Score range: 0-56. The higher the score, the greater the perceived stress.

    PSS-14 is highly sensitive to both acute and subtle changes in stress levels, making it effective for capturing variations in stress even within short periods of intervention. It can detect moderate fluctuations in perceived stress, even in individuals with low to moderate baseline stress levels.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of intervention at week 1, week 4, and week 8.

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Score of Difficulties in Emotion Regulation

    Chinese version of 16 item Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale Short Form (DERS-SF). Score range: 16-80. The higher the score, the lower the individual's level of emotional regulation.

    DERS-SF is highly sensitive to short-term fluctuations in emotion regulation.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of intervention at week 1, week 4, and week 8.

  2. Score of Stress Coping

    Chinese version of Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory (Brief-COPE). Score range: 28-112. The higher score of the subscale demonstrates more likely the coping strategies were used by the respondents.

    Brief-COPE is highly sensitive to changes in coping strategies and can capture variations in stress responses, especially following interventions aimed at improving coping mechanisms.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of intervention at week 1, week 4, and week 8.

  3. Score of Rumination

    Chinese version of Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS). Score range:22-88. A higher score indicates a more severe tendency toward ruminative thinking.

    RRS is sensitive to both moderate and subtle changes in rumination. It can detect shifts in rumination levels, particularly in individuals with depression or stress-related disorders.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of intervention at week 1, week 4, and week 8.

  4. Score of Distress Tolerance

    Chinese version of distress tolerance scale (DTS). Score range: 15-75. A higher score indicates that an individual has a higher tolerance for emotional distress.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of intervention at week 1, week 4, and week 8.

  5. Score of Depressive symptom

    Chinese version of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Score range:0-27. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms of depression.

    PHQ-9 is sensitive to both moderate and mild changes in depressive symptoms. It has been shown to detect reductions in depressive symptoms following short-term interventions, even those targeting stress or emotion regulation rather than directly treating depression.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of intervention at week 1, week 4, and week 8.

  6. Score of Anxiety Symptom

    Chinese version of Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7). Score range: 0-21. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms of anxiety.

    GAD-7 is particularly sensitive to changes in anxiety, capturing both the intensity and frequency of anxiety symptoms. Even short-term interventions can result in significant reductions in anxiety.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of intervention at week 1, week 4, and week 8.

  7. Score of Subjective Well-Being

    Chinese version of WHO Well-Being Index (WHO-5). Score range:0-30. A higher score indicates a higher level of wellbeing.

    WHO-5 is sensitive to short-term fluctuations in subjective well-being, making it ideal for measuring the effects of interventions like mindfulness.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of intervention at week 1, week 4, and week 8.

  8. Score of Acceptability of Intervention

    Chinese version of Acceptability of Intervention (AIM). Score range: 1-5. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability.

    4-item Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) will be used to assess acceptability. It is a 5-point Likert scale, with good readability, reliability, and validity. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of intervention at week 4.

  9. Score of Intervention Appropriateness

    Chinese version of Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM). Score range: 1-5. Higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.

    4-item Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) will be used to assess the appropriateness of the intervention. It is a 5-point Likert scale, with good readability, reliability, and validity. Higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of intervention at week 4.

  10. Score of AI Psychological Dialogue Quality

    AI Psychological Dialogue Quality Assessment. Score range: 1-5. Higher scores indicate higher quality.

    AI Psychological Dialogue Quality Assessment is a 5-point Likert scale for evaluating AI psychological dialogue quality including normativity, professionalism, emotional understanding and empathy, consistency and coherence and potentially harmful information).

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of intervention at week 4.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Jul 2026
  2. Study start31 Jul 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
76 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07732621
Sponsor's protocol ID
UW 26-192
Acronym
MSM
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
23 Jul 2026
Last updated
19 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data will not be shared to protect participant privacy and maintain strict confidentiality, given the sensitive nature of sexual minority status, mental health data, and personal conversational logs.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Mindfulness-centered stress management AI chatbot and Psychoeducation in people with Stress (Psychology), run by The University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Score of Perceived Stress (time frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at week 1, week 4, and week 8.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Aug 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in