AzTrials
AzTrials

Stress (Psychology)FOREST-INNCT07808762

Feasibility of Implementing the Internet-Delivered Stress Recovery Intervention FOREST for Healthcare Staff in a Real-World Healthcare Setting

A study testing FOREST in people with Stress (Psychology), run by Vilnius University.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of the study is to assess the feasibility of implementing the internet-delivered stress recovery intervention FOREST for healthcare staff in a real-world healthcare setting and to obtain preliminary estimates of changes in stress recovery and mental health outcomes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Stress (Psychology)
What is being tested?
FOREST
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
300 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Nov 2026to Sep 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • being at least 18 years old
  • working in a healthcare setting;
  • understanding Lithuanian;
  • living in Lithuania;
  • having access to an internet-enabled device.
  • Exclusion Criteria: No additional exclusion criteria will be applied in order to maximize inclusiveness and reflect real-world implementation.

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Austeja Dumarkaite, PhD contact

+37052686952

austeja.dumarkaite@fsf.vu.lt

Evaldas Kazlauskas, PhD contact

+37052686952

evaldas.kazlauskas@fsf.vu.lt

About this study

The aim of the study is to assess the feasibility of implementing the internet-delivered stress recovery intervention FOREST for healthcare staff in a real-world healthcare setting and to obtain preliminary estimates of changes in stress recovery and mental health outcomes.

Read the detailed description

The feasibility of implementing the evidence-based, internet-delivered stress recovery intervention FOREST for healthcare staff in a real-world healthcare setting will be evaluated using a single-arm pre-post study design. The study aims to assess the feasibility of implementing the intervention within a hospital setting and to obtain preliminary estimates of changes in stress recovery and mental health outcomes to inform broader implementation across healthcare settings. Information about the intervention and the study will be disseminated within participating healthcare settings. Interested healthcare staff will complete an online eligibility screening. Individuals who meet the inclusion criteria will be invited to provide informed consent and complete the baseline assessment before being enrolled in and granted access to the FOREST intervention.

The FOREST intervention consists of six sessions (Introduction, Psychological Detachment, Distancing, Mastery, Control, and Keeping the Change Alive) delivered over a four-week period. Each session includes psychoeducational content presented through text and video materials, as well as practical stress recovery exercises. Participants will also have access to support from a trained psychologist on demand throughout the intervention.

Assessments will be conducted at baseline, immediately after the four-week intervention, and at a 12-week follow-up after baseline. The study's primary outcomes will assess implementation at the individual level, guided by Proctor et al.'s Implementation Outcomes Framework to evaluate acceptability and appropriateness, alongside intervention uptake (initiation), and complemented by feasibility and process indicators capturing reach, recruitment, engagement, and retention. Secondary outcomes will provide preliminary estimates of changes in stress recovery and other mental health outcomes.

Being tested
FOREST
Keywords
Healthcare staff, Stress recovery, Internet-delivered intervention, Implementation feasibility, FOREST

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • FORESTBehavioural

    The internet-delivered stress recovery intervention FOREST consists of six sessions (Introduction, Psychological Detachment, Distancing, Mastery, Control, and Keeping the Change Alive) delivered over a four-week period. Each session includes psychoeducational content presented through text and video materials, as well as practical stress recovery exercises. Participants also have access to support from a trained psychologist on demand throughout the intervention.

Study groups in NCT07808762
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention groupExperimentalThe intervention group will get a four-week internet-delivered stress recovery intervention FOREST.
Receives: Behavioral: FOREST

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Reach

    Measurement: study recruitment records.

    Reach will be assessed as the proportion of the target healthcare workforce that enrolls in the intervention. It will be calculated as the number of enrolled participants divided by the estimated number of healthcare staff in the target workforce, expressed as a percentage.

    Measured: Through completion of recruitment, up to 9 months.

  2. Recruitment

    Measurement: Study screening, eligibility, and informed consent records.

    Recruitment will be assessed as the number and proportion of eligible healthcare staff who provide informed consent and enroll in the study.

    Measured: Through completion of recruitment, up to 9 months.

  3. Intervention uptake

    Measurement: FOREST intervention platform usage records.

    Intervention uptake will be assessed as the number and proportion of enrolled participants who initiate the intervention by completing the first FOREST session.

    Measured: Through completion of the intervention period, up to 10 months.

  4. Number of intervention sessions completed

    Number of intervention sessions completed will be assessed using FOREST intervention platform usage records. The number of FOREST intervention sessions completed by each participant will be recorded.

    Measured: Through completion of the intervention period, up to 10 months.

  5. Percentage of participants completing all six intervention sessions

    Percentage of participants completing all six FOREST intervention sessions will be assessed using FOREST intervention platform usage records. The percentage of participants who complete all six FOREST intervention sessions will be calculated as the number of participants completing all six sessions divided by the total number of participants who initiated the intervention, multiplied by 100.

    Measured: Through completion of the intervention period, up to 10 months.

  6. Retention

    Measurement: Study assessment completion records.

    Retention will be assessed as the number and proportion of enrolled participants who complete the post-intervention assessment and the 12-week follow-up assessment.

    Unit of Measure: Number and percentage of participants completing each assessment time point.

    Measured: Through completion of the 12-week follow-up, up to 12 months.

  7. Intervention acceptability

    Measurement: Post-intervention acceptability questions developed by study researchers.

    Acceptability will be assessed using post-intervention participant questions evaluating satisfaction with the FOREST intervention, perceived usefulness, and likelihood of recommending the intervention to colleagues. Each item will be reported according to its response scale, with descriptive summary statistics presented for participant responses. Higher scores indicate more pronounced acceptability.

    Measured: Through completion of the post-intervention assessment period, up to 10 months.

  8. Intervention appropriateness

    Measurement: Post-intervention appropriateness question developed by study researchers.

    Appropriateness will be assessed using a post-intervention participant question evaluating participants' perceptions of whether the FOREST intervention is relevant and suitable for healthcare staff working in a hospital setting. The item will be reported according to its response scale, with descriptive summary statistics presented for participant responses. A higher score indicates more pronounced appropriateness.

    Measured: Post-intervention assessment, up to 10 months.

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Changes in stress recovery

    Changes in stress recovery are measured. The Recovery Experiences Questionnaire (Sonnentag \& Fritz, 2007) is a self-report measure consisting of 16 questions. All items are answered on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Totally disagree) to 5 (Totally agree). A higher score indicates more pronounced stress recovery.

    Measured: Baseline, post-test after four weeks, follow-up after 12 weeks

  2. Changes in perceived stress

    Changes in perceived stress are measured. Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4, Cohen et al., 1983) is a self-report measure consisting of four questions. All items are answered on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (Never) to 4 (Very often). A higher score indicates more pronounced perceived stress.

    Measured: Baseline, post-test after four weeks, follow-up after 12 weeks

  3. Changes in symptoms of anxiety and depression

    Changes in symptoms of anxiety and depression are measured. The Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4; Kroenke et al., 2009) is a self-report measure consisting of four questions. All items are answered on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 3 (Nearly every day). A higher score indicates more pronounced symptoms of anxiety and depression.

    Measured: Baseline, post-test after four weeks, follow-up after 12 weeks

  4. Changes in mental well-being

    Changes in mental well-being are measured. Well-being Index (WHO-5, Bech, 2004) is a self-report measure consisting of five questions. All items are answered on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (At no time) to 5 (All of the time). A higher score indicates more pronounced mental well-being.

    Measured: Baseline, post-test after four weeks, follow-up after 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Sep 2026
  2. Study startNov 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionSep 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completionSep 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
300 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07808762
Sponsor's protocol ID
3.7 E-10000-KT-2858
Acronym
FOREST-IN
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
24 Aug 2026
Last updated
4 Nov 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing FOREST in people with Stress (Psychology), run by Vilnius University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Austeja Dumarkaite, PhD (+37052686952, austeja.dumarkaite@fsf.vu.lt), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Reach (time frame: Through completion of recruitment, up to 9 months.). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in