AzTrials
AzTrials

Athletic InjuriesNCT07713004

FIFA 11+ Warm-Up and Injury Risk Classification in Youth Amateur Soccer Players

A study testing FIFA 11+ Neuromuscular Warm-Up Program and Routine Warm-Up in people with Athletic Injuries and Soccer Injury, run by Pamukkale University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This randomized controlled trial evaluated whether an eight-week, supervised FIFA 11+ neuromuscular warm-up program improves multifactorial injury risk classification, functional performance, and time-loss injury incidence in youth amateur male soccer players aged 15 to 18 years. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 15 to 18 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
FIFA 11+ Neuromuscular Warm-Up Program and Routine Warm-Up
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
44 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
20 Aug 2024to 22 Oct 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 15 to 18 years
  • Men only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male, aged 15 to 18 years
  • Minimum of one year of competitive experience in an amateur soccer league
  • Actively competing in the Mugla Regional Amateur League at the time of enrolment
  • No diagnosed systemic disease
  • Written informed consent from a parent or legal guardian and written assent from the participant

Who cannot join

  • Pain reported at the time of baseline assessment
  • Injury sustained within the six months preceding the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Pamukkale University, Sports Sciences and Technology Research and Application Center

    Denizli, Pamukkale, 20000

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Effects of the FIFA 11+ Neuromuscular Warm-Up Program on Move2Perform Injury Risk Classification in Youth Amateur Soccer Players: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This randomized controlled trial evaluated whether an eight-week, supervised FIFA 11+ neuromuscular warm-up program improves multifactorial injury risk classification, functional performance, and time-loss injury incidence in youth amateur male soccer players aged 15 to 18 years.

Forty-four players from a regional amateur league were randomly allocated to either the FIFA 11+ group or a control group that continued its routine pre-training warm-up. Injury risk was classified using the Move2Perform algorithm, which integrates demographic data, injury history, the Functional Movement Screen (FMS), and the Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test (YBT-LQ). Jump performance and isometric lower extremity strength were also assessed at baseline and after eight weeks. Time-loss injuries were recorded prospectively throughout the intervention period.

This study was registered retrospectively.

Read the detailed description

Background. Lower extremity injuries are a major burden in youth soccer. Isolated screening tools such as the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) and the Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test (YBT-LQ) have shown limited standalone predictive accuracy, whereas multifactorial classification frameworks may better identify at-risk athletes. The FIFA 11+ program is an established neuromuscular warm-up shown to reduce injury incidence, but its combined application with multifactorial risk classification has been studied mainly in collegiate and elite cohorts, leaving youth amateur players underrepresented.

Design. Parallel-group, single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Outcome assessments were performed at baseline and after eight weeks. All testing took place on the natural grass field where the athletes regularly trained, under standard training conditions. The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Randomization and blinding. After baseline assessment, participants were allocated 1:1 using computer-generated block randomization with a block size of four. The allocation sequence was prepared by an independent researcher not involved in data collection or analysis, and assignments were concealed from the recruiting investigator until after baseline testing. Investigators administering the FMS, YBT-LQ, jump tests, and strength assessments at both time points were blinded to group allocation. Participants and the supervising physiotherapist could not be blinded due to the nature of the intervention. Data were de-identified prior to statistical analysis.

Intervention. The experimental group performed the complete FIFA 11+ program three times per week for eight weeks before regular training, each session lasting approximately 20 minutes, supervised throughout by a certified physiotherapist who monitored technical execution, progressed exercise difficulty when criteria were met, and provided real-time correction to ensure intervention fidelity. The control group continued its routine pre-training warm-up over the same period.

Sample size. An a priori power analysis (G*Power 3.1; F-test, repeated measures within-between interaction) indicated a minimum total sample of 34 participants to detect a moderate effect (f = 0.25) for the Group x Time interaction with alpha = 0.05 and power = 0.80. Forty-four participants were enrolled.

Statistical analysis. A mixed-design (2x2) ANOVA assessed Group x Time interactions. Within-group changes were examined with paired t-tests following confirmation of normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Effect sizes were reported as Cohen's d and partial eta-squared. Bonferroni correction was applied to post hoc comparisons. Between-group injury incidence was compared using Fisher's exact test, with relative risk and 95% confidence intervals reported. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

Registration note. This trial was registered retrospectively.

Being tested
FIFA 11+ Neuromuscular Warm-Up Program, Routine Warm-Up
Keywords
FIFA 11+, Neuromuscular warm-up, Injury prevention, Move2Perform, Functional Movement Screen, Y-Balance Test, Youth soccer, Randomized controlled trial
Medical subject headings
Athletic Injuries, Sprains and Strains

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • FIFA 11+ Neuromuscular Warm-Up ProgramOther

    The FIFA 11+ program comprises three sequential parts performed as a complete warm-up: (1) an initial running-based warm-up; (2) a central section of strength, plyometric, and balance exercises targeting neuromuscular control and core stability, progressed across three levels of difficulty; and (3) a final part of higher-speed running drills incorporating planting and cutting movements. Performed three times weekly for eight weeks, approximately 20 minutes per session, before regular training. All sessions were supervised by a certified physiotherapist who monitored technical execution, progressed exercise difficulty when criteria were met, and provided real-time correction to ensure intervention fidelity.

  • Routine Warm-UpOther

    The team's usual pre-training warm-up routine, continued unchanged for eight weeks with no additional structured neuromuscular component.

Study groups in NCT07713004
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
FIFA 11+ GroupExperimentalParticipants performed the complete FIFA 11+ neuromuscular warm-up program three times per week for eight weeks prior to regular training, each session lasting approximately 20 minutes, under the supervision of a certified physiotherapist.
Receives: Other: FIFA 11+ Neuromuscular Warm-Up Program
Control GroupActive comparatorParticipants continued their routine pre-training warm-up over the same eight-week period, with no additional structured neuromuscular component.
Receives: Other: Routine Warm-Up

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Move2Perform Injury Risk Category

    Injury risk is assessed using the Move2Perform injury risk classification system (Move2Perform LLC, Evansville, IN, USA). Each participant is assigned to one of four ordinal risk categories: Slight Risk, Moderate Risk, Substantial Risk, or High Risk. The outcome is the change in the assigned risk category from baseline to week 8. A shift toward a lower-risk category indicates improvement. The unit of measure is the ordinal risk category.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after completion of the 8-week intervention

  2. Number of Time-Loss Injuries

    The total number of time-loss injury events sustained during training or match play is recorded prospectively. A time-loss injury is defined as any physical complaint that prevents the participant from taking full part in a subsequent training session or match for at least 24 hours. The unit of measure is the number of injuries. Fewer injuries indicate a better outcome.

    Measured: From the first intervention session through completion of week 8

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Change in Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test Composite Score

    Dynamic balance is assessed using the Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test. The composite score is calculated from the maximal anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral reach distances normalized to limb length and expressed as a percentage. Change is calculated as the week 8 score minus the baseline score. The unit of measure is percentage of limb length (%). Higher positive change values indicate greater improvement in dynamic balance.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after completion of the 8-week intervention

  2. Change in Functional Movement Screen Total Score

    Functional movement quality is assessed using the seven-item Functional Movement Screen. Each item is scored from 0 to 3, producing a total score ranging from 0 to 21 points. Change is calculated as the week 8 total score minus the baseline total score. The unit of measure is points. Higher positive change values indicate greater improvement in functional movement quality.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after completion of the 8-week intervention

  3. Change in Three-Consecutive Double-Leg Horizontal Jump Distance

    Horizontal jump performance is assessed using three consecutive double-leg horizontal jumps. The total distance covered across the three jumps is recorded in centimeters. Change is calculated as the week 8 distance minus the baseline distance. The unit of measure is centimeters (cm). Higher positive change values indicate greater improvement in jump performance.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after completion of the 8-week intervention

  4. Change in Three-Consecutive Right Single-Leg Horizontal Jump Distance

    Right single-leg horizontal jump performance is assessed using three consecutive horizontal jumps performed on the right leg. The total distance covered across the three jumps is recorded in centimeters. Change is calculated as the week 8 distance minus the baseline distance. The unit of measure is centimeters (cm). Higher positive change values indicate greater improvement in right single-leg jump performance.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after completion of the 8-week intervention

  5. Change in Three-Consecutive Left Single-Leg Horizontal Jump Distance

    Left single-leg horizontal jump performance is assessed using three consecutive horizontal jumps performed on the left leg. The total distance covered across the three jumps is recorded in centimeters. Change is calculated as the week 8 distance minus the baseline distance. The unit of measure is centimeters (cm). Higher positive change values indicate greater improvement in left single-leg jump performance.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after completion of the 8-week intervention

  6. Change in Isometric Quadriceps Strength

    Maximal isometric quadriceps strength is assessed using a Powertrak handheld dynamometer (JTech Medical, Utah, USA). The highest recorded value across the maximal voluntary contraction trials is used for analysis. Change is calculated as the week 8 value minus the baseline value. The unit of measure is newtons (N). Higher positive change values indicate greater improvement in quadriceps strength.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after completion of the 8-week intervention

  7. Change in Isometric Hamstring Strength

    Maximal isometric hamstring strength is assessed using a Powertrak handheld dynamometer (JTech Medical, Utah, USA). The highest recorded value across the maximal voluntary contraction trials is used for analysis. Change is calculated as the week 8 value minus the baseline value. The unit of measure is newtons (N). Higher positive change values indicate greater improvement in hamstring strength.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after completion of the 8-week intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Jul 2026
  2. Study start20 Aug 2024
  3. Primary completion22 Oct 2024
  4. Study completion22 Oct 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Two parallel groups: an experimental group performing the FIFA 11+ neuromuscular warm-up program and a control group continuing its routine pre-training warm-up. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and after the eight-week intervention period.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
44 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07713004
Sponsor's protocol ID
PAU-FIFA11-2024
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
13 Jul 2026
Last updated
20 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Atabas EG, Yapici A, Bagis YE. Effects of the FIFA 11 + neuromuscular warm-up program on Move2Perform injury risk classification in youth amateur soccer players: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2026 Jul 28;18(1):521. doi: 10.1186/s13102-026-01919-y.

    PubMed 42928345

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing FIFA 11+ Neuromuscular Warm-Up Program and Routine Warm-Up in people with Athletic Injuries and Soccer Injury, run by Pamukkale University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Move2Perform Injury Risk Category (time frame: Baseline and immediately after completion of the 8-week intervention). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07713004, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in