AzTrials
AzTrials

Cervical CarcinomaNCT07678047

Leveraging Project ECHO for Improved Cervical Cancer Screening in Ethiopia

A study testing TICHILALECH ECHO in people with Cervical Carcinoma and Human Papilloma Virus (HPV), run by Albert Einstein College of Medicine at 1 site in Ethiopia.

Enrolling by invitation

Enrolling by invitation. The study team selects and invites participants, usually from an existing group of patients.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

Project TICHILALECH ("she can" in Amharic), a five-year, implementation science study, is focused on improving cervical cancer screening, triage, and treatment and integration with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care at five Ethiopian hospitals, with a focus on human papillomavirus (HPV) self-collection as the… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
TICHILALECH ECHO
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteEthiopia
Study dates
24 Jun 2026to Jul 2029
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Inclusion Criteria for Project ECHO and associated surveys, interviews, and focus group discussions:

  • 18 years or older
  • Willingness and ability to provide informed consent and participate in virtual, peer-mentoring through Project ECHO
  • Profession: Healthcare provider, any education/training/cadre with experience relevant to the delivery of cervical cancer screening and treatment or HIV care (e.g., cervical cancer screening, gynecologist, gynecological oncologist, or HIV/ ART provider), or other stakeholder (e.g., personnel at laboratories or health bureaus, administrators, ART data clerks)
  • Can communicate in English or Amharic (national language of Ethiopia)
  • Able and willing to meaningfully contribute in the virtual, peer-learning community of Project ECHO

Inclusion criteria for end service users (PLHIV) for focus group discussion and routine clinical service delivery data:

  • 25 years or older (in accordance with Ethiopia's national cervical cancer screening guidelines for PLHIV)
  • Have been diagnosed with HIV
  • Have a history of cervical cancer screening that was performed at one of the five study sites, either during the course of our study or previously
  • Were screened with primary HPV DNA testing during the course of the study intervention period
  • Are eligible for cervical cancer screening in accordance with Ethiopia's national cervical cancer screening guidelines (e.g., have an intact cervix)

Exclusion criteria for end service users (PLHIV) for focus group discussion:

  • HIV negative status
  • Age under 25 years
  • Any physical or mental disability that prevents the individual from consenting to cervical cancer screening and/or study participation
  • Patients without an intact cervix (e.g. a history of hysterectomy)
  • Anyone ineligible for cervical cancer screening in accordance with Ethiopia's national cervical cancer screening guidelines

Note: Routine clinical service delivery data of PLHIV will be reviewed to determine intervention effect of providers participating in Project ECHO. PLHIV are not considered participants of the trial and are not consented.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Ethiopia1 site
  • Addis Ababa University

    Addis Ababa

Other trials in Ethiopia

About this study

Official title: Leveraging Project ECHO for Improved Cervical Cancer Screening in Ethiopia: An Implementation Study of Integrated HPV Selfsampling in HIV Care Centers

Project TICHILALECH ("she can" in Amharic), a five-year, implementation science study, is focused on improving cervical cancer screening, triage, and treatment and integration with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care at five Ethiopian hospitals, with a focus on human papillomavirus (HPV) self-collection as the recommended screening strategy for people living with HIV (PLHIV). To improve implementation of screening and treatment, Project ECHO (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes), a peer-based, virtual, knowledge sharing model, will be used to convene healthcare providers and stakeholders over a period of approximately three years (2026-2029). A customized curriculum is developed featuring didactic lectures, case-based presentations, and experience sharing for peer-mentoring. A pre/post study design will measure changes in delivery of clinical services, such as the proportion of HPV-positive patients that are appropriately triaged and treated, before and after each hospital's participation in the TICHILALECH ECHO intervention.

Read the detailed description

Each year, more than 500,000 women are diagnosed with cervical cancer (CxCa), a preventable cancer caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) that disproportionately burdens low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Women living with HIV (WLHIV) are up to six times more likely to develop CxCa, making them an especially important target population for prevention and control efforts. In Ethiopia, a national CxCa screening program was established in 2016 and screening guidelines for PLHIV have recently been updated to shift from visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) to HPV DNA testing. There is limited data on the provider or facility adherence to the "screen-triage-and treat" guidelines and algorithm for HPV testing; Up to 30% of WLHIV screen positive for HPV and the proportions that are appropriately triaged with VIA and treated if needed are currently unknown. Implementation challenges to CxCa screening, as reported by health providers, include high variability in practices between screening sites, and insufficient training and monitoring and evaluation. This research study seeks to explore and address these challenges through an implementation science study of point-of-care HPV self-sampling integrated with routine HIV care in antiretroviral therapy (ART) clinics of hospitals, thereby leveraging established HIV care infrastructure for improved cancer control of PLHIV.

The overarching goal of Project TICHILALECH, this five-year implementation science study, is to enhance the screen-triage-treat cascade for HPV testing of PLHIV that is integrated with routine HIV care in Ethiopia. A mixed-method situational analysis including key stakeholder interviews, document review, and a landscape survey to assess facility readiness of HIV care centers to implement integrated, point-of-care CxCa screening and understand barriers and facilitators to HPV testing implementation in Ethiopia informs the development of the ECHO curriculum and program. Various cadres of health providers, the implementers of CxCa screening and HIV care at the five sites, and other actors such as laboratory personnel and administrators will participate in TICHILALECH ECHO. Key indicators for service delivery will be extracted and calculated from electronic medical records, paper-based screening logs, and paper-based charts to determine the proportion of screening eligible PLHIV that are screened, resulted, followed up with, linked to triage, and treated as appropriate. A pre/post study design will examine whether participating in ECHO and sharing experiences between sites results in increased triage and treatment rates, acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. Two low-performing sites will receive additional technical support through facilitated health equity action labs.

NOTE: This ClinicalTrials.gov registration exclusively focuses on Aim 2 of this study, participation TICHILALECH ECHO and related data collection and analysis, including service delivery measures for end users.

Being tested
TICHILALECH ECHO
Keywords
integrated screening, implementation science, Project ECHO, cervical cancer screening, selfsampling, Ethiopia
Medical subject headings
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TICHILALECH ECHOBehavioural

    Also called Project ECHO, Project TICHILALECH ECHO

    TICHILALECH ECHO, the study intervention, is a provider training and peer-mentoring intervention that will be delivered through 1-hour virtual sessions with multidisciplinary teams of cervical cancer screening stakeholders, organized in modules with sessions delivered at a regular cadence across three years. Project ECHO sessions will address challenges to improving the screen-triage-treat cascade of care identified by a situational assessment, however, the study will not directly intervene on the screen-triage-treat cascade. Participants will present case studies from their practice for input and guidance from other participants.

Study groups in NCT07678047
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Participation in TICHILALECH ECHOExperimentalHealthcare providers and relevant stakeholders participate in TICHILALECH ECHO, a peer-to-peer virtual learning modality.
Receives: Behavioral: TICHILALECH ECHO

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Triage Examination Percentage Among Screen-Positive People Living with HIV (PLHIV)

    Percentage of screen-positive PLHIV who received at least one timely (i.e., within 6 months of a positive screening result) triage examination (i.e., HPV partial genotyping, colposcopy, visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), or cytology), assessed separately for the baseline period (i.e., the 12 month period prior to ECHO intervention implementation) and the post-intervention period (i.e., 12 month period following ECHO intervention implementation)

    Measured: Baseline: 12 months prior to TICHILALECH ECHO study intervention; Post: Up to 12 months following TICHILALECH ECHO study intervention

  2. Percent of PLHIV with confirmed cervical cancer who received treatment

    Percentage of screen-positive and triage-positive PLHIV who have received timely (i.e., within 6 months of a positive triage result) treatment (i.e., Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP), thermal ablation, or cryotherapy), assessed separately for the baseline period (i.e., 12 month period prior to ECHO intervention implementation) and the post-intervention period (i.e., 12 month period following ECHO intervention implementation)

    Measured: Baseline: 12 months prior to TICHILALECH ECHO study intervention; Post: Up to 12 months following TICHILALECH ECHO study intervention

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Total number of PLHIV screened for cervical cancer

    Number of patients who were HIV-positive who were screened (using HPV DNA testing, VIA, or cytology) for cervical cancer (count) in a 12 month period.

    Measured: Baseline: 12 months prior to TICHILALECH ECHO study intervention; Post: Up to 12 months following TICHILALECH ECHO study intervention

  2. Percent screened with an HPV DNA test among eligible PLHIV Patients

    Percentage of eligible PLHIV screened for cervical cancer who received an HPV DNA screening test at participating clinical sites.

    Measured: Baseline: 12 months prior to TICHILALECH ECHO study intervention; Post: Up to 12 months following TICHILALECH ECHO study intervention

  3. HPV-Positive result notification among PLHIV

    Percentage of PLHIV with a HPV positive cervical cancer screening result at participating clinical sites who received notification of their HPV-positive result.

    Measured: Baseline: 12 months prior to TICHILALECH ECHO study intervention; Post: Up to 12 months following TICHILALECH ECHO study intervention

  4. Post-treatment follow-up of PLHIV with precancerous lesions after 1 year

    Percentage of PLHIV treated for precancerous lesions - including LEEP, thermal ablation, or cryotherapy - who return for a timely follow-up screening (i.e., within 1.5 years of treatment as per the recommendation according to Ethiopia's National Cervical Cancer Guidelines for post-treatment follow-up rescreening after 1 year), assessed separately for the baseline period (i.e., 12 month period prior to ECHO intervention implementation) and the post-intervention period (i.e., 12 month period following ECHO intervention implementation)

    Measured: Baseline: 12 months prior to TICHILALECH ECHO study intervention; Post: Up to 12 months following TICHILALECH ECHO study intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Jul 2026
  2. Study start24 Jun 2026
  3. Primary completionJul 2029 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJul 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07678047
Sponsor's protocol ID
2025-17496
Other IDs
U01CA294799, 2025
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
18 Jun 2026
Last updated
1 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: All quantitative and qualitative IPD collected throughout the trial.

Publications

  • Ethiopian Federal Ministry of Health. National Guideline for Cervical Cancer Prevention and Control Ethiopia. 2025.

  • Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C, Ezzati M, Shibuya K, Salomon JA, Abdalla S, Aboyans V, Abraham J, Ackerman I, Aggarwal R, Ahn SY, Ali MK, Alvarado M, Anderson HR, Anderson LM, Andrews KG, Atkinson C, Baddour LM, Bahalim AN, Barker-Collo S, Barrero LH, Bartels DH, Basanez MG, Baxter A, Bell ML, Benjamin EJ, Bennett D, Bernabe E, Bhalla K, Bhandari B, Bikbov B, Bin Abdulhak A, Birbeck G, Black JA, Blencowe H, Blore JD, Blyth F, Bolliger I, Bonaventure A, Boufous S, Bourne R, Boussinesq M, Braithwaite T, Brayne C, Bridgett L, Brooker S, Brooks P, Brugha TS, Bryan-Hancock C, Bucello C, Buchbinder R, Buckle G, Budke CM, Burch M, Burney P, Burstein R, Calabria B, Campbell B, Canter CE, Carabin H, Carapetis J, Carmona L, Cella C, Charlson F, Chen H, Cheng AT, Chou D, Chugh SS, Coffeng LE, Colan SD, Colquhoun S, Colson KE, Condon J, Connor MD, Cooper LT, Corriere M, Cortinovis M, de Vaccaro KC, Couser W, Cowie BC, Criqui MH, Cross M, Dabhadkar KC, Dahiya M, Dahodwala N, Damsere-Derry J, Danaei G, Davis A, De Leo D, Degenhardt L, Dellavalle R, Delossantos A, Denenberg J, Derrett S, Des Jarlais DC, Dharmaratne SD, Dherani M, Diaz-Torne C, Dolk H, Dorsey ER, Driscoll T, Duber H, Ebel B, Edmond K, Elbaz A, Ali SE, Erskine H, Erwin PJ, Espindola P, Ewoigbokhan SE, Farzadfar F, Feigin V, Felson DT, Ferrari A, Ferri CP, Fevre EM, Finucane MM, Flaxman S, Flood L, Foreman K, Forouzanfar MH, Fowkes FG, Fransen M, Freeman MK, Gabbe BJ, Gabriel SE, Gakidou E, Ganatra HA, Garcia B, Gaspari F, Gillum RF, Gmel G, Gonzalez-Medina D, Gosselin R, Grainger R, Grant B, Groeger J, Guillemin F, Gunnell D, Gupta R, Haagsma J, Hagan H, Halasa YA, Hall W, Haring D, Haro JM, Harrison JE, Havmoeller R, Hay RJ, Higashi H, Hill C, Hoen B, Hoffman H, Hotez PJ, Hoy D, Huang JJ, Ibeanusi SE, Jacobsen KH, James SL, Jarvis D, Jasrasaria R, Jayaraman S, Johns N, Jonas JB, Karthikeyan G, Kassebaum N, Kawakami N, Keren A, Khoo JP, King CH, Knowlton LM, Kobusingye O, Koranteng A, Krishnamurthi R, Laden F, Lalloo R, Laslett LL, Lathlean T, Leasher JL, Lee YY, Leigh J, Levinson D, Lim SS, Limb E, Lin JK, Lipnick M, Lipshultz SE, Liu W, Loane M, Ohno SL, Lyons R, Mabweijano J, MacIntyre MF, Malekzadeh R, Mallinger L, Manivannan S, Marcenes W, March L, Margolis DJ, Marks GB, Marks R, Matsumori A, Matzopoulos R, Mayosi BM, McAnulty JH, McDermott MM, McGill N, McGrath J, Medina-Mora ME, Meltzer M, Mensah GA, Merriman TR, Meyer AC, Miglioli V, Miller M, Miller TR, Mitchell PB, Mock C, Mocumbi AO, Moffitt TE, Mokdad AA, Monasta L, Montico M, Moradi-Lakeh M, Moran A, Morawska L, Mori R, Murdoch ME, Mwaniki MK, Naidoo K, Nair MN, Naldi L, Narayan KM, Nelson PK, Nelson RG, Nevitt MC, Newton CR, Nolte S, Norman P, Norman R, O'Donnell M, O'Hanlon S, Olives C, Omer SB, Ortblad K, Osborne R, Ozgediz D, Page A, Pahari B, Pandian JD, Rivero AP, Patten SB, Pearce N, Padilla RP, Perez-Ruiz F, Perico N, Pesudovs K, Phillips D, Phillips MR, Pierce K, Pion S, Polanczyk GV, Polinder S, Pope CA 3rd, Popova S, Porrini E, Pourmalek F, Prince M, Pullan RL, Ramaiah KD, Ranganathan D, Razavi H, Regan M, Rehm JT, Rein DB, Remuzzi G, Richardson K, Rivara FP, Roberts T, Robinson C, De Leon FR, Ronfani L, Room R, Rosenfeld LC, Rushton L, Sacco RL, Saha S, Sampson U, Sanchez-Riera L, Sanman E, Schwebel DC, Scott JG, Segui-Gomez M, Shahraz S, Shepard DS, Shin H, Shivakoti R, Singh D, Singh GM, Singh JA, Singleton J, Sleet DA, Sliwa K, Smith E, Smith JL, Stapelberg NJ, Steer A, Steiner T, Stolk WA, Stovner LJ, Sudfeld C, Syed S, Tamburlini G, Tavakkoli M, Taylor HR, Taylor JA, Taylor WJ, Thomas B, Thomson WM, Thurston GD, Tleyjeh IM, Tonelli M, Towbin JA, Truelsen T, Tsilimbaris MK, Ubeda C, Undurraga EA, van der Werf MJ, van Os J, Vavilala MS, Venketasubramanian N, Wang M, Wang W, Watt K, Weatherall DJ, Weinstock MA, Weintraub R, Weisskopf MG, Weissman MM, White RA, Whiteford H, Wiebe N, Wiersma ST, Wilkinson JD, Williams HC, Williams SR, Witt E, Wolfe F, Woolf AD, Wulf S, Yeh PH, Zaidi AK, Zheng ZJ, Zonies D, Lopez AD, AlMazroa MA, Memish ZA. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2197-223. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61689-4.

    PubMed 23245608
  • Beck JR, Pauker SG. The Markov process in medical prognosis. Med Decis Making. 1983;3(4):419-458. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8300300403.

    PubMed 6668990
  • Gray A, Clarke PM, Wolstenholme JL. Applied methods of cost-effectiveness analysis in health care. Oxford University Press; 2011.

  • U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs. Measuring the Cost of a Program of Practice: Microcosting. Accessed 14 Dec 2020.

  • Neumann PJ, Ganiats TG, Russell LB, Sanders GD, Siegel JE. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 2016.

  • Milgrom ZZ, Severance TS, Scanlon CM, Carson AT, Janota AD, Vik TA, Duwve JM, Dixon BE, Mendonca EA. An evaluation of an Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) intervention in cancer prevention and survivorship care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 May 17;22(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01874-x.

    PubMed 35581580
  • Moore DE Jr, Green JS, Gallis HA. Achieving desired results and improved outcomes: integrating planning and assessment throughout learning activities. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2009 Winter;29(1):1-15. doi: 10.1002/chp.20001.

    PubMed 19288562
  • Weiner BJ, Lewis CC, Stanick C, Powell BJ, Dorsey CN, Clary AS, Boynton MH, Halko H. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 29;12(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3.

    PubMed 28851459
  • Reid A, Abraczinskas M, Scott V, Stanzler M, Parry G, Scaccia J, Wandersman A, Ramaswamy R. Using Collaborative Coalition Processes to Advance Community Health, Well-Being, and Equity: A Multiple-Case Study Analysis From a National Community Transformation Initiative. Health Educ Behav. 2019 Oct;46(1_suppl):100S-109S. doi: 10.1177/1090198119838833. Epub 2019 Apr 13.

    PubMed 30982339
  • Miller CJ, Barnett ML, Baumann AA, Gutner CA, Wiltsey-Stirman S. The FRAME-IS: a framework for documenting modifications to implementation strategies in healthcare. Implement Sci. 2021 Apr 7;16(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01105-3.

    PubMed 33827716
  • Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches Creswell John W Sage 320 pound29 0761924426 0761924426 [Formula: see text]. Nurse Res. 2004 Sep 1;12(1):82-83. doi: 10.7748/nr.12.1.82.s2.

    PubMed 28718745
  • Blair E. A reflexive exploration of two qualitative data coding techniques. Journal of Methods and Measurement iin the Social Sciences. 2015;19(6):14-29.

  • Mensah K, Mosquera I, Tisler A, Uuskula A, Firmino-Machado J, Lunet N, Nicula F, Taut D, Baban A, Basu P; CBIG-SCREEN Consortium. Development and pilot implementation of a novel protocol to assess capacity and readiness of health systems to adopt HPV detection-based cervical cancer screening in Europe. Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Aug 12;22(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01190-y.

    PubMed 39135116
  • Ethiopian Federal Ministry of Health. Guideline for Cervical Cancer Prevention and Control in Ethiopia. 2021.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in