AzTrials
AzTrials

Patello Femoral Pain SyndromePFPSNCT07671482

Effects of Kinesio Taping Versus McConnell Taping on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome.

A study testing Kinesio Taping, McConnell Taping and Exercise Therapy in people with Patello Femoral Pain Syndrome and Anterior Knee Pain Syndrome, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Lebanon.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary goal of this randomized clinical trial (RCT) is to evaluate whether Kinesio Taping versus McConnell Taping, when integrated into a standardized hip-knee strengthening and neuromuscular control program, produces significant effects in individuals aged 18-50 with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 years
What is being tested?
Kinesio Taping, McConnell Taping and Exercise Therapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteLebanon
Study dates
Jun 2026to Oct 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Anterior or retropatellar pain for a minimum of 3 months during functional activities.
  • 18-50 years of age.
  • Minimum pain of 3/10 on the VAS score.
  • No LL physical therapy in the past 3 months.

Who cannot join

  • Meniscal or ligamentous injury
  • Neurological or systemic conditions affecting proprioception, coordination and balance.
  • Spinal referred pain or rheumatoid arthritis.
  • Hip and ankle disorders.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Ahmed El Melhat, PhD contact

+201112595022

ahmed.elmelhat@cu.edu.eg

Mohamad Ibrahim Baayoun, BSc contact

+96181852495

mohdbaa500@gmail.com

Lebanon1 site, 1 recruiting
  • PTOC Beirut Arab University

    Beirut, Beirut, 0000

    Ahmed El Melhat, PhD, +201112595022, ahmed.elmelhat@cu.edu.eg

    Mohamad Ibrahim Baayoun, BSc, +96181852495, mohdbaa500@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Lebanon

About this study

Official title: Effects of Kinesio Taping Versus McConnell Taping on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome. A Randomized Clinical Trial.

The primary goal of this randomized clinical trial (RCT) is to evaluate whether Kinesio Taping versus McConnell Taping, when integrated into a standardized hip-knee strengthening and neuromuscular control program, produces significant effects in individuals aged 18-50 with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS).

The main question it aims to answer is: Does Kinesio Taping compared with McConnell Taping when both combined with a standardized hip-knee exercise program, produce different effects on quadriceps neuromuscular activation (VMO-VL sEMG), pain, functional knee pain, and dynamic knee valgus over a 6 week period intervention?

Participants will be divided into three groups for comparison: the control group will receive a structured hip-knee physical therapy exercise program without any taping intervention, Kinesio Taping group with a standardized exercise program, and a McConnell Taping group with a standardized exercise program.

Read the detailed description

Kinesio Taping and McConnell Taping are commonly used as adjuncts to exercise therapy in the management of patellofemoral pain syndrome. Both techniques have been shown to improve pain and function in the short term; however, evidence directly comparing their long-term effects when combined with a standardized exercise program remains limited. Furthermore, the influence of taping modality on quadriceps muscle activation and lower-limb kinematic patterns during rehabilitation has not been fully established.

Based on this, the investigators hypothesize that both interventions will improve clinical and neuromuscular outcomes.

Being tested
Kinesio Taping, McConnell Taping, Exercise Therapy
Keywords
Electromyography, EMG, Kinesio Taping, McConnell Taping, Exercise Therapy, Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome, Single-Leg Squat
Medical subject headings
Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Kinesio TapingOther

    Also called Elastic Kinesio Taping, Kinesiology Taping, K-Tape

    Kinesio Taping will be applied to the patellofemoral joint during a 6-week structured hip-knee exercise program.

  • McConnell TapingOther

    Also called Patellar Taping, Non-Elastic Taping

    McConnell Taping will be applied to correct patellar alignment during a 6-week structured hip-knee exercise program.

  • Exercise TherapyOther

    Also called Exercise

    A standardized hip-knee strengthening and neuromotor training program will be performed for 6 weeks.

Study groups in NCT07671482
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Kinesio Tape GroupExperimentalThe subjects will receive Kinesio Taping combined with the structured exercise program.
Receives: Other: Kinesio Taping
McConnell Taping GroupExperimentalThe subjects will receive McConnell Taping combined with the structured exercise program.
Receives: Other: McConnell Taping
Exercise Only GroupActive comparatorA standardized hip-knee strengthening and neuromotor training program will be performed for 6 weeks.
Receives: Other: Exercise Therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. VMO and VL Muscle Activation Amplitude

    Surface electromyography (sEMG) amplitude of the Vastus Medialis Obliquus (VMO) and Vastus Lateralis (VL) muscles recorded during a standardized single-leg squat task. Higher values indicate greater muscle activation.

    Measured: Baseline and post-intervention (6 weeks).

  2. VMO/VL Activation Ratio

    Ratio of VMO to VL electromyographic activity during a standardized single-leg squat task. The ideal VMO/VL ratio should be close or equal to 1; a ratio greater than 1 reflects higher VMO activation, while a ratio less than 1 reflects a greater VL activation.

    Measured: Baseline and post-intervention (6 weeks).

  3. VMO Onset Timing

    Period from movement initiation to onset of VMO and VL activation, measured using sEMG during a standardized single-leg squat task; measured in ms.

    Measured: Baseline to post-intervention (6 weeks).

  4. VMO-VL Activation Delay

    Difference in activation onset timing between the VMO and VL muscles during a standardized single-leg squat task, measured using sEMG; measured in ms.

    Measured: Baseline to post-intervention (6 weeks).

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Pain Intensity

    Task-specific pain intensity measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain; measured during a standardized single-leg squat, reflecting pain experienced during functional loading.

    Measured: Baseline and post-intervention (6 weeks).

  2. Functional Knee Pain

    Knee-related symptoms and functional disability assessed using the Kujala Score (AKPS), ranging from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicating better knee function and lower disability.

    Measured: Baseline and post-intervention (6 weeks).

  3. Dynamic Knee Valgus

    Frontal-plane projection angle in degrees, measured during a standardized single-leg squat to quantify lower-limb movement quality and dynamic knee control under functional load.

    Measured: Baseline and post intervention (6 weeks).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jun 2026
  2. Study startJun 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionSep 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionOct 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07671482
Sponsor's protocol ID
KT vs McT and exercise in PFPS
Acronym
PFPS
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
19 Jun 2026
Last updated
26 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Jiao H, Tao M, Cui X. Efficacy on pain and knee function of Kinesio taping among patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Apr 21;26(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08627-7.

    PubMed 40259274
  • Chang WD, Chen FC, Lee CL, Lin HY, Lai PT. Effects of Kinesio Taping versus McConnell Taping for Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:471208. doi: 10.1155/2015/471208. Epub 2015 Jun 21.

    PubMed 26185517
  • Pereira PM, Baptista JS, Conceicao F, Duarte J, Ferraz J, Costa JT. Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome Risk Associated with Squats: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 28;19(15):9241. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159241.

    PubMed 35954598

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Kinesio Taping, McConnell Taping and Exercise Therapy in people with Patello Femoral Pain Syndrome and Anterior Knee Pain Syndrome, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Lebanon.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Lebanon. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Ahmed El Melhat, PhD (+201112595022, ahmed.elmelhat@cu.edu.eg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

VMO and VL Muscle Activation Amplitude (time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (6 weeks).). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07671482, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in